AUTHORS » Joe Anady

Afternoon Sermon: May All Men Make Use Of The Holy Scriptures?, Baptist Catechism 5,  Acts 8:26–40

Baptist Catechism 5

Q. 5. May all men make use of the Holy Scriptures?

A. All men are not only permitted, but commanded and exhorted, to read, hear, and understand the Holy Scriptures. (John 5:39; Luke 16:29; Acts 8:28-30; 17:11)

Scripture Reading: Acts 8:26–40

“Now an angel of the Lord said to Philip, “Rise and go toward the south to the road that goes down from Jerusalem to Gaza.” This is a desert place. And he rose and went. And there was an Ethiopian, a eunuch, a court official of Candace, queen of the Ethiopians, who was in charge of all her treasure. He had come to Jerusalem to worship and was returning, seated in his chariot, and he was reading the prophet Isaiah. And the Spirit said to Philip, “Go over and join this chariot.” So Philip ran to him and heard him reading Isaiah the prophet and asked, “Do you understand what you are reading?” And he said, “How can I, unless someone guides me?” And he invited Philip to come up and sit with him. Now the passage of the Scripture that he was reading was this: “Like a sheep he was led to the slaughter and like a lamb before its shearer is silent, so he opens not his mouth. In his humiliation justice was denied him. Who can describe his generation? For his life is taken away from the earth.” And the eunuch said to Philip, “About whom, I ask you, does the prophet say this, about himself or about someone else?” Then Philip opened his mouth, and beginning with this Scripture he told him the good news about Jesus. And as they were going along the road they came to some water, and the eunuch said, “See, here is water! What prevents me from being baptized?” And he commanded the chariot to stop, and they both went down into the water, Philip and the eunuch, and he baptized him. And when they came up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord carried Philip away, and the eunuch saw him no more, and went on his way rejoicing. But Philip found himself at Azotus, and as he passed through he preached the gospel to all the towns until he came to Caesarea.” (Acts 8:26–40, ESV)

*****

Introduction

This question, “May all men make use of the Holy Scriptures?”, might seem like a no-brainer to you. We are so used to having copies of the Scriptures written in our own language at our disposal. And it is very common for pastors to encourage Christians to read the Scriptures for themselves. But we should remember that our catechism was written not too long after the invention of the printing press. Before that time, it was very, very rare to have access to a copy of Holy Scripture. And even if someone did, it was probably written in a language that very few people knew how to read – Hebrew, Greek, or perhaps Latin. The invention of the printing press, the practice of translating the Scriptures into the native langue of the people, and the Protestant Reformation changed all of that.  In a very short period of time people went from having very little access to Scripture to having the opportunity to read the Scriptures for themselves. If we keep this history in mind, then the question, “May all men make use of the Holy Scriptures?”, will seem more reasonable to us. 

The answer to the question is very helpful no matter what time you live.  Again, “All men are not only permitted, but commanded and exhorted, to read, hear, and understand the Holy Scriptures.”

*****

“All men are not only permitted, but commanded…” 

The words “all men” are important. They emphasize the need for all people – men and women, boys and girls, clergy and laymen, educated and uneducated, rich and poor, etc – to engage with Holy Scripture. The Scriptures are not to be reserved for a particular class of men within society or within the church, but all should have access to them.

Next, our catechism says that all men are “not only permitted, but commanded…” to engage with Holy Scripture. The proof texts that are listed in our catechism are really interesting. They are John 5:39; Luke 16:29; Acts 8:28-30; 17:11. They all share this in common: they speak of men searching the Scriptures. For example, Acts 17:11 speaks of the men of Berea and says that they “ were more noble than those in Thessalonica; they received the word with all eagerness, examining the Scriptures daily to see if these things were so.” (Acts 17:11, ESV)

It truly is mind-boggling to think that the Romanists decided that the Scriptures should only be read by the religious elite. The Scriptures were originally written in Hebrew and Greek. In other words, they were written in the language of the people of that day – they were written to be read! And the Scriptures themselves speak of men – common men – searching the Scriptures. Indeed, they even encourage and command it! What a dark time that must have been to have the light of Holy Scripture hidden away within the confines of the Roman hierarchy. Praise God for the Reformation which did, among other things, bring the light of scripture back into the midst of the people.

*****

Hear The Scriptures

“All men are not only permitted, but commanded and exhorted, to read, hear, and understand the Holy Scriptures.” 

We are to read the Scriptures, so long as we are able. 

Do you read the Scriptures, brothers and sisters? You should. May I encourage you to read the Scriptures daily? The word of God should be like daily bread for our souls. I would encourage you to read the Scriptures regularly and to read them broadly. By this I mean, we should read through the Scriptures from beginning to end, though not necessarily in that order. We all have our favorite books and passages. Yes, there are some portions of the Bible that we speak more to the soul than others. But do not forget that all Scripture is inspired by God and is profitable. No part of Scripture can be called unimportant, therefore, for each part does contribute in some way to the whole. Read the Scriptures, brothers and sisters. Read them carefully and thoughtfully. 

And listen to them read too. Here we are to think primarily of the reading of Holy Scripture by the pastor in church. Did you know that this is one of the things that pastors are called to do? Listen to what Paul says to pastor Timothy: “Until I come, devote yourself to the public reading of Scripture, to exhortation, to teaching” (1 Timothy 4:13, ESV). When ministers read Scripture they should work hard at reading clearly and in such a way that the meaning of the text shines through. When congregants listen to the reading of the Scripture, they should listen very intently, knowing that they are indeed encountering the very word of God.

But do not forget the warning of James. “Know this, my beloved brothers: let every person be quick to hear, slow to speak, slow to anger; for the anger of man does not produce the righteousness of God. Therefore put away all filthiness and rampant wickedness and receive with meekness the implanted word, which is able to save your souls. But be doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving yourselves. For if anyone is a hearer of the word and not a doer, he is like a man who looks intently at his natural face in a mirror. For he looks at himself and goes away and at once forgets what he was like. But the one who looks into the perfect law, the law of liberty, and perseveres, being no hearer who forgets but a doer who acts, he will be blessed in his doing.” (James 1:19–25, ESV)

Hear the word, but do not be hearers only.

*****

Understand The Scriptures

Lastly, our catechism exhorts us to understand the Scriptures. “All men are not only permitted, but commanded and exhorted, to read, hear, and understand the Holy Scriptures.” 

Understanding the Scriptures can be difficult. One of the proof-texts listed by our catechism is Acts 8:28-30. That is that passage where Phillip approaches the Ethiopian eunuch who is reading Isaiah the prophet and asks him, “Do you understand what you are reading?” What was his response? “‘How can I, unless someone guides me?’ And he invited Philip to come up and sit with him” (Acts 8:31, ESV). I’m sure that many Christians have felt like the  Ethiopian eunuch at times while reading Scripture. How can I understand this unless someone guides me?

Last week I introduced you very briefly to the doctrine of the perspicuity or clarity of Scripture. I said the Scriptures have these characteristics: they are inspired, clear, sufficient, and authoritative. What do we mean when we say that the Scriptures are “clear”. 

Our confession is very helpful. In chapters 1 para 7 we read, “All things in Scripture are not alike plain in themselves, nor alike clear unto all; yet those things which are necessary to be known, believed and observed for salvation, are so clearly propounded and opened in some place of Scripture or other, that not only the learned, but the unlearned, in a due use of ordinary means, may attain to a sufficient understanding of them.” 

First, when we say that the Scriptures are clear we do not mean that all things are equally clear. Some things are indeed difficult to understand. 

Second,  when we say that the Scriptures are clear we mean that the main message is clear. The gospel is clear. “Those things which are necessary to be known, believed and observed for salvation” are clear.”

Third, not everything is equally clear to everybody. Those who have been in the faith for a long time may have an easier time understanding Scripture when compared to the one who is new to the faith. And indeed, some are more gifted, naturally or spiritually, than others when it comes to the interpretation of Scripture.    

Here is the point though.  The Scriptures are clear enough that “not only the learned [literate], but the unlearned [illiterate], in a due use of ordinary means, may attain to a sufficient understanding of them.” What are the “ordinary means” that our confession is referring to? They are the means of grace, one of them being the preaching and teaching of the Scriptures. 

When the Ethiopian eunuch was having a hard time with Isaiah and said “How can I [understand] unless someone guides me?”, it was not a denial of the perspicuity of Scripture. No, for the Lord provided Phillip to minister the Word to the man so that he might understand the message of the gospel. 

We have the responsibility, not only to read and hear the Scriptures but to understand them too. Are they clear? Yes! But that does not mean we won’t have to work at understanding them. 

*****

Conclusion

Brothers and sisters, young and old, grow very familiar with the Scriptures. Read them, listen to them read, and preached. And when you hear the Scriptures preached, pay very careful attention. Especially pay attention to the way that pastors who are faithful to the Scriptures interpret Scripture, so that you might learn how to rightly divide the word of truth yourself. Do not forget that this is how God saves us, through the ministry of the Word of God. This is why Paul told Timothy, “Keep a close watch on yourself and on the teaching. Persist in this, for by so doing you will save both yourself and your hearers.” (1 Timothy 4:16, ESV) Q. 5. May all men make use of the Holy Scriptures? A. All men are not only permitted, but commanded and exhorted, to read, hear, and understand the Holy Scriptures. (John 5:39; Luke 16:29; Acts 8:28-30; 17:11)

Posted in Sermons, Joe Anady, Posted by Joe. Comments Off on Afternoon Sermon: May All Men Make Use Of The Holy Scriptures?, Baptist Catechism 5,  Acts 8:26–40

Discussion Questions: Exodus 18:13-27

QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION AT HOME OR IN GOSPEL COMMUNITY GROUPS

Sermon manuscript available at emmausrbc.org

  • Chapter 19 of our confession divides the law of Moses up into three categories: moral, civil, and ceremonial. Can you define these terms (see 2LCF 19 for help)? How are these categories helpful in understanding the law of Moses and its application to the New Covenant people of God? 
  • What errors could result from failing to see the civil (judicial) and ceremonial laws of Moses as being unique to Israel? 
  • You may be innocent as it pertains to the civil laws of this land, but no man is innocent as it pertains to God’s moral law. Discuss. 
  • On the last day all men will stand, not before Moses, but Christ. He will judge according to the moral law. We will either have him as Savior or Judge. We had better have him as Savior. Discuss.
Tags:
Posted in Study Guides, Gospel Community Groups, Gospel Community Groups, Joe Anady, Posted by Joe. Comments Off on Discussion Questions: Exodus 18:13-27

Morning Sermon: Exodus 18:13-27, The Judicial System Of Old Covenant Israel And Its Implications For Us

New Testament Reading: Acts 14:19–23

After reading about the miracle performed through Paul at Lystra, wherein a man crippled from birth was made able to walk, and after hearing of the enthusiastic and even idolatrous reaction of the crowd towards Paul and his companion Barnabous, we read, “But Jews came from Antioch and Iconium, and having persuaded the crowds, they stoned Paul and dragged him out of the city, supposing that he was dead. But when the disciples gathered about him, he rose up and entered the city, and on the next day he went on with Barnabas to Derbe. When they had preached the gospel to that city and had made many disciples, they returned to Lystra and to Iconium and to Antioch, strengthening the souls of the disciples, encouraging them to continue in the faith, and saying that through many tribulations we must enter the kingdom of God. And when they had appointed elders for them in every church, with prayer and fasting they committed them to the Lord in whom they had believed.” (Acts 14:19–23, ESV)

Old Testament Reading: Exodus 18:13-27

“The next day Moses sat to judge the people, and the people stood around Moses from morning till evening. When Moses’ father-in-law saw all that he was doing for the people, he said, ‘What is this that you are doing for the people? Why do you sit alone, and all the people stand around you from morning till evening?’ And Moses said to his father-in-law, ‘Because the people come to me to inquire of God; when they have a dispute, they come to me and I decide between one person and another, and I make them know the statutes of God and his laws.’ Moses’ father-in-law said to him, ‘What you are doing is not good. You and the people with you will certainly wear yourselves out, for the thing is too heavy for you. You are not able to do it alone. Now obey my voice; I will give you advice, and God be with you! You shall represent the people before God and bring their cases to God, and you shall warn them about the statutes and the laws, and make them know the way in which they must walk and what they must do. Moreover, look for able men from all the people, men who fear God, who are trustworthy and hate a bribe, and place such men over the people as chiefs of thousands, of hundreds, of fifties, and of tens. And let them judge the people at all times. Every great matter they shall bring to you, but any small matter they shall decide themselves. So it will be easier for you, and they will bear the burden with you. If you do this, God will direct you, you will be able to endure, and all this people also will go to their place in peace.’ So Moses listened to the voice of his father-in-law and did all that he had said. Moses chose able men out of all Israel and made them heads over the people, chiefs of thousands, of hundreds, of fifties, and of tens. And they judged the people at all times. Any hard case they brought to Moses, but any small matter they decided themselves. Then Moses let his father-in-law depart, and he went away to his own country.” (Exodus 18:13–27, ESV)

*****

Please excuse any typos and misspellings within this manuscript. It has been published online for the benefit of the saints of Emmaus Reformed Baptist Church but without the benefit of proofreading.

