Old Testament Reading: Exodus 24:1–11

“Then he said to Moses, ‘Come up to the LORD, you and Aaron, Nadab, and Abihu, and seventy of the elders of Israel, and worship from afar. Moses alone shall come near to the LORD, but the others shall not come near, and the people shall not come up with him.” Moses came and told the people all the words of the LORD and all the rules. And all the people answered with one voice and said, “All the words that the LORD has spoken we will do.” And Moses wrote down all the words of the LORD. He rose early in the morning and built an altar at the foot of the mountain, and twelve pillars, according to the twelve tribes of Israel. And he sent young men of the people of Israel, who offered burnt offerings and sacrificed peace offerings of oxen to the LORD. And Moses took half of the blood and put it in basins, and half of the blood he threw against the altar. Then he took the Book of the Covenant and read it in the hearing of the people. And they said, “All that the LORD has spoken we will do, and we will be obedient.” And Moses took the blood and threw it on the people and said, “Behold the blood of the covenant that the LORD has made with you in accordance with all these words.” Then Moses and Aaron, Nadab, and Abihu, and seventy of the elders of Israel went up, and they saw the God of Israel. There was under his feet as it were a pavement of sapphire stone, like the very heaven for clearness. And he did not lay his hand on the chief men of the people of Israel; they beheld God, and ate and drank.” (Exodus 24:1–11, ESV)

New Testament Reading: Luke 22:14-20

“And when the hour came, he reclined at table, and the apostles with him. And he said to them, ‘I have earnestly desired to eat this Passover with you before I suffer. For I tell you I will not eat it until it is fulfilled in the kingdom of God.’ And he took a cup, and when he had given thanks he said, ‘Take this, and divide it among yourselves. For I tell you that from now on I will not drink of the fruit of the vine until the kingdom of God comes.’ And he took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and gave it to them, saying, ‘This is my body, which is given for you. Do this in remembrance of me.’ And likewise the cup after they had eaten, saying, ‘This cup that is poured out for you is the new covenant in my blood.’” (Luke 22:14–20, ESV)

*****

Please excuse any typos and misspellings within this manuscript. It has been published online for the benefit of the saints of Emmaus Reformed Baptist Church, but without the benefit of proofreading.

Introduction

This sermon is a continuation of the one I preached last Sunday. Given the extreme importance of the Lord’s Supper to the New Covenant community, we are taking some time to consider this Holy ordinance as we consider its institution as reported by Luke.

In the previous sermon we addressed the question, who is the author of this ordinance? The author and originator is the Lord Jesus Christ. He instituted the Supper as he celebrated the Passover with his disciples, on the night he was betrayed, the night before the day of his crucifixion. Christ Jesus instituted the Lord’s Supper and commanded that it be observed throughout the New Covenant era, that is to say, until he returns (see 1 Corinthians 11:26).

And in the previous sermon, we also addressed the question, what are the elements to be used when celebrating the Supper? In brief, bread and wine. In my opinion, the wine should be red. And my preference is that it be unleavened, though I would not charge anyone with sin if they chose to use unleavened bread. According to Christ, the bread and wine signify his broken body and his shed blood. Indeed, the cup signifies the entirety of the New Covenant that Christ instituted and mediates. When communicants eat the bread and drink the cup, the substance they consume is bread and wine. And yet we confess that Christ is really present in the elements, not in a fleshly way, but in a spiritual sense. We must take care to discern the body of Christ, therefore, and approach the Table worthily, knowing that it is not common bread or common wine that we partake of, but bread and wine set apart for a holy use. When God’s people partake of these elements by faith, they do actually partake of Christ and enjoy communion or fellowship with him, and with one another. .  

All of that is review. Today, I wish to address these questions: Who is to administer this ordinance, and how? Who is to receive this ordinance, and how? And when is this ordinance to be observed? I’ve left the last question, What is its purpose, end, or goal?, for next Sunday.  

Who Is To Administer This Ordinance And How? 

To answer the question, who is to administer or serve the Lord’s Supper, we must start with our passage in Luke wherein the Supper was instituted and trace things from there. 

It was the Lord Jesus Christ who first administered or served the Supper. It was Christ who first broke the bread and distributed the cup, saying, “Do this in remembrance of me”. 

And to whom did Christ speak when he uttered this command? Notice very carefully, it was not to a natural family that he spoke. Under the Old Covenant, families, or households, were to observe the Passover feast. Sometimes, multiple households would join together to eat the meal if the families were small. Households were observing the Passover throughout Jerusalem on the night that Christ was betrayed. But who was Christ celebrating the Passover with? His twelve Apostles. It was to the Apostles that he spoke when he served the bread and cup of the Lord’s Supper and said, “Do this in remembrance of me.” It should be clear to all, therefore, that the Lord’s Supper is not an individual or a family ordinance. It is a church ordinance, for the Apostles are the foundation stones of the church (see Ephesians 2:20)! 

And sure enough, as we trace the Lord’s Supper through pages of the New Testament, we find that it was administered within the church. And by church, I do not mean the catholic or universal church. That church is invisible now. It cannot assemble presently, and so the Lord’s Supper cannot be administered there. No, the Supper is administered within local churches. It was observed by the Christians assembled in the cities of Jerusalem, Corinth, and Thessalonica, etc.     

Let us quickly trace the progression. 

Christ gave the Supper to the Apostles and said, “Do this in remembrance of me.”

Later, he commissioned his Apostles, saying, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age” (Matthew 28:18–20, ESV). This is the very thing they did. After the Holy Spirit fell upon them, the Apostles preached the Gospel of Jesus Christ in Jerusalem and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the end of the earth” (Acts 1:8, ESV).

And what did those who were converted and baptized do? Acts 2:42 says, “they devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and the fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers” (Acts 2:42, ES). Here, the breaking of bread refers to the observance of the Lord’s Supper. 

We see more evidence of this in the Book of Acts. In Acts 20:7, we hear Luke say, “On the first day of the week [Sunday], when we were gathered together to break bread, Paul talked with them, intending to depart on the next day, and he prolonged his speech until midnight” (Acts 20:7, ESV).

