AUTHORS » Joe Anady

Discussion Questions: Genesis 11:10-32

QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION

  • Taking into consideration the preaching of Stephen in Acts 7, what is the gospel?
  • What three elements are necessary to have a kingdom? Why is the story of our redemption in Christ best understood as the story of the establishment of the kingdom of God?
  • What three problems are introduced in Gen 11:27-32 as it relates to the kingdom of God? In other words, what is lacking?
  • In what ways is God’s kingdom present in the world now? Why then  do we still pray, “Thy kingdom come”?
  • What will the kingdom of God look like when all is said and done?
Posted in Study Guides, Gospel Community Groups, Joe Anady, Posted by Joe. Comments Off on Discussion Questions: Genesis 11:10-32

Discussion Questions for Sermon on Acts 6:1-7, 05/05/2019

QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION

  • Discuss the different ways in which the church needs to be maintained. What forces threaten to deteriorate the church?
  • Discuss the particular responsibilities that elders and deacons have in the maintenance of the church.
  • Discuss the general responsibilities that members have to maintain the church.
  • Please spend time in prayer, and include prayers for the preservation of the unity of our church and for the ministry of our deacons.
Posted in Study Guides, Gospel Community Groups, Joe Anady, Posted by Joe. Comments Off on Discussion Questions for Sermon on Acts 6:1-7, 05/05/2019

Sermon: Acts 6:1-7: The Ordination Of Deacons

Old Testament Reading: Psalm 72:1-4; 12-14

“Of Solomon. Give the king your justice, O God, and your righteousness to the royal son! May he judge your people with righteousness, and your poor with justice! Let the mountains bear prosperity for the people, and the hills, in righteousness! May he defend the cause of the poor of the people, give deliverance to the children of the needy, and crush the oppressor! [Verse 12] For he delivers the needy when he calls, the poor and him who has no helper. He has pity on the weak and the needy, and saves the lives of the needy. From oppression and violence he redeems their life, and precious is their blood in his sight.” (Psalm 72:1-4; 12–14, ESV)

New Testament Reading: Acts 6:1-7

“Now in these days when the disciples were increasing in number, a complaint by the Hellenists arose against the Hebrews because their widows were being neglected in the daily distribution. And the twelve summoned the full number of the disciples and said, “It is not right that we should give up preaching the word of God to serve tables. Therefore, brothers, pick out from among you seven men of good repute, full of the Spirit and of wisdom, whom we will appoint to this duty. But we will devote ourselves to prayer and to the ministry of the word.” And what they said pleased the whole gathering, and they chose Stephen, a man full of faith and of the Holy Spirit, and Philip, and Prochorus, and Nicanor, and Timon, and Parmenas, and Nicolaus, a proselyte of Antioch. These they set before the apostles, and they prayed and laid their hands on them. And the word of God continued to increase, and the number of the disciples multiplied greatly in Jerusalem, and a great many of the priests became obedient to the faith.” (Acts 6:1–7, ESV)

*****

Introduction

Back in  August Lindsay and I  moved our family to a new house, which is in fact, a very old house — built in the year 1915. One of our main concerns when looking at the house was it’s condition, given it’s age. It looked really good on the surface, but what was lurking beneath?, we wondered. I think you would have the same concern if you were considering a home that was built over a hundred years ago. That question nagged at us a bit until we were able to look carefully at the house with the home inspector. I crawled under the crawl space with him, and I went up into the attic. We looked carefully at the roof and at the condition of the eaves, and so on. The house wasn’t perfect, but we found that it was really, really straight and clean. And so we made the move. 

But here is my question: Why are some houses that were built a hundred years ago dilapidated today, whereas others are still in good shape? What differentiates between the old house that has deteriorated and the one that has stood the test of time? 

Three things come to mind. First, the quality and craftsmanship of the original construction matters. Was the house built well in the first  place? Was  it set down upon a solid foundation, and so on?  Secondly, the providence of God matters. Even a very well built home will not necessarily stand the test of time if some calamity strikes it. I am  thinking here of a wildfire or a flood. And thirdly, maintenance matters. And this is what I wish to emphasize this morning. If a house is to stand the test of time it must be well maintained. The ordinary forces of nature will, in the process of time, bring even a well built house to the ground if it is not maintained. Common things like rain, wind and the fluctuation of temperature will wear out even a  good roof. And if the roof leaks, the water will rot the wood. And if the wood rots, the force of gravity will begin to have it’s way with the structure. And if all of that goes unchecked, the house will eventually crumble. 

I will not bore you with anymore talk of home maintenance. The point that I am making is this: if a structure is to stand the test of time it must, first of all, be well built. And secondly, it must be well maintained. Even the best of structures, if not maintained, will deteriorate with the passing of time.

So what does this have to do with our sermon text today? Well, not only are solid foundations and proper maintenance necessary for the preservation of houses and other physical things, they are also necessary for the preservation of human institutions. 

Your marriage, for example, will not hold up very well to the test of time if it is not set down upon a solid foundation (namely Christ and his word), and then maintained. The institution of marriage must be maintained. You must keep the marriage healthy and pure. You must invest into it if you hope to see it last, and better yet, improve with the passing of time.  

The same may be said of your business ventures, your friendships, indeed, your own spiritual life. These non-physical entities share this in common with physical things — if they are to stand the test of time — if they and improve with the passing of years — they must, first of all, be set upon a solid footing, and they must be carefully maintained.   

Brothers and sisters, the church is no exception. And no, I am not referring to a church building. Yes, it is true — if  we ever own one, we will need to maintain it. Someone will need to paint the eaves! But I am not talking about that. I’m talking about the church — the local church — that is, the church as an institution, consisting of officers and members, governed by the word of God, and  bound together by the blood of Christ through faith in his name. The local church is an institution. And if a church — a local church, or congregation — hopes to stand the test of time, it must first be set down upon a solid foundation. It must be formed according to the command of Christ, the teaching of Holy Scripture, which is the word of God. And then it must be carefully maintained. 

I suppose it is possible for a church with solid foundations which is also carefully maintenance to dissolve.  Perhaps intense persecution could bring it down. Perhaps a particularly intense attack from the evil one could it. But more often than not, churches — even churches with good foundations — fall because they are not maintained. 

I can here you now saying, I know what needs to be done to maintain a house — cleaning, painting, weeding, caulking, roof repair, bug and rodant control, etc. — but how is the church to be maintained? 

I bet you know the answer. The work is not physical, but spiritual, intelectual, and relational. If the threats to a house are wind and rain, the sun and gravity, the fluctuation of temperature and the moving earth,  the threats to the church are sin, false teaching, a  lack of love and concern for one another, unresolved conflict, disorderliness, prejudice, gossip and slander, favoritism, unfaithfulness, disbelief, and the like. These destructive forces must be confronted in the maintenance of the church. 

Brothers and sisters, church maintenance is hard work. It requires diligence. And both officers and members have an role to play. The elders and deacons of the church have a particular obligation to maintain the church. But the members are also responsible. 

Listen carefully to the words of the apostle Paul in his letter to the church in Ephesus. Notice that he is here writing to the church as a whole, and not just to the pastor or the to the elders. In chapter 4 verse 1 of his letter to the Ephesians he says:

“I therefore, a prisoner for the Lord, urge you to walk in a manner worthy of the calling to which you have been called, with all humility and gentleness, with patience, bearing with one another in love, eager to maintain the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.” And little later he says, “And he gave the apostles, the prophets, the evangelists, the shepherds and teachers, to equip the saints for the work of ministry, for building up the body of Christ, until we all attain to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to mature manhood, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ, so that we may no longer be children, tossed to and fro by the waves and carried about by every wind of doctrine, by human cunning, by craftiness in deceitful schemes. Rather, speaking the truth in love, we are to grow up in every way into him who is the head, into Christ, from whom the whole body, joined and held together by every joint with which it is equipped, when each part is working properly, makes the body grow so that it builds itself up in love.” (Ephesians 4:1–16, ESV)

Elders have a particular responsibility to maintain the church. According to this text the work of elders, pastors and teachers,  is to “equip the saints… for building up the body of Christ, until we all attain to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to mature manhood, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ, so that we may no longer be children, tossed to and fro by the waves and carried about by every wind of doctrine, by human cunning, by craftiness in deceitful schemes.” The elders have a particular role to play. They are to equip the saints. This is their ministry. They are to build up the church. And if we were to take into consideration the teaching of the rest of scripture we would see that elders are to minister as overseers and shepherds. They are to “preach the word” and “be ready in season and out of season” to “reprove, rebuke, and exhort, with complete patience and teaching” (2 Timothy 4:2, ESV). In general, elders are to take the lead in the maintenance of the church.

But notice that in the Ephesians 4 passage, Paul’s exhortation is to the church as a whole. Every member is to 

“walk in a manner worthy of the calling to which [they] have been called, with all humility and gentleness, with patience, bearing with one another in love, eager to maintain the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.” This command is given, not to the elders only, but to every member of the church. Every member has a responsibility to maintain the church, to “walk in a manner worthy of the calling to which [they] have been called”, to be humble, gental and patient, to bear with one another in love, and to be “eager to maintain the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.” The word translated as “eager” here in Ephesians 4:3 means, “to do something with intense effort and motivation—‘to work hard, to do one’s best, to endeavor.’” The word translated “maintain” means to guard something; to watch over it so as to cause it to continue. In this passage the thing to be maintained is the “unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace”. This is referring to the unity that is to exist within the local church. We are bound together through faith in Christ and by the Holy Spirit. Not only should the elders of the church work hard to maintain unity within the church — it is also the responsibility of every member. 

But here is the point that I would really like to make this morning: deacons have a particular role to play in the maintenance of Christ’s church. All members are responsible to maintain the Lord’s spiritual house. The elders have a particular responsibility to lead in the maintenance of the Lord’s house as ministers, or servants. And the same is true of deacons. Deacons have a particular role to play. They are to serve within Christ’s church in  order to  maintain “the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace”.

*****

Acts 6: The Ordination of the Original Deacons

In Acts chapter 6 we have an account of the ordination of the first deacons. They are not called by that name in this passage, but it is clear that that is what they were. These seven were the very first to be appointed to the office of deacon. Consider three things in support of this claim:

First of all, notice that the word deacon means “servant”, and that is what these men were called to do. They were appointed to the task of serving. Their duty was to serve (in the Greek the word is διακονέω) tables. Verses 2 and 3 make that clear: “And the twelve summoned the full number of the disciples and said, “It is not right that we should give up preaching the word of God to serve tables. Therefore, brothers, pick out from among you seven men… whom we will appoint to this duty” (Acts 6:2–3, ESV), that is to the duty of serving tables. 

Secondly, notice that these men had to meet certain qualifications. In verse 3 we learn that were to be “men of good repute, full of the Spirit and of wisdom” who were appointed to this duty (Acts 6:3, ESV). It appears, therefore, that this was an office that they were being appointed to. 

In Paul’s letter to Timothy we find a more detailed and  exact description of the qualifications that man must meet in order to be appointed to the office of deacon. Paul there elaborated on the general qualifications of Acts 6 — that “men of good repute, full of the Spirit and of wisdom” — when  he says, “Deacons likewise must be dignified, not double-tongued, not addicted to much wine, not greedy for dishonest gain. They must hold the mystery of the faith with a clear conscience. And let them also be tested first; then let them serve as deacons if they prove themselves blameless. Their wives likewise must be dignified, not slanderers, but sober-minded, faithful in all things. Let deacons each be the husband of one wife, managing their children and their own households well. For those who serve well as deacons gain a good standing for themselves and also great confidence in the faith that is in Christ Jesus” (1 Timothy 3:8–13, ESV).

Thirdly, notice that the seven men in Acts 6 were formally ordained. 

They were selected by the church at the direction of the apostles. It was the apostles who said to the church, “Therefore, brothers, pick out from among you seven men of good repute… (Acts 6:3, ESV)”

Notice that the whole church was involved in the selection of these men. Verse 5: “And what they said pleased the whole gathering, and they chose” the seven men.

And  finally the seven were presented back to the apostles for formal ordination. Verse 6: “These they [the church] set before the apostles, and they prayed and laid their hands on them” (Acts 6:6, ESV). This means that apostles ordained or appointed these men to function as deacons.

In Acts chapter 6 we find an account of the ordination of the first deacons. 

*****

The Occasion for the Ordination of Deacons: The Unity of the Church Was Threatened

Pay careful attention to the occasion for the ordination of these deacons in Acts 6. In verse 1 we read, “Now in these days when the disciples were increasing in number, a complaint by the Hellenists arose against the Hebrews because their widows were being neglected in the daily distribution.”

The early church was experiencing division. Something terrible was happening. Favoritism was being shown to the widows who were Jewish Christians, while the Gentile Christian widows were being neglected. To be a widow is always a difficult thing. Perhaps it was even more difficult in the first century AD than it is today. And it is was probably especially difficult for those widows who identified as followers of Christ. Jew and Gentile Christians would have been cut off from their culture to one degree or another due to their professed faith in Christ. How important it was, therefore, for the church to care for the widows in their midst. 

The scriptures often speak of the importance of caring for the poor and downtrodden, particularly widows. Remember the words of James, where he says, “Religion that is pure and undefiled before God the Father is this: to visit orphans and widows in their affliction, and to keep oneself unstained from the world” (James 1:27, ESV). The early church was failing at this. Not only were they failing to care for widows, but they were also showing favoritism to a particular class of people. The Jewish widows were being cared for, while the non-Jews were being neglected. 

The same James who urged us to care for widows and orphans in their distress also said, “My brothers, show no partiality as you hold the faith in our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory” (James 2:1, ESV). And again he said, “If you really fulfill the royal law according to the Scripture, ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself,’ you are doing well. But if you show partiality, you are committing sin and are convicted by the law as transgressors” (James 2:8–9, ESV). What does it mean to show partiality? It means to show favoritism; to have bias in favor of one person over another, for whatever reason. And that is precisely what was going on in the early days of the church, or at least that was the perception.  It was truly a scandalous thing. 

Please recognize, therefore, that the first deacons were appointed, not to do menial an d insignificant work, but to do work that was crucial to the well being and maintenance of the church of Christ. Their task would require wisdom and discernment. And the effect of their work would be that individual Christians would be cared for, and the unity of the church maintained

Notice also that the work of the deacons is meant to compliment and even support the work of the elders. Again, in verse 3 we hear the  apostles saying, “Therefore, brothers, pick out from among you seven men of good repute, full of the Spirit and of wisdom, whom we will appoint to this duty. But we will devote ourselves to prayer and to the ministry of the word” (Acts 6:3–4, ESV). 

The apostles, who were also elders, had as their task the ministry of the word and of prayer. They were to devote themselves to the study, preaching and teaching,  and to the writing of Holy Scripture. It is not that  waiting on tables was below them. After all, Christ himself commanded them to do likewise when clothed himself with the garb of a servant and washed their feet. The task of serving tables was not below them, but it was too heavy of a burden for them to bear on their own.  It would have taken them from the work that God has specifically called them to do. 

Elders in the church today are not apostles, but they do have a similar task to accomplish. Elders do not write scripture as the apostles did. They do not speak with the same authority as the apostles. But they are to devote themselves to the ministry of the word, to prayer, and to the oversight of the church. The ministry ofd the deacon complements and supports the work of the  elder. 

So what was the occasion for the ordination of deacons in the church? The unity of the church was threatened due to a failure to justly care for those in need, and an apostleship that neither could nor should have met the need all on their own. 