Introduction

You know, I had a bit of an interesting experience with our text for today as I began to study it and to prepare for this sermon. As I read it and reflected upon it I quickly realized that I was bringing some baggage with me to the text. 

By the way, we do always have to be mindful of this when studying the scriptures. The student of the Bible should ask, do I have any preconceived ideas about this text that might impact my ability to interpret and apply it correctly? The answer will often be yes. The important thing is to acknowledge those biases and then to go about the task of interpretation and application in an honest way.   

So what were the preconceived notions that I had to wrestle with as it pertains to this text? Well, in my experience this text, which is about the establishment of a hierarchical judicial system within Old Covenant Israel, has been used and abused by those who wish to justify unbiblical forms of church government. In some traditions, it seems as if the New Testament is largely ignored while great weight is placed upon this passage here to justify a form of church government that is very top-heavy and structured in a hierarchical manner.  

I wonder, what forms of church government do you think of when I say this? Some of you, no doubt, will think of Rome with the pope at the head functioning like a Moses figure and its hierarchy of cardinals, bishops, and priests. But others will probably think of what they have observed within evangelical churches today where pastors function as CEOs, and the work of the ministry (which the New Testament teaches that pastors are to do) is delegated away to church staff, and even to the members of themselves. I’ve actually heard this model referred to as the “Moses model”, which is of course an allusion to this passage.  

It might not seem like a huge thing to you, but it’s a big deal to me. Over the years I’ve developed a rather strong disdain for this top-heavy and hierarchical form of church government that is now so common within evangelical churches. I’m afraid that it has led to a situation within churches where Pastors are neglecting what the Lord has called them to do, where members are asked to do things they were never called to do, and where Christians are left, therefore, without adequate pastoral care. I’ve come to see the “Moses model”, as it has been called by some, as highly problematic and damaging. 

So with that as background, where do you think my mind went when I read this text? My initial impulse was to deal only with what this event meant to Old Covenant Israel historically, and to deny that this passage has any bearing upon the church today. I think that would have been a mistake. 

Has this passage been misused and abused? Yes, I’m sure of it. Pragmatists have approached this text as if the point of it is to provide us with leadership principles. Dare to Delegate, that would be the pragmatists’ sermon title. And yes, I’m convinced that it is wrong to pretend that this passage is primarily about church government, or principles for leadership, for the original context must be ignored to do this. But it would also be a mistake to say this text has nothing at all to do with New Covenant church life, practically speaking.  

So then,  let us now consider this text carefully and in two parts. First, we will ask what did this text mean to Old Covenant Israel? And second, we will ask what does this text mean for the church today?

*****

What Did This Mean For Old Covenant Israel?

First, what did this text mean for Old Covenant Israel? Well, generally speaking, it described the origin of Old Covenant Israel’s judicial system. When the Old Covenant people of God read this text and reflected upon the event that is recorded here, they were moved to contemplate the beginning of their judicial system and of its impact upon their nation. 

I have three observations to make regarding this text as it applied to Old Covenant Israel:  

One, we must observe that the Hebrews, at this time, came to have a judicial system of their own. 

Think of it. In the days of Abraham, the Hebrews were only a family. Soon, they would grow into a clan. And after that, they would become a great multitude, but only as sojourners, and then slaves, in Egypt. While in Egypt they were subject to the laws of that land. They were not free, therefore, to establish their own judicial system. But when God redeemed them, and when they were at peace near Sinai, Moses began to adjudicate the disputes that had arisen between the people. Before this, the Hebrews did not have an established and well-developed judicial system of their own, but here we witness the birth of it. Stated differently, here in Exodus we are witnessing the birth of a nation – a nation that would come to have laws of its own, judges, eventually kings. Here we are told of the beginning of all that. And, as you know, the beginning of things is very important, for there in the beginning foundations are laid. We should pay careful attention to what is said about the beginning of things, therefore.   

Two, pay careful attention to the structure of this judicial system adopted by Israel. 

At first, Moses sat alone to judge the people. The lines were very long, and at the end of the day, not all of the cases were heard. Moses was exhausted, and the people of Israel were undoubtedly frustrated. So Jethro, “Moses’ father-in-law said to him, ‘What you are doing is not good. You and the people with you will certainly wear yourselves out, for the thing is too heavy for you. You are not able to do it alone.” Let us not forget who Jethro was. He was the father-in-law of Moses, the priest of Midian, who had recently blessed the LORD God Israel,  worshiped him, saying, “Now I know that the LORD is greater than all gods… (Exodus 18:11, ESV). We have just witnessed the conversion of Jethro, but we should not forget that the was a Gentile. He was not a Hebrew, and he would not join himself permanently to Israel but would return to his homeland of Midian. Jethro was a Gentile. And it was he who observed Moses sitting alone as judge and said,  “What you are doing is not good. You and the people with you will certainly wear yourselves out, for the thing is too heavy for you.”

Jethro the Gentile did not only have criticism, he offered wise counsel to Moses too, saying, “Now obey my voice; I will give you advice, and God be with you! You shall represent the people before God and bring their cases to God, and you shall warn them about the statutes and the laws, and make them know the way in which they must walk and what they must do. Moreover, look for able men from all the people, men who fear God, who are trustworthy and hate a bribe, and place such men over the people as chiefs of thousands, of hundreds, of fifties, and of tens. And let them judge the people at all times. Every great matter they shall bring to you, but any small matter they shall decide themselves. So it will be easier for you, and they will bear the burden with you. If you do this, God will direct you, you will be able to endure, and all this people also will go to their place in peace.” (Exodus 18:19–23, ESV)

Jethro’s advice was about the structure of Israel’s judicial system. Where did Jethro get these ideas concerning a hierarchical judicial system like the one he proposed? Undoubtedly, these ideas came from his experience as the priest of Midian. Jethro, being a respected leader amongst his people, was certainly called upon to engage in judicial matters. Perhaps the system he proposed was the exact system employed by the Midianites. Or perhaps the system he proposed was a refinement of the one used by the Midianites. The point is this: it was a Gentile who was used by the LORD to give Israel their hierarchical judicial system. 

Again, I will ask the question that I have asked many times before in this sermon series: why this way? Why did this happen? Why did Moses record this for us so that we have this as scripture? Could not the LORD have revealed this system to Moses from the get-go? Or, could not the LORD have revealed it to Moses, Aaron, or one of the other leaders of Israel after things went badly at first? Why this way? Why did God use a Gentile? And even after the LORD used Jethro in this way, why did Moses record it for us? You know how historians sometimes work. Sometimes they write down the good while ignoring the bad so as to make a people or nation look better than they really are. At other times they will ignore the good and record the bad if they wish to make people look worse than they are. We call that propaganda. But here, as is the case elsewhere in the Pentateuch, Moses tells the truth regarding himself and the Hebrews. His approach was at first bad, but Jethro-the-Gentile’s advice was very good. Verse 24 says, “So Moses listened to the voice of his father-in-law and did all that he had said” (Exodus 18:24, ESV).

What’s the point? Well, here we see a couple of things. One, the Hebrews in general, and Moses in particular were chosen by the LORD, not because they were naturally more wise or gifted than other peoples and nations, but by the grace of God alone. Two, here we have yet another example of Moses highlighting the natural wisdom and justice of Gentiles, even showing them to be sometimes superior to the Hebrews. I am thinking, of course, of the way that Moses contrasts Abraham with Pharaoh in Genesis 12, and Abraham with Abimelech in Genesis 20, in those stories wherein Abraham instructed Sarah to say that she was his sister and not his wife. Do you remember those stories? Abraham assumed that was no fear of God in these lands. He assumed that these people would act in a thoroughly unjust way, and yet in these instances, the kings of Egypt and Gerar appear to be more just than Abraham. Why these stories? Moses must have included them in the Hebrew scriptures to humble us and also to show that God was restraining evil in the world, that he was preserving a degree of morality and justice even amongst the pagans, and that even they have some access to truth and wisdom through the natural world. The Hebrews would be given God’s Word. God would speak to them in a special way.  To use Paul’s language, “They are Israelites, and to them belong the adoption, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship, and the promises. To them belong the patriarchs, and from their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ, who is God over all, blessed forever. Amen” (Romans 9:4–5, ESV). So yes, the Hebrews were the recipients of special revelation. But there are indications sprinkled throughout the Old Testament that help us to see that God did not leave the nations without witness, but reveals some truth to them through nature (see Acts 14:17).   

It was Jethro, a Gentile, who suggested that Israel’s judicial system be structured in this wise and prudent manner. Let us consider his advice a little more closely.

One, Moses, the prophet and priest of God, would still be involved in the judicial process, but he would hear only the difficult cases brought to him through a process of appeal. 

Two, other men would be appointed to hear lesser cases. And there would be a hierarchical structure amongst them. Some would be appointed to serve in the lower courts (if I may use language familiar to us), and others would be appointed to serve in higher courts. 

Three, Moses was to select these jedges from amongst the people. This means that the people were to be fairly represented. One tribe was not to be shown preference over another, for example. 

Four, the judges were to be selected, not on the basis of birth or social status, but on the basis of giftedness and character.  Moses was to “look for able men from all the people, men who fear God, who are trustworthy and hate a bribe…” These were the kinds of men that Moses was to place “over the people as chiefs of thousands, of hundreds, of fifties, and of tens” (Exodus 18:21, ESV).

Five, this structure would then free Moses to “warn [the people]  about the statutes and the laws, and make them know the way in which they must walk and what they must do” (Exodus 18:20, ESV). In other words, this method of delegation would free Moses to function as God’s prophet. 

My third observation concerning what this passage meant to Old Covenant Israel is this: the civil laws of Old Covenant Israel were given to them by God, through Moses, by special revelation. 

This is such an important observation. In the days of Moses Israel became a great nation. But they were not an ordinary nation. No, they were a holy nation set apart by God for redemptive purposes. The precious and very great promises of God were entrusted to them. They entered into a special covenant with God. They were to build the tabernacle, and later the temple, by God’s command. There they were to worship being led by the priesthood. Prophets ministered amongst them. Their Kings were to be after God’s own heart. This nation – the nation of Old Covenant Israel – was unique. Never was there a nation like them before, during or after the time of the Old Mosaic Covenant. And we must recognize that the law that was given to them through Moses was in some ways unique too. 