And this chain of transmission is made very clear in the words of the Apostle Paul to the church in Corinth, saying, “For I received from the Lord what I also delivered to you, that the Lord Jesus on the night when he was betrayed took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it, and said, ‘This is my body, which is for you. Do this in remembrance of me’” (1 Corinthians 11:23–24, ESV). So then, Paul the Apostle received this ordinance from the Lord, and he delivered it to the church in Corinth to be observed by them perpetually. 

And so it is within every local church down to this present day. The ordinance of the Lord’s Supper was instituted by Christ and entrusted to the Apostles, who then commanded the churches they planted to administer the Supper until Christ returns. 

Who is to administer or serve the Lord’s Supper? The church is. The Lord’s Supper is an ordinance given to local churches. And who, in particular, is to administer the Supper within local churches? Ordinarily, pastors or elders are to preside over and administer the Supper. 

This becomes clear when one considers that after the extraordinary offices of Apostle, Prophet, and Evangelist ceased, spiritual authority was left in the office of pastor or elder. This progression can be seen in Ephesians 4:11-12, which says, “And [Christ] gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers; For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ…” (Ephesians 4:11–12, KJV). And this progression is witnessed in the book of Acts in passages like Acts 14:23: “And when they [Paul and Barnabus] had ordeined thẽ Elders by election in everie Church, and praid, and fasted, they commended them to the Lord in whom they beleved” (Acts 14:23, GB). What did the Apostles and Evangelists do in the days of the early church? They planted churches through the preaching of the gospel, and they appointed elders in those churches by the election of the people. It is no wonder, then, that Paul the Apostle listed qualifications for the office of elder (and deacon) in his letters to the Evangelists, Timothy and Titus. This was a crucial aspect of their job. They were like church planters. And they were to entrust the work of the ministry to faithful men who would carry the work forward. And what would these elders do except devote themselves to the ministry of the word, prayer, and the pastoral oversight of the church? Connected with the ministry of the word is also the administration of the sacraments of Baptism and the Lord’s Supper, these being visible words or signs ordained by Christ. 

Consider the way that Paul speaks of his work as an Apostle, and of the work of pastors, by way of extension. In 1 Corinthians 4:1, he says, “This is how one should regard us, as servants of Christ and stewards of the mysteries of God.”

Interestingly, our confession cites 1 Corinthians 4:1 as a proof text for the statement made in 2LCF 28.2, regarding baptism and the Lord’s Supper. “These holy appointments [baptism and the Lord’s Supper] are to be administered by those only who are qualified and thereunto called, according to the commission of Christ. (Matthew 28:19; 1 Corinthians 4:1).”

And listen to what Matthew Poole says about 1 Corinthians 4:1: “The apostle here gives us the right notion of the preachers of the gospel; they are but ministers, that is, servants, so as the honour that is proper to their Master… belongeth not to them; they are ministers of Christ, so have their primary relation to him, and only a secondary relation to the church to which they are ministers; they are ministers of Christ, and so in that ministration can only execute what are originally his commands, though those commands of Christ may also be enforced by men… They are also stewards of the mysteries of God, such to whom God hath committed his word and sacraments to dispense out unto his church. The word mystery signifieth any thing that is secret, but more especially it signifieth a Divine secret, represented by signs and figures; or a regious secret, not obvious to every capacity or understanding… Ministers are the stewards of the mysterious doctrines and institutions of Christ, which we usually comprehend under the terms of the word and sacraments.”

Ordinarily, the Lord’s Supper is to be administered in local churches by those ordained to the office of pastor or elder in those churches. As a bit of an aside, I will add that I do believe that under unusual circumstances, in the case wherein a church finds herself without elders for an extended period of time, she may appoint a Gifted Brother, that is, one who has the gift of teaching, who has been approved by the church to preach (licensed to preach), to adminster the Lord’s Supper, so that the church is not left without her spirtual food for a prolonged time. I would argue the point like this: The members of a local church have a right to eat of the Supper. In fact, the Lord Jesus Christ has commanded us to eat the Supper.  Ordinarily, it is to be administered by the elders of the church. But in the absence of elders, a Gifted Brother may be appointed to administer the sacrament so that everything is done decently and in order. This man will have met the character qualifications of 1 Timothy 3 and Titus 1. He will have been recognized by the congregation as having the gift of teaching. And given that the sacraments are appended (attached, or added) to the Word as visible signs (as Calvin says,” But as the sacraments are connected with these mysteries as appendages, it follows, that those who have the charge of administering the word are the authorized stewards of them also.”), then one who has been approved to administer the Word of God may also, under unusual circumstances and for a limited time, be approved to administer the sacraments of baptism and the Lord’s Supper. The argument is from the greater to the lesser. If a man has been approved by the church to administer the higher, converting ordinance, namely, the preaching of the Word, then he may, for a time, be approved to administer the lower, sanctifying ordinance that Christ has added or appended to the Word, namely, the Lord’s Supper. As you may know, our association of churches has had to wrestle with this question recently, as we presently have two churches without elders. I’m not claiming that this is the position of our association or all the churches in our association, but I do know that others share this opinion, and it is my opinion. Finally, I do believe that our confession is worded in such a way to leave room for this view, when it says, “These holy appointments [baptism and the Lord’s Supper] are to be administered by those only who are qualified and thereunto called, according to the commission of Christ” (2LCF 28.2). 

Who is to administer the Lord’s Supper? The local church is. And, ordinarily,  it is the elders who are to administer the Supper. Now I ask, what are those who administer the elements to do? They are to follow the pattern established by Christ when he first instituted the Supper. Those who administer the Supper are to take the bread, bless it, break it, and distribute it to the disciples. And likewise, the cup is to be blessed and distributed so that all may drink of it. You will find many different opinions within the church and the history of the church as to how exactly the bread and the cup are to be distributed. Are the people to be served, or are they to come forward? If they are served, by whom? Some would say, the deacons. What should the posture of those who partake be? Should they stand, kneel, or sit? Consider this: the disciples of Jesus were likely reclining on the ground at a low table when they partook of the elements. And should the members drink from a single cup, or one that has been divided? These questions, in my opinion, though not unimportant, may be answered by each congregation according to the light of nature. What matters is that the elements be served according to the general pattern established by Christ and in an orderly way so that the worshiper is not distracted from the Lord.