*****

The Obligation of Deacons: Maintaining the Church by Caring for Those in Need

What, therefore, are the obligations of the  deacon? The form that we will use later in this worship service in the ordination of two deacons puts it this way: “The duties of deacons consist of encouraging members of the church to provide for those who are in want, seeking to prevent poverty, making discreet and cheerful distribution to the needy, praying with the distressed and reminding them of the consolations of Holy Scripture.” 

Let us consider these words carefully. 

“The duties of deacons consist of encouraging members of the church to provide for those who are in want.” Notice carefully, the job of the deacon is not to meet all of the needs themselves, but to be sure that needs within the church are met. 

The deacons are “to prevent poverty.” This is a very general statement, and fulfilling it could involve many things. Perhaps the deacons need to distribute food, clothing or money to those in need. Perhaps they will need to help in other practical ways to help individuals secure good employment, or to manage their resources well.

Deacons are also  to make “discreet and cheerful distribution to the needy.” Our deacons will work in  cooperation with the elders to distribute from the benevolence fund of the church. By the way,  the benevolence fund used to be called the deacons fund. At the church we came out of it was called the deacons fund. And we first stated, it was called the deacons fund. But if you remember, there were no deacons at our previous church, and we didn’t have deacons when we first began, and so we thought it sounded silly to call the fund the “deacons fund”,  and so we changed the name to the “benevolence fund”, benevolence meaning “kindness”. I’m not sure that we will change the name back now that we have a thriving deaconship. Whatever the name, please understand that  the deacons have a particular responsibility to, under the authority of the elders, maintain and distribute those funds to the needy in our midst. If ever you able to give above and beyond your normal tithe, we  would encourage you to consider giving to the benevolence fund. Distributions are made from the fund regularly. 

Lastly, see that deacons are to “[pray] with the distressed and [remind] them of the consolations of Holy Scripture.” I hope that  you can see clearly that the deacons are not the janitors of the church, but instead they are ministers of mercy. They are to care for people, particularly for their physical needs. But they are to care for them as brothers and sisters in Christ. The job of the deacon is to see to it that no one in  our congregation has the joy of their salvation diminished due to physical poverty or suffering, so far as we can help it.     

Later in this service we will ordain two new deacons, thanks be to God. Each of our deacons will have particular responsibilities — to oversee the food ministry (Tom Evans), to oversee the see the set up and tear down of the church (Nick Mucelli), to organize meals for those who have had surgery,  etc. (Nick Mucelli), to serve as an adminsitrative assistant to the Pastors (Mike Thezier), to provide fellowship meals for the church (Dave Anady). But all of them have the same general calling, and it is the one that has been described above. They are to labor to maintain the unity of the church by “encouraging members of the church to provide for those who are in want, seeking to prevent poverty, making discreet and cheerful distribution to the needy, praying with the distressed and reminding them of the consolations of Holy Scripture.”  

*****

Application  

Brothers and sisters, how might we apply these truths?

First, I would exhort you to give thanks to Christ that he would care for his people in this way. Clearly he is concerned to care for us in body and soul.

We will certainly experience trials and tribulations in this life. But Christ will refine and preserve his people through them, body and soul.  

Christ will save us on  the last day, body and soul. 

How did he teach us to pray? Not only for spiritual things, but also for the physical — give us this day our daily bread. 

It is no wonder then that within his church he has ordained two offices — elder and deacon — which  correspond to the two parts of man — body and soul 

This spiritual and physical care was present in the  early church. Acts 2:42:  “And they devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and the fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers. And awe came upon every soul, and many wonders and signs were being done through the apostles. And all who believed were together and had all things in common. And they were selling their possessions and belongings and distributing the proceeds to all, as any had need. And day by day, attending the temple together and breaking bread in their homes, they received their food with glad and generous hearts, praising God and having favor with all the people. And the Lord added to their number day by day those who were being saved” (Acts 2:42–47, ESV). 

The two offices of elder and deacon correspond to the two aspects of man. 

Secondly, will  you give honor to the deacons who serve in your midst. At the end of the ordination ceremony, after certain questions have been asked of the two men, I will ask you a question. I will say, “Do you, the members of this church, acknowledge and receive this brother as a deacon, and do you promise to yield him all that honor, encouragement, and obedience in the Lord, to which his office, according to the Word of God and the constitution of this Church, entitles him?” I hope that you will be willing to say a heart “I will” to that question. Please pray for the deacons and for their ministry. 

Thirdly, are you yourselves “eager to maintain the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.” Are striving to “walk in a manner worthy of the calling to which you have been called, with all humility and gentleness, with patience, bearing with one another in love.” Are you willing to serve one another, to give of your resource to meet needs, and use the particular gifts that God has given to you for the building up of the body of Christ? The elders and deacons have particular roles to play, but the it is the responsibility of every member to “maintain the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.” 

Posted in Sermons, Joe Anady, Acts 6:1-7, Posted by Joe. Comments Off on Sermon: Acts 6:1-7: The Ordination Of Deacons

Sermon: 1 Corinthians 15:12–28: Christ Has Been Raised From The Dead

Scripture Reading: 1 Corinthians 15:12–28

“Now if Christ is proclaimed as raised from the dead, how can some of you say that there is no resurrection of the dead? But if there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised. And if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain and your faith is in vain. We are even found to be misrepresenting God, because we testified about God that he raised Christ, whom he did not raise if it is true that the dead are not raised. For if the dead are not raised, not even Christ has been raised. And if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile and you are still in your sins. Then those also who have fallen asleep in Christ have perished. If in Christ we have hope in this life only, we are of all people most to be pitied. But in fact Christ has been raised from the dead, the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep. For as by a man came death, by a man has come also the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ shall all be made alive. But each in his own order: Christ the firstfruits, then at his coming those who belong to Christ. Then comes the end, when he delivers the kingdom to God the Father after destroying every rule and every authority and power. For he must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet. The last enemy to be destroyed is death. For “God has put all things in subjection under his feet.” But when it says, “all things are put in subjection,” it is plain that he is excepted who put all things in subjection under him. When all things are subjected to him, then the Son himself will also be subjected to him who put all things in subjection under him, that God may be all in all.” (1 Corinthians 15:12–28, ESV)

*****

Introduction

I’ve selected this passage for today assuming that you are familiar with the story of Christ’s crucifixion, death, burial, and resurrection as recorded for us in the pages of Holy Scripture, particularly, the Gospels. Jesus the Christ was crucified, he died, was buried, and on the third day he rose from the grave. If you wish to read about these things — which would be a wonderful thing do, either on your own or with others on this Lord’s Day — then you can open to the end of any of the four Gospels to find an account of the death, burial and resurrection of Christ. Matthew chapters 27 and 28, Mark 15 and 16, Luke 23 and 24, and John chapters 19 through 21 all testify to the truth that Jesus the Christ was crucified, died and was buried, and that he rose again on the third day. 

I’ve selected this passage for today assuming that you are familiar with this story, for this passage —  1 Corinthians 15:12–28 — does not tell the story of the resurrection of Christ. Instead, it establishes that without the resurrection of Christ, our faith would be empty, meaningless and vain. Stated positively, the fact that Christ was raised from the dead on the third day changes everything. When Christ raised from the dead he demonstrated that he was not just another teacher, or a great moral leader, but is in fact our conquering Savior. He defeated sin and death when he was raised up to live forevermore. And this he did for us, and for all who  believe upon him, so that we might have life eternal in his name.  

In verse 12 of 1 Corinthians 15 we learn something about the situation which made it necessary for Paul the Apostle to write on this subject. Evidently there were some within the church of Corinth who did not believe that there would be a resurrection at the end of time.  Exactly what they though is not clear from the text, but one thing is certain — they did not believe that believers would be raised in the future. This is why Paul wrote “Now if Christ is proclaimed as raised from the dead, how can some of you say that there is no resurrection of the dead? But if there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised.” Evidently some within the church in Corinth believe that Christy was raised from the dead, but they denied that believers will be.

This is a bit of a tangent, but I must say that I take a bit of comfort in Paul’s letters to the church in Corinth. They reassure me that it is not unusual to encounter trouble within Christ’s church. The church will always struggle against sin and false doctrine. I don’t mean to say that we should be content to live with the sin and false doctrine in our midst, but we should not be surprised when we encounter. The question is, what we do in responce to it? And the scriptures provide us with ample guidance here. 

In verse 12 of 1 Corinthians 15 Paul begins to address a doctrinal error within Corinth. Some believed that there would be no resurrection, even of believers, at the end of the age, and so Paul set them strait. Listen again to his reasoning. “Now if Christ is proclaimed as raised from the dead, how can some of you say that there is no resurrection of the dead? But if there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised.” He is drawing attention to their inconsistency. On the one hand they said, there is no resurrection. And on the other hand they said, Christ was raised. And Paul replied by saying, how can that be? If there is no resurrection, then Christ did not raise. But if Christ did rise, then we also should expect to rise with him, if we are united to him by faith.  The two things, you see — Christ’s resurrection and ours — are inextricably tinkled together. 

After establishing this principle, Paul then begins to show how central the resurrection of Christ is to the Christian faith.  He does this in two parts. Firstly, in verses 14-19 he tells us how things would be “if Christ has not been raised.” Secondly,  in verses 20-28 he tells us how things are because Christ has, in fact, been raised from the dead.

*****

If Christ is not raised…

In verse 14 we learn, first of all, that if Christ is not raised, then our faith is empty and without effect. There we read,  “And if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain and your faith is in vain.” 

The resurrection of Christ from the dead is so central to our faith that Paul says, if you take that away — if you take the historical, bodily resurrection of Christ away — then our preaching (meaning the preaching of the Apostles, and all preaching from that time onward) is empty, without content, untrue and ultimately ineffective.  

Brothers and sisters, you should know that there are many in this  world who call themselves “Christians” who do not believe that Christ was actually raised from the dead, but consider it a myth. Why they insist on having the name “Christian”, I do not know. It would be far better — far more honest — if they would admit that they are not Christians at all, but are something else. They might be moral people; ethical people, but they are not Christians. For Paul himself has said,  “if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain and your faith is in vain.” It is an empty faith.    

Secondly, Paul says that if Christ has not been raised, then he and the other Apostles would be found misrepresenting God. Look with me at verse 15. If Christ is not raised then, “We are even found to be misrepresenting God, because we testified about God that he raised Christ, whom he did not raise if it is true that the dead are not raised.”

It is not a good idea to misrepresent to God. And Paul, along with the other Apostles and the elders that had been appointed in the churches, had been preaching that God was the one who raised Christ from the grave.

Listen to Peter’s preaching on the day of Pentacost. Acts 2:22: “Men of Israel, hear these words: Jesus of Nazareth, a man attested to you by God with mighty works and wonders and signs that God did through him in your midst, as you yourselves know— this Jesus, delivered up according to the definite plan and foreknowledge of God, you crucified and killed by the hands of lawless men. God raised him up, loosing the pangs of death, because it was not possible for him to be held by it” (Acts 2:22–24, ESV). And a little bit later in that same sermon Peter said that Christ “was not abandoned to Hades, nor did his flesh see corruption. This Jesus God raised up, and of that we all are witnesses” (Acts 2:31–32, ESV). 

Listen again to Peter’s preaching, this time in Solomon’s Portico. He spoke to the Jews when he said, “The God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, the God of our fathers, glorified his servant Jesus, whom you delivered over and denied in the presence of Pilate, when he had decided to release him. But you denied the Holy and Righteous One, and asked for a murderer to be granted to you, and you killed the Author of life, whom God raised from the dead. To this we are witnesses.” (Acts 3:13–15, ESV)

You are noticing a theme, no doubt. What was at the heart of the evangelistic preaching of the early church? The Apostles preached about Christ, and in particular they wanted everyone to know that he rose from the grave. “To this we are witnesses”, Peter said. They were witness to the life of Christ. But in particular they were witnesses to his death and resurrection. They saw him raised. 

This testimony that “God raised [Christ] from the dead” is found on the lips of the Apostles throughout the pages of the book of Acts. And it also appears in Paul’s writings. In Romans 10:9 we read, “if you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved” (Romans 10:9, ESV). This same message also appears in 1 Corinthians 6:14, only about nine chapters previous to the text that we are studying today. There we read, “And God raised the Lord and will also raise us up by his power” (1 Corinthians 6:14, ESV). This is the teaching of the Apostles. “God raised the Lord and will also raise us up by his power.” The  two things, Christ’s resurrection, and ours are inextricably linked together. 

Paul and the other Apostles had testified repeatedly saying, “God raised the Lord.” This was at the heart of their message — “God raised [Christ] from the dead”. And if it was not true, then these men would be found misrepresenting God.

Thirdly, we learn that if Christ is not raised, then we are still in our sins. Look with me at verse 16 of 1 Corinthians 15. There we read, “For if the dead are not raised, not even Christ has been raised. And if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile and you are still in your sins.” (1 Corinthians 15:16–17, ESV)

Paul repeats himself a bit in these verses. Again he states his argument that “if the dead are not raised, not even Christ has been raised.“ And again he says, “if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile”. The Greek word translates as “futile”  here in verse 17 is different than the Greek word translated as “vain” in verse 14. The meaning of these two words is very similar. In verses 14 the emphasis might be upon the ineffectiveness of our faith if Christ is not raised. If Christ is not raised your faith does not really accomplish anything. It is empty, without effect, a waste of time. Here in verse 17 the emphasis might be upon the worthlessness of our faith if Christ is not raised. If Christ is not raised your faith is futile, empty and worthless. This is all repetition.

In verses 17 something is new is said though. “And if Christ has not been raised… you are still in your sins.” I love the way that Calvin explains this verse. He says, “For although Christ by his death atoned for our sins, that they might no more be imputed to us in the judgment of God, and has crucified our old man, that its lusts might no longer reign in us, (Rom. 6:6, 12;) and, in fine, has by death destroyed the power of death, and the devil himself, (Heb. 2:14;) yet there would have been none of all these things, if he had not, by rising again, come off victorious. Hence, if the resurrection is overthrown, the dominion of sin is set up anew.” 

Those are beautiful words, I think. The point is this: Though it be true that Christ atoned for sins by his death on the cross, none of that would have mattered if he would have remained dead. We would still be in our sins if Christ did not rise, for then we have not have a victorious Savior, but rather a defeated one. 

Fourthly, we learn that if Christ is not raised then those who have died in the Lord are hopelessly lost. This is what Paul means when he says in verse 18, if Christ is not raised “then those also who have fallen asleep in Christ have perished.”

He has already established that if Christ is not raised then we who are living are still in our sins. You see, there is now power in Christ if he is not raised. Whatever we say about what he did on the cross to pay for sin, to defeat the evil one, to earn an eternal reward, means nothing if remained in that tomb. Our faith would be vain and futile if this were true. And nothing illustrates this more than to talk about those who have “fallen asleep”, as Paul puts it. If Christ himself did not have victory over death and the grave, then there is no hope for those who have themselves died and gone into the grave. They  simply have perished.  They are hopelessly lost if Christ is not risen. 

Fifthly, we learn that if Christ is not raised then our hope is for this life only, and we are of all people most to be pitied. Verse 20: “If in Christ we have hope in this life only, we are of all people most to be pitied.” 

Two things: First, do you see that if Christ is not raised then our hope is for this life only? If Christ did not rise, then he did not defeat death. He does not have the power to do anything for us beyond the grave. Perhaps he could be of some use to us in this world as a moral example, as a demonstration of  God’s love, etc. But if he did not rise,  then he cannot do anything for us beyond the grace, for he himself would have been consumed by that, just as we will be. 

Secondly, Paul puts it most bluntly when he says, if this is true that Christ is not raised, then “we are of all people most to be pitied.”  