I have said, “in some ways”, because the ten commandments which were given to Israel, having been written by the finger of God on stone, are to be viewed as a summary of God’s moral law. God’s moral law was not unique to Israel, but was written on man’s heart at the time of creation and is accessible to all even now being revealed in the things that God has made. Yes, men and women suppress and distort this natural law, as it is sometimes called, but there it is nonetheless. You may see Romans 1 to learn about this. But as we consider the law that was given to Israel through Moses we will see that many of these laws were unique to them. 

Israel was called to worship the LORD in a way that no other people on earth were called to worship. God gave them laws – we call them ceremonial laws – to govern their worship. They were to build a tabernacle, they were to establish a priesthood, they were to abstain from certain foods, they were to call some things clean and others things unclean, they were to observe holy days in addition to the weekly Sabbath. These laws were given to them through Moses by divine revelation. These laws were not given to other nations.   

And something very similar may be said of the civil law code that was given to Israel. These civil laws, which are sometimes called judicial laws, were given to Israel. They were not imposed upon other nations. May we learn from these civil laws that were given to Israel through Moses by God? Yes, of course. All civil laws have moral principles at their core. Something may be learned about morality and justice, therefore, from the civil laws that God revealed to Israel.  But we must draw these principles of general equity, as they are called, out of the civil laws given to Israel very carefully. In brief, we must remember that Israel was a holy nation wherein the kingdom of God was prefigured on earth. Therefore, we should not be surprised to find an unusual strictness in the laws imposed upon Israel. We will find, for example, that violations of the first table of the ten commandments, which have to do with the worship of God, were punishable by death. Idollators were to be put to death in Israel. False prophets were to die. Even Sabbath-breakers were to die. May we learn something about God’s moral law as we consider these civil laws imposed upon Israel? Yes, of course. God alone is to be worshiped. And we are to worship in the way that God has prescribed. We also see in Old Covenant Israel’s laws a kind of picture of how God will judge the world through Christ on the last day when he consummates his kingdom. On the last day God will not judge men for crimes, but sins (if not in Christ by faith). And what is sin? “Sin is any [lack] of conformity unto, or transgression of, the law of God. (1 John 3:4; Rom. 5:13)” (Baptist Catechism, 17). 

Here’s the point: The civil law code that was given to Israel by God through Moses was for them, for the LORD was doing something special with them. They were a holy nation, and so their civil law code was not only concerned with matters of justice but holiness too. Crimes against persons were not the only crimes punished civilly, but also violations of God’s law pertaining to worship.  

This is a big and complex subject that I have begun to wade into. I need to turn around to return to shore now. I’ll do so by restating my third observation concerning what this passage meant to Old Covenant Israel: the civil laws of Old Covenant Israel were given to them by God, through Moses, by special revelation. 

Look at verse 16. It’s really marvelous to consider. As the people came to Moses with their disputes he would “decide between one person and another, and [would] make them know the statutes of God and his laws” (Exodus 18:16, ESV). And when Jethro offered his advice to Moses he said in verse 19, “Now obey my voice; I will give you advice, and God be with you! You shall represent the people before God and bring their cases to God, and you shall warn them about the statutes and the laws, and make them know the way in which they must walk and what they must do” (Exodus 18:19–20, ESV).

Taken together these verses describe Moses, not as a philosopher, nor as a legal theorist, nor as a highly-skilled judge, writing laws and enforcing them based upon natural reason. No, Moses was a prophet. He heard from God and he delivered God’s word to Israel. This was special, brothers and sisters. No other nation on earth can make the claim that its law code – the whole thing, with all of the specifics – came by divine inspiration. Yes, all of the civil laws in every nation on earth should be based on God’s moral law as revealed in nature, and even much more clearly in scripture. But this was different. Here God gave a holy civil law, to a holy people, through a holy prophet.  What is introduced here, in brief, will be greatly amplified later in Exodus and in the rest of the Pentateuch. 

*****

What Does This Mean For The Church Today?

Well, after hearing all of that I hope you agree with me that it’s a bit of a stretch to jump from this text straight to questions about New Covenant church government. But I have left a little time to ask, what does this mean for the church today? 

First, I have two observations to make regarding the difference between Old Covenant Israel’s experience and ours. 

One, unlike Old Covenant Israel we do not have a Moses figure amongst us, for Christ has come. Stated differently, Christ, the eternal and incarnate Word of God, is our Moses. To whom do we appeal in questions regarding faith and practice? We appeal to God through Christ, and we have his Word. Old Covenant Israel had Moses in the midst of them at the time of the Exodus. The people and the judges appealed to him. After Moses died, the people were to appeal to the scriptures that he wrote. And the same pattern holds true for the New Covenant people of God. Christ has come. He is the great Prophet of whom Moses said, “The LORD your God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among you, from your brothers—it is to him you shall listen…” (see Deut. 18:15 and Acts 3:22). We appeal to God through Christ, therefore, and not to any man on earth today. We appeal to the Word of God, the holy scriptures as our authority for all things pertaining to faith and practice.   

Two, unlike Old Covenant Israel, the church, as an institution has no responsibility or right to formulate or enforce civil laws. The reason for this is really quite simple. The church is not a nation. Under the Old Covenant church and state were wed together (if you’ll allow me to use that terminology), but under the New Covenant church and state are separated. 

Is God Lord over both church and state? Yes.  He rules them both but in different ways. 

May Christian’s labor in the civil realm. Yes, in fact, I would say that they ought to, if they have the giftedness, the calling, and the opportunity. 

And should Christians use God’s general revelation and God’s special revelation when working in the civil realm to encourage a moral and just society? Yes, they must. How could they not? But they must do so with great care being sure to rightly divide the word of truth. 

But what about the church? What can the church, as an institution, learn from this story about Moses, Jethro, and the establishment of Israel’s hierarchical judicial system? 

Well, it is right for us to see that there are some similarities between this Old Covenant legal system and the system of government that is prescribed for the church in the New Testament.  

One, we must recognize that God has provided the church with a system of government under the New Covenant just as he did for Israel under the Old. In other words, the Lord has not left questions about structure open-ended. Local churches are to be self-governing. They are to be led and served by elders and by deacons, each in their own way.

Two, the final authority to which we must appeal is the word of God. God is our authority, and he has spoken. He has spoken through Christ and his Apostles. Now we have the written word. 

Three, just as the responsibility to govern was to be shared under the Old Covenant, so too it is to be shared under the New. 

Churches should strive to have a plurality of elders so that the burdens of teaching, leading, shepherding, and overseeing may be shared by many. Unless the church is very small, the work of the ministry will be too overwhelming for one man. And even then, there is wisdom in a plurality. Churches should strive for that so the work of the ministry may be shared by many.  

Deacons are crucial too. We know that the first deacons were appointed to address practical and physical needs within the church so that the elders (Apostles) could devote themselves to the ministry of the word of God and to prayer. Deacons are vital. Churches ought to appoint them, and elders should be sure to allow them to do their work and even to delegate to them appropriately. 

You should notice that just as Israel’s judges were to be selected from amongst the people, not on the basis of birth or status, but only after meeting character qualifications, so too it is for church officers. The judges of Israel were to “from all the people, men who [feared] God, who [were] trustworthy and [hated] a bribe…” And you are well aware of the qualifications for elders and deacons that are set forth so clearly in the New Testament in 1 Timothy 3 and Titus 1.    

So then, this principle of delegation is present within the New Testament pattern for church government. A plurality of elders is ideal, and so too is a faithful diaconate. I think you would also agree that the members of the church can make a great difference by being faithful to use the gifts that God has given to them for the building up of the body of Christ. No, I am not claiming that every member is called to do what elders and deacons are called to do. But I am saying that every Christian is to be used by the Lord, according to their ability and giftedness, for the edification of others, and the building up of the body of Christ, of which we are all members.   

Lastly, I will make this brief observation: The Old Covenant nation of Israel was given civil laws and a judicial system. The same cannot be said of the church. But the church does have the ability to advise, mediate, and even make judgments,  in non-criminal matters, and it should take those obligations seriously. Paul wrote to the Corinthian church about this, saying, “When one of you has a grievance against another, does he dare go to law before the unrighteous instead of the saints [speaking of Rome]? Or do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if the world is to be judged by you, are you incompetent to try trivial cases? Do you not know that we are to judge angels? How much more, then, matters pertaining to this life! So if you have such cases, why do you lay them before those who have no standing in the church? I say this to your shame. Can it be that there is no one among you wise enough to settle a dispute between the brothers, but brother goes to law against brother, and that before unbelievers?” (1 Corinthians 6:1–6, ESV).

My point is this: on the one hand, we must not ignore the separation that exists now between church and state under the New Covenant. On the other hand, we must not ignore the responsibility that we have within the church to mediate, advise and even judge on non-criminal matters. Far too often troubles within the modern church are ignored. Sometimes they are even left to non-believers to sort out, and this is to our shame. 

*****

Conclusion

I would like to conclude now by explicitly saying something that I have already alluded to. The existence of civil law codes and of judicial systems, both in Old Covenant Israel and in all of the nations of the earth, should remind us that a final judgment is coming. These civil laws, and these judicial systems – yes, even the unusually strict laws of Israel – are intended to restrain evil in the world. This is one way that God preserves the natural order until Christ returns. Evildoers are punished, those who do good are encouraged, and a degree of justice is upheld when law systems are functioning as they should. But these attempts at justice are but a faint shadow of the kind of justice that will be vetted by God, who sees all, on the last day. Not all, but some crimes are prosecuted in our civil courts. And even when there is a degree of justice it is not full or final. No, the justice that is served in this life is only earthly and temporal. But on the last day, God will judge, not only crimes against persons but every sin committed against him. His judgments will not be earthly and temporal, but spiritual and eternal. 

Friends, please hear me. You may be innocent as it pertains to the laws of this land, but no one is innocent before God. All have sinned and have fallen short of his glory. All have violated his law in thought, word, and deed. And what does every sin deserve? “Every sin deserveth God’s wrath and curse, both in this life, and in that which is to come” (Baptist Catechism, 89)

On the last day, you will stand, not before Moses to be judged by the civil laws or ceremonial laws of Israel. No, you will stand before Jesus Christ. If you do not have him as Savior, you will have him as Judge. And will judge with perfect knowledge, holiness, and righteousness according to God’s perfect, eternal, and unchanging moral law, of which the ten commandments are a summary. When held up to that standard – the standard of God’s moral law – “None is righteous, no, not one” (Romans 3:10, ESV). When Christ judges by that law, “every mouth [will] be stopped, and the whole world [will] be held accountable to God. For by works of the law no human being will be justified in his sight, since through the law comes knowledge of sin…” (Romans 3:19–21, ESV)

“When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, then he will sit on his glorious throne. Before him will be gathered all the nations, and he will separate people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. And he will place the sheep on his right, but the goats on the left. Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world… Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels.” (Matthew 25:31–41, ESV)

Friends, you had better have Christ as Savior, not as Judge. And how do we come to have him as Savior? By turning from our sins and to him by faith. We must trust in him from the heart. We must confess that he is Lord. I implore you to be sure that he is your Savior, not your Judge. 

Here is good news. “God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.” (John 3:16, ESV)

Posted in Sermons, Joe Anady, Exodus 18:13-27, Posted by Joe. Comments Off on Morning Sermon: Exodus 18:13-27, The Judicial System Of Old Covenant Israel And Its Implications For Us

Afternoon Sermon: What Is The Word Of God?, Baptist Catechism 4, 2 Timothy 3:10–17

Baptist Catechism 4

Q. 4. What is the Word of God?

A. The Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments are the Word of God, and the only certain rule of faith and obedience. (2 Peter 1:21; 2 Timothy 3:16,17; Isaiah 8:20)

Scripture Reading: 2 Timothy 3:10–17

“You, however, have followed my teaching, my conduct, my aim in life, my faith, my patience, my love, my steadfastness, my persecutions and sufferings that happened to me at Antioch, at Iconium, and at Lystra—which persecutions I endured; yet from them all the Lord rescued me. Indeed, all who desire to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted, while evil people and impostors will go on from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived. But as for you, continue in what you have learned and have firmly believed, knowing from whom you learned it and how from childhood you have been acquainted with the sacred writings, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.” (2 Timothy 3:10–17, ESV)

*****

Introduction

To appreciate question 4 of our catechism, we need to remember question 3. 