Who Is To Receive This Ordinance And How?

We have answered the question, Who is to administer or serve the Lord’s Supper, and how? And now we turn our attention to the question, Who is to receive this ordinance, and how? The answer to this question may seem obvious to you, but it is not obvious to all, and so teaching is needed. If you were to survey Evangelical churches today and ask them the question, Who is to receive the Lord’s Supper?, you might be surprised by what you hear.  

Let me ask you, are little children to be given the Supper? Are those not yet baptized to be given the Supper? Are those who are unbelieving to be given the Supper? The answer to all of these questions is no. And yet this is precisely what is done in many churches today. It is not uncommon for the Supper tp be distributed indiscriminately to all who happen to be present. This is contrary to the Scriptures. 

To whom is the Supper to be served? 

One, not to little children. 

The Passover was given to little children. But the Lord’s Supper is not the Passover. The Passover was to be celebrated by Hebrew families from generation to generation. It was used to teach about their shared history of redemption from Egypt. But the Lord’s Supper was not given by Christ to an ethnic people. It was given to his disciples, that is to say, those who professed faith in him. Just as the New Covenant is not made with an ethnic people or with families, neither are the sacraments of the New Covenant given to an ethnic people or families. The sacraments of the New Covenant belong to those of whom the symbolism is true. Who is to be baptized? Only those who have made a credible profession of faith and appear to the church to have been united to Christ by faith, washed in his blood, and raised to new life. And who is to partake of the Supper? Those who have, in fact, eaten of Christ with the mouth of faith. 

As you may know, it is very common in Evangelical churches for the Lord’s Supper to be given to little children. I would encourage those who think that this is an appropriate practice to consider two things:  

One, consider again the command of that the Apostle delivered to the Christians in Corinth:  “Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup. For anyone who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment on himself” (1 Corinthians 11:28–29, ESV). To examine oneself is to test the genuineness of one’s heart and profession. To discern is “to make a judgment on the basis of careful and detailed information—‘to judge carefully, to evaluate carefully.’” Ask yourself, are little ones capable of doing these things? The answer is no. 

Two, consider the relationship between the two Sacraments and the order of the Great Commission. Baptism marks entrance into the covenant community and is to be given once, near the beginning of the Christian life, after a person repents and professes faith in Jesus. The Lord’s Supper marks continuance in the covenant community. It is a kind of covenant renewal. If Baptism may be compared to a wedding, the Lord’s Supper may be compared to an anniversary celebration. My point is simple. Baptism is to be applied first, and then the Supper is to be given.  And this order is perceived in the Great Commission: “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you.” (Matthew 28:19–20, ESV).

Many Evangelicals will not give baptism to their infants or children, but wait until they make a credible profession of faith. That’s good and right. But strangely, some will give the Lord’s Supper to their children before their conversion and baptism. This is backwards and highly inappropriate (even sinful). 

Ironically, most Presbyterian and Reformed paedobaptists do not give the Lord’s Supper to their little ones. They wait for a credible profession of faith. This is good and right. But they are inconsistent in their administration of the Sacraments when they baptize their infant children and withhold the Supper. There are some who practice paedobaptism and paedocommunion. These are doubly wrong, but at least they are consistent! They rightly see that those who have the right to receive Baptism then have a right to come to the Lord’s Table.  

Dear friends, in brief, the Lord’s Supper is not for the unregenerate and unbelieving. The Lord’s Supper is for believers. It is to be given to those who make a credible profession of faith, have been baptized upon profession of faith, and are walking worthily (they are living in sin, divisive, or disorderly—see 2 Thessalonians 3:6, 14-15; 1 Corinthians 5:9-11; Titus 3:10). This is what we confess in 2LCF 30.8: “All ignorant and ungodly persons, as they are unfit to enjoy communion with Christ, so are they unworthy of the Lord’s table, and cannot, without great sin against him, while they remain such, partake of these holy mysteries, or be admitted thereunto; yea, whosoever shall receive unworthily, are guilty of the body and blood of the Lord, eating and drinking judgment to themselves.”

Stated even more succinctly, the Lord’s Supper is to be given to those who are members in good standing of a true and orderly church of Jesus Christ. There is no single passage of Scripture that you can point to to prove this (the Scriptures are not written like a church constitution or polity manual). But when all that the Scriptures have to say regarding Baptism, the Lord’s Supper, church membership, and church discipline is considered, this is what the Scriptures teach. The Lord’s Supper is for believers. It is for those who have been baptized in the church upon profession of faith. It is for those who walk worthily within the church, in obedience to the commands of Christ. The Lord’s Supper is not for the world, and neither is it for professing Christians who are walking in a disorderly way (see again 2 Thessalonians 3:6, 14-15).

How are disciples of Jesus to parake of the Supper? Answer: By faith, with hearts prepared, with the confession of sins, in humility, and with much thanksgiving.

When Is This Ordinance To Be Observed?

The last question that I wish to address today is, When should the Lord’s Supper be observed? 

Interestingly, Christ did not speak clearly about the frequency of the observance of the Lord’s Supper when he instituted it.  “Do this in remembrance of me”, he commanded. And when Paul spoke of the observance of the Supper, he was not clear either, saying, “In the same way also he took the cup, after supper, saying, ‘This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.’ For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes” (1 Corinthians 11:25–26, ESV).

Throughout the history of the church, there have been differences of opinion concerning the frequency of the observance of the Supper. Some have observed weekly, others monthly, some quarterly, and some yearly. 

It seems to me that the first Christians observed the Supper week. Acts 2:42 says, “And they devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and the fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers” (Acts 2:42, ESV). In Acts 20:7, Luke says, “On the first day of the week, when we were gathered together to break bread, Paul talked with them, intending to depart on the next day, and he prolonged his speech until midnight” (Acts 20:7, ESV). In brief, it seems that the church observed the Supper when they assembled to worship on the Lord’s Day Sabbath. Again, “And they devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and the fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers” (Acts 2:42, ESV). 

