AUTHORS » Joe Anady

Discussion Questions: Luke 1:39-56

  • It was noted that Mary’s saying, as found in Luke 1:46-55, is very similar to Hannah’s saying as found in 1 Samuel 2. Why is it important to notice the similarities? How does this observation affect our interpretation of Luke?
  • How should we view Mary? Ought we to pray to her, venerate her, or regard her as a kind of mediator? Why or why not?
  • Mary refers to God as “God my Savior” in verse 47. What does this have to do with the things that were happening to her? How did she describe the salvation of the Lord? In what terms? Did she know how exactly the Messiah would accomplish our salvation at this point in her life? What did she know?
  • What does it mean, ultimately, that God had (and would) bring down the mighty from their thrones? (verse 52)
  • What does it mean, ultimately,  that God would exult those of humble estate, etc (verses 52-55)
Posted in Study Guides, Joe Anady, Posted by Joe. Comments Off on Discussion Questions: Luke 1:39-56

Afternoon Sermon: What Does The Fifth Commandment Require And Forbid?, Baptist Catechism 68 – 71, Proverbs 4

Baptist Catechism 68 – 71

Q. 68. Which is the fifth commandment?

A. The fifth commandment is, “Honor thy father and thy mother, that thy days may be long upon the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee.” (Exodus 20:12)

Q. 69. What is required in the fifth commandment?

A. The fifth commandment requireth the preserving the honor, and performing the duties, belonging to everyone in their several places and relations, as superiors, inferiors, or equals. (Lev. 19:32; 1 Peter 2:17; Rom. 13:1; Eph. 5:21,22; Eph. 6:1,5,9; Col. 3:19-22; Rom. 12:10)

Q. 70. What is forbidden in the fifth commandment?

A. The fifth commandment forbideth the neglecting of, or, doing anything against the honor and duty which belongeth to everyone in their several places and relations. (Prov. 30:17; Rom. 13:7,8)

Q. 71. What is the reason annexed to the fifth commandment?

A. The reason annexed to the fifth commandment is a promise of long life and prosperity (as far as it shall serve God’s glory and their own good), to all such as keep this commandment. (Eph. 6:2,3; Prov. 4:3-6; 6:20-22)

Scripture Reading: Proverbs 4

“Hear, O sons, a father’s instruction, and be attentive, that you may gain insight, for I give you good precepts; do not forsake my teaching. When I was a son with my father, tender, the only one in the sight of my mother, he taught me and said to me, “Let your heart hold fast my words; keep my commandments, and live. Get wisdom; get insight; do not forget, and do not turn away from the words of my mouth. Do not forsake her, and she will keep you; love her, and she will guard you. The beginning of wisdom is this: Get wisdom, and whatever you get, get insight. Prize her highly, and she will exalt you; she will honor you if you embrace her. She will place on your head a graceful garland; she will bestow on you a beautiful crown.” Hear, my son, and accept my words, that the years of your life may be many. I have taught you the way of wisdom; I have led you in the paths of uprightness. When you walk, your step will not be hampered, and if you run, you will not stumble. Keep hold of instruction; do not let go; guard her, for she is your life. Do not enter the path of the wicked, and do not walk in the way of the evil. Avoid it; do not go on it; turn away from it and pass on. For they cannot sleep unless they have done wrong; they are robbed of sleep unless they have made someone stumble. For they eat the bread of wickedness and drink the wine of violence. But the path of the righteous is like the light of dawn, which shines brighter and brighter until full day. The way of the wicked is like deep darkness; they do not know over what they stumble. My son, be attentive to my words; incline your ear to my sayings. Let them not escape from your sight; keep them within your heart. For they are life to those who find them, and healing to all their flesh. Keep your heart with all vigilance, for from it flow the springs of life. Put away from you crooked speech, and put devious talk far from you. Let your eyes look directly forward, and your gaze be straight before you. Ponder the path of your feet; then all your ways will be sure. Do not swerve to the right or to the left; turn your foot away from evil.” (Proverbs 4, ESV)

*****

Please excuse any typos and misspellings within this manuscript. It has been published online for the benefit of the saints of Emmaus Reformed Baptist Church but without the benefit of proofreading.