Question three addresses the question of knowing. “How may we know…”, question three begins. That is an interesting question all by itself, wouldn’t you agree? How can we know things, all kinds of things? That is a question worthy of our consideration. In particular, question three asks, “How may we know there is a God?” The answer that is given is helpful both to the general question, how may we know?, and to the more specific question, “How may we know there is a God?” 

The answer given is, “The light of nature in man and the works of God plainly declare that there is a God; but His Word and Spirit only do it fully and effectively for the salvation of sinners.” So here we learn a most foundational truth. We may know things in general, and we may know that God exists in particular, because God has revealed truth to us. God has spoken both through nature and also through his Word. We call these two forms of revelation general or natural revelation, and special revelation. God reveals himself, and certain truths about himself generally through the world that he has made. And God reveals himself, and truths about himself much more specifically through his Word. Who has access to natural or general revelation? All people do. Who has access to his special revelation? It is only those who have read or heard the truths now contained within Holy Scripture. One more question about this: is it possible for men and women to be saved through natural revelation? We say, no. For the gospel is not communicated in the stars or in the trees or in the heart of man, but only through God’s special revelation. 

So then, question 3 introduced us to the “Word of God”, and now question 4 asks, “what is the Word of God?” The answer that is given is very basic. “The Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments are the Word of God, and the only certain rule of faith and obedience.” The answer is basic, but it is very helpful. Let us consider it now piece by piece. 

*****

The Holy Scriptures

Here the “Holy Scriptures” are said to be “the Word of God”.

Scripture means writing. The writings that are being referred to here are (for the most part) the writings of men. Men like Moses, David, and Paul wrote the scriptures that we now have. But here we are confessing that these writings are not ordinary writings — they are holy. The word “holy” reminds us that the scriptures are from God and they are pure. 

We confess that the scriptures are inspired by God. Did men write them? Yes indeed. Did men choose the words? Yes, they did. Can we get a sense of their education or their personalities through their writings? Yes, I think we can. Men wrote the scriptures. But with the holy scriptures, there is more to the story. These men we inspired by God. God’s spirit carried them along to write what they wrote so that at the end of the day we are correct to refer to their words as the Word of God. This is what Peter says, and I quote, “knowing this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture comes from someone’s own interpretation. For no prophecy was ever produced by the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit” (2 Peter 1:20–21, ESV). This is a marvelous description of inspiration. Again, “no prophecy was ever produced by the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.”

The Holy Scriptures are the Word of God, and they are therefore pure. The scriptures are inerrant and infallible. They are trustworthy and sure. By the way, if we are going to confess that the scriptures are the words of God, we must also confess that they are inerrant, infallible, trustworthy, and sure, for God cannot error. He cannot utter a lie. In fact, if we were not so constrained by time, I would explain to you that, because scriptures is God’s Word, we must view scriptures as having these qualities or characteristics: the scriptures are inspired, clear, sufficient, and authoritative.  

I said that the answer provided by our catechism is simple. If it were more complex it might also address the fact that God has spoken in other ways in the past. God spoke to men directly, as with Adam. He spoke to and through the prophets. He wrote the ten commandments with his own “finger”. Supremely, God spoke to us through his Son, Christ the Lord, the eternal  Word of God come in the flesh. That is all true. But where is the Word of God found by us today? Not in the mouths of prophets, not from within ourselves, but in the Holy Scriptures.

If our catechism were more complex it might also address the fact that what most of us read today are translations of the Holy Scriptures. The scriptures were written originally in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. And when we speak of the scriptures being inspired by God, inerrant, infallible, and authoritative we have those texts in mind. The modern translations we possess are marvelous. It is a tremendous blessing to have translations of Holy Scripture in our native tongue at our fingertips. But it is important for us to keep the distinction between the originals, copies of the originals, and translations of the originals in mind. Thanks be to God that he has not only spoken to us by his Word, he has also preserved the scriptures for us so that we might know what he has said. 

Q: “What is the Word of God?”  A: “The Holy Scriptures… are the Word of God…” 

*****

Old And New Testaments

More precisely, our catechism also says that “the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments are the Word of God…” The phrase, “of the Old and New Testaments”, is very important, for it identifies what “scriptures” we have in mind. Not just any scriptures (writings), but the scriptures “of the Old and New Testaments”.

As you know, our catechism summarizes our confession of faith. And our confession of faith is more detailed at this point. The books of the Holy Scripture are actually listed out in chapter 1.2. Brothers and sisters, I think it is important to understand something about the structure of the scriptures. The Holy Scriptures are made up of two testaments. And what divides the Old Testament from the New? What distinguishes them? Well, it is the life of Christ. 

Matthew 1 is the beginning of the New Testament and it begins by telling us about the birth of Jesus the Messiah – his life, death burial, and resurrection. The other three gospels do the same. The book of Acts tells us about the Acts of Jesus’ Apostles. The Epistles provide instruction for the church based upon what Jesus accomplished. Revelation does the same while also giving us a glimpse of our final inheritance in Christ in apocalyptic form. Stated succinctly, the New Testament is about Jesus Christ, the promised Messiah. 

What then is the Old Testament. Well, it is about many, many things. In brief, the Old Testament scriptures tell us about creation, man’s fall into sin, the promise of God to provide a Savior. The Messiah would emerge from the descendants of Abraham after they became a great nation. The vast majority of the Old Testament scriptures is about Israel, therefore, and what God did in and through them to bring the promised Messiah into the world through them. 

So then, we must see that both the Old and New Testament scriptures are about Jesus Christ. This is in fact what Jesus taught his disciples on the road to Emmaus as recorded in Luke 24. He interpreted the scriptures, that is to say, the Old Testament scriptures, showing how all of the law prophets, and Psalms were fulfilled in him. Saint Augustine once famously described the relationship between the Old and New Testament like this: “The New is in the Old concealed; the Old is in the New revealed” .

*****

The Works Of God

After saying that “the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments are the Word of God”, our catechism then declares that they are “the only certain rule of faith and obedience. 

Rule means standard. What is the standard for what we should believe and for what we should do? The scriptures are. They are the rule of faith and obedience. 

What should we believe about God? To the scriptures we must go! What should we believe about ourselves? To the scriptures we must go! What should we believe about salvation? To the scriptures we must go! And how should we live? How should we worship? To the scriptures we must go! Natural revelation may help us in many ways, but the rule of faith and obedience is not found there. It is found only in God’s Holy Word.

*****

Conclusion

Do you know the scriptures, brothers and sisters? To love to listen to them read and preached? Do you read them for yourselves? Do you cherish them and store them up in your heart? We ought to, for the scriptures are God’s word to us. 

Moreover, “The law of the LORD is perfect, reviving the soul; the testimony of the LORD is sure, making wise the simple; the precepts of the LORD are right, rejoicing the heart; the commandment of the LORD is pure, enlightening the eyes; the fear of the LORD is clean, enduring forever; the rules of the LORD are true, and righteous altogether. More to be desired are they than gold, even much fine gold; sweeter also than honey and drippings of the honeycomb. Moreover, by them is your servant warned; in keeping them there is great reward.” (Psalm 19:7–11, ESV)

Q. 4. What is the Word of God?

A. The Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments are the Word of God, and the only certain rule of faith and obedience. (2 Peter 1:21; 2 Timothy 3:16,17; Isaiah 8:20)

Posted in Sermons, Joe Anady, Posted by Joe. Comments Off on Afternoon Sermon: What Is The Word Of God?, Baptist Catechism 4, 2 Timothy 3:10–17

Discussion Questions: Exodus 18:1-12

QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION AT HOME OR IN GOSPEL COMMUNITY GROUPS

Sermon manuscript available at emmausrbc.org

  • How will contemplation of and appreciation for the marvelous victory that Christ has accomplished for us in his life, death, burial, and resurrection help us to witness to others regarding the good news?
  • How will contemplation of the judgment that awaits all who are not in Christ motivate us to witness?
  • Discuss the significance of Jethro’s response? Consider that he was a gentile. Consider what he confessed to knowing. Consider his worship, and also the meal that he ate before God and with Israel. What is the significance of these things?
  • Why have I said that the goal of witnessing is worship?
Tags:
Posted in Study Guides, Gospel Community Groups, Gospel Community Groups, Joe Anady, Posted by Joe. Comments Off on Discussion Questions: Exodus 18:1-12

Morning Sermon: Exodus 18:1-12, We Are Witnesses

New Testament Reading: Acts 1:1-11

“In the first book, O Theophilus, I have dealt with all that Jesus began to do and teach, until the day when he was taken up, after he had given commands through the Holy Spirit to the apostles whom he had chosen. He presented himself alive to them after his suffering by many proofs, appearing to them during forty days and speaking about the kingdom of God. And while staying with them he ordered them not to depart from Jerusalem, but to wait for the promise of the Father, which, he said, ‘you heard from me; for John baptized with water, but you will be baptized with the Holy Spirit not many days from now.’ So when they had come together, they asked him, ‘Lord, will you at this time restore the kingdom to Israel?’ He said to them, ‘It is not for you to know times or seasons that the Father has fixed by his own authority. But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the end of the earth.’ And when he had said these things, as they were looking on, he was lifted up, and a cloud took him out of their sight. And while they were gazing into heaven as he went, behold, two men stood by them in white robes, and said, ‘Men of Galilee, why do you stand looking into heaven? This Jesus, who was taken up from you into heaven, will come in the same way as you saw him go into heaven.’” (Acts 1:1–11, ESV)

Old Testament Reading: Exodus 18:1-12

“Jethro, the priest of Midian, Moses’ father-in-law, heard of all that God had done for Moses and for Israel his people, how the LORD had brought Israel out of Egypt. Now Jethro, Moses’ father-in-law, had taken Zipporah, Moses’ wife, after he had sent her home, along with her two sons. The name of the one was Gershom (for he said, ‘I have been a sojourner in a foreign land’), and the name of the other, Eliezer (for he said, ‘The God of my father was my help, and delivered me from the sword of Pharaoh’). Jethro, Moses’ father-in-law, came with his sons and his wife to Moses in the wilderness where he was encamped at the mountain of God. And when he sent word to Moses, ‘I, your father-in-law Jethro, am coming to you with your wife and her two sons with her,’ Moses went out to meet his father-in-law and bowed down and kissed him. And they asked each other of their welfare and went into the tent. Then Moses told his father-in-law all that the LORD had done to Pharaoh and to the Egyptians for Israel’s sake, all the hardship that had come upon them in the way, and how the LORD had delivered them. And Jethro rejoiced for all the good that the LORD had done to Israel, in that he had delivered them out of the hand of the Egyptians. Jethro said, “Blessed be the LORD, who has delivered you out of the hand of the Egyptians and out of the hand of Pharaoh and has delivered the people from under the hand of the Egyptians. Now I know that the LORD is greater than all gods, because in this affair they dealt arrogantly with the people.’ And Jethro, Moses’ father-in-law, brought a burnt offering and sacrifices to God; and Aaron came with all the elders of Israel to eat bread with Moses’ father-in-law before God.” (Exodus 18:1–12, ESV)

*****

Please excuse any typos and misspellings within this manuscript. It has been published online for the benefit of the saints of Emmaus Reformed Baptist Church but without the benefit of proofreading.

Introduction

The theme of the previous passage is warfare. The theme of the passage that is before us today is witnessing. From warfare to witnessing – isn’t that an interesting transition? 