Conclussion

There are many points of application to be drawn from this sermon. I wish to highlight three: 

One, though the pastors and elders of a local church indeed have a primary responsibility to administer the Lord’s Supper and to fence the Lord’s Table, the entire church must take an interest in seeing to the proper administration of this ordinance. The Lord’s Supper belongs not to the elders but to the church. Yes, those who hold the office of elder are to serve the Supper, but elders are ministers or servants. We are servants, first and foremost, of Christ, and secondly, of the members. Though not every member is qualified and called to serve the Supper, every member should be eager to see the Supper faithfully administered and served. 

Two, we must be diligent to prepare our minds and hearts to partake of the Supper. Those who advocate for a less frequent observance of the Supper (monthly, quarterly, yearly) often do so because they wish to encourage preparation. I say, prepare weekly. 

Three, I wish to speak to the young people in our midst who are emerging into adulthood, who have not yet been baptized and who, therefore, do not partake of the Supper.  I must urge you to turn from your sins and to place your faith in Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And if, when I say that, you think I have! Then I must urge you to be baptized and then to come to the table. I know that one of the things that holds young people back is a fear of professing faith in Christ in front of other people. This is something you must do.  As Paul says, “if you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. For with the heart one believes and is justified, and with the mouth one confesses and is saved. For the Scripture says, ‘Everyone who believes in him will not be put to shame’” (Romans 10:9–11, ESV).

Baptist Catechism 93

Q. 93. What are the outward means whereby Christ communicateth to us the benefits of redemption?

A. The outward and ordinary means whereby Christ communicateth to us the benefits of redemption are His ordinances, especially the Word, baptism, the Lord’s Supper and prayer; all which are made effectual to the elect for salvation. (Rom. 10:17; James 1:18; 1 Cor. 3:5; Acts 14:1; 2:41,42)

Scripture Reading: Acts 2:41–47

“So those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls. And they devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and the fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers. And awe came upon every soul, and many wonders and signs were being done through the apostles. And all who believed were together and had all things in common. And they were selling their possessions and belongings and distributing the proceeds to all, as any had need. And day by day, attending the temple together and breaking bread in their homes, they received their food with glad and generous hearts, praising God and having favor with all the people. And the Lord added to their number day by day those who were being saved.” (Acts 2:41–47, ESV)

*****

Please excuse any typos and misspellings within this manuscript. It has been published online for the benefit of the saints of Emmaus Reformed Baptist Church but without the benefit of proofreading.

*****

God ordinarily works through means. That is a very important concept to understand. 

Now, sometimes God works in an immediate way. For example, when God created the heavens and the earth in the very beginning, he did not work through means. He simply called the heavenly and earthly realms into existence. But often God works through means, or through conduits. He uses people and things to accomplish his purposes. Take, for example, the parting of the Red Sea. God could have worked in an immediate way. He could have simply caused the waters to part in front of Israel, but he chose to part the sea through Moses. He revealed his will to Israel through Moses and commanded that Moses lift his staff, and in this way, he parted the waters. Though God could always work in a direct way and without the involvement of people and things, he often uses means. He parted the sea by means of Moses and his staff. He brought you to faith in Christ by means of the prayers and gospel witness of others. And he is sanctifying you now by means of your life experiences, and your relationships, among other things. God is at work in the world, and he typically works through means.

Here, our catechism is not only teaching us that God works through means, but that there are few things that God has determined to use regularly to distribute his saving and sanctifying grace to his people. These we call the ordinary means of grace.

How does God bring his elect to faith in Christ? How does he purify, strengthen, and preserve them? I suppose he could do it in an immediate way. He could speak his gospel directly to sinners from on high. He could purify us in the mind and heart directly by zapping us with spiritual power from on high. But he has determined to give us his grace through means. And some of these means are called ordinary means because they are the means that God has determined to ordinarily use. They are the Word of God (read and preached), baptism, the Lord’s Supper, and prayer.   

*****

Baptist Catechism 93

Let us now consider the answer to Catechism 93 piece by piece.

First, our catechism clarifies that it is talking about “the outward” means. These are things external to us that God uses to work his grace within us. Does God do a work in us when he regenerates us and sanctifies us further? Yes! He does this inward work immediately by the power of the Holy Spirit. But the Spirit of God does also use things that are outside of us to work on our minds and hearts. So, we are talking about the outward means here. 

Secondly, our catechism clarifies that it is talking about the “the ordinary” means. Does the Lord sometimes use things other than the Word, baptism, the Lord’s Supper, and prayer to work within his people? Of course! Often, the Lord will use life circumstances —even the trials and tribulations of life—to purify and strengthen his people. But these circumstances will be unique to each one of us, according to the will of God. We are not called to chase after these sanctifying circumstances, therefore. We are not called to chase after trials and tribulations so that we might be sanctified by them. God may use these things to refine us, but they are not the ordinary means that God has set apart for his people to use, so we need not pursue them. 

Thirdly, our catechism is specifically speaking of those means whereby Christ “communicateth to us the benefits of redemption”. Here, “communicate” does not refer to the dissemination of information, but to distribution. So the question is this: Christ has earned our redemption, but how do we come to have the benefits of it as our own? Or, more to the point, what are the things that God has determined to regularly use to distribute his gift of salvation and sanctification to his people?    

Fourthly, the question is answered in a very succinct way with these words: “The outward and ordinary means whereby Christ communicateth to us the benefits of redemption are His ordinances…” “Ordinances” are those things that Christ has ordered, or commanded, us to use.

Think of it. God has his elect in the world. Every one of them will be saved, for this is the will of God. But how will these elect come to be saved? Well, what has Christ commanded or ordered? He has ordered us to preach the gospel. God works through means, remember? Gospel proclamation is the means that God will use to bring his elect to salvation. It is a converting ordinance. How do we know? Because Christ has ordered it. 