*****

Introduction

I have come to really love and appreciate the instruction that our catechism provides on the Ten Commandments. One thing that I appreciate is the breadth of the interpretation. Our catechism does not give us a narrow interpretation, but a broad one. In other words, these commandments are teased out. And it is right for the Ten Commandments to be teased out, for this is what the scriptures do, and this is what Christ himself did. The Ten Commandments are to be viewed as a summary of God’s moral law. And you know what a summary is. A summary provides a brief account of something but does not tell the whole story. The Ten Commandments contain God’s moral law, in summary. 

So, the fifth commandment, which is, “Honor thy father and thy mother”, does not merely require little children to respect their parents. No, properly understood, it requires us “to  preserve the honor, and perform the duties, belonging to everyone in their [various] places and relations, as superiors, inferiors, or equals.” Stated negatively, it forbids “the neglecting of, or, doing anything against the honor and duty which [belongs] to everyone in their [various]  places and relations.  In other words, respect is to be shown to all people. And it is to be shown to all people taking into consideration their place in relation to you as either superiors, inferiors, or equals. So it is not only superiors — like parents — who are to be respected but equals and inferiors too, each in a way that is fitting. 

And where is this behavior first learned? In the home. It is in the family environment where children are taught to honor others. First, they are to honor their parents. Second, if they have siblings, they are to honor them as equals. And third, they are to take this responsibility with them out into the world to apply in every realm. “The fifth commandment requireth the preserving the honor, and performing the duties, belonging to everyone in their several places and relations, as superiors, inferiors, or equals.”

*****

Baptist Catechism 69 & 70

Notice that the fifth commandment is the first commandment of the second table of God’s law. The first table of the law (commandments 1-4) has to do with our relationship to God and the worship of his name. And the second table (commandments 5-10) has to do with our relationships with our fellow man. The fifth commandment, just like the first commandment, is foundational then. 

Where do we start if we wish to relate to our fellow man in the right way? We start with honor. And the very first people we must learn to honor are our parents.       

My time is very limited in the afternoon, and so I will not expand upon this much. But think of how devastating the breakdown of the family is to society. Think of how devastating it is for God’s moral law to be abandoned and suppressed within a society. If God’s law is not honored, and if children are not taught to honor God and man within the home, then do not be surprised when that society grows very harsh and sinful. If we are to learn how to relate well to our fellow man, we must learn to show honor to everyone in their different places. And this is to be learned first all in the home as children are raised, ideally, by father and mother.

Notice that our catechism says that we must “preserve the honor” of others. Does this not imply that men and women possess a certain dignity by nature? Yes, and this is because they have been made in the image of God. And add to this the place that God has given them in the world. Each place — be it low or high — requires a certain kind of honor. This honor is to be preserved. Does this not also imply that we, because of our sinful condition, do tend towards dishonor? Throughout the history of the world, the weak have been exploited by the strong. This cannot be. And men do also slander other men. This also is a great evil. Not only are we to show honor to others who have been made in God’s image, we must also seek to preserve their honor. So this may involve standing up for the weak and oppressed and rebuking the slanderer to preserve the reputation of another.

Next, our catechism speaks of “performing the duties, belonging to everyone”. When I think of the instruction to preserve the honor… belonging to everyone”, I think of defense. We must defend the honor of others. But the words, “performing the duties, belonging to everyone”, communicates that we are to positively and proactively give to others the honor that is due to them. 

Children owe their parents honor in the form of respect and obedience. Children, honor your parents. You must. God commands it. And when you fail to honor your parents, you must learn to repent. That means that you must learn to confess your sin to God, for you sin against him when you dishonor your parents. You must ask him to forgive you in Christ Jesus. And you must also learn to ask your parents to forgive you, for you have done wrong to them. You have failed to give them what they deserve as your parent — respect and obedience. And lastly, you must ask the Lord to help you to not stumble again. Children owe their parents honor in the form of respect and obedience. 

Citizens owe respect to governing authorities; congregants owe respect to their ministers; wives owe respect to their husbands; employees owe respect to their employers. On and on I could go. But I do love this little phrase, “ in their several places and relations, as superiors, inferiors, or equals.” It helps us to remember that honor is owed, not only to those who are over us, but also to those who stand beside us and are under us. 