In the previous sermon, I said that Christian sojourners must engage in spiritual warfare. In this sermon, I will say that Christian sojourners must witness. At first glance, these two activities seem to be very different and unrelated, but upon closer examination, we will see that the two things are tightly linked in the outworking of God’s plan of redemption. Victory in warfare must result in witnessing. 

Please do not misunderstand me. I am not speaking of ordinary warfare here. I’m not talking about the kind of warfare that is fought between the common nations of this earth – but spiritual warfare – warfare that has to do with the spiritual conflict between Satan and those who belong to him by birth, and Christ and those who belong to him by faith. There is a battle that rages in the spiritual realm. Yes, it does manifest itself on earth. But it is, in the end, a battle for the souls of men and for the glory of God.  

The story of scripture may be described as a story about this spiritual war. It began with the temptation of man in the garden. The treason of Adam was the spark.  The declaration of war was made by God himself when he declared to the Serpent that one would arise from the offspring of the women who would crush his head. Until then – until the full and final defeat of the Evil One – there would be conflict, or warfare, between those who belonged to God by faith, and those whose allegiance was with Serpent.

Old Covenant Israel’s wars, as earthly and natural as they were, must be viewed as spiritual wars. They were holy wars, for they were divinely sanctioned. They were fought, not for selfish gain, but for the glory of God. They fought, not for the expansion of borders, nor for the procurement of personal wealth, but for the advancement of God’s kingdom on earth and for the accomplishment of his program of redemption. The wars of Old Covenant Israel were holy wars, for in those days the LORD was fulfilling the promises that he made to Abraham concerning his offspring possessing the land of Canaan to become a great nation with kings to govern them. And we know that the purpose of this was to prefigure the kingdom of God on earth until the promised Messiah would emerge from this people to atone for sins, to defeat the Evil One, and to usher in the Kingdom of God with power. 

Here I am reiterating what was said in the previous sermon. When we consider the wars of Old Covenant Israel we must see them as unique and as holy, for the LORD commanded these wars. He fought for his people in a special way. These wars, unlike all other wars, had something to do with the accomplishment of God’s plan of redemption in Christ. From this nation, the Messiah – the skull-crushing seed of the women – would be brought into the world. And until then, this nation would be preserved in Canaan. There the kingdom of God would be prefigured. There the Israelites would guard the precious and very great promise of God. There they would worship the LORD as they lived in covenant with him. They were God’s holy people. The wars that they fought were holy wars, for these wars, unlike all other wars, were about the advancement of God’s kingdom, the accomplishment of his plans and purposes, and were for his glory. It is no wonder then, that victory in warfare gave way to witnessing. After the Exodus, and after the victory that Israel won over Amalek, Moses witnessed, or testified, concerning the mercy and grace of God towards Israel, and of his greatness.

Brothers and sisters, if Moses was moved to witness, or to testify, concerning the grace and greatness of God after Israel’s deliverance from Egypt and Joshua’s victory over Amalek at Rephidim, how much more so ought we be moved to witness, or to testify, concerning the grace and greatness of God now that he has delivered us from the domain of darkness, bondage to sin, and the fear of death through Jesus’ victory over the Evil One on the cross?

I alluded to this in the previous sermon. Now would be a good time to state it explicitly. Jesus is the Greek pronunciation of the Hebrew name, Joshua. Joshua was a type of Christ. It was through Joshua that God worked the victory for Israel over Amalek. It would be Joshua who would lead Israel into the promised land. I am saying to you that Joshua and the victories won by him, foreshadowed the Joshua to come, his victory over Satan himself, and the leading of his people, the Israel of God, into The Promised Land, the new heavens and earth – it was Jesus the Messiah who accomplished these things. 

Again I ask, if Moses was eager to witness concerning the earthly deliverance and victory that God had worked for Old Covenant Israel, how much more should we be eager to witness concerning the eternal deliverance and victory that God has worked for his elect through Jesus Christ?

*****

Christian Sojourners Must Witness

So then, the first and main point of the sermon is this: Christian sojourners must witness. 

In verse 1 we read, ​​“Jethro, the priest of Midian, Moses’ father-in-law, heard of all that God had done for Moses and for Israel his people, how the LORD had brought Israel out of Egypt.” (Exodus 18:1, ESV)

We were introduced to Jethro for the first time back in 2:18. In that passage, he is called by the name Reuel. After that, he is called by the name Jethro. Moses married Jethro’s daughter after he took refuge with him after fleeing Egypt as a relatively young man. Moses lived in Jethro’s clan for a very long time. He tended his flocks. In fact, this was what Moses was doing when then the LORD spoke to him in the burning bush and called him to act as the deliverer of his people. 

Undoubtedly, Moses had told Jethro about the LORD God. I’m sure he communicated to him the same truths that are contained for us in Genesis. He testified that the LORD was the creator of heaven and earth, that he had created man upright and entered into a covenant with him, but that man fell. Surely Moses told Jethro, along with his wife and children, about the promises made to his forefathers, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. And certainly, Moses reported to Jethro about the call of God that was upon him after his encounter with God in the burning bush. But up to now, there is no indication that Jethro believed in YHWH. The scriptures say that Jethro was the priest of Midian. He was concerned with matters of worship, therefore. He was viewed by his people as a spiritual leader. What exactly were his beliefs? Just how pure or false was the religion he promoted? We do not know for sure. But here it seems that the LORD got his attention. “Jethro “heard of all that God had done for Moses and for Israel his people, how the LORD had brought Israel out of Egypt” (Exodus 18:1, ESV).

How did Jethro hear it? I suppose it could be that Moses sent messengers to him. But it may also be that word had spread to him concerning what the LORD had done to the Egyptians and to the so-called gods of Egypt. We know that word spread to the surrounding nations for other passages say that they trembled as Israel drew near to them. Jethro came to Moses having heard of what the LORD had done for Israel to deliver them and brought his daughter and grandsons, that is to say, Moses’ wife and children, with him. 

Why was Moses separated from his wife and children? Commentators debate this. So think that there was some sort of break in the relationship between Moses and his wife. That would mean that perhaps even she was unconvinced that Moses was called by God, and then convinced when she heard the news of the deliverance of Israel. Others think that Moses had sent his wife and children back home for their safety, and called for them once things were settled. I lean towards the second of these two opinions.

Here we learn the name of Moses’ two sons along with their meaning. Verse 3: “The name of the one was Gershom (for he said, ‘I have been a sojourner in a foreign land’), and the name of the other, Eliezer (for he said, ‘The God of my father was my help, and delivered me from the sword of Pharaoh’).” Gershom sounds like the Hebrew word for “sojourner”. Eliezer means “my God is help”. 

So then, Jethro journeys to Moses as they encamped at the mountain of God, this is, near Sinai, and he brought Moses’ wife and children with him. The scene is very sweet. It is a blessed reunion after a long time of separation. Moses must have been very pleased to see his wife and children, but the story focuses upon his interaction with his father-in-law, Jethro, the priest of Midian. I think this is very significant. The point is not to downplay the joyousness of the reunion between Moses, his wife, and children, but to emphasize the interaction between Moses, the prophets and priest of Israel, and Jethro, the priest of Midian. “Moses went out to meet his father-in-law and bowed down and kissed him. And they asked each other of their welfare and went into the tent. Then Moses told his father-in-law all that the LORD had done to Pharaoh and to the Egyptians for Israel’s sake, all the hardship that had come upon them in the way, and how the LORD had delivered them.” (Exodus 18:7–8, ESV)

In other words, Moses witnessed to Jethro. He testified concerning the redemption that the LORD had accomplished for Israel. Notice these things: 

One, Moses’ witness was not forced but was natural. He greeted his father-in-law in an honorable way. He invited him into his home and spoke to him naturally while sitting around the table, as it were. 

Brothers and sisters, we should be eager to testify concerning the redemption that Christ has accomplished for us, and in my experience, it is best when the testimony is delivered in a natural, instead of forced, way. Be friendly. By kind and hospitable. Develop relationships with others. “[H]onor Christ the Lord as holy, always being prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you; yet do it with gentleness and respect…” (1 Peter 3:15, ESV)

Two, Moses told the story of redemption. What exactly did he say to Jethro? We do not know for sure, but there is good reason to believe that what he said was set against the backdrop of the story of Genesis. As I have said, I think it is safe to assume that Moses had already communicated the message of creation, fall, and the promise of redemption to Jethro. And now as they met together in the tent near Sinai, I assume Moses told Jethro a story similar to the one that is now contained for us in Exodus 1 through 17. Are you following me? Moses is the author of both Genesis and Exodus (not to mention Lev., Num, and Deut.). And yes, we confess that he wrote the scriptures under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. But this does not mean that these stories were not near and dear to his heart while raised in Egypt, while exiled in Midian while standing before Pharaoh, and while leading the people out of Egypt towards Sinai. These stories were in Moses’ mind and heart before he wrote them down, and here we see that they were on his lips too. He told Jethro all about what “the LORD had done to Pharaoh and to the Egyptians for Israel’s sake… and how the LORD had delivered them.”

Brothers and sisters, do you know the story of redemption? It is treasured in your mind and heart so that you can tell it to others? If we hope to be an effective witness to others regarding the redemption that is ours in Christ Jesus, we must know the story of redemption. And may I suggest to you that it is best to start at the beginning when speaking of the redemption that is ours in Christ? It is very difficult if not impossible to understand the truth about who Christ is and what he has accomplished without the backstory. And so testify to the hope that is in you by starting with creation and the fall. After that, you may tell people about God’s gracious plan of redemption. Moses had the promises of God concerning Christ. And he witnessed God’s redeeming power displayed before his very eyes. But we have something greater. We have the fulfillment of those promises. We have received the good news about the accomplishment of our eternal redemption through the life, death, and resurrection of the Messiah, Christ Jesus our Lord. Tell that story, friends. Tell people about creation, fall, and redemption. Our redemption was prefigured in the Exodus but realized in the cross of Christ. Tell people about that and urge them to repent and believe upon the Messiah. 

Three, Moses told Jethro about “all the hardship that had come upon them in the way…” What hardships? Well, they must be the hardships that are recorded for us in the pages of Exodus! I am thinking of the lack of faith regarding water and food, the grumbling, and even the threats against Moses’ life from the people of Israel as they grew discontent and angry. Included in these hardships must also have been the assault of Amalek. “The LORD had delivered” Israel from Egypt and from all of these hardships. It was the LORD who did it, despite Israel’s weakness, and here Moses testifies to the LORD powerful provision. 

Brothers and sisters, when you witness, do not be afraid to highlight the hardships that you have endured and to place emphasis upon your weakness and your failings. The truth is this: we are weak, but he is strong. And when we testify concerning the salvation that is our in Christ Jesus, we must tell the truth. Moses told the truth about Israel’s lack of faith, their fear and his, the weakness of their military, and the weakness of his own arms. We ought to give glory to God by doing the same – by telling the truth regarding our weakness and God’s strength, our unworthiness, and God’s abundant grace.

Will you witness? We must.

Old Covenant Israel was to witness. They were to call the nations to repentance as the glory and power of God was manifest in and through them. 

New Covenant Israel is to witness too. But New Covenant Israel does not have a land of their own from which they call the nations to come and worship. No, the church is to go to the nations. This is what Christ said to his disciples at his ascension: “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the end of the earth.” (Acts 1:8, ESV)

We must witness, brothers and sisters. We must be ready to give a reason for the hope that is in us. We must pray for opportunities, look for opportunities, and take them when they come. We must tell the truth about creation, man’s fall into sin, and the redemption that God has accomplished for us in Christ. We must urge men and women to turn from their sins to Christ for the forgiveness of sins and the hope of life eternal. 

Christian sojourners must witness. 

*****

To Witness Faithfully, Christians Sojourners Must Contemplate, Comprehend, And Cherish The Significance Of The Victory That Christ Has Won For Them

The second point of the sermon is really a sub-point to the first, and it is this: To witness faithfully, Christian sojourners must contemplate, comprehend, and cherish the significance of the victory that Christ has won for them. 