Fifthly, our catechism highlights four things in particular when it says, “especially the Word, baptism, the Lord’s Supper and prayer…” These are the outward and ordinary things that God uses to distribute the benefits of the redemption that Christ has earned to his elect. 

As has already been said, the elect are brought to faith through the preaching of the Word of God. And the elect are further strengthened and preserved in the faith through the word of God. This is why Paul says, “So faith comes from hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ” (Romans 10:17, ESV). Do you wish to see your loved ones come to salvation? Then one thing you must do is share the word of God with them,  for God brings sinners to salvation through his word. And do you wish to grow in the grace of God? Then you had better be reading and hearing God’s word, for it is one of the outward and ordinary means that God has determined to use to grow his people up in the faith. 

Next, baptism is mentioned. We will learn more about baptism in questions 97-101. For now, I will say, baptism is not something that we are to partake of over and over again. No, we are to be baptized in water in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit at the beginning of the Christian life, after faith and repentance. But God does use baptism to distribute the benefits of the redemption that Christ has earned to his elect. The elect are baptized into Christ. They are baptized by the church and into the fellowship of the church. The Spirit of God works mightily in his people through the waters of baptism. Does baptism save us? Does the water wash away sin? No! It is the thing that baptism signifies that saves us, namely, faith in and union with Christ Jesus. But God does strengthen his people through baptism, for it is a means of grace. 

Next, the Lord’s Supper is mentioned. We will learn more about the Lord’s Supper in questions 102-104 of our catechism. For now, let us confess that the Lord’s Supper is not only a memorial. It is not only a time for the church to remember what Christ has accomplished (though it is certainly not less than that). No, the Lord’s Supper is a means of grace. God works powerfully through the Lord’s Supper both to strengthen his church and to purify her.  

Lastly, prayer is mentioned. We will learn more about prayer in questions 105-114 of our catechism. For now, know that God works through prayer, brothers and sisters. You’ve heard it said that prayer changes things, and it does! It does not change the eternal decree of God. But God does work through the prayers of people to accomplish his decree. More than anything, prayer changes us. Prayer is an outward and ordinary means of grace, and so we are to be diligent in it. We are to pray without ceasing. 

The sixth and last phrase of the catechism is, “all which are made effectual to the elect for salvation.” So, who does the word, baptism, the Lord’s Supper, and prayer benefit? They benefit the elect of God. And who is it that makes these things effectual, or effective? We know that it is the Spirit of God who makes these ordinary means of grace effective.

*****

Conclusion

Please allow me to make two observations by way of conclusion. 

One, our catechism will clarify in the following questions that these ordinary means of grace do not work in an automatic way. No, they are only effective when they are received by faith, and we know that faith is the gift of God.

Two, by identifying these things as outward and ordinary means of grace, our catechism is urging us to use them. You know, it never ceases to amaze me to see professing Christians look to other things besides these things for growth in Christ. They will look to this program and to that discipline, and to this method to find spiritual nourishment while neglecting the ordinary things that God has ordained. 

The first Christians, after being baptized, “devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and the fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers.” The rest of the Scripture confirms that these are the ordinary things that we are to make use of for growth in Christ Jesus.  

Old Testament Reading: Jeremiah 31:31–34

“Behold, the days are coming, declares the LORD, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah, not like the covenant that I made with their fathers on the day when I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, my covenant that they broke, though I was their husband, declares the LORD. For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the LORD: I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts. And I will be their God, and they shall be my people. And no longer shall each one teach his neighbor and each his brother, saying, ‘Know the LORD,’ for they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest, declares the LORD. For I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.”” (Jeremiah 31:31–34, ESV)

New Testament Reading: Luke 22:14-20

“And when the hour came, he reclined at table, and the apostles with him. And he said to them, ‘I have earnestly desired to eat this Passover with you before I suffer. For I tell you I will not eat it until it is fulfilled in the kingdom of God.’ And he took a cup, and when he had given thanks he said, ‘Take this, and divide it among yourselves. For I tell you that from now on I will not drink of the fruit of the vine until the kingdom of God comes.’ And he took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and gave it to them, saying, ‘This is my body, which is given for you. Do this in remembrance of me.’ And likewise the cup after they had eaten, saying, ‘This cup that is poured out for you is the new covenant in my blood.’” (Luke 22:14–20, ESV)

*****

Please excuse any typos and misspellings within this manuscript. It has been published online for the benefit of the saints of Emmaus Reformed Baptist Church, but without the benefit of proofreading.

Introduction

It was a joy to preach on Luke 22:1-23 last Sunday. In that passage, we learned of the wicked preparations that Judas made to betray Jesus and to deliver him into the hands of his enemies, the holy preparations that Jesus made to celebrate the last Passover with his disciples, Jesus’ faithful observance of the last Passover with his disciples, the institution of the Lord’s Supper, and finally, Jesus’ prediction that one of his own would betray him. You may remember that in that sermon, I said we would come back to this passage to give special attention to the institution of the holy ordinance of the Lord’s Supper, and that is what we will do today. 

As you know, the Lord’s Supper, or Holy Communion, is a central feature of New Covenant worship and the life of the New Covenant community. Where does the church gather to hear the Word of God read and preached, to sing and to pray, and to commune with God and with one another, except around the Lord’s Table? Given its great and central importance, it is good and right for us to pay careful attention to its institution. The New Testament has a lot to say about the Lord’s Supper, but Luke 22:19-20 is foundational, for here the Lord’s Supper is instituted, that is, established for the first time.  

In this sermon, I will raise several questions about the Supper and attempt to answer them in the hopes that we, as a congregation, will have a better understanding of this sacrament and a greater appreciate for it as one of the outward and ordinary means that Christ uses to sanctify and sustain his people in this New Covenant era. 

Here are the main questions on my mind: Who is the author of this ordinance, when was it instituted, and for what era or time? What are the elements to be used, and what do they signify? Who is to administer this ordinance, and how? Who is to receive this ordinance, and how? When is this ordinance to be observed, and for what purpose, end, or goal? 

Let us now briefly explore these questions together. We will only consider the first two today. The others will need to wait until next Sunday. 