Why would Paul say this? Why would he say that Christians — those who have faith in Christ — are pitiful people, if Christ  is not raised? Doesn’t he know that following Christ is great blessing even in this life? Doesn’t he realize how joyous it is to know Christ in this life? Certainly he does! It was Paul himself who said that he counts “everything as loss because of the surpassing worth of knowing Christ Jesus [his] Lord. For [Christ’s sake he had] suffered the loss of all things and count[ed] them as rubbish, in order that [he] may gain Christ” (Philippians 3:8, ESV). Paul knew very well the blessing of walking with Christ in this world. Every other pleasure and honor seemed as rubbish to him in comparison. 

But Paul also knew something else. He knew from experience that being a Christian in this world is very difficult.

The Christian is called to resist the temptations of the world the flesh and the Devil.

The Christian should expect to be disciplined by the Lord. 

The Christian should expect to suffer a degree of persecution in this world. 

“Beloved, do not be surprised at the fiery trial when it comes upon you to test you, as though something strange were happening to you. But rejoice insofar as you share Christ’s sufferings, that you may also rejoice and be glad when his glory is revealed. If you are insulted for the name of Christ, you are blessed, because the Spirit of glory and of God rests upon you. But let none of you suffer as a murderer or a thief or an evildoer or as a meddler. Yet if anyone suffers as a Christian, let him not be ashamed, but let him glorify God in that name.” (1 Peter 4:12–16, ESV)

Brothers and sisters, the resurrection of Christ from the dead is so central to the Christian faith that if Christ is not risen, “our preaching is in vain and your faith is in vain. We are even found to be misrepresenting God… your faith is futile and you are still in your sins…” and  “those also who have fallen asleep in Christ have perished.” In fact, “if in Christ we have hope in this life only, we are of all people most to be pitied” (1 Corinthians 15:12–19, ESV).

*****

But in fact Christ has been raised…

“But in fact, Christ has been raised from the dead.” That is what we read in verse 20.

Paul testified to the fact of Christ’s resurrection in the previous passage when he wrote, “For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures, and that he appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve. Then he appeared to more than five hundred brothers at one time, most of whom are still alive, though some have fallen asleep. Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles. Last of all, as to one untimely born, he appeared also to me” (1 Corinthians 15:3–8, ESV). The Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John testify to the fact of Christ’s resurrection. The Apostles, when they were alive, testified to the fact of Christ’s resurrection. They saw him, and they were witnesses. Many others saw him  too. Indeed, Christ appeared in his resurrection to “more than five hundred brothers at one time, most of whom [were] still alive”, at the time when Paul wrote to the Corinthians. If Christ is not risen our faith is futile. “But in fact, Christ has been raised from the dead.” 

And what does this mean for us? It means that our preaching and our faith  is not in vain, but is powerful and effective. It means that we are correctly representing God when we say that he raised Christ from the grave. It means that our sins have been atoned for — washed away by the blood of the lamb — if we are united to him by faith. It means that those who have died in the Lord are alive with him in spirit as they eagerly  await the resurrection of their bodies. It means that not only to we enjoy Christ in this live, but we have a hope that goes beyond the grave.  Far from being “of all people most to be pitied”, we are “more than conquerors through him who loved us. For [we are] sure that neither death nor life, nor angels nor rulers, nor things present nor things to come, nor powers, nor height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord” (Romans 8:37–39, ESV).

This is precisely the point that Paul goes on to make when he says in verses 20, “But in fact Christ has been raised from the dead, the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep” (1 Corinthians 15:20, ESV). 

What does it mean that Christ is the “firstfruits”? It means that he is the first of many. What happened to him will also happen to us if we are in him. Christ’s resurrection guarantees our resurrection. Because Christ is risen, we know for sure that we too will be raised. You see, Christ did not rise from the grave for himself only, but so that he mighty “bring many sons to glory”, as Hebrews 2:10 so beautifully reveals. Christ was not merely and individual who was raised up. He was the “firstfruits” — the first of many to rise unto life eternal. 

Paul then explains why Christ is the firstfruits in verse 22 when he says, “For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ shall all be made alive (1 Corinthians 15:22, ESV). Christ is the firstfruits because Christ was and is a federal head and representative of others, just as Adam. 

Adam lived as a representative of others. His obedience would have meant life for others. His disobedience meant death for others. And who did Adam represent? He represented all who descended from him. To be born into this world is to be born in Adam. And to be in Adam is to be dead in trespasses and sins.    

Christ also lived (and died and rose again) as a representative for others. And who did Christ represent in his life, death burial and resurrection? He stood in the place of all who were given to him by the Father from all eternity (see John 17). These are all who ever have and ever will place their faith in Jesus the Christ. To be in Christ is to have life everlasting. “In Adam all die”,  but “in Christ shall all be made alive.” 

But there is an order to things, brothers and sisters. That is what Paul says in verse 23: “But each in his own order: Christ the firstfruits, then at his coming those who belong to Christ” (1 Corinthians 15:23, ESV). No one has come to enjoy their resurrection body yet except Christ. I can  think of only two possible  exceptions — Enoch and Elijah. All who have died having placed their faith in Christ, either before or after his coming, do indeed live in the presence of God. But they live in God’s presence in the spirit while their bodies lie in the grave. Christ was raised bodily. He was the first of a many who would be brought to glory in and through him. “Then at his coming [that it to say, his second coming] those who belong to Christ”, will also be raised. 

Verse 24: “Then comes the end, when he [Christ] delivers the kingdom to God the Father after destroying every rule and every authority and power” (1 Corinthians 15:24, ESV). At the end of time the dead in Christ will be raised. At the end of time “the kingdom” of Christ will be delivered “to God the Father”. By the way, this is what Adam was to do. He was to labor to promote and to advance God’s kingdom as a faithful servant of God to the glory and honor of God. When Adam failed, Christ has succeeded. Christ, on the last day, will deliver the kingdom of which he is Lord, to God the Father. 

Verse 25: “For he must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet” (1 Corinthians 15:25, ESV). Again, there is a process, friends. Christ is ruling and reigning now. His rule is supreme and absolute. But every enemy of his is progressively being brought under his feet. 

Verse 26: “The last enemy to be destroyed is death” (1 Corinthians 15:26, ESV). Death is something that we still must experience. It is the way that we pass from this life into the next one. If we are in Christ we will pass from life to life. If we are in Christ we will pass “from life to life. Those not in Christ will pass from “death to death” (see 2 Corinthians 2:16). At the end of time, death itself will be destroyed by Christ for all those who are in him. This is why the Christian can say, “‘O death, where is your victory? O death, where is your sting?’ The sting of death is sin, and the power of sin is the law. But thanks be to God, who gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ” (1 Corinthians 15:55–57, ESV).

In verse 27 Paul sites Psalm 8 when he says, “For ‘God has put all things in subjection under his [that is, Christ’s] feet.’ But when it says, ‘all things are put in subjection,’ it is plain that he is excepted who put all things in subjection under him. When all things are subjected to him, then the Son himself will also be subjected to him who put all things in subjection under him, that God may be all in all” (1 Corinthians 15:27–28, ESV). 

What is the meaning of this? Paul is saying that all things have been made subject to Christ. But there is one exception. God has not and will not be made subject to Christ. God is the one exception, for he is the one “who put all things in subjection under [Christ], so that God may be all in  all.”

Do you see, therefore, that when Christ was raised from the dead it for our good and to God’s glory?

It was for our good because Christ was the firstfruits. He raised, not fro himself, but for us so that we might be raised up with him at the end of time. 

And it was for God’s glory because Christ is establishing God’s kingdom. The kingdom of Christ and the kingdom of God are one in  the same. The kingdoms of Christ will advance in this world until it is fully established, with all things being made subject to Christ. And at that time Christ will “deliver the kingdom to God the Father after destroying every rule and every authority and power”, all the glory of our great God and King. 

*****

Conclusion  

So tell me, friend. Does it matter whether or not Christ was in fact raised from the dead?

And do you believe that he has been raised? Have you done what Paul says we must do if we are to be saved from our sins? “If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.” (Romans 10:9, ESV)

And if you have believed upon Christ, are you aware of how rich you  are in him. We deserved God’s wrath because of our sin, “But God, being rich in mercy, because of the great love with which he loved us, even when we were dead in our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ—by grace you have been saved— and raised us up with him and seated us with him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus, so that in the coming ages he might show the immeasurable riches of his grace in kindness toward us in Christ Jesus” (Ephesians 2:4–7, ESV).

Friends, are you eager to grow in your knowledge of Christ Jesus?

Are you eager to share that knowledge with others?

Brothers and sisters, it is good that have given special attention today to the resurrection of Christ. Indeed each Lord’s Day we gather to give worship to God through Christ who was risen on the first day of the week, but today, in a special way, we gather to say, he is risen… he is  risen indeed.   

Posted in Sermons, Study Guides, Joe Anady, 1 Corinthians 15:10-28, Posted by Joe. Comments Off on Sermon: 1 Corinthians 15:12–28: Christ Has Been Raised From The Dead

Sermon: Genesis 11:1-9: Babel: A Warning To All Who Would Build Independent Of God

Old Testament Reading: Genesis 11:1-9

“Now the whole earth had one language and the same words. And as people migrated from the east, they found a plain in the land of Shinar and settled there. And they said to one another, ‘Come, let us make bricks, and burn them thoroughly.’ And they had brick for stone, and bitumen for mortar. Then they said, ‘Come, let us build ourselves a city and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves, lest we be dispersed over the face of the whole earth.’ And the LORD came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of man had built. And the LORD said, ‘Behold, they are one people, and they have all one language, and this is only the beginning of what they will do. And nothing that they propose to do will now be impossible for them. Come, let us go down and there confuse their language, so that they may not understand one another’s speech.’ So the LORD dispersed them from there over the face of all the earth, and they left off building the city. Therefore its name was called Babel, because there the LORD confused the language of all the earth. And from there the LORD dispersed them over the face of all the earth.” (Genesis 11:1–9, ESV)

New Testament Reading: 1 Corinthians 3:10-14

“According to the grace of God given to me, like a skilled master builder I laid a foundation, and someone else is building upon it. Let each one take care how he builds upon it. For no one can lay a foundation other than that which is laid, which is Jesus Christ. Now if anyone builds on the foundation with gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, straw— each one’s work will become manifest, for the Day will disclose it, because it will be revealed by fire, and the fire will test what sort of work each one has done. If the work that anyone has built on the foundation survives, he will receive a reward.” (1 Corinthians 3:10–14, ESV)

*****

Introduction

The story of the tower of Babel is well known even in our culture, but I’m not sure that it is often understood. I wonder how many after reading this story think to themselves, “what was God so upset about that he would respond by confusing the language of the peoples of the earth to scatter them abroad?” On the surface it might seem as if God is against all cultural progress — as if he was upset that man dared to cooperate with one another to build a city. God’s response to this activity of man probably seems harsh to some, as if it were an overreaction. 

But a careful reading of this text, especially when it is considered  in the broader context of the story of Genesis and of scripture as a whole, will reveal that there is more going on here. God was displeased, not with city building or tower building per say, but with the spirit of these sinful men who sought to live their lives, to build their city and their tower, independent of God and for their own glory. 

The tower that these men built was not just a tower, but a temple — a Mesopotamian ziggurat used to promote the worship of false gods. When these men built their city and their tower their hope was that the god’s would descend to them to bless them, and they would ascend to become like the gods, and make a name for themselves. This construction project was no innocent enterprise. Instead, the building of this city in a plain in the land of Shinar, and the construction of this tower-temple, was an act of rebellion against the God of heaven. The story shows that the same desire for independence and autonomy which drove Adam and Eve to take of the forbidden tree, for Cain to build a city and to name it after his son, and for the sons of God to rule corruptly, harsly and oppressively in the days leading up to the flood, was also present in the world after the flood. Prior to the flood the earth was filled with corruption  because men sought to establish their own kingdoms, and not the kingdom of God. And the same is true in the world after the flood. Though Noah and his sons were saved from the flood waters in that Ark of God, and though they set their feet down upon a renewed earth after the floodwaters receded, they did not find themselves in the new heavens and new earth where righteousness dwells. Man was still fallen and in sin. Man still lived in a fallen and sinful world. What wee see is in this Babel story is that men were  still eager to pursue, not the glory of God, but their own glory. They were eager to decide for themselves how they ought to worship and to live. With this God was displeased.       

This brief story is a literary masterpiece . I wish that I could take the time to describe to you all of the wordplays contained in this text in the Hebrew. I wish that I could show how complex the structure of the text is, for that does help us to undestand the main point. Briefly, let me say that this little story is broken into seven sections. Those sections are formed into an extended chiasmus with verses five as the turning point. Not only is this text structured as an extended chiasmus, it is also organized into two parallel panels which are meant to be compared with one another, with emphasis given again to verse 5. I love this stuff, but it doesn’t preach very well. We will simply consider this text in it’s seven sections consisting of introductory remarks, fives scenes, and then concluding remarks. Let us consider this text scene by scene.

*****

Introductory Remarks

First, we encounter introductory remarks: “Now the whole earth had one language and the same words. And as people migrated from the east, they found a plain in the land of Shinar and settled there” (Genesis 11:1–2, ESV).

The stament, “now the whole earth had one language and the same words”, might strike you as odd given what we have already read in Genesis chapter 10. There in that table of nations, as we have called it, the spread of the descendents of Noah’s sons, Shem, Ham and Japheth are

described to us. And at the end of each section in that table of nations we read these words, “each with his own language, by their clans, in their nations” (Genesis 10:5, ESV). This is how the account of the descendents of Japheth is concluded — they spread to the coastlands,  “each with his own language, by their clans, in their nations”. The same is true for Ham — “These are the sons of Ham, by their clans, their languages, their lands, and their nations.” (Genesis 10:20, ESV). And it is also true for the section dealing with Shem — “These are the sons of Shem, by their clans, their languages, their lands, and their nations” (Genesis 10:31, ESV).

If this is what we have learned in Genesis 10, then how can Genesis 11:1 say, “Now the whole earth had one language and the same words.” The answer is that the Bible often recapitulates. It is not always organized chronologically, but sometimes goes backwards in time to emphasize some other aspect or theme in the historical development. 

The table of nations in Genesis 10 chronicles for us the dispersion of the peoples of the earth, and even takes us past the Babel incident to the time where each of these clans and nations had their own language. But as we move forward to Genesis 11 in the text, we find that the text takes us backwards in time. Genesis 10 tells us about the dispersion of the peoples of the earth. Genesis 11 tells us why they were dispersed. 

These two texts — Genesis 10 and 11 — are not difficult to harmonize. 

It should be remembered that Genesis 10 gave attention to one figure in particular in the line of Ham — his name was Nimrod. We are told in 10:8 that “he was the first on earth to be a mighty man” (he was a great and powerful king), and that “the beginning of his kingdom was Babel, Erech, Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar” (Genesis 10:10, ESV). In Genesis 10 the camera angle is very wide — there we are zoomed way out to consider the spread of the nations in general. But in Genesis 11 we are zoomed way in upon the city of Babel which Nimrod founded to see the true spirit of that civilization which lead to the curse of confusion and to the dispersion. The spirit of that civilization was to build independent from God in the line and spirit of Cain and Lamech, Ham and Nimrod. 

Also, it should be remember that in Genesis 10:25 we were introduced to one named Peleg. Peleg was born in the line of Shem, and in the righteous line of Eber. Through Peleg’s line, Abram (who we know as Abraham) would be born. From him the Hebrew people would come. And in Genesis 10:25 we learn that in Peleg’s “days the earth was divided…” (his name means “division”. In other words, it was during Peleg’s livetime that the Babel event happened. 