I’ve drawn this second point from the enthusiasm that I sense in Moses to testify to Jethro. This enthusiasm is evident, it seems to me, in Jethro’s response, which we will come to in just a moment. Jethro was moved by Moses’ testimony to rejoice, to bless the LORD, and to worship. 

Though the text does not say it explicitly, I think it is strongly implied: Moses was blown away by what the LORD had done for Israel. He marveled at the thought of the great act of redemption that was accomplished through him and before his eyes.

We should not forget that it was not long before this that Moses was reluctant to be used by the LORD. When God called him he pleaded with the LORD to send someone else. But think of all that Moses has witnessed from his encounter with the LORD in the burning bush through to the defeat of Amalek at Rephidim. As he contemplated it, his mind must have been blown. As he thought of the significance of these events in light of the promises made to Adam and Abraham, he must have stood in awe. When Jethro, his father-in-law, and the priest of Midian come, he could not wait to tell him the good news. And I am saying that it was because Moses himself contemplated, comprehended, and cherished in his own heart the significance of the victory that the LORD had worked for Israel that he was so eager to share the good news with others. 

I think the same thing can be said for the first disciples of Jesus. They were deeply discouraged and dejected when Christ was crucified and buried. They went away to their homes defeated. But when Christ rose from the grave in victory, and when he showed them from the scriptures how he was the fulfillment of all the law, the prophets and the Psalms, their hearts burned within them. As they consider the victory that Christ has won, and as they contemplated the significance of his resurrection in light of the promises previously made, then they were moved to witness. Stated differently, it was only after comprehending the marvelous goodness of the good news that the first disciples of Jesus were moved to testify to others concerning what the LORD had done.

Have you ever received good news, brothers and sisters? I’m not talking about the gospel of Jesus Christ here, just ordinary good news – good news about a job promotion, the improved health of a loved one, a pregnancy, or an engagement – that kind of good news. There is something about good news that excites the heart and stirs within us a desire to share it with others. You know this is true. What is the first thing you want to do after receiving good news? You want to tell someone! Good news has this effect on us. It excites the heart and compels us to share!

The point I am making is this: Christian sojourners will witness – they will be eager to testify concerning the redemption is ours in Christ Jesus – only when they come to see the good news of the gospel as the good news that is. Yes, we may witness sporadically for a time being motivated by a sense of duty. But the one who has contemplated Christ and his work, who has comprehended its significance and its goodness, and who truly cherishes it in their hearts – this one will feel compelled to witness. I think it can also be said that this one will witness to others with the right attitude. They will testify concerning Christ with an attitude of thankfulness and love towards God for the marvelous grace that he has shown to us in Christ. 

Christians sojourners must witness, this is true. And certainly, we may witness being driven by a sense of duty – I suppose it is better to speak of Christ to others out of a sense of duty than to not speak of him at all. But it would be far better if we spoke enthusiastically of Christ because we ourselves are overwhelmed with the kindness of God towards us. It would be better if we witness being driven by a sense of awe and gratitude towards God concerning his grace. 

So I ask you, brothers and sisters, have you contemplated the gospel? Have you contemplated it in the past, and do you contemplate it regularly to this present day. Do you think deeply about the promises of God and of their fulfillment in Christ Jesus? Do you ponder the glorious grace of God that has been shown to us in Christ Jesus? It will only be after we contemplate, comprehend, and cherish the significance of the victory that Christ has won for us that we will feel that natural urge to share this good news with others. 

It seems to me that this is what Moses experienced. He marveled over the grace of God and over the redemption that he had witnessed. And felt the natural compulsion to testify to his yet unbelieving father-in-law, Jethro. May the same be true of you and me as we ponder Christ crucified and risen, and the hope that is ours through faith in him. 

*****

To Witness Faithfully, Christians Sojourners Must Contemplate The Judgment That Awaits All Who Are Not United To Christ By Faith  

The third point of the sermon is also a sub-point to the first, and it will be very brief. To witness faithfully, Christian sojourners must also contemplate the judgment that awaits all who are not united to Christ by faith. Our text for today does not say this explicitly either, but I think it is safe to say that Moses was moved to witness to Jethro because he loved him and was concerned for his eternal destiny. 

Moses knew, just as Abraham did, that salvation from sin was received through faith in the promised Messiah. Moses knew that the Israelites redemption from Egypt was not the full and final redemption that the Christ would accomplish, but was a small step forward, a partial fulfillment of the promises made to Abraham, and a foretaste of the salvation that was to come. When Moses witnessed to Jethro he was not merely emploring Jethro to believe that the LORD had rescued Israel from Egypt, but to believe in the LORD who had redeemed Israel, for the LORD had also promised to provide a Savior who would one day defeat the serpent, providing eternal salvation from sin and its consequences. 

What compelled Moses to testify concerning the LORD’s redemption? First, he himself marveled over the victory the LORD had won. Second, his true concern for the soul of his father-in-law. Stated differently, Moses was moved to witness by his love for God and his love for his fellow man. 

Brothers and sisters, I have exhorted you to contemplate the glory of the gospel of Jesus Christ so that you would see it as the marvelously good news that it is, and thus be compelled to speak of it to others. Now I am compelling you to contemplate the fate of those not in Christ. The scriptures are clear. Those not in Christ will be judged for their sins. According to Jesus, They will be cast “into the outer darkness. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.’” (Matthew 22:13, ESV)

*****

The Goal Of Witnessing Is The Worship Of God Through Christ Jesus

The fourth and final point of the sermon today will also be brief. It is this: The goal of witnessing is the worship of God through Christ Jesus. We do not witness to convert sinners to believe in the existence of God. Nor do we witness to make men moral, nor to move them to have our political views. No, we testify to others concerning Christ and the victory that he has won for us so that men and women, boys and girls, would turn from their sins, believe upon Christ, and be reconciled to God through faith in him, to give him the worship that is due to his name. This is the goal of our witnessing. Yes, it is true. For it to happen the Spirit of God must work upon the hearts of men to regenerate them. But this is our aim – the worship of God – and so we pray that God would do his work in the hearts of men as we are faithful to do ours by telling others of the glories of Christ. 

It is truly marvelous to consider how Jethro, the priest of Midian, responded to Moses’ testimony concerning the redemption the LORD had worked for Israel.  “Jethro said, ‘Blessed be the LORD, who has delivered you out of the hand of the Egyptians and out of the hand of Pharaoh and has delivered the people from under the hand of the Egyptians. Now I know that the LORD is greater than all gods, because in this affair they dealt arrogantly with the people.’ And Jethro, Moses’ father-in-law, brought a burnt offering and sacrifices to God; and Aaron came with all the elders of Israel to eat bread with Moses’ father-in-law before God” (Exodus 18:10–12, ESV).

I have not left much time to consider these wonderful words. Perhaps I can bring out the glory of them by making five brief observations.

One, these words came from the lips, not of a Hebrew, but of a gentile, and not of one who had previously believed in the promises of God, but of one who likely remained skeptical up to this point. After hearing of the marvelous works of the LORD, he worshiped. God’s setting apart of the Hebrews was always with this goal in mind – to bring the gentiles also to himself. 

Two, the words “he blessed the LORD” are significant when considered in the light of what God had said to father Abraham many generations earlier. “Now the LORD said to Abram, “Go from your country and your kindred and your father’s house to the land that I will show you. And I will make of you a great nation, and I will bless you and make your name great, so that you will be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you, and him who dishonors you I will curse, and in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed’” (Genesis 12:1–3, ESV). Not long after this, “Melchizedek king of Salem brought out bread and wine. (He was priest of God Most High.) And he blessed [Abraham] and said, ‘Blessed be Abram by God Most High, Possessor of heaven and earth; and blessed be God Most High, who has delivered your enemies into your hand!’ And Abram gave him a tenth of everything” (Genesis 14:18–20, ESV). Now it is Jethro, priest of Midian, who blesses the LORD. 

Three, as Jethro contemplated what the LORD had done for Israel he said, “now I know that the LORD is greater than all gods, because in this affair they dealt arrogantly with the people.”  This has been said before: the Exodus event was, among other things, a demonstration of the supremacy of God over arrogant Pharaoh and the so-called gods of Egypt. God has done the same thing in the spiritual realm through the life, death and resurrection of Christ. “He disarmed the rulers and authorities and put them to open shame, by triumphing over them in him” (Colossians 2:15, ESV). “Now I know that the LORD is greater than all gods…”, Jethro said. And many have said a similar thing after witnessing or hearing testimony regarding the miracles of Christ and the resurrection of Christ from the dead. Now I know… that this was the Christ, the eternal Son of God come in the flesh. Now I know…

Four, this knowledge of Jethro did not remain in the head only, but penetrated the heart too, and resulted in worship. “Jethro, Moses’ father-in-law, brought a burnt offering and sacrifices to God…” If we are to be faithful in our witnessing, we must urge sinners to do the same. They must turn from their sins. They must believe upon Christ. They must worship God through him as God has prescribed in his word.

Five, Jethro’s faith resulted in communion with God and with God’s people. “Aaron came with all the elders of Israel to eat bread with Moses’ father-in-law before God.” The significance of these words will become even more apparent as we continue our study through Exodus, but I’m sure you can grasp something of the significance of them even now. To eat before God with others signifies communion with God and with his people. This is signified every Lord’s Day as we partake of the Lord’s Supper. Through Christ’s broken body and shed blood, we have been reconciled to God by faith. Something of that is signified even here in Exodus 18 as Jethro offers a sacrifice to the LORD, and communes with God and with his people. It’s truly marvelous to consider, isn’t it?

*****

Conclusion

So much more can be said about our witnessing. In particular, more needs to be said about tactfulness, I think. But here I have attempted to address the heart of the matter. We must remember that Christian sojourners must witness. And if we hope to witness regularly and in the right spirit, we must contemplate, comprehend, and cherish the significance of the victory that Christ has won for us in our own hearts. We must also contemplate the judgment that awaits all who are not united to Christ by faith. In this way, we will be moved to witness, not by mere duty, but by a true love for God and our fellowman. Lastly, we must have the worship of God as our aim whenever we witness. Many other benefits come through faith in Christ, but our supreme aim must be the glory of God in Christ.

Posted in Sermons, Joe Anady, Exodus 18:1-12, Posted by Joe. Comments Off on Morning Sermon: Exodus 18:1-12, We Are Witnesses

Discussion Questions: Exodus 17:8-16

QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION AT HOME OR IN GOSPEL COMMUNITY GROUPS

Sermon manuscript available at emmausrbc.org

  • Some imagine that spiritual warfare is mystical, involving dreams and visions and the like. In reality, it is very practical. Consider the armor of God listed in Ephesians 6 and discuss the practical ways in which that armor is to be taken up, put on, and wielded day by day. 
  • What is prayer? Why is it imperative that we clothe ourselves with the armor of God and fight the spiritual battle in prayer? Why must prayer be persistent and faithful?
  • How do the words, “The LORD is my banner” of Exodus 17:15 find their fulfillment in Jesus (Joshua) the Christ? Why must we run to him and be found in him by faith? What is the victory that he has won?