Who Is The Author Of This Ordinance, When Was It Instituted, And For What Era Or Time?

First of all, who is the author or originator of this ordinance? Answer: The Lord Jesus Christ. 

Our confession of faith draws attention to this fact in its opening statement on the ordinances of Baptism and the Lord’s Supper. 2LCF 28.1, says, “Baptism and the Lord’s Supper are ordinances of positive and sovereign institution, appointed by the Lord Jesus, the only lawgiver, to be continued in his church to the end of the world.”

What is an ordinance? It is something that has been ordered or commanded. 

What does our confession mean when it says that Baptism and the Lord’s Supper are ordinances of a positive institution? It means that these laws were added to the moral law when the New Covenant began.  

And what does our confession mean when it calls the Lord’s Supper a sovereign institution? It means these laws were added by a great, powerful, and sovereign King. Who is that King? Christ Jesus is the King. He is the King of God’s eternal Kingdom. And these ordinances—Baptism and the Lord’s Supper— were instituted by him. 

Notice the authority of Christ in our text. When he instituted the Lord’s Supper, he simply issued this command, “Do this in remembrance of me.” Friends, Moses did not speak with this kind of authority when the positive laws associated with Old Covenant worship were revealed through him. Moses received those laws from God before he delivered them to the people. And listen to how the Apostle Paul speaks about the Lord’s Supper. To the church in Corinth he wrote, “For I received from the Lord what I also delivered to you, that the Lord Jesus on the night when he was betrayed took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it, and said, ‘This is my body, which is for you. Do this in remembrance of me’”, etc. (1 Corinthians 11:23–24, ESV). The point is this: The Lord Jesus Christ did not receive instructions about the ordinance of the Lord’s Supper from anyone. He spoke with an authority all his own. Our confession is right: “Baptism and the Lord’s Supper are ordinances of positive and sovereign institution, appointed by the Lord Jesus, the only lawgiver, to be continued in his church to the end of the world.”

This is a very significant observation. The Lord Jesus Christ, the Anointed King of God’s eternal Kingdom, instituted the Lord’s Supper and commanded that his disciples do this in remembrance of him. Those who love Jesus will be eager to obey this command, as Christ has said, “If you love me, you will keep my commandments” (John 14:15, ESV). In another place, Jesus rebukes those who claim to love him but do not keep his commandments, saying, “Why do you call me ‘Lord, Lord,’ and not do what I tell you?” (Luke 6:46, ESV). Indeed, abiding in Christ’s love involves keeping his commandments. As Christ says in John 15:10,  “If you keep my commandments, you will abide in my love, just as I have kept my Father’s commandments and abide in his love” (John 15:10, ESV). Dear friends, one of the things that Christ has commanded his disciples is to do is to observe the Lord’s Supper. “Do this in remembrance of me.” And yet so many professing Christians today neglect this Holy ordinance. 

Who is the author or originator of this ordinance? Jesus Christ the Lord. And when was this ordinance instituted or established as law? On the night that Jesus was betrayed, the night before the day of his crucifixion. 

The Lord’s Supper was indeed anticipated and prefigured long before in the days of Abraham and Melchizadek. In Genesis 14:17, we read, “After [Abraham’s] return from the defeat of… the kings… the king of Sodom went out to meet him at the Valley of Shaveh (that is, the King’s Valley). And Melchizedek king of Salem brought out bread and wine. (He was priest of God Most High.) And he blessed him and said, “Blessed be Abram by God Most High, Possessor of heaven and earth…” (Genesis 14:17–19, ESV). Isn’t it interesting that Melchizedek, the priest-king who was a type of the Christ to come, blessed Abraham while breaking bread and drinking wine? Indeed, we may say that the Lord’s Supper was anticipated and prefigured in this event, but it was not yet an instituted ordinance. 

And we may also see that the Lord’s Supper was anticipated in the words that Christ spoke to the multitude in the wilderness earlier in his ministry. In John 6:51-56, we hear Christ say, ‘I am the living bread that came down from heaven. If anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever. And the bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh.’ The Jews then disputed among themselves, saying, ‘How can this man give us his flesh to eat?’ So Jesus said to them, ‘truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. Whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day. For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink. Whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him’” (John 6:51-56, ESV). Clearly, eating the flesh of Christ and drinking the blood of Christ is not to be taken literally. It symbolizes the reception of him by faith—we feed upon Christ and drink of Christ by the mouth of faith. Certainly, the Lord’s Supper was hinted at and anticipated when Christ spoke these words. But the Lord’s Supper was not instituted, ordered, or ordained until Christ broke the bread, distributed the cup, and spoke to his disciples, saying, “Do this in remembrance of me”, on the night he was betrayed.   

It is interesting to note that just as the Passover feast was instituted on the night before the Hebrews were delivered from Egyptian bondage, and not afterward, so too the Lord’s Supper was instituted on the night before the accomplishment of our redemption through death, burial, and resurrection of Christ. In other words, the institution of the Passover (Exodus 12:1-28) and the institution of the Lord’s Supper predated the events they would signify. And this was to show these these great acts of redemption were according to the definite plan and foreknowledge of God.  

When was this ordinance instituted or established as law? On the night Jesus was betrayed, the night before the day of his crucifixion. And how long is this ordinance to be observed? Our Confession is correct. It is to be observed by God’s people until the end of the world. This is stated directly by the Apostle Paul in the words, “For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes” (1 Corinthians 11:26, ESV). The Lord’s Supper is to be observed by followers of Christ until he comes, that is to say, throughout the entirety of this New Covenant era. 

What Are The Elements To Be Used And What Do They Signify? 

We’ve considered my first set of questions: Who is the author of this ordinance, when was it instituted, and for what era or time? Now we will turn our attention to the elements. What are the elements to be used in the Lord’s Supper, and what do they signify?

The elements to be used are bread and wine. Luke 22:19 says, “And he took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and gave it to them…” (Luke 22:19, ESV). And Luke 22:20 says, “And likewise the cup after they had eaten… (Luke 22:20, ESV). What was in the cup? The fruit of the vine was in the cup (see verse 22:18), that is to say, wine. 