Husbands, honor your wives, therefore. Am I now contradicting the scriptures which say, “Wives, submit to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord.” No! I am only drawing your attention to what is said next in that same passage — “Husbands, love your wives, and do not be harsh with them.” So do you see that there is a special kind of honor that a wife owes to her husband, and there is a special kind of honor that a husband owes to his wife?! Yes, the husband has authority in the home, but honor is to be shown to all. As Peter says, “Likewise, husbands, live with your wives in an understanding way, showing honor to the woman as the weaker vessel, since they are heirs with you of the grace of life, so that your prayers may not be hindered.” (1 Peter 3:7, ESV)

In a similar way, governors owe a certain kind of honor to their citizens. Bosses owe a certain kind of honor to their employees. And parents are even called to honor their children. “Fathers, do not provoke your children, lest they become discouraged” (Colossians 3:21, ESV). “Fathers, do not provoke your children to anger, but bring them up in the discipline and instruction of the Lord” (Ephesians 6:4, ESV).

I hope you are able to see, brothers and sisters, that the fifth commandment is foundational. It sets the standard, not only for the relationship between child and parent but for all human relationships. Honor is to be shown to all in a way that is fitting. Or to use another term, love is to be shown. And I’m sure you remember how Christ summed up the whole law with the word love. Love God with all you are, and love your neighbor as yourself. In fact, listen to the way he summed up the second table of the law as he spoke to a rich young man who was covetous. “And Jesus said, ‘You shall not murder, You shall not commit adultery, You shall not steal, You shall not bear false witness, Honor your father and mother, and, You shall love your neighbor as yourself’” (Matthew 19:18–19, ESV). The law, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself”, is the sum of the entirety of the second table of God’s moral law. 

*****

Baptist Catechism 71

In the remainder of our time together I would like to briefly consider Baptist Catechism 71 which asks, “What is the reason annexed to the fifth commandment?” “Annexed” is simply an old-fashioned word for added. “What is the reason [added or attached] to the fifth commandment?”

This is a question about the promise attached to the fifth commandment itself, which says, “Honor your father and your mother, that your days may be long in the land that the LORD your God is giving you.” (Exodus 20:12, ESV). So there is a blessing attached to the fifth commandment. In Ephesians 6:1 Paul says, “Children, obey your parents in the Lord, for this is right. ‘Honor your father and mother’”, and then he adds, “this is the first commandment with a promise” (Ephesians 6:1–2, ESV). 

So what is this promise all about? Our catechism gives this answer: “The reason annexed to the fifth commandment is a promise of long life and prosperity (as far as it shall serve God’s glory and their own good), to all such as keep this commandment.”

The little qualification, “as far as it shall serve God’s glory and their own good” is meant to keep us from assuming that this is a guarantee. In other words, we should not take this to mean that every child that honors his parents will live a very long and prosperous life. No, life doesn’t work that way. The righteous do sometimes die young. 

Instead, we are to take this as a general rule. In fact, the Proverbs are filled with things like this. They are not promises, strictly speaking, but general principles. Those who obey God’s law and pursue wisdom will be blessed in life, generally speaking. And you know this to be true. Wise living does usually produce good things. But not always. As I said, sometimes the righteous do suffer. In fact, I think that is one reason we have the book of Job. That book shows us that the righteous do sometimes suffer. But what is the general principle in this promise attached to the fifth commandment?

Well, we should remember that the ten commandments were originally given to Israel as a nation. If Israel were to obey this law, they would be blessed in the land. But Paul does also apply this same law to New Covenant Christians who do not have a homeland. And to us, he says, “‘Honor your father and mother’ (this is the first commandment with a promise), ‘that it may go well with you and that you may live long in the land’” (Ephesians 6:2–3, ESV).

Here is the principle. Though it is true that God may have other plans and purposes, in general, it is true that keeping this commandment will be rewarded with good things in this life. Good things will come to you because the blessing of God is on you. And also good things will come to you because of the so-called natural consequences of your actions. Those who are rebellious will most often suffer difficulty, whereas those who honor God and their fellow man will most often enjoy the blessings that come with that way of life. You have witnessed this, I’m sure. 

And indeed this is true when it comes to all of God’s commandments. There is a blessing in them. There is life in them. No, we do not keep them perfectly, so we need a Savior. But God’s law is good. God’s law is not burdensome. 

Proverbs 4, which was read at the start of this sermon, speaks to this reality. It begins, “Hear, O sons, a father’s instruction, and be attentive, that you may gain insight, for I give you good precepts; do not forsake my teaching.” And then later it says, “Get wisdom, and whatever you get, get insight. Prize her highly, and she will exalt you; she will honor you if you embrace her. She will place on your head a graceful garland; she will bestow on you a beautiful crown. Hear, my son, and accept my words, that the years of your life may be many.”