Genesis 10 and 11 do not contradict one another. Instead they complement one another. Genesis 10 describes the dispersion of the nations generally. Genesis 11 looks up close to show us the details. And so with these words the stage is set for our story — “Now the whole earth had one language and the same words. And as people migrated from the east [that is, from mountains of Ararat], they found a plain in the land of Shinar and settled there” (Genesis 11:1–2, ESV). 

Let us take a moment to imagine a world like that? Imagine a world where there was no such thing as a “language barrier”. People would be able to come together much more easily. People would be able to work together much more efficiently towards a common good. Or so you would think. The rest of the story describes what sinful and fallen men in the line of Ham and Nimrod did with this blessing of a unified language. Instead of using it for good, they used it for evil.  

*****

Scene 1 

Having had the scene set for us in verses 1 and  2,  let us now consider the first scene in verse 3: “And they said to one another, ‘Come, let us make bricks, and burn them thoroughly.’ And they had brick for stone, and bitumen for mortar” (Genesis 11:3, ESV).

These words need to be considered carefully if we are to understand the central meaning of this text.

The phrase, “And they said to one another, ‘Come, let us make bricks, and burn them thoroughly’”, is meant to be contrasted with another well known phrase found earlier the book of Genesis. Notice that the words of these worldly men are similar to the words of God as recorded in Genesis 1:26: “Then God said, ‘Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion…” (Genesis 1:26, ESV).

God engaged in a building project at the beginning of time. He made the heavens and earth. And he also made man. And his purpose for man — and this is very significant for our story today — was that man would exercise dominion upon the earth, but under his authority. God is not opposed to kingdom building. In fact, God created man for the express purpose of building a kingdom. Man was created to have dominion on earth and to labor for the advancement of God’s kingdom. Adam was to expand and keep the garden temple of God. 

The words of the men who built Babel, and the words of God when he made man are similar so that we might be prompted to compare and contrast them. When we do,  it becomes apparent that these city builders are up to no good. They are building a city and a tower, not under God and to advance his kingdom, but they are seeking to establish a kingdom of their own. 

*****

Scene 2

The second scene makes all of this explicitly clear. Verse 4: “Then they said, ‘Come, let us build ourselves a city and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves, lest we be dispersed over the face of the whole earth’” (Genesis 11:4, ESV).

The words “us” and “ourselves” are important.  “Come, let us build ourselves a city and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves.”

These men were very ambitious. Ambition – that is, the strong desire to achieve something — is not evil. But there is a between holy ambition and unholy ambition. Ambition that acts for the glory of something other than the glory of God and the good of others is sinful. Often, our ambitions are selfish. And this is why James says in 3:13 of his epistle, “Who is wise and understanding among you? By his good conduct let him show his works in the meekness of wisdom.” James is promoting wisdom that is meek — wisdom which first humbly submits to God and has God’s word as it’s source. And then  he says, “But if you have bitter jealousy and selfish ambition in your hearts, do not boast and be false to the truth. This is not the wisdom that comes down from above, but is earthly, unspiritual, demonic. For where jealousy and selfish ambition exist, there will be disorder and every vile practice” (James 3:13–16, ESV).

This is exactly what we see on display in this Babel narrative. Thes men had a kind of wisdom, but it was not the wisdom from above. They did not live in submission to God’s rule and to his word, but sought to establish their autonomy. And their ambition, though great in size, was selfish  ambition —  “Come, let us build ourselves a city and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves.” They wisdom and ambition were not good and godly, but “earthly, unspiritual, demonic”. It is no wonder then that the product was “disorder and every vile practice”, for this is what “jealousy and selfish ambition” produce.  

Notice the word “city”. These men desired to build a city. This city was not the city of God dedicated to the glorification of his name, but the city of man. Their ambition was to do what other city builders in the past had done in the line of Cain. 

Pay special attention to this – their city, the city of Babel, would in the course of time become the prototypical city of man, and the antitype to the city of God, called Babylon. Babel becomes Babylon in the course of time. 

Remember that to Babylon the Israelites would eventually be taken into captivity and then brought out again. In the scriptures Babylon stands for all that opposes God and his people in the earth. And yet God is sovereign even over Babylon. 

And remember also how the city of Babylon functioned symbolically in the book  of Revelation? There, Babylon symbolized the wicked and godless kingdoms of the earth. In Revelation 14:8 we read, “Another angel, a second, followed, saying, ‘Fallen, fallen is Babylon the great, she who made all nations drink the wine of the passion of her sexual immorality’” (Revelation 14:8, ESV).  Concerning the great prostitute of Revelation 17 we read,  “And on her forehead was written a name of mystery: ‘Babylon the great, mother of prostitutes and of earth’s abominations.’ And I saw the woman, drunk with the blood of the saints, the blood of the martyrs of Jesus. When I saw her, I marveled greatly” (Revelation 17:5–6, ESV). And in Revelation 18 the fall of Babylon, who stands for all of the wicked kingdoms of the the earth, was foretold. Verse 2: “And he called out with a mighty voice, ‘Fallen, fallen is Babylon the great! She has become a dwelling place for demons, a haunt for every unclean spirit, a haunt for every unclean bird, a haunt for every unclean and detestable beast” (Revelation 18:2, ESV). Verse 10: “They will stand far off, in fear of her torment, and say, ‘Alas! Alas! You great city, you mighty city, Babylon! For in a single hour your judgment has come’” (Revelation 18:10, ESV). And verse 21: “Then a mighty angel took up a stone like a great millstone and threw it into the sea, saying, ‘So will Babylon the great city be thrown down with violence, and will be found no more’” (Revelation 18:21, ESV). At the end of time the kingdoms of this world will be judged and banished from the earth so that only the kingdom of God remains. 

Notice that these men — these who were associated with Ham and Nimrod — not only desired to build a city, but also a tower with its top in the heavens. This was not just any old tower, but a temple — a Mesopotamian ziggurat. These structures were similar to the pyramids found in Egypt. But instead of being finished off and polished into that pyramid shape which is so familiar to us, these ziggurat were built up level by level, with a base that is wider than the second and third levels, and so on.

It would be nieve to think that these structures — both the pyramids of Egypt and the ziggurat tower of Babel – were mere and meaningless structures, as if the men who made them  said,  hey, lets build something big and cool. No, they were built for religious purposes. They were constructed being driven by the  religions fervor of their makers. These men built this tower to reach to heaven. Their hope was that the god’s of heaven would descend upon the mountain that they had built, and that by their mountain they themselves would manage to ascend to heaven. 

Their objective was to make a name for themselves. This means that their goal was to advance and to establish their own name. In the context their quest must have been to establish their names in the heavenly realm amongst the God. In essence, they were attempting to do what Adam and Eve thought they were doing when they ate of the forbidden fruit — they thought they would become like God. These early Babylonians built their temple with  the hopes that it would function like a stairway to heaven — the god’s would descend to them, and they would ascend to take their place amongst the god’s. Their religion was, in this sense, no different from all of the other man made religions of the world — they sought to obtain immortality by their own effort, by their own building. 

But the scriptures are clear. Now that man is fallen — now that the covenant of works has been broken — there is no way for man to ascend to heaven or to have fellowship with God by his own efforts and by his own  building. God himself must provide a way. God himself must build. And here is the distinguishing characteristic of the Covenant of Grace through which  we are saved. In the covent of Works God says, do this and you shall live. But in the Covenant of Grace God says, I will… I will do such and such. I will provide a Savior, I will establish my kingdom. I will build my church. I will finish the work that I have begun in you. Christ is the mediator of the Covenant of Grace. It is only through him that salvation is possible. And was is required for one to partake of the benefits which Christ has earned? Answer: Faith alone. Faith in Christ alone and the work he has accomplished on our behalf.   

Contrast what these early Babylonians said with what God said to Abram when he called him out of that pagan culture to make him in to a great nation and to bless the nations through the Christ who come from his loins. These early Babylonians said, “come…  let us make a name for ourselves”. But “the LORD said to Abram, ‘Go from your country and your kindred and your father’s house to the land that I will show you. And I will make of you a great nation, and I will bless you and make your name great, so that you will be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you, and him who dishonors you I will curse, and in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed” (Genesis 12:1–3, ESV).

Friends, if anything of the kingdom of God is to be built after man’s fall  into sin  and  after the breaking of the covenant of works, it must be  built by God  and according to his revealed design. 

Here in this story the building of the tower of Babel we find men building, not for God and under his rule, but fop themselves and according to their own wisdom. More than this, they are found fighting against the explicit decree of God. They built their  city and tower “lest [they] be dispersed over the face of the whole earth.”

But we should remember that after God create Adam and Eve, “God blessed them. And God said to them, ‘Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it, and have dominion…” (Genesis 1:28, ESV). And after God brought Noah and his sons through the flood and into the world that now is, he “blessed Noah and his sons and said to them, ‘Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth’ (Genesis 9:1, ESV).

Here these people of Babel aligned with Cain, Ham and Nimrod say, “Come, let us build ourselves a city and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves, lest we be dispersed over the face of the whole earth.” These people were living in all out rebellion against the God of heaven as they sought to develop their culture independent of him. 

*****

Scene 3

The third scene, which is found in the fifth verse, is the pivotal scene in this story. There we read, “And the LORD came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of man had built” (Genesis 11:5, ESV).

If you know anything about the God of the Bible, the Creator of heaven and earth, you  know that he does not need to “come down” to see anything on earth, but is omnipresent and omniscient,  that is to say, all present and all knowing. Why then  does the text say that “the LORD came down to see the city and the tower…”? 

The  statement is ironic. The Mesopotamians built their tower-temple in hopes that their god’s would come down  to them. Instead,  the one true God of heaven descended to inspect and to judge. 

The stament is also mocking. From a human perspective the ziggurat built by these people in the plane of Shinar was an impressive sight to behold. How far they got in the process we are not told, but I’m sure the project would have been considered an  engineering marvel. But from God’s persecutive, the project was small and insignificant, So small was it that God had to “come down” to see. This highlights how terribly short these people fell short in reaching their goals to build a  tower which reached to heaven. The God of heaven had to “come down” to see it.  

It really is ridiculous — and if were not so serious, I would say, comical — to consider how much we make of ourselves. We think that we are so big and powerful, so intelligent and creative, so independent and supreme. But if we were to compare ourselves to the God who made us, we would see clearly that we so small and insignificant. 

Listen to Isaiah 40:21-23. “Do you not know? Do you not hear? Has it not been told you from the beginning? Have you not understood from the foundations of the earth? It is he who sits above the circle of the earth, and its inhabitants are like grasshoppers; who stretches out the heavens like a curtain, and spreads them like a tent to dwell in; who brings princes to nothing, and makes the rulers of the earth as emptiness” (Isaiah 40:21–23, ESV).

These sons of Ham and of Nimrod were so proud of themselves. The thought they could reach up to heaven with the tower they built. But God is so  highly exulted above us, and so small are we, that he had to “come down” as it we to see their little achievement.

*****

Scene 4

Let us move on to scene 4 which is found in verse 6.  There we read, “And the LORD said, ‘Behold, they are one people, and they have all one language, and this is only the beginning of what they will do. And nothing that they propose to do will now be impossible for them” (Genesis 11:6, ESV).

This is a problem, not because God is opposed to progress, but because he, in his mercy, is opposed to progress that is Godless. He is opposed to Godless progress for it is neither to his glory, nor for our good. 

*****

Scene 5

Scene 5 is  found in verse 7, where we read, “Come, let us go down and there confuse their language, so that they may not understand one another’s speech” (Genesis 11:7, ESV).

To confuse their language means that God caused the peoples who were then unified and speaking one language, to speak many languages, and thus they would  be divided. 

Clearly, this was an act of judgement. Because the people used their unity for evil, God cursed them with disunity. No longer were they able to communicate to build their city and temple, and they were dispersed. 

We might also view this same act as an act of mercy. By confusing their languages and by dividing them God restrained the peoples of the earth from running headlong into sin. By pouring out this judgment evil was restrained.   These men and women were running full speak towards the establishment of the kingdom of Satan and of the anti-Christ, but showed mercy when he  disrupted their plans. God will do  this from time to time in the world and in our own lives. He will judge and will chasten us because he is merciful and kind. 

*****

Concluding Remarks

In verses 8 and 9 we find concluding remarks. “So the LORD dispersed them from there over the face of all the earth, and they left off building the city. Therefore its name was called Babel, because there the LORD confused the language of all the earth. And from there the LORD dispersed them over the face of all the earth” (Genesis 11:8–9, ESV).

Genesis 11 doesn’t take us any further than Genesis 10 did historically, but it does take us further as it pertains to our understanding of the spirit of this world and of God’s activities within it. 

There are two kingdoms present within this world — the kingdom of God and the kingdom of man. God is Lord and king over both kingdoms. He is Lord and  king over the kingdom of God, for that kingdom is made up of those who desire to live in obedience to him and for his glory. But he is also Lord and King over the city of man, for God is ultimately sovereign over all things. Even those who oppose and resist his rule are not outside of his sovereign  control. 

*****

Application  

Let me  make a few points of application as we close. 

First of all, the story of Babel should encourage us to be careful with how we build in this life. 

Let us take care to build our own personal lives according to God’s word. 

“Why do you call me ‘Lord, Lord,’ and not do what I tell you? Everyone who comes to me and hears my words and does them, I will show you what he is like: he is like a man building a house, who dug deep and laid the foundation on the rock. And when a flood arose, the stream broke against that house and could not shake it, because it had been well built. But the one who hears and does not do them is like a man who built a house on the ground without a foundation. When the stream broke against it, immediately it fell, and the ruin of that house was great” (Luke 6:46–49, ESV).

Let us also take care as we seek to build Christ’s church. We must build according to God word and for his glory, and not our own. 

This is  what the apostle was speaking to when he wrote those words which we read at the start of this sermon. “According to the grace of God given to me, like a skilled master builder I laid a foundation, and someone else is building upon it. Let each one take care how he builds upon it. For no one can lay a foundation other than that which is laid, which is Jesus Christ. Now if anyone builds on the foundation with gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, straw— each one’s work will become manifest, for the Day will disclose it, because it will be revealed by fire, and the fire will test what sort of work each one has done. If the work that anyone has built on the foundation survives, he will receive a reward.” (1 Corinthians 3:10–14, ESV)

Secondly, be careful how you pursue life eternal. Not by works, but by grace. Not by our efforts, but through faith in what God has built. 

“What shall we say, then? That Gentiles who did not pursue righteousness have attained it, that is, a righteousness that is by faith; but that Israel who pursued a law that would lead to righteousness did not succeed in reaching that law. Why? Because they did not pursue it by faith, but as if it were based on works. They have stumbled over the stumbling stone, as it is written, “Behold, I am laying in Zion a stone of stumbling, and a rock of offense; and whoever believes in him will not be put to shame.”” (Romans 9:30–33, ESV)

Thirdly, let us be faithful to proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ locally and to the ends of the earth. 