Tags:
Posted in Study Guides, Gospel Community Groups, Joe Anady, Posted by Joe. Comments Off on Discussion Questions: Exodus 17:8-16

Morning Sermon: Exodus 17:8-16, The LORD Is Our Banner

New Testament Reading: 1 Timothy 2:1–6

“First of all, then, I urge that supplications, prayers, intercessions, and thanksgivings be made for all people, for kings and all who are in high positions, that we may lead a peaceful and quiet life, godly and dignified in every way. This is good, and it is pleasing in the sight of God our Savior, who desires all people to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth. For there is one God, and there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, who gave himself as a ransom for all, which is the testimony given at the proper time.” (1 Timothy 2:1–6, ESV)

Old Testament Reading: Exodus 17:8-16

“Then Amalek came and fought with Israel at Rephidim. So Moses said to Joshua, ‘Choose for us men, and go out and fight with Amalek. Tomorrow I will stand on the top of the hill with the staff of God in my hand.’ So Joshua did as Moses told him, and fought with Amalek, while Moses, Aaron, and Hur went up to the top of the hill. Whenever Moses held up his hand, Israel prevailed, and whenever he lowered his hand, Amalek prevailed. But Moses’ hands grew weary, so they took a stone and put it under him, and he sat on it, while Aaron and Hur held up his hands, one on one side, and the other on the other side. So his hands were steady until the going down of the sun. And Joshua overwhelmed Amalek and his people with the sword. Then the LORD said to Moses, ‘Write this as a memorial in a book and recite it in the ears of Joshua, that I will utterly blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven.’ And Moses built an altar and called the name of it, The LORD Is My Banner, saying, ‘A hand upon the throne of the LORD! The LORD will have war with Amalek from generation to generation.’” (Exodus 17:8–16, ESV)

*****

Please excuse any typos and misspellings within this manuscript. It has been published online for the benefit of the saints of Emmaus Reformed Baptist Church but without the benefit of proofreading.

Introduction

There are three points to the sermon today. One, Christian sojourners must engage in spiritual warfare. Two, Christians will find victory in warfare through persistent prayer. And three, the victory is ours because Jesus Christ has won it! We must be found trusting in him. 

Now, you may be thinking to yourself, Pastor, you really had to stretch and strain to draw these conclusions from this simple little text which tells us of a battle between Israel and Amalek at a place called Rephidim. 

Well, if that is your opinion, I would have to disagree with you. In fact, I do believe this is the proper interpretation and application of this passage for the people of God living under the New Covenant. What can we learn from this text? Not only are we to learn a history lesson regarding the battle between the Israelites and Amalek. No, we must remember that these things happened to Israel as an example for us upon whom the end of the ages has come (1 Corinthians 10:6). And when we consider this little story in light of what happened before and what happened afterward in the history of redemption, it is clear that it has reference to Jesus Christ and to the victory that he has won over the spiritual powers of darkness. This spiritual interpretation – this typological interpretation – is in perfect harmony with the example set forth in the New Testament. You’ve seen it throughout our study of the book of Exodus. The New Testament scriptures consistently look back upon the Old Testament scriptures in general, and the Exodus story in particular, and they see Christ pictured there. The New Testament also sees in these historical events an example for the Christian life.

So, when I deliver these three points to you from Exodus 17:8-16 – “Christian sojourners must engage in spiritual warfare, we will find victory through persistent prayer, and the victory is ours only because Jesus Christ has won it! We must be found trusting in him” – it is not at all a stretch. Here we are simply being sensitive to the way in which Christ and the Christian life are prefigured in the Old Testament, and of the progression that has been made in the accomplishment of our redemption from the days of Moses to the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the grave.

*****

Christian Sojourners Must Engage In Spiritual Warfare

As we consider our passage for today we are indeed reminded that Christian sojourners must engage in spiritual warfare. 

Granted, the warfare that Israel engaged in was physical warfare. It was fought with swords and spears. Flesh was pierced. Blood was spilled. Many perished. But behind this physical war between Amalek and Israel, there was a spiritual war, and we must not forget that. 

We likely will forget the spiritual war if we read this story with our noses pressed against the page. But if we back up a bit to gain perspective we will remember that a spiritual conflict lies behind all physical conflict, especially the conflict between God’s chosen people and those who belong to the Evil One. 

Consider this: When Satan tempted Adam he did so in the physical realm and with physical things, but the temptation was really spiritual. It had to do with the question, would the man be loyal to God, or would he rebel and transfer his allegiance to another? We know that Adam rejected God’s word when he listened to the voice of another. The temptation and the fall took place in the physical realm, but the battle was really spiritual.  

As you know, God was merciful to this rebel. He promised to provide salvation for mankind. And when he spoke of the coming Savior he directed the announcement at Satan, saying, “I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and her offspring; he shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise his heel” (Genesis 3:15, ESV). This little announcement of good news was like a small seed of hope, but in the course of time, it would sprout up and grow into a great and mighty tree, a tree in which the birds of the air could find rest (see Matthew 13:32). 

And as we consider the scriptures from this first promise of the gospel in Genesis 3 on through the Exodus, what do we notice about the fulfillment of this promise regarding the conflict between the seed of the woman and the seed of the serpent? It does not take long to see that these words were not about the hostility between men and snakes! No, the promise was about the hostility that would exist between those aligned with the Evil One against those who belong to the LORD, by his grace. Remember how the wicked man Cain rose up and killed his righteous brother Able. Remember how Noah was a righteous man tormented by the wicked around him. Of Noah’s three sons, Shem was blessed of the LORD, Japheth would take refuge in him, but Ham was cursed. From these men, all the peoples of the earth would descend. Abraham was a descendent of the blessed one, Shem. And of Abraham’s two sons, Isaac was chosen. And of Isaac’s two sons, Jacob was loved, but Esau was hated.  And you know that the two were at enmity with each other from the womb. My point is this: When God promised that there would be enmity between the seed of the woman and the seed of the serpent, this is what he meant. In the world, there would be those who belonged to the Evil One, and these would strike continuously those who belonged to God in the world. 

Brothers and sisters, this man Amalek, who is introduced to us so abruptly in Exodus 17:8, was a direct descendent of Esau. The Hebrews were descendants of Jacob, who was chosen of the Lord. Think about that for a moment. 

Friends, we cannot lose touch with the storyline of Genesis and Exodus if we hope to understand the meaning of these small individual texts. Yes, the battle that was fought between Israel and the clan of Amalek was physical – flesh was pierced, and blood was spilled. But when all is considered we see that battle raging in the background was spiritual. This is yet another fulfillment of what was said by God in Genesis 3:15. In the course of history, the seed of Satan would strike repeatedly at the heel of God’s people. This time it was Amalek. But in due time one would arise from the offspring of the women who would crush the serpent’s head, bringing ultimate victory to God and his people. This was the work of Messiah, the Christ, the Anointed One of God.    

Israel’s battle with Amalek was physical, but it was also spiritual. This is clear, not only from the context of Genesis, but from the text itself. Israel experienced victory, not because they were militarily superior, but only when Moses, the man of God, interceded for them. Clearly, this was no ordinary battle. The battle belonged to the LORD. And this is what is emphasized at the conclusion of our text where Moses builds an altar to give thanks to God for the victory, and he calls it, “the LORD is my Banner”.  Israel trusted in the LORD, and it was the LORD who won the battle for Israel.  

I suppose this is true of all battles. It is the LORD who brings victory and defeat according to his will. But it is especially true of the wars of Israel, for God’s purpose was to accomplish our redemption through them. This little battle with Amalek would be the first of many battles fought by the people of Israel. And as I have said, all of Israel’s divinely sanctioned wars under the Old Covenant were special, for God was accomplishing our redemption through them. His will was to free this people from Egypt, to give them Canaan, to bless them with kings, to preserve them in the land, until the Christ was brought into the world through them. They would fight many wars according to the command of God – real wars – physical wars where blood was shed – but do not forget the spiritual battle, friends. These wars of Israel, though fought on earth, had to do with that promise of the gospel that was made to Adam and to Eve in God’s curse of the serpent. 

Now that the Christ has come into the world through the nation of Israel, God’s people are no longer called to fight for the advancement of God’s kingdom with the sword. Those days are long gone. They passed away with the Old Covenant. When Old Covenant Israel fought with the sword they did, in a sense, further God’s kingdom. God’s kingdom was, under the Old Covenant, manifest on earth through them. As Israel fought in the wilderness, at the time of the conquest of Canaan, and in the days of the judges and kings, they, in a way, fought for the advancement of God’s kingdom on earth. I have said, “in a way”, and “in a sense”, for we know that the kingdom of God was not present in power until the time of Christ, for it was Christ and his forerunner who said, “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.” (Matthew 3:2, ESV). Nevertheless, the Kingdom of God was prefigured in Israel. And it would be through Israel that the Messiah would emerge to bring in the kingdom of God with power. And this is why I have said, when Old Covenant Israel fought with the sword they did, in a sense, further God’s kingdom. These wars were holy wars. God commanded them. They were fought, not for personal enrichment, nor for the expansion of borders, but for the advancement of God’s plan of redemption. They were governed by special rules, therefore. No other nation on earth has fought wars such as these. They were unique to Old Covenant Israel. And this is why I have said that God’s people are no longer called to fight for the advancement of God’s kingdom with the sword. Those days are long gone, for the Christ has come.

This is why Jesus spoke to the Roman ruler, Pilate, saying, “My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world, my servants would have been fighting, that I might not be delivered over to the Jews. But my kingdom is not from the world” (John 18:36, ESV). That statement from Jesus is very significant. 

The kingdom of Old Covenant Israel was of this world, friends. It was physical. It was earthly. And its wars were fought with physical weapons. But when Christ came to inaugurate his kingdom he said,  in so many words, those days are over. Yes, the kingdom of God was prefigured in Old Covenant Israel. And yes, God’s kingdom purposes were advanced in and through them. But it was Christ who brought the kingdom of God in with power. And what did he say about it? “My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world, my servants would have been fighting, that I might not be delivered over to the Jews. But my kingdom is not from the world” (John 18:36, ESV). This is why he told Peter to put his sword back in its shielth when he began to fight against those who came to take Jesus captive to crucify him. Peter had to learn the lesson that the days of fighting for the advancement of God’s kingdom with the sword were over. They concluded with the passing away of the Old Covenant and with the inauguration of the New. Perhaps an argument could even be made that they ended in the days of King David, for in his reign the kingdom of Israel was made secure. Future kings would be responsible, not to advance or to expand, but to defend Israel’s borders. Certainly, the tie between the kingdom of God on earth and the nation of Israel was severed when Christ died and rose again and inaugurated the New Covenant in his shed blood. 

Here’s my question: if it is true that the days of advancing God’s kingdom with the sword are over, does that mean God’s people may rest from all warfare? The answer is certainly, no. A battle still rages. Though it is often invisible, it is as fierce as ever. Christian sojourners must engage in warfare, but ours is spiritual. 

As Paul says, “For though we walk in the flesh, we are not waging war according to the flesh. For the weapons of our warfare are not of the flesh but have divine power to destroy strongholds… (2 Corinthians 10:3–6, ESV).

In another place, he says, “be strong in the Lord and in the strength of his might. Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the schemes of the devil. For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places. Therefore take up the whole armor of God, that you may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand firm. Stand therefore, having fastened on the belt of truth, and having put on the breastplate of righteousness, and, as shoes for your feet, having put on the readiness given by the gospel of peace. In all circumstances take up the shield of faith, with which you can extinguish all the flaming darts of the evil one; and take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God, praying at all times in the Spirit, with all prayer and supplication. To that end, keep alert with all perseverance, making supplication for all the saints…” (Ephesians 6:10–18, ESV).

Christ’s kingdom is in not earthly. Yes, his kingdom is manifest on earth. It is visible wherever Christians assemble in the name of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ to hear his word and to keep his ordinances. In other words, Christ’s kingdom is manifest on earth in the church. But his kingdom is of heaven, not earth. It is spiritual, not physical. It is advanced, not by the sword, but by the word of God as the Spirit works. It is preserved and protected, not with earth warfare, but spiritual. 

Are you fighting, brothers and sisters? Or have you forgotten that there is a battle raging? 

Are you dressed from the battle, brothers and sisters? Have you prepared yourself with the armor of God, or have you let your guard down? 

In the age to come, there will be no warfare, only rest. But this age is characterized by spiritual battle and worldly tribulation. Rest in the Lord, but do not grow complacent. Know for certain that if you are going to stand in Christ, and if you will be used for the advancement and preservation of his kingdom, you will have to wage spiritual warfare. 