And I would like to show you this same principle in Paul’s instructions to husbands. He says, among other things, “In the same way husbands should love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself” (Ephesians 5:28, ESV). Oh, how true that is. Brothers, do you want good? Then love your wives with the love of Christ. And sisters, do you want it good, then honor your husbands in the Lord. Children, do you want it good? Then honor your father and mother — indeed, give everyone the honor that is due to them. 

As I have said, there are no guarantees, but generally, this principle is true. Keeping God’s law does bring about much that is good and pleasant. And certainly, it will produce good and pleasant things in the life to come where we will enjoy life eternal with our Maker and our Savior. And really, I think that is the ultimate point. 

Posted in Sermons, Joe Anady, Posted by Joe. Comments Off on Afternoon Sermon: What Does The Fifth Commandment Require And Forbid?, Baptist Catechism 68 – 71, Proverbs 4

Discussion Questions: Baptist Catechism 68-71

  • What is the fifth commandment?
  • What is the most obvious and direct thing this commandment requires and forbids?
  • Does the fifth commandment only require children to honor their parents? What else does it imply?
  • Does the fifth commandment only require those with an inferior position to honor those who are over them? What else does it imply? 
  • Give examples of how a superior is to show honor to an inferior (from the Bible and from real-life experience). 
  • Why is it important to note that the fifth commandment is the first of the second table of God’s moral law?
  • What is another word we could use instead of honor? Hint: Matthew 19:18-19; 22:39.
Posted in Study Guides, Joe Anady, Posted by Joe. Comments Off on Discussion Questions: Baptist Catechism 68-71

Morning Sermon: He Will Be Called Holy—The Son Of God, Luke 1:26-38

Old Testament Reading: Genesis 3:1–20

“Now the serpent was more crafty than any other beast of the field that the LORD God had made. He said to the woman, ‘Did God actually say, ‘You shall not eat of any tree in the garden’?’ And the woman said to the serpent, ‘We may eat of the fruit of the trees in the garden, but God said, ‘You shall not eat of the fruit of the tree that is in the midst of the garden, neither shall you touch it, lest you die.’’ But the serpent said to the woman, ‘You will not surely die. For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.’ So when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyes, and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise, she took of its fruit and ate, and she also gave some to her husband who was with her, and he ate. Then the eyes of both were opened, and they knew that they were naked. And they sewed fig leaves together and made themselves loincloths. And they heard the sound of the LORD God walking in the garden in the cool of the day, and the man and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the LORD God among the trees of the garden. But the LORD God called to the man and said to him, ‘Where are you?’ And he said, ‘I heard the sound of you in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked, and I hid myself.’ He said, ‘Who told you that you were naked? Have you eaten of the tree of which I commanded you not to eat?’ The man said, ‘The woman whom you gave to be with me, she gave me fruit of the tree, and I ate.’ Then the LORD God said to the woman, ‘What is this that you have done?’ The woman said, ‘The serpent deceived me, and I ate.’ The LORD God said to the serpent, ‘Because you have done this, cursed are you above all livestock and above all beasts of the field; on your belly you shall go, and dust you shall eat all the days of your life. I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and her offspring; he shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise his heel.’ To the woman he said, ‘I will surely multiply your pain in childbearing; in pain you shall bring forth children. Your desire shall be contrary to your husband, but he shall rule over you.’ And to Adam he said, ‘Because you have listened to the voice of your wife and have eaten of the tree of which I commanded you, ‘You shall not eat of it,’ cursed is the ground because of you; in pain you shall eat of it all the days of your life; thorns and thistles it shall bring forth for you; and you shall eat the plants of the field. By the sweat of your face you shall eat bread, till you return to the ground, for out of it you were taken; for you are dust, and to dust you shall return.’ The man called his wife’s name Eve, because she was the mother of all living.” (Genesis 3:1–20, ESV)