“Now there were dwelling in Jerusalem Jews, devout men from every nation under heaven. And at this sound the multitude came together, and they were bewildered, because each one was hearing them speak in his own language. And they were amazed and astonished, saying, “Are not all these who are speaking Galileans? And how is it that we hear, each of us in his own native language? Parthians and Medes and Elamites and residents of Mesopotamia, Judea and Cappadocia, Pontus and Asia, Phrygia and Pamphylia, Egypt and the parts of Libya belonging to Cyrene, and visitors from Rome, both Jews and proselytes, Cretans and Arabians—we hear them telling in our own tongues the mighty works of God.”” (Acts 2:5–11, ESV)

Posted in Sermons, Study Guides, Joe Anady, Genesis 11, Posted by Joe. Comments Off on Sermon: Genesis 11:1-9: Babel: A Warning To All Who Would Build Independent Of God

Sermon: Genesis 10: The Table Of Nations

Scripture Reading: Genesis 10

“These are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth. Sons were born to them after the flood. The sons of Japheth: Gomer, Magog, Madai, Javan, Tubal, Meshech, and Tiras. The sons of Gomer: Ashkenaz, Riphath, and Togarmah. The sons of Javan: Elishah, Tarshish, Kittim, and Dodanim. From these the coastland peoples spread in their lands, each with his own language, by their clans, in their nations. The sons of Ham: Cush, Egypt, Put, and Canaan. The sons of Cush: Seba, Havilah, Sabtah, Raamah, and Sabteca. The sons of Raamah: Sheba and Dedan. Cush fathered Nimrod; he was the first on earth to be a mighty man. He was a mighty hunter before the LORD. Therefore it is said, ‘Like Nimrod a mighty hunter before the LORD.’ The beginning of his kingdom was Babel, Erech, Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar. From that land he went into Assyria and built Nineveh, Rehoboth-Ir, Calah, and Resen between Nineveh and Calah; that is the great city. Egypt fathered Ludim, Anamim, Lehabim, Naphtuhim, Pathrusim, Casluhim (from whom the Philistines came), and Caphtorim. Canaan fathered Sidon his firstborn and Heth, and the Jebusites, the Amorites, the Girgashites, the Hivites, the Arkites, the Sinites, the Arvadites, the Zemarites, and the Hamathites. Afterward the clans of the Canaanites dispersed. And the territory of the Canaanites extended from Sidon in the direction of Gerar as far as Gaza, and in the direction of Sodom, Gomorrah, Admah, and Zeboiim, as far as Lasha. These are the sons of Ham, by their clans, their languages, their lands, and their nations. To Shem also, the father of all the children of Eber, the elder brother of Japheth, children were born. The sons of Shem: Elam, Asshur, Arpachshad, Lud, and Aram. The sons of Aram: Uz, Hul, Gether, and Mash. Arpachshad fathered Shelah; and Shelah fathered Eber. To Eber were born two sons: the name of the one was Peleg, for in his days the earth was divided, and his brother’s name was Joktan. Joktan fathered Almodad, Sheleph, Hazarmaveth, Jerah, Hadoram, Uzal, Diklah, Obal, Abimael, Sheba, Ophir, Havilah, and Jobab; all these were the sons of Joktan. The territory in which they lived extended from Mesha in the direction of Sephar to the hill country of the east. These are the sons of Shem, by their clans, their languages, their lands, and their nations. These are the clans of the sons of Noah, according to their genealogies, in their nations, and from these the nations spread abroad on the earth after the flood.” (Genesis 10, ESV)

*****

Introduction

Brothers and sisters, one of the things for which I am grateful is to have the privilege of pastoring a church that is eager to hear God’s word proclaimed in its entirety. And I would urge you to never allow that hunger for God’s word to fade.  

I think all of you would agree that there are some passages of scripture that are more exciting and obviously applicable than others. But our belief is that “all Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness” (2 Timothy 3:16, ESV). And so our practice it to teach through the scriptures in their entirety. 

I would imagine that to many the portions of scripture that seem least applicable are the ones that contain genealogies. Perhaps you have had the experience of opening your Bible a the scripture reading for the day (assuming you are using a Bible reading plan) only to see a long list of names. Many, I would imagine, feel as if there is nothing for them in a text like that. While I understand the sentiment, I do hope to change your mind today. 

While I am willing to admit that the genealogies of Genesis apply to us in a different way than, let’s say, Colossians 3:5-10 applies — they still apply! 

The application of a passage like Colossians 3:5-10 is obvious. It lays there on the surface and is easily picked up by the reader: “Put to death therefore what is earthly in you: sexual immorality, impurity, passion, evil desire, and covetousness, which is idolatry. On account of these the wrath of God is coming. In these you too once walked, when you were living in them. But now you must put them all away: anger, wrath, malice, slander, and obscene talk from your mouth. Do not lie to one another, seeing that you have put off the old self with its practices and have put on the new self, which is being renewed in knowledge after the image of its creator” (Colossians 3:5–10, ESV). This text speaks in a most direct way to how we ought to live in Christ Jesus. The meaning is clear. The application is direct. 

It is not that passages like Genesis 10 are less meaningful. Neither are they less applicable. But two things need to be said: One, it is true that more work is required to mine texts like Genesis 10 when compared to texts like Colossians 3:5-10 if we are to understand its meaning and make application. Hard mental and spiritual spade work is required here. The reader must dig a little to reap the rewards and profit from a passage of scripture like this. Two, the kind of application drawn from texts like Genesis 10 is different from the kind of application drawn from texts like Colossians 3:5-10. After considering the Colossians passage, the reader is most naturally urged to “do something” — “Put to death therefore what is earthly in you”, etc. But after considering the list of names, peoples and places in Genesis 10, the reader is most naturally urged to “see and to understand” something. The application is simply different. It has more to do with what we art to believe than with what we are to do. 

Friends, application that begins with the words, “see” or “understand” is not less important than application that begins with the word, “do”. In fact, seeing and understanding the message of the Bible is more foundational than doing what the Bible says. My objective as a minister of the gospel is not primarily to convince you to do this or that, but to convince you to believe something. My primary concerning is not to make you a better person, in other words, but to convince you that “Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and [to understand] that by believing you… have life in his name” (John 20:31, ESV). And after urging you to believe that Jesus is the Christ, then my objective is urge you to obey him.

Brothers and sisters, today I hope to convince you, if you are not convinced already, that these lists of names that appear in the scriptures from time to time are of great importance. They are of great importance for they tell the story of the accomplishment of our salvation.

Friends, I hope that you are beginning to understand that God did not accomplish our salvation through a Christ who appeared out of the blue one day. Instead, God provided salvation for us by first promising that he would.  He promised that a victorious savior would one day appear. And he would appear, not by dropping from the sky without warning, but in fulfillment to  promises previously made. The savior would, in due time, come from amongst the offspring of Eve. 

The accomplishment of our salvation, therefore, began with a promise. And it also involved the fulfillment of that promise in human history. God promised to accomplish our salvation through the offspring of the woman, and he was also faithful to bring it about. The scriptures tell this story. The scriptures tell the story of God calling and preserving a people for himself in the world. And it was through this people that the Christ eventually came to pay the price for our sins. 

Brothers and sisters, hear me now. There is no gospel of Jesus Christ apart from these genealogies.

I should  remind you that Matthew began his gospel with a genealogy. The title of his work is, “The Gospel According to Matthew”. And the first words in his gospel presentation are, “The book of the genealogy of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham”, etc. (Matthew 1:1–2, ESV). Luke’s gospel also has a genealogy at the heart of it. In Luke 3:23 we read, “Jesus, when he began his ministry, was about thirty years of age, being the son (as was supposed) of Joseph, the son of Heli”, etc. I will say it again — there is no gospel of Jesus Christ apart from these genealogies, for God determined in eternity past to accomplish our redemption progressively, in human history, through the selection and preservation of an elect line through every generation up until the birth of the Christ, who would atone for the sins of his people by his own shed blood. 

And what do we see here in Genesis 10 except the earliest stages of the development of that story. 

There is so much that could be said about this passage. Some scholars have labored to identify each of the names in this list and to identify them with known peoples and nations in the ancient world. Many of the names and peoples mentioned are known to us. Some are a bit more difficult to identify. This is a very interesting and important field of study, but it is not the focus of the sermon today. 

Let me begin by making seven general and brief observations about this list of people, places and nations before moving on to make three main points. 

One, notice that this list of names differs a bit from the lists of names that we encountered earlier in the book of Genesis. The earlier lists are appropriately called genealogies, for they clearly trace the descent from father to son. Take, for example, the genealogy beginning in Genesis 5:1. There we read, “This is the book of the generations of Adam… When Adam had lived 130 years, he fathered a son in his own likeness, after his image, and named him Seth”, etc. The language is less precise in Genesis 10. This is not so much a genealogy, but a table of nations. The point is to show where the nations of the earth descended from after the days of Noah. 

Two, notice that this passage is a continuation of what was said in Genesis 9:18. There we read, “The sons of Noah who went forth from the ark were Shem, Ham, and Japheth. (Ham was the father of Canaan.) These three were the sons of Noah, and from these the people of the whole earth were dispersed” (Genesis 9:18–19, ESV). The table of nations of Genesis 10 maps out the dispersion of the peoples of the earth descending from Noah’s three sons, Shem, Ham and Japheth. 

Three, we must remember that the book of Genesis was originally written, not to us, but by Moses to ancient Israel after they had been redeemed from Egypt. While it is difficult for you and I to recognize the names in this list and to visualize where in the world these peoples resided, it would not have been so difficult for the ancient Israelite. As they heard these names, they would have recognized them, and they would have been able to visualize where in the world these people lived. 

Four, notice the order in which the descendents of Shem, Ham and Japheth are listed. First, the descendents of Japheth are presented. Second, the descendents of Ham. And third, the descendents of Shem. Why this order? Up until this point the order has been Ham, Shem and Japheth, or Shem, Ham and Japheth. But here the order is Japheth, Ham and Shem. This ordering makes sense only if we consider it from the perspective of ancient, Old Covenant Israel and in the context of the overarching story of the history of redemption. 

The Japhethites are mentioned first, and the least detail is given concerning them, because they were the people furthest removed from the Israelites. They were the peoples with whom the Israelites had least contact. They were the “ends of the earth” peoples  from the perspective of the Hebrews. 

The Hamites are mentioned second, and with much more detail, because they were the peoples that Israel had most contact with, and many of them were their enemies. Consider verse 6, where we read,  “The sons of Ham: Cush, Egypt, Put, and Canaan” (Genesis 10:6, ESV). Of those four names, two are familiar to us — Egypt and Canaan. And coinsider this — the Israelites had just been freed from Egypt and they were sojourning towards a land that God had promised to them, the land of Canaan. Israel would have to drive the Canaanites out of the land and subdue them before occupying it. 

The Shemites are mentioned last because this is line through through with the Hebrew people — God’s chosen people under the Old Covenant — would descend.  

Five, remember that when Noah cursed Ham for his sin, he did not curse Ham directly, but his son Canaan. Now it should be clear why Noah cursed Canaan and not Ham, for not all who descended from  Ham were cursed, but only the Canaanites. Noah said, “Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be to his brothers” (Genesis 9:25, ESV). Again, this must be considered from the perspective of the Israelite who had been redeemed from slavery in Egypt and was sojourning towards the promised land of the Canaanites.  

Six, it is significant that if all of the descendents of Shem, Ham and Japheth are counted, the number comes to 70. Seventy is a number of completion in  the scriptures. Clearly, this is not a complete and detailed genealogy of the sons of Noah. This is a selective list. The number 70  is meant to communicate the idea of completeness. From the sons of Noah, “the people of the whole earth were dispersed” (Genesis 9:18–19, ESV).   

Seven, special attention should be payed to the remarks that are made about certain individuals in this list. 

Take, for example, the remarks that are made about Nimrod in the line of Ham. Verse 8: “Cush fathered Nimrod; he was the first on earth to be a mighty man. He was a mighty hunter before the LORD. Therefore it is said, ‘Like Nimrod a mighty hunter before the LORD.’ The beginning of his kingdom was Babel, Erech, Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar. From that land he went into Assyria and built Nineveh, Rehoboth-Ir, Calah, and Resen between Nineveh and Calah; that is the great city” (Genesis 10:8–12, ESV). This is quite a statement. It is meant to catch our attention. In brief, it communicates that in the line of Ham was characterized by  mighty men — oppressive rulers, who engaged in city building, not to the glory of God, but to the glory of man. 

Notice also that when we come to the line of Shem in verse 21 we read, “To Shem also, the father of all the children of Eber, the elder brother of Japheth, children were born” (Genesis 10:21, ESV). It is highlighted and emphasized from  the outset that Shem was the “the father of all the children of Eber”. From Eber, the Hebrew people would descend, and this is emphasized  from the outset. 

With those general remarks out of the way, let me now make three points:

*****

The Sons Of Japheth

Screen Shot 2019-04-05 at 2.12.39 PM.png

Firstly, as we consider the Japhethites, let it be recognized that God’s plan from the beginning was to bring salvation to all the peoples of the earth.

This table of the nations in Genesis 10 makes it clear that those who descended from Japheth were the ones who were far removed from Israel. They were the gentile people — the people with whom Israel had least contact. But we must also remember the blessing that God pronounced upon his son Japheth: “May God enlarge Japheth, and let him dwell in the tents of Shem, and let Canaan be his servant” (Genesis 9:27, ESV). God’s purpose from the beginning was to bless all the nations of the earth — even those who were far off — through his chosen people, the Israelites. 

This will become even more clear in Genesis 12 when God calls Abram, one of Shem’s descendents. There we will read, “Now the LORD said to Abram, ‘Go from your country and your kindred and your father’s house to the land that I will show you. And I will make of you a great nation, and I will bless you and make your name great, so that you will be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you, and him who dishonors you I will curse, and in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed” (Genesis 12:1–3, ESV). Two things are communicated here: one, God would make Abram into a great nation. And two, in Abram “all the families of the earth shall be blessed”. This is a reiteration of the blessing pronounced upon Japheth when Noah said, “May God enlarge Japheth, and let him dwell in the tents of Shem”, which would become the tents of Abram in the course of time. 

Friends, God’s purpose from the beginning was to save a people for himself from every tongue, tribe and nation. The savior, when he did come, would be the savior of the world, and not of the Hebrews only. The savior would defeat the evil one who plunged the world into sin and darkness. And the savior would redeem the children of Adam, who was the father, not of the Jews only, but of all people. But this savior would come into the world through one particular people, namely, the Hebrew people. It would be through the Jewish people that all the nations o f the earth would be blessed. This was God’s design from the beginning. 

So much of the Old Testament scriptures focuses in upon this one people — the Hebrew people —  that it would be east to assume that God had as his supreme goal the salvation  of this people. Really, Genesis 12 through to the end of  the Old Testament is about things that happened amongst the Hebrews. But do not forget God’s original design — to bless the Japhethites in and through the Shemites.  

You and I live in an amazing time, for the gospel of Jesus Christ has gone to the farthest corners of the earth. The Christ has come. He atoned for sin by his death and resurrection. And the good news off salvation in his name has been preached in Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria, and to the ends of the earth. But there are still some places where the gospel has never been preached. There are some peoples who have never heard. 

*****

The Sons of Ham

Screen Shot 2019-04-06 at 9.19.06 AM.png

Secondly, as we consider the Hamites, let it be recognized that impulse of fallen and sinful man has always been to build cities and kingdoms for themselves, and for their own glory.  

I have already mentioned the emphasis  that is placed upon that man named Nimrod in the line of Ham. It must be recognized that a theme continues to develop in the story of scripture. God called Adam to build a city for the glory of God. He was to expand the garden, tend and keep it, so that worship of God might be promoted in that place. The garden was a temple — a city and  kingdom devoted entirely to the worship and service of God. Adam sinned when he rebelled against his maker and sought establish his own kingdom — to decide for himself right and wrong, good and evil. 

All of human history can be viewed from this angle. There are those who belong to God who are concerned  to live for his glory and for the advancement of his kingdom on earth, and there are those who belong to the evil one who are concerned to promote their own glory (to make a name for themselves), and to advance the kingdoms of this world. 

Cain and his son Enoch were of the world. Cain built a city and named it after his son, Enoch. 

Lamech was a mighty king who perverted justice. 

In the days leading  up to the flood powerful and tyrannical kings ruled on earth. They “saw that the daughters of man were attractive. And they took as their wives any they chose” (Genesis 6:2, ESV).