The more that I think about it, it is a strange thing that so many churches today have changed one of the elements of the Supper from wine to grape juice. Granted, both wine and grape juice come from the vine. Granted, both have the appearance of blood. And yes, I do understand that some within the church might have personal convictions never to touch alcohol. With these things in mind, if a church serves grape juice instead of wine, or if a church makes juice available to those with the convictions just mentioned, I cannot bring myself to charge them with sin. Nevertheless, it seems odd to alter the elements. What was in the cup that Jesus served? Wine was in the cup. I will not take the time to prove that wine was in the cup, nor will I talk about the use of wine throughout the Bible and its symbolism. There is a little book written by a man named G.I. Williamson, entitled Wine in the Bible and the Church. I’m afraid it’s out of print. You can probably find a digital version online for free. It’s excellent. Perhaps the easiest way to prove that wine was used to celebrate the Supper in the early church is to consider the rebuke that Paul delivered to the church in Corinth, saying, “When you come together, it is not the Lord’s supper that you eat. For in eating, each one goes ahead with his own meal. One goes hungry, another gets drunk” (1 Corinthians 11:20–21, ESV). How would some of the members in the church of Corinth get drunk when assembled together if wine were not present? Clearly it was. Paul’s solution to the problem was not to change the elements from wine to juice, but to rebuke the Corinthian church for their sin. 

When Jesus instituted the Lord’s Supper, he distributed bread and wine. What color was the wine? Given that it represented the shed blood of Christ, it must have been red. And what kind of bread did Christ serve? He served unleavened bread—bread that was flat because it was free from a leavening agent which would cause it to rise— for that was the only kind of bread available to him. Christ instituted the Lord’s Supper while eating the Passover with his disciples, remember. And one of the things God commanded the Jews to do while celebrating Passover was to rid their homes of all leaven. 

We serve unleavened bread when observing the Lord’s Supper. But if you were to visit other churches, even in our association, you would find that some serve leavened bread. And if you were to ask them, why do you serve leavened bread and not unleavened bread? I think they would answer you like this: the Scripturers say that Christ broke bread and distributed it to his disciples. True, unleavened bread was the only kind of bread available to him as he ate the Passover. But this does not mean that unleavened bread must be used. Bread is to be used. And either leavened or unleavened bread will do. This is the argument you will find in John Gill’s, Body Of Doctrinal And Practical Divinity (page 917), and I respect it. Nevertheless, I do appreciate the symbolism of unleavened bread.  

Leaven symbolizes sin. And in 1 Corinthians 5:6-8, Paul uses this symbolism while speaking to New Covenant Christians, saying, “Your boasting is not good. Do you not know that a little leaven leavens the whole lump? Cleanse out the old leaven that you may be a new lump, as you really are unleavened. For Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed. Let us therefore celebrate the festival, not with the old leaven, the leaven of malice and evil, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth” (1 Corinthians 5:6–8, ESV). I’ll admit that Paul may have been using the unleavened bread that was used in the Old Covenant Passover to illustrate his point, but it seems reasonable to me to assume that unleavened bread was being used by the church in Corinth while celabreating the festivle of the Lord’s Supper, and so Paul used this to illustrate his point. “Cleanse out the old leaven”, church. Turn from your sins personally and corporately, and walk in holiness.   

What are the elements to be used in the Lord’s Supper? Bread and wine. And what do they signify? 

The broken bread signifies the body of Christ that was broken for his people. The cup symbolizes his blood poured out for the remission of sins. Notice, the cup also stands for the entire New Covenant—“This cup that is poured out for you is the new covenant in my blood” (Luke 22:20, ESV).

As you may know, there has been no small debate between the Roman Catholics and Protestants over the question, what did Christ mean when he said, this is my body and “this is my blood.” Rome teaches the doctrine of transubstantiation. According to them, the words of Christ are to be taken very literally. When Christ said, “This is my body”, he meant that the bread was actually transformed into the flesh of Christ, and when he said, “This… is the new covenant in my blood”, the wine was transformed into the blood of Christ. And they imagine that this happens every time Holy Communion is served when the priest pronounces his blessing over the elements. 

This is not our view. Our confession of faith explicitly and firmly rejects the doctrine of transubstantiation in 30.6, saying, “That doctrine which maintains a change of the substance of bread and wine, into the substance of Christ’s body and blood, commonly called transubstantiation, by consecration of a priest, or by any other way, is repugnant not to Scripture alone, but even to common sense and reason, overthrows the nature of the ordinance, and hath been, and is, the cause of manifold superstitions, yea, of gross idolatries.” 

So then, what did Christ mean by the word “is” in the phrase, “This is my body”, and “This… is the new covenant in my blood.” Clearly, he meant that the elements represent, symbolize, or signify his body and blood. His disciples would have understood this clearly, for they could see the body of Christ there in front of them, whole and intact. They could see that his blood was not poured into the cup for them to drink. They could distinguish between the body of Christ and the bread, and the blood that ran through his veins, and the wine. When they are the bread, that is what they taste—bread! And when they drank the wine, they tasted wine. 

The Protestants were right to reject the superstitious and idolatrous doctrine of transubstantiation. But another question arose and eventually divided the Lutherans, the Zwinglians, and the Reformed. The question is this: Is Christ in any way present in the Supper? The Zwiglians (those who followed Ulrich Zwingli) said no. Christ’s body and blood are merely symbolized or represented by the elements, and we merely remember the death of Christ when we partake. While the Lutherans (following Martin Luther) denied the Roman doctrine of transubstantiation (they confessed that bread was still bread and the wine was still wine), they insisted that the physical body and blood of Christ are somehow really present with the elements. This view is called consubstantiation. But the Reformers, following Calvin, insist that, though Christ is not present in the Supper bodily—for his body is in heaven and is not omnipresent or divisible — Christ is really present in the Supper. He is present, not according to his human nature, but according to his divine nature, and through the agency of the Holy Spirit he has poured out.