Daily you must “take up the whole armor of God”. You must fasten on the belt of truth. You must put on the breastplate of righteousness, and have as shoes for your feet the readiness given by the gospel of peace. You must take up the shield of faith, the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God. And how do clothe ourselves with this armor from God? It is through prayer. The Christian must pray “at all times in the Spirit, with all prayer and supplication.”  

*****

Christians Will Find Victory In Warfare Through Persistent Prayer

That brings us now to the second point of the sermon for today, which is this: Christians will find victory through persistent prayer.

As we return to the text of Exodus 17 I want you to notice that Joshua is introduced to us out of the blue. Joshua will play a very important role in Israel’s history. From other texts, we know that he was much younger than Moses. He was Moses’ right-hand man. He was a mighty warrior and a skilled military commander. He was one of the two spies who kept the faith when the twelve were sent to spy out the land of Canaan. He would eventually succeed Moses as the leader of Israel and would, after forty years of wilderness wandering, lead them into the promised land. Joshua is a very important figure, and he is introduced to us very abruptly in verse 8 where he is set forth as a contrast to the evil one,  Amalek. 

So it is Jacob versus Esau, Joshua versus Amalek, and all of this does anticipate the conflict that would day come to a head between Jesus, the blessed seed of the woman, and Satan, that serpent of old. 

We know from other texts that Amalek was a descendent of Esau. He was the head of this tribe. His descendants would become the Amalekites. They would be mortal enemies of Israel from this day forward. And as such, they were devoted to destruction. 

Other texts like Deuteronomy 25:17 and 1 Samuel 15:2 help us to understand that Amalek was ruthless when he attacked Israel. He attacked them when they were weak and struggling in the wilderness. He attacked them from behind, meaning that he targeted, not the military, but the women and children along with those who were lagging behind. We know that the Amalekites were raiders who were strong militarily. Israel, by contrast, was at this time weak, poorly armed, and inexperienced. All of that becomes evident as the story unfolds. 

Joshua had one day to summon his troops. It is likely that some training had taken place before this. Perhaps the Hebrews left Egypt with some weapons, or perhaps they fashioned some for themselves while in the wilderness. But clearly, they were outmatched. The natural result would have been a defeat for Israel. Left to themselves, apart from the intervention of God, Israel would have been annihilated, blotted out from the face of the earth by Amalek and his mighty men. 

How then did Israel experience victory? The story is very clear. It was by the power of God worked through the faithful intercession of Moses.  

Verse 9: “So Moses said to Joshua, ‘Choose for us men, and go out and fight with Amalek.’” That was the natural response. But here is the spiritual and faithful response: “Tomorrow I will stand on the top of the hill with the staff of God in my hand” (Exodus 17:9, ESV). Moses was a servant of the LORD; God’s prophet and priest. This staff of his had been used by God to work miracles. It came to signify God’s presence and power. So when Moses said, “Tomorrow I will stand on the top of the hill with the staff of God in my hand”, the meaning was clear. Joshua would go down and fight with the sword, while Moses would go up to fight through intercessory prayer. 

Now, I am well aware of the fact that the text does not say that Moses prayed, nor is any prayer of Moses recorded for us here. Some might criticize me then for drawing this application from the text, saying, “Christians will find victory through persistent prayer.” But I think the application is valid.

Granted, the text does not explicitly say that Moses prayed, but it seems quite clear that this is what he was doing. Joshua went down to fight, and Moses went up to intercede. He took the staff with him, which signified God’s power and presence he lifted up his arms to heaven, which is a common posture for prayer, and there he remained all the day long. When his arms fell, Israel was defeated. When his arms were lifted up, Israel was victorious. In other words, Moses ascended the mountain to come into God’s presence to maintain a posture of dependence upon God on behalf of Israel. Did Moses utter anything with his lips? And if he uttered something, what did he say? The scriptures are silent about this. But his actions spoke volumes. By his actions and by his posture Moses said, LORD, have mercy upon Israel. Strengthen Joshua. Strengthen the men who fight with him, so that they might have the victory over the evil one, for the sake of the advancement of your kingdom, and for the glory of your name. 

What is prayer? Prayer is an offering up of our desires to God, by the assistance of the Holy Spirit, for things agreeable to His will, in the name of Christ, believing, with confession of our sins, and thankful acknowledgment of His mercies (Baptist Catechism 105). To pray is to take a posture of dependence before God.  That is what Moses did. As he maintained that posture, Israel experienced victory. And I am saying that the same is true in a spiritual battle. The war is fought and won through prayer. 

Pay careful attention to how Paul speaks of prayer in that passage that I read not long ago about the spiritual armor of God. Prayer is not listed as a piece of spiritual armor as if it sits alongside the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God, the breastplate of righteousness, etc. No, prayer is presented as the means by which all of this armor is taken up, put on, and wielded. Paul lists our spiritual armor and then says, “praying at all times in the Spirit, with all prayer and supplication.” In other words, we are to take up and wield the sword of Spirit in prayer.  We are to put on the helmet of salvation in prayer, etc. 

Christian sojourners must engage in spiritual warfare, and they must fight as Moses and Joshua did, by maintaining a posture of perpetual dependence upon the LORD. This posture of dependence must come from the heart, and it is expressed through prayer. 

I do love the symbolism of this story. The truths that are communicated in the narrative are obvious and they are powerful. To get at this I will ask you the same question I have asked before regarding the water and the manna in the wilderness: why this way? Why did God choose to meet the needs of his people in this way? He could have done so in other ways – in much more natural ways. But he determined to satisfy Israel’s thirst by turning bitter waters sweet and by causing a rock to gush water like a spring. He fed Israel with manna from heaven. And concerning the threat of extinction by military defeat, God could have turned Amalek away, or provided Israel with strong allies, or strengthened them more quickly to be competent at war in a natural way. But instead, the LORD determined to bring victory to Israel through Moses’ uplifted hands. Why this way? I say it was to send the same message as with the provision of water and manna. It was to prove that the LORD was present with Israel, that he was committed to provide for them, and that he has the power to save. In this way Israel would learn to trust the LORD even more. And in this way God would get the glory. 

Notice a few things about this story.

One, Moses went up on the mountain and lifted the staff of God towards the throne of the God in heaven. Clearly, Moses was petitioning the LORD for assistance in this time of great need. Brothers and sisters, we must learn to run to the LORD in faithful prayer always, but especially in times of trouble. Natural men and women will run only to the battle. Spiritual men and women will run to the battle covered in prayer. 

Two, it is emphasized that Moses’ arms soon grew weak and tired. Anyone’s would. But in this we see clearly that Israel got the victory, not because Moses was strong, but because the LORD God of heaven is strong. Brothers and sisters, our trust must not be in weak and fallible men, but in God. As great as Moses was, the victory was not found in him, but in the LORD. 

Three, others recognized that the battle belonged to the LORD, and so they joined with Moses to support him in his work of intercession. A rock was placed under Moses so that he could sit, while Aaron the priest (who was Moses’ brother), and Hur (who was perhaps the husband of Miriam, and thus Moses’ brother-in-law) supported the arms of Moses’ so that they would not fall. Here is an application for the people of God today: we must pray together, brothers and sisters. Do not neglect private prayer, and do not neglect corporate prayer either. Indeed, all of Israel was taught to trust the LORD in this episode, for they witnessed their leaders labor in prayer. Certainly, they themselves did also lift their eyes and their hearts to the God of heaven with them. Do not neglect corporate prayer, brothers and sisters. Pray with the congregation on the Lord’s Day morning and evening, pray in small groups, pray as families. 

Four, when Moses’ arms drooped with fatigue, the battle was lost, and when they were raised up again, the battle was won. This was to show that it was truly the LORD who fought for Israel. Moses was weak, but the LORD is strong. Joshua was weak, but the LORD is strong. The army of Israel was weak, but the LORD is strong. Brothers and sisters, I wonder if LORD does not sometimes allow us to experience setbacks and defeats when we rely, not on him, but in ourselves. And it seems to me that he sometimes blesses us with answered prayer to show us that he hears us and that he is a present and powerful provider and protector.  

Five, Moses, with the support of Aaron and Hur, was persistent in his intercession for Israels. He sat and lifted his arms to heaven all the day long. Brothers and sisters, will you be persistent in prayer? Or will you cease from prayer when you grow weary or when it seems as if the battle has been lost. “[P]ray without ceasing” (1 Thessalonians 5:17, ESV), the scriptures say. This does not mean that we are to nothing but pray. No, it means that we are to pray continuously throughout the day, from day to day, and from Lord’s Day to Lord’s Day. The Christian sojourner must be clothed with prayer, for it is through persistent and faithful prayer that the battle will be won.

*****

 The Victory Is Ours Because Jesus Christ Has Won It;  We Must Be Found Trusting In Him

The last point of the sermon is this: The victory is ours because Jesus Christ has won it; we must be found trusting in him.

The conclusion of our passage today says, “And Moses built an altar and called the name of it, The LORD Is My Banner, saying, ‘A hand upon the throne of the LORD! The LORD will have war with Amalek from generation to generation’” (Exodus 17:8–16, ESV). 

I’ve already said that the Amalekites would be enemies of Israel from this day forward. Here we see that they were devoted by the Lord to utter destruction. A vow was taken concerning this: “A hand upon the throne of the LORD! The LORD will have war with Amalek from generation to generation.”

The portion of the text that I wish to draw your attention to is the memorial that Moses constructed to celebrate the victory. He built an altar. Altars were for worship. And it was only right that the LORD be praised for the victory he had worked for the Hebrews on that day. But notice the name of the alter. Moses named it,  “The LORD Is My Banner”. What a beautiful name. What a beautiful memorial to the LORD faithfulness.

Armies in those days would raise tall banners into the air to signal where the soldiers should rally for safety and for planning as the battles developed. To raise a banner was to rally the troops to a particular place and to a particular person. With the construction and naming of this alter Moses declared on behalf of Israel that the LORD was their banner, for the people had rallied, not to Joshua or Moses, but to the LORD. They ran to him and trusted him for protection and provision in the fight, and he was faithful to give them the victory. 

As it pertains to the spiritual battle that rages around us continuously, the LORD has raised a banner for us, Christ the Lord. 

Listen to the way that Christ spoke of his crucifixion. He said, “Now is the judgment of this world; now will the ruler of this world be cast out. And I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all people to myself” (John 12:30–32, ESV). 

The LORD is our banner, brothers and sisters. And what is the banner that has been raise except the Son of man of the cross, crucified, not for his own sins, but for the sin of his people. He was lifted up unto death. He was buried in the grave. On the third day he rose in victory. And what was the victory that he won? He did not conquer Amalek as the first Joshua did. No, the second Joshua conquered the Evil One himself, through whom the plague of sin was brought into this world.  

When we say, “The LORD Is My Banner”, this is what mean. Jesus Christ  – the second Adam, the second Joshua, the one greater than Moses – is our banner, for he is the LORD incarnate who was lifted up from the earth for us. He has won the victory. We must run to him and be found in him by faith. 

Friends, have you run to Jesus for the forgiveness of sins? Have you placed your faith in him, for this is the only way to be saved. Listen to the words of Jesus: “No one has ascended into heaven except he who descended from heaven, the Son of Man. And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, so must the Son of Man be lifted up, that whoever believes in him may have eternal life. “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him. Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God.” (John 3:13–18, ESV)

*****

Prayer

Posted in Sermons, Joe Anady, Posted by Joe. Comments Off on Morning Sermon: Exodus 17:8-16, The LORD Is Our Banner


"Him we proclaim,
warning everyone and teaching everyone with all wisdom,
that we may present everyone mature in Christ."
(Colossians 1:28, ESV)

© 2011-2022 Emmaus Reformed Baptist Church