The Nimrod in the line of Ham was another one who lived  for his own glory and sought to advance the kingdoms of this world independent of God. “The beginning of his kingdom was Babel, Erech, Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar. From that land he went into Assyria and built Nineveh, Rehoboth-Ir, Calah, and Resen between Nineveh and Calah; that is the great city” (Genesis 10:10–12, ESV).

This conflict between the kingdom of God and the kingdoms of the world will by displayed most famously in Genesis 11  in the story of the tower of  Bable, when the people of the earth said, “‘Come, let us build ourselves a city and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves, lest we be dispersed over the face of the whole earth.’ And the LORD came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of man had built” (Genesis 11:4–5, ESV).

Friends, there is nothing new under the sun. Even today there are those who live for their own glory and pleasure, and for the kingdoms of this world, and there are those who live for the glory and pleasure of God, and the advancement of his righteous kingdom. 

The line of Ham is characterized by the insatiable desire to establish kingdoms where man rules as supreme, independent of, and in constant rebellion against the God of heaven. 

*****

The Sons of Shem

Screen Shot 2019-04-06 at 9.20.33 AM.png

Thirdly, as we consider the Sethites, let it be recognized that God, by his grace, determined to set a people apart for himself as holy and, through them, to provide a savior. 

Remember the blessing pronounced upon Seth by Noah. Genesis 9:26: “He also said, ‘Blessed be the LORD, the God of Shem; and let Canaan be his servant.” (Genesis 9:26, ESV)

From Seth, Eber would be born. And from Eber, the Hebrews would descend. 

But notice that in this passage the line of Seth is traced through Eber and then through Yoktan (10:25), which does not lead Abram and the Hebrews.

In chapter 11 we will find that the line of Seth is again traced through Eber, but this time through Ebers son Peleg (11:16), and eventually to Terah, who was the father of Abram and the Hebrews.   

Seths line is put before us twice, therefore — first in chapter 10 and again in chapter 11. The first does not lead to God’s chosen people. The second genealogy does. This was also true of Adam’s genealogy. The line of Cain was traced from Adam in Genesis 4. And the genealogy of Adam was presented again in Genesis 5 — this time with attention given to righteous and chosen line of Seth. 

What is the meaning of all of this?  It shows that God, by his grace, was faithful to preserve a people for himself in the world as holy and, through them, to provide a savior. This is the story of scripture. This is a crucial aspect of the gospel of Jesus Christ. 

*****

Application  

From the line of Japheth 

God’s purpose has always been to save people from every tongue, tribe and nation. 

Let us pray for the salvation of the nations. 

Racism has no place in Christ’s church. 

From the line of Ham

Let us recognize and beware of the spirit of the world which is to build cities and kingdoms  for the glory and honor of man and not for the glory of God. 

Let us be sure that that spirit is not in us. 

Let us live for God’s glory — may he be our only Lord and king. 

And let us labor to promote his kingdom in the world around us. 

I wonder, what opportunities do you have to promote God’s kingdom?

From the line of Shem 

Let us marvel at the mercy and grace of God that he would call and  keep a people for himself so that he might provide salvation for the world through them? 

This  is your spiritual heritage if you are in Christ.  

Thanks be to God for his faithfulness to call and to preserve his people in every generation. 

Posted in Sermons, Study Guides, Joe Anady, Genesis 10, Posted by Joe. Comments Off on Sermon: Genesis 10: The Table Of Nations

Sermon: Genesis 2:24-25: Marriage, Divorce, And Remarriage: Divorce

Old Testament Reading: Genesis 2:24–25

“Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh. And the man and his wife were both naked and were not ashamed.” (Genesis 2:24–25, ESV)

New Testament Reading: Matthew 19:1-9

“Now when Jesus had finished these sayings, he went away from Galilee and entered the region of Judea beyond the Jordan. And large crowds followed him, and he healed them there. And Pharisees came up to him and tested him by asking, ‘Is it lawful to divorce one’s wife for any cause?’ He answered, ‘Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female, and said, ‘Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’? So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate.’ They said to him, ‘Why then did Moses command one to give a certificate of divorce and to send her away?’ He said to them, ‘Because of your hardness of heart Moses allowed you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning it was not so. And I say to you: whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery.” (Matthew 19:1–9, ESV)

*****

Introduction

Over the years I have preached many sermons. And there have been many times when after having preached a sermon I thought to myself, I could have preached that text or that topic much better than I did. I readily admit it, I have preached some poor sermons. But there was one sermon that I preached years ago that I wish I had never preached. That sermon was on the text of Matthew 19 and on the subject of divorce and remarriage. 

I actually dug up the outline to that sermon and found that it was dated August 22, 2010, about a year prior to the founding of Emmaus. In that sermon on Matthew 19 and on the topic of divorce and remarriage I presented something like what is called the “permanence view” of marriage. In essence the permanence view is that the one flesh union established by God in the marriage covenant is permanent, death being the only thing that can dissolve it. And so although divorce may be permitted under certain circumstances, remarriage never is, for the one flesh union remains intact until the death of one of the spouses. To divorce and remarry under any and all circumstances, therefore, is to commit adultery according to the permanence view. 

J. Carl Laney is a proponent of the permanence view. Listen to how he defines marriages in his book, “No Divorce and No Remarriage”. Marriage is “God’s act of joining a man and a woman in a permanent, covenanted, one-flesh relationship” (Laney, 20). In the same book he also says, “I believe Scripture teaches that marriage was designed by God to be permanent unto death, and that divorce and remarriage constitute the sin of adultery” (Laney, 16). John Piper is also a proponent of the permanence view of marriage. His view is that the “New Testament [prohibits]… all remarriage except in the case where a spouse has died” (Piper, Divorce and Remarriage: A Position Paper).

As I have said, I wish that I had never preached that sermon. Over the past eight years I have come to see that my knowlede of the subject was very limited and my study was rushed. If my memory is correct the one thing I did do in that sermon that brings me some comfort was to acknowledging that I was not sure of myself and could be wrong. I preached being open and honest about my uncertainty. Actually, I do not believe that a pastor should ever preach with uncertainty. If he is uncertain then it would be better for him to keep his mouth shut. But given that I failed to keep my mouth shut, I am at least glad that I was honest about my uncertainty. 

Emmaus was established in June of 2011. And as I started off in full time pastoral ministry I found that this topic of divorce and remarriage kept popping up. One situation after another would arise which had this issue of divorce and remarriage either at the center of it or in the background. Brothers and sisters, I do not like this subject, but I couldn’t get away from it. Those who know me best could tell you that over the years (and especially in the early years of Emmaus) I often had a book on the subject of divorce and remarriage out on my desk. I was constantly being driven back to this topic by the situations I was encountering as a pastor. 

Thankfully, I began to have strong doubts concerning the permanence view of marriage early on in Emmaus’ history. But it did take me some time to fully shed that view and to develop firm convictions of my own concerning this difficult subject. I have been settled in my view for a few years now. I’ve had discussions with some of you about my view on the subject. The elders of Emmaus have also considered the issue and are of the same mind. And now the time has come for me to publicly repent of the erroneous views that I presented back in 2010 and to present teaching on this subject that is faithful to scripture. 

Brothers and sisters, please forgive me for my careless handling of scriptures back in 2010 on this subject of divorce and remarriage. I know that it has caused some unnecessary angst for some of you, and I do seek your forgiveness.

The teaching that I present today and on the next Lord’s Day is the result of years of thought and study on this subject. I am happy to no longer feel uncertain about the teaching of scripture, but that does not mean that I no longer find the issue of divorce and remarriage very challenging. Understanding what the scriptures say on the subject is one thing. Applying the truth of scripture to the often complicated circumstances that arise within the lives of God’s people is another thing all together. This subject is a difficult one for pastors, and it always will be. We should proceed with great caution and with humility.  

Todays sermon is on the subject of divorce. The sermon next Sunday will be on the subject of remarriage. These two sermons really need to be considered together. 

I should also say that the elders have read Jim Newheiser’s book “Marriage, Divorce, and Remarriage” and agree with his handling of this very difficult subject. I will only be able to say so much in these two sermons. If you have questions about divorce and remarriage that are not addressed in these two sermons I would urge you schedule a meeting with me and/or to grab a copy of Newheiser’s book. He does address a number of difficult questions, and he does so in a clear and concise manner. 

So what does the Bible say about divorce? 

*****

I. God’s Design For Marriage Is That It Last For Life

First of all, it must be stated that God’s design for marriage is that it last for life. There is a sense, therefore, in which me might say that God’s will for us is that we never divorce. 

This point has already been established in this sermon series, but it needs to be restated here. Remember that we have defined marriage as “a lifelong covenant of companionship between a man and a woman that has been established under God and before the community.”

Understanding this basic principle – that God’s design for marriage is that it last for life – will help us to understand much of what the scriptures have to say on the subject of divorce and remarriage. 

As a general rule, marriage is to last for life. As a general rule, it is “till death do us part”. This does not mean that there are no exceptions to this general rule (we will look at those exceptions momentarily), but the general rule must be established before the exceptions can be stated and understood. And so the scriptures time and time again establish the general rule that marriages are to last for life. 

Remember the words of Christ in Matthew 19. When answering the question of the Pharisees, “Is it lawful to divorce one’s wife for any cause? He answered, ‘Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female, and said, ‘Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’? So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate.” (Matthew 19:4–6, ESV)

What is God’s ideal for marriage? That it last for life. 

And take for example that famous text in Malachi 2:16 where we are told most bluntly that the “LORD God of Israel says that He hates divorce…” (Malachi 2:16, NKJV). Is it true that God hates divorce? Well, yes it is true, for the scriptures clearly say that he does. But we must pay careful attention to the context lest we misunderstand what is being said here. 

In Malachi 2:13 we read,  “And this is the second thing you do: You cover the altar of the LORD with tears, With weeping and crying; So He does not regard the offering anymore, Nor receive it with goodwill from your hands. Yet you say, ‘For what reason?’ Because the LORD has been witness Between you and the wife of your youth, With whom you have dealt treacherously; Yet she is your companion And your wife by covenant. But did He not make them one, Having a remnant of the Spirit? And why one? He seeks godly offspring. Therefore take heed to your spirit, And let none deal treacherously with the wife of his youth. For the LORD God of Israel says That He hates divorce, For it covers one’s garment with violence, Says the LORD of hosts. Therefore take heed to your spirit, That you do not deal treacherously.” (Malachi 2:13–16, NKJV)

Why does God hate divorce? Because it is a violation of his design for marriage – marriage being a life long covenant of companionship. Whenever there is divorce someone has violated the marriage covenant, either by committing the sin of adultery, or by divorcing without just cause. This is thing that God “hates”. This was the thing being addressed by Malachi the prophet – men were putting away their wives for no good reason. They were dealing “treacherously” with their wives, and as a result the alter of the LORD was being covered with tears – the tears of the wives and children presumably. 

There are many passages in the holy scriptures which speak strongly against divorce and forcefully in favor of marriage lasting for life. Why? Because this is the ideal. This is God’s revealed will. 

*****

II. Under Some Circumstances Divorce Is Permitted

Secondly, we must recognize that under some circumstances divorce is permitted.

This point should be considered in two parts. One, divorce as it was permitted for those under the Old Covenant. And two, divorce as it is permitted for those under the New Covenant. 

First of all let us consider that divorce was permitted under the Old Covenant. In other words the people of Israel were permitted to divorce. The law of God given to them through Moses permitted divorce, and also regulated it.

It would be good for you to turn with me to Deuteronomy 24. There we read in verse 1, “When a man takes a wife and marries her, if then she finds no favor in his eyes because he has found some indecency in her, and he writes her a certificate of divorce and puts it in her hand and sends her out of his house, and she departs out of his house, and if she goes and becomes another man’s wife, and the latter man hates her and writes her a certificate of divorce and puts it in her hand and sends her out of his house, or if the latter man dies, who took her to be his wife, then her former husband, who sent her away, may not take her again to be his wife, after she has been defiled, for that is an abomination before the LORD. And you shall not bring sin upon the land that the LORD your God is giving you for an inheritance.” (Deuteronomy 24:1–4, ESV)

A few things should be noticed about this passage. One, divorce was by no means commanded or encouraged under Moses. Two, divorce (and remarriage) was permitted under Moses. And three, divorce (and remarriage) was regulated under Moses. In fact that is what this Deuteronomy passage is most about – the regulation of the existing practice of divorce. If a man was going to divorce his wife, or a wife her husband, a certificate of divorce would need to be given. What would the purpose of that certificate be except to show that the marriage had in fact been dissolved, that the man or woman was not longer obligated to fulfill martial duties, and that the divorced person was free to remarry. And what is expressly forbidden in this passage? Notice that the law of Moses did not forbid divorce (or even remarriage after divorce), but a woman returning to her first husband after the divorce once she had married another. That is thing forbidden under Moses – a divorce, and new marriage, and then a returning back to the first spouse if the second marriage ended in either divorce or in the death of the second spouse. What we see here in Deuteronomy 24 is the regulation of the practice of divorce.

We know that in the days of Jesus there were questions about valid grounds for divorce. There were some who held the position that a man was free to divorce his wife for just about any reason, and there were others who believed that valid reasons for divorce were much more limited in number. It was that debate concerning valid grounds for divorce that gave the Pharisees of Matthew 19 the opportunity to put Jesus to the test by asking “is it lawful to divorce one’s wife for any cause? (Matthew 19:3, ESV)”. The Jews in Jesus’ day debated over the law on this point. They wondered, how are we to understand Deuteronomy 24 and the words, “When a man takes a wife and marries her, if then she finds no favor in his eyes because he has found some indecency in her, and he writes her a certificate of divorce… etc., etc.”(Deuteronomy 24:1, ESV). The Jews in Jesus’ day debated over what Moses meant when he said, “if then she finds no favor in his eyes”, and “because he has found some indecency in her.” What does that include? Can a man divorce his wife because she is a bad cook, for example? Or does the offence need to be more severe? What are the valid grounds for divorce according to the law? That was the question they debated over, and that was the question that they put to Jesus. Jesus, what is your understanding of the law of Moses on this point? They hoped to trip him up and entangle him in this messy debate. 

Jesus’ answer surprised the Pharisees. 

First of all, He refused to approach Deuteronomy 24 as if it answered their questions regarding divorce but went instead to Genesis 2:24-25. In other words the Pharisees were focused on Deuteronomy 24 thinking that that passage answered the question of valid grounds, but Jesus took them to another text – one that was earlier and more foundational. Jesus replied to the Pharisees saying, “Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female, and said, ‘Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’? So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate” (Matthew 19:4–6, ESV). Jesus presented God’s ideal for marriage established at creation by quoting Genesis 2:24-25. Jesus, when is it appropriate for a man to divorce his wife?, the Pharisees asked. And what was Jesus’ answer? God’s ideal is that they remain together forever. 

The Pharisees pressed him further saying,  “Why then did Moses command one to give a certificate of divorce and to send her away?” (Matthew 19:7, ESV). Clearly these man had Deuteronomy 24 in view. Their question is reasonable. It is as if they said, if it is true that marriage is to last for life then how are were to understand the words of Moses in Deuteronomy 24 which speak of divorce but do not forbid it outright? 

Jesus’ answer: “Because of your hardness of heart Moses allowed you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning it was not so” (Matthew 19:8, ESV). 