This is our view.  In 2LCF 30.7, we confess that, “Worthy receivers, outwardly partaking of the visible elements in this ordinance, do then also inwardly by faith, really and indeed, yet not carnally and corporally [in a fleshly way], but spiritually receive, and feed upon Christ crucified, and all the benefits of his death; the body and blood of Christ being then not corporally or carnally, but spiritually present to the faith of believers in that ordinance, as the elements themselves are to their outward senses.”

Is the Lord’s Supper a memorial? Is it a time to remember Christ crucified? Yes, of course! “Do this in remembrance of me”, Christ said. But it is also more than a memorial, and this is made clear in other Scripture texts. That Christ is really present in the Supper is made clear in 1 Corinthians 10:16-17, wherein Paul says, “The cup of blessing that we bless, is it not a participation [communion, or sharing] in the blood of Christ? The bread that we break, is it not a participation [communion, or sharing] in the body of Christ? Because there is one bread, we who are many are one body, for we all partake of the one bread” (1 Corinthians 10:16–17, ESV). This text is clear. When we partake of the Supper we enjoy fellowship or communion with Christ and with one another through our shared union with him. The question is, what is the nature of this participation or fellowship we enjoy. Is it a carnal, fleshly participation? In other words, do we actually eat the substance of the body and drink the substance of the blood of Christ (as those who belive in transubstantiation and consubstantiation believe)? Or is it a spiritual fellowship that we enjoy? We say it must be spiritual, for the body of Christ is in heaven, and it is a true (albiet glorified) human body that he has. It cannot be divided and dispersed throughout the world so that believers may partake of it. And when we eat the bread and drink the cup, the substance we consume is bread, not flesh, and wine, not blood—this should plain and clear to all who have the senses of sight, taste, touch, and smell functioning. Furthermore, when Christ promised to be with his people always after his ascension, he was clear that, though he would go away from us bodily, he would be with us spiritually according to his divine nature and through the agency of the Helper that he would send forth, the Holy Spirit of promise (see John 14:8-31).      

Here is the takeaway: The elements of the Lord’s Supper are bread and wine. They signify or symbolize Christ’s broken body and shed blood. By these elements, we are helped to remeber Christ’s atoning sacrifice. When we see the bread broken, it helps us to remember that Christ’s body was broken for us—he was crushed for our iniquities. And when we see the read wine in the cup, it helps us to remember that Jesus’s blood was poored out to atone for the sins of those given to him by the Father in eternity (see John 17).  More than this, when we, as believers, partake of these visible elements by faith, we confess that we do “also inwardly by faith, really and indeed, yet not carnally and corporally, but spiritually receive, and feed upon Christ crucified, and all the benefits of his death…”(2LCF 30.7). In other words, God’s people do really enjoy communion or fellowship with Christ and when they partake of the Supper. It is a part of what it means to abide in him. And God’s people also enjoy communion or fellowship with one another at the Lord’s Table, for we are united together in Christ Jesus. When we commune with Christ, we also commune with one another.

I do believe I will return to this idea that the Lord’s Supper is more than a memorial, and that it is, in fact, a means of grace to us—a conduit of sorts, whereby the benefits of Christ’s death and ressurection are delivered to God’s people— in the second sermon I preach on this topic. For now, let it be clear that while what eat is bread and what we drink is wine, by faith God’s people do trully feast upon Christ Jesus when they observe the New Covenant festival that Christ the Lord has ordained.   

Conclusion

I’ll conclude this sermon with a few contemplations or suggestions for application. 

First of all, if you love Christ and have him as your Lord and King, you will be eager to obey what he has ordained or commanded. “Do this in remeberance of me”, is not a suggestion, it is a command. And yet so many who profess faith in Christ and claim to love him, neglect this holy ordinance. Brothers and sisters, do not neglect the Lord’s Supper. Do not forsake the assembly wherein the Lord’s Supper is served (without good reason). And if you assemble, do not forsake that portion of the worship service wherein the Supper is eaten (without good reason). Come to the Table, friends, and, by faith, commune with the Christ you love.    

Secondly, when you come to the Table, be sure to come in a worthly manner. By this we mean, come by faith, with understanding, having confessed and turned from known sin, and with thankfulness in your hearts to God. I do hope that this sermon and the one to follow will help you to come to the Table with a greater understanding and appreciation for what it is that we do when we partake of the bread and the cup—trully, we feast upon Christ!  This is why the Apostle issued this warning: “Whoever… eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty concerning the body and blood of the Lord. Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup. For anyone who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment on himself. That is why many of you are weak and ill, and some have died. But if we judged ourselves truly, we would not be judged. But when we are judged by the Lord, we are disciplined so that we may not be condemned along with the world” (1 Corinthians 11:27–32, ESV). What does Paul mean when he warns that we must not fail to discern the body? He means to that we must not fail to discern and distingnish between “ordinary and common bread, and that bread which is the representation of the Lord’s body, [and to eat] the one as carelessly, and with as little preparation and regard to what he [deos], as he [uses] the other” (Matthew Poole’s commentary on 1 Cor. 11:29). Come worthiliy to the Table, brothers and sisters. If you have faith in Christ Jesus, you must come. It is not a suggestion from our Lord, but a command. To neglect the Supper is to live in disobedience to the King. But be sure to come worthily. Discern the body and blood of Christ as spiritually present in these elements that are set apart for a holy use, and prepare to come. Come by faith, with understanding, having confessed and turned from known sin, and with thankfulness in your hearts to God for the salvation that is yours in Christ Jesus. 

Thirdly, we as a congregation, and especially the pastors or elders of the church, must be diligent to teach Christians how to properly obserbve the Lord’s Supper. That this is to be of concern to us is made clear in the Great Commission. After his resurrection and before his ascension, Christ spoke to the Apostles, saying, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age” (Matthew 28:18–20, ESV). No doubt, many things are included in the phrase, “teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you”, but the Lord’s Supper is certainly one of those things. The Apostles are dead and gone. Now it is the mission of the local church to preach the gospel to all nations, to baptize those who make a credible profession of faith, and to teach these to observe all that Christ has commanded, including the faithful and worthly observance of the Lord’s Supper. May the Lord help us and may we be found faithful.