This is a very important verse in helping us to understand divorce as it was under the Old Mosaic Covenant. Jesus’ interpretation of the law was that marriage was to last for life, that divorce was permitted (or tolerated) under Moses due to the hardness of the people’s hearts, and that it was regulated by Moses. In other words, the Pharisees were laboring to understand the grounds for divorce from Deuteronomy 24 and Jesus essentially said, you will not find them there. Deuteronomy 24 has to do with the regulation of the practice of divorce which was tolerated under Moses due to the hardness of the people’s hearts, but God’s ideal is that marriage last for life.  “What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate” 

It should be remembered, brothers and sisters, that Old Covenant Israel was a mixed people. There were many – indeed, very many – within Israel who did not know the Lord. They were of Israel externally, but not inwardly. They were circumcised according to the flesh, but not of the heart. The law of Moses which was used to govern this mixed multitude included laws which regulated the practice of divorce, but did not forbid it altogether. This was due to the hardness of their hearts. Divorce was tolerated under the Old Covenant, but even then the ideal for the marriage relationship was that it be permanent.

One last thing that needs to be said before we move on to consider divorce under the New Covenant. We should not forget that under the Old Covenant the penalty for the sin of adultery was death.  The adulterer and the adulteress were to be put to death under Moses. Leviticus 20:10 says, “If a man commits adultery with the wife of his neighbor, both the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death” (Leviticus 20:10, ESV). The sin of adultery is such a violation of God’s moral law and such a violation of the marriage covenant that under Moses the adulterer and the adulteress were to be put death. I was tempted here to go off on a tangent concerning the law of Moses and how we are to understand it now that we are under the New Covenant and in Christ, but that will have to wait for another time. For now, let this fact stand – under Moses the sin of adultery was to be punished by death.

Under the New Covenant two things happen that have a direct impact on this subject of divorce and remarriage.

First of all, with the transition from the Old Covenant to the New we find that civil laws that governed Israel no longer govern God’s people. To put it differently, under the Old Covenant church and state were united as one, but under the New Covenant church and state are distinct. No longer does God have a particular nation that is his own, but is calling his elect from all the peoples of the earth. His kingdom is expanding to the ends of the earth through the proclamation of the gospel. This is not accomplished through military conquest, but by the word and Spirit. The expansion of Christ’s kingdom has nothing to do with boarders, but souls rescued from the kingdom of darkness and transferred into the kingdom of light. And under the New Covenant God’s people (the church) do not wield the sword – the state does. It is not the churches job to enforce civil law. It is not the churches job to try criminals and to punish. The state has the responsibility to do so, but not the church. Under the New Covenant God’s kingdom is not of this world. The weapons of his kingdom are not sword and spear, but word and Spirit. 

How does all of this apply to the subject of divorce (and remarriage)? Well, it is very important to recognize that the sin of adultery, which under the Old Covenant was punishable by death, is no longer punishable by death under the New. 

Let me put the matter this way. If under the Old Covenant the subject of divorce (and remarriage) was being discussed the question of the sin of adultery being a valid grounds for divorce and remarriage would not have arisen, for the penalty for adultery was death. But under the New Covenant this question does arise, for the New Covenant people of God are not governed by the civil laws of Old Covenant Israel. The Israel of God (the church) under the New Covenant is governed by the civil laws of the nations where God has placed them providentially. You have probably noticed that the civil laws under which we live do not have death as the penalty for adultery. In fact, in most States there is no penalty at all for the sin of adultery (I believe it is true that there are 20 States in our Union in which adultery is still a crime, but it is very rare for there to be any prosecutions). 

So under the New Covenant this question must be addressed. Is the sin of adultery a valid ground for divorce for the Christian? And the answer is yes.

Jesus says so most directly in the Matthew 19 passage that we have been considering. Verse 9: “And I say to you: whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery” (Matthew 19:9, ESV).

Ordinarily, marriage is to last for life. To divorce and remarry is to commit adultery. The one exception given by Christ is in the case of the sin of adultery, or sexual immorality, committed by ones spouse. The sin of adultery so violates the marriage covenant that divorce (and as we will see, remarriage) is permitted. 

There is one other situation in which a Christian is free to divorce (and as we will see, remarry), and that is in the case of abandonment by a non-believing spouse.

Listen to Paul’s words in 1 Corinthians 7 and starting in verse 8: “To the unmarried and the widows I say that it is good for them to remain single, as I am. But if they cannot exercise self-control, they should marry. For it is better to marry than to burn with passion. To the married I give this charge (not I, but the Lord [this means that this is something that Christ addressed in his ministry]): the wife should not separate from her husband (but if she does, she should remain unmarried or else be reconciled to her husband), and the husband should not divorce his wife [this is the general rule – divorce is not an option for the believer, with the one stated exception being the sin of adultery]. To the rest I say (I, not the Lord [in other words, Jesus did not address this directly, but Paul is addressing it here) that if any brother has a wife who is an unbeliever, and she consents to live with him, he should not divorce her. If any woman has a husband who is an unbeliever, and he consents to live with her, she should not divorce him. For the unbelieving husband is made holy because of his wife, and the unbelieving wife is made holy because of her husband. Otherwise your children would be unclean, but as it is, they are holy. But if the unbelieving partner separates, let it be so. In such cases the brother or sister is not enslaved. God has called you to peace. For how do you know, wife, whether you will save your husband? Or how do you know, husband, whether you will save your wife?” (1 Corinthians 7:8–16, ESV)

Paul’s teaching agrees with Jesus’, as you would expect it to. But Paul is here applying the teaching of Christ to the difficult circumstances that arrise within the church. What does he add? Ordinarily, marriage is for life. If a believing husband and wife do separate they should not remarry but work towards reconciliation. And if a Christian is abandoned by his or her unbelieving spouse, “let it be so. In such cases the brother or sister is not enslaved.” I take this to mean that the brother our sister does not sin by going through with the divorce. It probably also means that the abandoned Christian is also free to remarry, though I would urge the Christian to proceed with caution here. It is likely that the non-believer who has abandoned the Christian will remarry. By remarrying he or she will commit adultery, leaving the abandoned spouse free to remarry, with no doubt.  

*****

Conclusion 

Brothers and sisters, this is such a complicated subject. I’ll admit that it is difficult to understand the teaching of scripture concerning divorce and remarriage. I struggled to understand it, as I said. But this subject is made exceedingly complicated by the difficult situations that people (even Christians) get themselves into because of their sin. In this sermon I have only presented the basic teaching of scripture concerning divorce. I understand that I have left many questions unanswered. You can probably think of dozens of hypothetical situations and ask, “what if…?” Please bring those questions to me so that we can work through them together. 

Let me close by making a few points of application. 

First of all, it must be said that although divorce without Biblical grounds is a sin, it is not an unforgivable sin. To the one who has sinfully divorced in the past I would say, acknowledge your sin, turn from it, do everything in your power to undo the dammage that has been done (which might involve reconciling with your previous spouse provided that neither of you have remarried)  and look to Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. Christ is able to cleanse you and to restore you. Run to him. 

Secondly (and this point is going to sound very strange to you at first), it must me recognized that divorce is, under some circumstances, and in a certain sense, good. True, God hates divorce. True, divorce is always the result of some sin. True, divorce will always be accompanied by a great deal of sorrow. But with that said, there is a sense in which it is good. It is good in that it protects the innocent spose from being joined for life to a spouse that is unfaithful.   Here is that way that Jay Adams put it: “Even though all divorces are the result of sin, not all divorces are sinful” (Adams, Marriage, Divorce and Remarriage in the Bible, 30). To put it more directly, if you have divorced with Biblical grounds – due to adultery or abandonment – you need not feel the least bit guilty about that. You will likely feel grief and sorrow over the divorce, but you need not feel guilt.   

Thirdly, it should be recognized that although divorce is permitted the case of adultery it is not required. A husband or wife who has been sinned against in this way may choose to remain in the marriage. Of course this would require repentance from the adulterer. This would require forgiveness from the one sinned against. And this would require a great deal of effort as the husband and wife would need to work to restore the marriage and to rebuild trust. Though this road may be difficult, it is not impossible, especially with Christ at work within the midst of it. 

Consider this. A Christian must forgive those who have sinned against them from the heart even if there is no repentance. If there is repentance, that forgiveness must be transacted – forgiveness must be extended. Extending forgiveness does not mean that everything goes back to how it used to be. In other words, a Christian is not obligated to take his or her adulterous spouse back just because they say the words “I’m sorry, please forgive me” – adultery is a valid grounds for divorce. But if the repentance is true the Christian spouse does have an opportunity to extend a grace to the one who has sinned and to keep the marriage in tact. In my opinion, this would be a very beautiful reflection of the love of Christ for his church. We have been so terribly unfaithful to our God, and yet takes us back time and time again in Christ Jesus. 

I will say one more thing about keeping a marriage intact after the sin of adultery. If a husband or wife chooses that rout (to continue on with the marriage despite the sin of unfaithfulness), then the threat of divorce needs to be set aside after that decision is made. Do you have grounds for divorce if your spouse has been unfaithful? Yes you do. Must you divorce? No, you may remain in the marriage if your spouse is repentant. But if you choose to stay married the sin of adultery needs to be forgiven and not held against your spouse any longer. In other words, at some point (and I’m not sure how long this will take) the one has been sinned against needs to say, “I forgive you, I’m staying, I no longer have grounds for divorce. Till death do us part.” It should not be difficult to understand why this would be important.  

Fourthly, if you are a Christian and a member of a church that takes the responsibility of exercising biblical church discipline seriously (every Christian should be), the church must be involved in the process of determining whether divorce is permissible. I feel for the Christian who attends a church without membership and without discipline when deep troubles within the marriage arise leading to divorce. Marriage is instituted publicly and before witness. The decision to divorce should also involve witnesses. If a Christian man or woman has committed adultery the church must be involved. If a Christian man or woman abandons his or her spouse the church must be involved. If a Christian is considering or going through a divorce the church must be involved to either oppose or support the decision.  

Fifthly, let us do everything in our power to protect our marriages, brothers and sisters. 

  

Posted in Sermons, Joe Anady, Genesis 2:24-25; Matthew 19:1-9, Posted by Joe. Comments Off on Sermon: Genesis 2:24-25: Marriage, Divorce, And Remarriage: Divorce

Sermon: Genesis 2.24-25: Marriage, Divorce, And Remarriage: Communication

Old Testament Reading: Genesis 2:24–25

“Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh. And the man and his wife were both naked and were not ashamed.” (Genesis 2:24–25, ESV)

New Testament Reading: James 3:1–4:3

“Not many of you should become teachers, my brothers, for you know that we who teach will be judged with greater strictness. For we all stumble in many ways. And if anyone does not stumble in what he says, he is a perfect man, able also to bridle his whole body. If we put bits into the mouths of horses so that they obey us, we guide their whole bodies as well. Look at the ships also: though they are so large and are driven by strong winds, they are guided by a very small rudder wherever the will of the pilot directs. So also the tongue is a small member, yet it boasts of great things. How great a forest is set ablaze by such a small fire! And the tongue is a fire, a world of unrighteousness. The tongue is set among our members, staining the whole body, setting on fire the entire course of life, and set on fire by hell. For every kind of beast and bird, of reptile and sea creature, can be tamed and has been tamed by mankind, but no human being can tame the tongue. It is a restless evil, full of deadly poison. With it we bless our Lord and Father, and with it we curse people who are made in the likeness of God. From the same mouth come blessing and cursing. My brothers, these things ought not to be so. Does a spring pour forth from the same opening both fresh and salt water? Can a fig tree, my brothers, bear olives, or a grapevine produce figs? Neither can a salt pond yield fresh water. Who is wise and understanding among you? By his good conduct let him show his works in the meekness of wisdom. But if you have bitter jealousy and selfish ambition in your hearts, do not boast and be false to the truth. This is not the wisdom that comes down from above, but is earthly, unspiritual, demonic. For where jealousy and selfish ambition exist, there will be disorder and every vile practice. But the wisdom from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, open to reason, full of mercy and good fruits, impartial and sincere. And a harvest of righteousness is sown in peace by those who make peace. What causes quarrels and what causes fights among you? Is it not this, that your passions are at war within you? You desire and do not have, so you murder. You covet and cannot obtain, so you fight and quarrel. You do not have, because you do not ask. You ask and do not receive, because you ask wrongly, to spend it on your passions.” (James 3:1–4:3, ESV)

*****

Introduction

This is now the seventh sermon in this series within a series on the subject of marriage, divorce and remarriage. So far we have only addressed the subject of marriage, and the same will be true of the sermon today. Teaching concerning the difficult but important subject of divorce and remarriage will be presented in the weeks to come, Lord willing. Today we are once again asking the question, how can we build marriage relationships that are healthy and God honoring?

My original intention for this sermon was to address common problems that arise within marriages. Couples often struggle to show love, to resolve conflicts, and to develop physical and emotional intimacy. It is common for conflicts to arise over issues such as parenting, time management, and finances. Indeed, if we were to make a list of the problems prevalent within marriages the list would be quite long. But instead of saying a little about a lot of common problems I have decided to say a lot about one issue in particular, and that is the issue of communication.

I have three reasons for focusing in upon the issue of communication.

One, in my experience this is the thing that couples struggle with the most in marriage. Husbands and wives often struggle to communicate. Their communication may be either nonexistent, superficial, or hostile.

Two, if my reasoning is sound, improving communication will also bring improvements to the other issues that husbands and wives face. I think you would agree that husbands and wives can work through many things, even very difficult things, if they only had the ability to speak the truth to one another in love.

Three, communication is the lifeblood of every relationship. The health of your relationship is directly tied to the health of your communication.

You cannot say that you have a relationship with someone if you have never spoken with them. If someone asks you, “do you know so and so…” you cannot answer in the affirmative unless you have at some point and in some way communicated with that person. If you have never communicated with them you may say, “I know of her”, but you can say I “know her…” But if there was communication in the past, even if it was only a brief exchange, then you may say, “I know her”. Communication is the thing that establishes a relationship. You pass by people every day. You make eye contact with some of them. But you do not have a relationship with any of them, unless you talk. And the more frequent and substantial the communication, the deeper the relationship. You may rightly say that you know a person that you met only once years ago, but you cannot say that you know them well. How do you come to know someone well? It is by frequent and substantial communication. This is true of your relationship with God. A person’s relationship with God may be called “strong” when that person knows God’s word, walks according to it, and lives in constant and prayerful dependence upon him. It is also true of our relationships with one another, and especially husbands and wives. The health a marriage relationship is directly tied to the health of the couples communication. Communication is the lifeblood of every relationship.

I have five points to make that I hope will help us to improve in our communication with one another, particularly within the marriage relationship.

*****

I. Husbands and Wives Must Resolve to Communicate Well with One Another

First of all, husbands and wives must resolve to communicate well with one another. 

A couple of things are implied in this point. 

First of all, it is implied that good communication requires effort.

Why is it so difficult for us to communicate well? Why does good communication require so much effort? The answer is that we are fallen. Communication is difficult for us because of the sins, weakness and immaturities that are in our hearts.  

Stringing together a series of words in a coherent fashion is not difficult for most people. This we learned to do at a very young age. Communication becomes difficult when there is some sin or weakness in the heart of the one speaking or in the heart of the one listening. 

Things like pride and fear make good communication difficult. A judgemental or harsh spirit is a hindrance to good communication. The same may be said of the one who is defensiveness  or overly sensitive. These sins and weakness are barriers to healthy communication.

It seems to me that this point is illustrated in the narrative of Genesis chapters 2 and 3. We have read this text many times now, and so it should be familiar to you. In that passage where the institution of marriage is first mentioned we read, “Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh. And the man and his wife were both naked and were not ashamed” (Genesis 2:24–25, ESV). Adam and Eve were created to enjoy intimacy in the marriage relationship. They were joined together by God in a covenant of companionship. And we know that they did in fact enjoy this intimacy – that they were in fact close companions – for we are told that “the man and his wife were both naked and were not ashamed.” 

What is meant by this? Well, first of all it simply means that they were physically naked and felt no shame about that. But the narrative of Genesis 3 will make it clear that their physical nakedness and lack of shame corresponded to their spiritual, emotional and relational nakedness and lack of shame. Adam and Eve stood before one another completely naked and exposed in every way as husband and wife, and they felt no shame. They knew one another truly and thoroughly. They did not hide anything from one another for there was nothing to hide. Before sin entered into the world there was no shame. This was true for Adam and Eve in regard to their relationship before God, and this was true of to their relationship with one another. 

But as we will see all of this changed when the couple fell into sin. In Genesis 3:7 we read, “Then [that is, after the ate of the forbidden fruit] the eyes of both were opened, and they knew that they were naked. And they sewed fig leaves together and made themselves loincloths” (Genesis 3:7, ESV). The couple then hid from God. And what happened to the blissfulness of their one flesh union? Their perfect and shameless companionship was corrupted and marred by conflict. 

God confronted Adam concerning his sin, and what did Adam say? He shifted the blame, saying, “The woman whom you gave to be with me, she gave me fruit of the tree, and I ate” (Genesis 3:12, ESV). And do you remember the curse pronounced upon the woman? “To the woman [God] said, ‘I will greatly increase your labor pains; with pain you will give birth to children. You will want to control your husband, but he will dominate you’” (Genesis 3:16, NET).

What am I saying? Well, simply this: do not be surprised that good communication will require effort this side of the fall and this side of the new heavens and new earth. I trust that you are able to string words together in a coherent fashion – that is not the problem. The problem is the sin that resides within our hearts. We can harsh, judgmental, defensive, uncaring, disengaged in our communication, and this is due to our sin.  

The secondly thing implied by this first point, husbands and wives must resolve to communicate well with one another, is that many are in fact complacent in the their poor communication.

You and I have developed communication habits, I’m sure of it. And I am also confident that some of those habits are bad habits. Some have the habit of not really listening. Others have the habit of speaking harshly. And others have the habit of shutting down when the conversation goes in a direction they are not pleased with. I could go on and on with a list of bad communication habits.

At some point we simply have to decide that we are going to make good and Godly communication   a priority. At some point we must say, God and Christ are Lord, not only over that which I think and do, but also over my speaking and even my listening. Tell me, friend, do you speak to the glory of God? And do you listen to others to the glory of his name?

I will not develop this thought too much for the sake of time, but I am convinced that one of the ways that we can glorify God the most is through our communication. God is a communicating God. One of the things that it means for us to be made in his image is that we are able to communicate with him. And one of the things that it means for us to be a part of the human species is that we are able to communicate with one another. Eve was made to correspond to Adam. The two could, among other things, communicate with one another and together they could commune with God. Marriage was instituted to serve as a picture of God’s covenantal relationship to his people. Marriage is in fact an analogy of Christ’s relationship to the church. If the relationship between husband and wife is to function as a picture of the relationship between God and his people, then we had better pursue intimacy in our communication, for God has communicated to us through his Son and has reconciled us to himself through our union with him. Let us resolve to glorify God, not only in our thoughts and actions, but also in our communication. Let us speak and listen in a way that gives glory to God. 

*****

II. Husbands and Wives Must Communicate in Love

This brings us to the second point in this sermon which is, husbands and wives must communicate in love.

Let us communicate being driven by our love for God and our love for one another.

I would assume that many when they hear the exhortation to speak the truth in love, they assume it means to speak in a gentle and loving tone. And while it is true that our tone should usually be gentle and loving, I can actually think of instances where it is good and right and, dare I say, most loving to speak in a firm and confrontational tone. Did not our Savior do this? Did not the prophets do this? Did Christ and the prophets sin when they spoke firmly with the rebellious of their day? No! For though their tone might have been harsh, their words were spoken in love. They said what they said in the way that they said it out of a true love for God and out of a true love for their neighbor. Now, I would imagine that it would be on very rare occasions that a husbands and wives would need to be so firm and dirrectr with one another. But the point I am making is this: to “communicate in love” is to communicate being driven and governed by a sincere love for God and a sincere love for the one you are communicating with.

What is motivating your communication? When you listen and speak to your spouse or children (or anyone for that matter), what is driving you? What principle is governing you?

Two things should be driving and governing all of our communication. First of all, love for God. And secondly, love for one another.

I will ask the question again, are you seeking the glory and honor of God in your listening and in your speaking? Are you mindful of this question as you communicate with others: is God pleased with the way that I am listening and speaking?

And secondly, are you seeking the good of your neighbor (your spouse) in your communication? Is your communication with others driven and governed by love?

I am convinced that most of our failures in communication can be traced back to a failure to love the one we are communicating with. Instead of loving and serving the other with our ears and mouth, we love and serve ourselves.

There have been times where as a father I have spoken too harshly to my children. I’ve grown impatient with them and have barked at them. And when I have analyzed those instances of sinful communication I have often come to the conclusion that I was simply being lazy as a father. Instead of being driven by my love for God and love for my children I was driven by love for self. Instead of asking the question, what do my children truly need right now? I asked the question (though I didn’t realize it at the time), what will be easiest for me? What did my children really need? What would have been most beneficial them? They probably needed their father to intervene in the situation (whatever it was) in a calm manner. They needed their father to listen so as to truly understand the situation (whatever it was). And they probably needed their father to offer advice and maybe even discipline so that the problem might be truly resolved and so that the sin (whatever it was) might truly be addressed and repented of. That is what my children really needed. But that would have required a lot of time and effort, and I was tired, and so I carelessly communicated. Instead of listening and seeking to understand before speaking (maybe even firmly), I just yelled at them. Instead of being driven and governed by a true love for God and a true love for my children, I was driven by love for self.

And what can I say about arguments that I have had with my wife? The same principle applies. If my communication with her was always driven and governed by my love for God and my love for her then I dont think we would ever fight. We might have differences of opinion, but those differences of opinion would never turn into arguments or fights if we were being driven and governed by love as we communicate with one another.

I don’t think Lindsay and I are unique in this. There have been times where after having an argument we look back upon the argument and have a hard time remembering what the argument was about. Maybe it was a difference of opinion about money or what color to paint the walls or where to go for dinner, but the argument became an argument, not because of money or paint or a restaurant, but because of a failure to love. At some point someone started to be selfish. Someone started to be driven by pride. Someone decided that they would have to have it their way. And that is what caused the fight, not the difference of opinion.

James 4:1 poses the question, “What causes quarrels and what causes fights among you?” Listen carefully to the answer that James gives. “Is it not this, that your passions are at war within you? You desire and do not have, so you murder. You covet and cannot obtain, so you fight and quarrel. You do not have, because you do not ask. You ask and do not receive, because you ask wrongly, to spend it on your passions.” (James 4:1–3, ESV) It is selfishness or the sin of covetousness in the heart which causes quarrels and fights.

Brothers and sisters, our communication with one another must flow, not from selfish hearts, but from selfless and loving hearts. We should look into the eyes of the one we are communicating with and think, I am going to interact with this one in a way that is pleasing to God and in a way that will be for their good

Ephesians 4:15 says, “Rather, speaking the truth in love, we are to grow up in every way into him who is the head, into Christ, from whom the whole body, joined and held together by every joint with which it is equipped, when each part is working properly, makes the body grow so that it builds itself up in love” (Ephesians 4:15–16, ESV). This should be our goal in communication – to build one another up.

Spouses have been exhorted in this sermon series to love one another, that is, to live for the good of the other. What I am proposing to you now is that the greatest opportunity we have to love one another is through our communication. We love one another when we listen and seek to truly understand one another. Brothers and sisters, there is so much power in our words. Our words have the power to either build up or tear down. Husbands and wives must communicate in love.

*****

III. Husbands and Wives Must Learn to Listen Well

Thirdly, husbands and wives must learn to listen well.

When I say “communication” I would imagine the very first thing that comes to mind is talking. But really the beginning of good communication involves listening. And by listening I do not mean allowing the other person to make noise with their mouth so that your ear drums vibrate, but actually laboring to understand the other persons point of view before responding. Your first objective in communication should be to hear the other person so as to understand them. Most of our bad communication begins with poor listening.

This is why James says, “let every person be quick to hear, slow to speak, slow to anger…” (James 1:19, ESV). What is the thing that we should do first when communicating? We should listen! This is the thing that we should be eager to do – listen. We should labor to truly understand the perspective of the other person. And what is the thing that we should be willing to delay? Our speaking.

Proverbs 18:12 says, “If one gives an answer before he hears, it is his folly and shame.”

Proverbs 29:20 says, “Do you see a man who is hasty in his words? There is more hope for a fool than for him.”

If we hope to have good communication we must learn listen well.

Here are a few things that you can do to become a good listener.

The first step is to actually want to understand the other persons perspective. Often times we do not make it past this step, but have winning the argument as a highest goal.

Secondly, be sure that you are giving full attention to the one who is speaking to you.

Thirdly, during especially important or sensitive conversations repeat back to the person what it is that you heard them say. You may say something like, “if I undestand you correctly this is what you are saying…”

Fourthly, it is also helpful to ask clarifying questions, saying, “is this what you meant when you said such and such?” We should be ever aware of the fact that we are prone to misunderstand what others are saying. Sometimes we take what they are saying in a way different from how they intended it. Sometimes we read in to what they are saying. Sometimes are defensive and overly sensitive. If our goal is to truly understand the other person then we will take the time to ask clarifying questions.

As I said before, the trouble is that our goal is often not to hear so as to understand the other, but to get our own way. Instead of listening carefully, repeating what we have heard and asking clarifying questions, we pick apart the words of the other, capitalize on every misstep and assume the worst so that we might have ammunition to use against the other to win the argument.

Brothers and sisters, “do nothing from selfish ambition or conceit, but in humility count others more significant than yourselves. Let each of you look not only to his own interests, but also to the interests of others…” (Philippians 2:3–5, ESV)

Let us love one another by truly listening to one another.

*****

IV. Husbands and Wives Must Learn to Speak Well 

Fourthly, husbands and wives must learn to speak well.

Husbands and wives would be wise to say the right thing to one another at the right time and in the right way.

Husbands and wives should always say the right thing. We should always speak the truth to one another. Never should we lie. And sometimes husbands and wives will need to say difficult things to one another. If there is some weakness or sin that you see in your spouse, it should not be ignored.

Some, I have found, are prone to avoid difficult conversations at all costs. This mighty seem easier in the short term, but things will be more difficult in the long run.

Others are hasty and careless in their confrontation. They see a problem and address it immediately and often in a harsh manner.

We should be truthful with one another, but timing and tone matters.

Husband, if there is something you need to address with your wife be careful when you choose to do it. Do not address it when the two of you are tired, or in the middle of and already heated argument, or when the kids are around.

Wives, if there is something you need to address with your husband be careful when you choose to do it. Perhaps not the moment he walks in the door from a long and stressful day work.

Tone also matters. Confrontation does not have to involve conflict. We should be able to speak calmly to one another about difficult matters. We should be aware of our tone and also our body language when we communicate.

The goal should be to say what needs to be said at a time and in a way that gives the others person the greatest opportunity to listen well to what is being said.

Brothers and sisters, say the right thing, at the right time, in the right way.

Colossians 4:6: “Let your speech always be gracious, seasoned with salt, so that you may know how you ought to answer each person”.

Proverbs 15:4: “A gentle tongue is a tree of life, but perverseness in it breaks the spirit”.

Proverbs 15:23: “To make an apt answer is a joy to a man, and a word in season, how good it is!”

I understand that some people (men in particular) struggle with communication in that they do not talk enough. Men, we need to talk. And we should be willing to talk with our wives about things that are deep and substantial.

But many more struggle with communication because their words are too numerous. Proverbs 10:19 says, “When words are many, transgression is not lacking, but whoever restrains his lips is prudent.”

Brothers and sisters, “let no corrupting talk come out of your mouths, but only such as is good for building up, as fits the occasion, that it may give grace to those who hear” (Ephesians 4:29, ESV).

*****

V. Husbands and Wives Must Communicate with Hearts Prepared and Pure

Fifthly, and lastly, husbands and wives must communicate with hearts prepared and pure.

It is so very important for you to understand this principle: the words that come out of your mouth come from your heart.

Listen to the words of Christ beginning in Luke 6:43: “For no good tree bears bad fruit, nor again does a bad tree bear good fruit, for each tree is known by its own fruit. For figs are not gathered from thornbushes, nor are grapes picked from a bramble bush. The good person out of the good treasure of his heart produces good, and the evil person out of his evil treasure produces evil, for out of the abundance of the heart his mouth speaks” (Luke 6:43–45, ESV).

Are you struggling to controle your words? Then check your heart!

The same principle is communicated in the James 3 passage that was read at the beginning of this sermon.

James draws attention to the power that it is in the tongue. Though a very small part of our body, the tongue has great power. Like a bit that controls the direction of a powerful horse, like the the small rudder which steers a great ship, and like a small spark which sets a forrest ablaze, so the tongue, though very small has the power to do great harm or great good. The way we use our tongue in many ways determines the course of our life.

James also points out that tongue is the hardest thing of all to control. He says, “Not many of you should become teachers, my brothers, for you know that we who teach will be judged with greater strictness. For we all stumble in many ways. And if anyone does not stumble in what he says, he is a perfect man, able also to bridle his whole body” (James 3:1–2, ESV). And again in verse 7, “For every kind of beast and bird, of reptile and sea creature, can be tamed and has been tamed by mankind, but no human being can tame the tongue. It is a restless evil, full of deadly poison. With our tongue we bless our Lord and Father, and with it we curse people who are made in the likeness of God. From the same mouth come blessing and cursing. My brothers, these things ought not to be so” (James 3:7–10, ESV).

And why is it that we have such a hard time controlling the tongue? How can it be that we spew forth such evil and poison with our words? How can in be that in one moment we use or tongue to bless God and the next we use the same tongue to curse men made in the image of God? James agrees with Jesus. It is the heart that is the problem. “Does a spring pour forth from the same opening both fresh and salt water? Can a fig tree, my brothers, bear olives, or a grapevine produce figs? Neither can a salt pond yield fresh water. Who is wise and understanding among you? By his good conduct let him show his works in the meekness of wisdom. But if you have bitter jealousy and selfish ambition in your hearts, do not boast and be false to the truth. This is not the wisdom that comes down from above, but is earthly, unspiritual, demonic. For where jealousy and selfish ambition exist, there will be disorder and every vile practice” (James 3:11–16, ESV).

A fresh water spring will produce fresh water, fig tree will produce figs, and a heart that is pure and well prepared will manifest itself in purity of speech, “for out of the abundance of the heart [the] mouth speaks” (Luke 6:45, ESV).

Prepare your hearts, brothers and sisters. Do this daily. But especially do it prior to confronting someone concerning sin. “First take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother’s eye.” (Matthew 7:5, ESV)

*****

Conclusion 

Dear friends, let us resolve to communicate well with one another. 

Let our communication be driven and governed by our love for God and for one another. 

Let us learn to listen well. 

And let us learn to speak well. 

Above all let us live with hearts that are pure and well prepared, “for out of the abundance of the heart [the] mouth speaks”.

The health of our marriages depend largely upon the health of our communication.

If we hope to have healthy and God honoring marriages we must learn to love one another ion our listening and in our speech. 

Posted in Sermons, Joe Anady, Genesis 2:24-25, Posted by Joe. Comments Off on Sermon: Genesis 2.24-25: Marriage, Divorce, And Remarriage: Communication


"Him we proclaim,
warning everyone and teaching everyone with all wisdom,
that we may present everyone mature in Christ."
(Colossians 1:28, ESV)

©2025 Emmaus Reformed Baptist Church