New Testament Reading: Luke 1:26-38

“In the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent from God to a city of Galilee named Nazareth, to a virgin betrothed to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David. And the virgin’s name was Mary. And he came to her and said, ‘Greetings, O favored one, the Lord is with you!’ But she was greatly troubled at the saying, and tried to discern what sort of greeting this might be. And the angel said to her, ‘Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus. He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. And the Lord God will give to him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end.’ And Mary said to the angel, ‘How will this be, since I am a virgin?’ And the angel answered her, ‘The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born will be called holy—the Son of God. And behold, your relative Elizabeth in her old age has also conceived a son, and this is the sixth month with her who was called barren. For nothing will be impossible with God.’ And Mary said, ‘Behold, I am the servant of the Lord; let it be to me according to your word.’ And the angel departed from her.” (Luke 1:26–38, ESV)

*****

Please excuse any typos and misspellings within this manuscript. It has been published online for the benefit of the saints of Emmaus Reformed Baptist Church but without the benefit of proofreading.

Introduction

It is interesting that when the first promise concerning the coming Redeemer was made by God in the curse that was pronounced upon the serpent in the presence of Adam and Eve shortly after their fall into sin, it was specifically said that the Savior – the one who would crush the serpents head – would be brought into the world, not by the man’s seed, but through the women.

And also notice the name that was given to her. “The man called his wife’s name Eve, because she was the mother of all living.” (Genesis 3:20, ESV). In Hebrew, “Eve” sounds like the words meaning “life-giver” and “living.” Notice that she is given this name after she was deceived by the serpent, after she was used to bring temptation to Adam, and after Adam’s fall into sin, which brought humanity into a state of sin and death. The name “Eve” almost seems inappropriate given the way she was used by the Evil One to bring sin and death into the world. But in fact, the name is fitting for two reasons: One, by God’s grace, life would go on on planet earth. The human race would descend from Eve. In this physical sense, she is the mother of all living. Two, by God’s grace, she is the mother of all who are given spiritual and eternal life through faith in the Redeemer (or Messiah) who would, in the fullness of time, be brought into the world through her. The name “Eve” was fitting, therefore. But note this: it could only be given to her because of the grace of God, and because of the promise of the Redeemer that was delivered by God in the curse pronounced upon the serpent – “I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and her offspring; he shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise his heel.’”

Now, it is true that many descended from Eve. Indeed, all of humanity descended from her. But the Scriptures are clear that some were of her seed, spiritually speaking, because they shared her faith and they served her God. Many of her physical descendants, on the other hand, were of the Evil One. They did not believe the promise concerning the Redeemer. They did not serve God, but Satan. These are the seed of the serpent, spiritually speaking. So then, two spiritual lines descended from Eve, and the hostility that existed between these two lines is evident in the Genesis story. 

There is a sense, therefore, in which the seed of the women and the seed of the serpent are to be understood as a collective seed. Eve was the mother of a living, that is to say, of all humanity, collectively. And Eve was the mother of all who belonged to God in the world through faith in the promised Redeemer, collectively. All others belonged to the Deceiver, collectively, for they aligned themselves with him.  

But notice, the seed of the women is also singular.  Listen again to the first promise of the gospel in Genesis 3:15. God cursed the serpent saying, “I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring [collective] and her offspring [collective]; he [singular] shall bruise your head, and you [singular] shall bruise his heel.’” The point is this: though Eve would have many descendants, only one of them – a male son – would be the promised Redeemer who would crush the serpent’s head. And this does also mean that though many women would descend from Eve in human history, only one would have the great privilege of giving birth to this promised Redeemer. 

When, how, and by whom would this Redeemer be brought into the world? These things were not clearly revealed at first, but they would grow in clarity with the passing of time and with further revelation. 

Is it possible that Eve thought she had given birth to the promised Redeemer when she gave birth to her first son, Cain? I think so. But those hopes were dashed when Cain proved himself to be an evil man, that is to say, of the seed of the serpent. Being driven by envy, he killed his righteous brother, Able. So the LORD replaced Able with righteous Seth. From Seth, the righteous line continued. And in the process of time, it was clarified, by way of covenant promises, that the Messiah would descend from Abraham. And after that, it was clarified further, by way of more covenant promises, that the Messiah would descend from King David. All along the way, there are hints that the birth of the Messiah would be miraculous. As I’ve said, the first promise of the gospel revealed that the Redeemer would come from the woman, but the man’s involvement was not mentioned – perhaps this was a hint at the virgin birth. In the era of the patriarchs, the line of Abraham was threatened by old age and barrenness, but God miraculously preserved the line by bringing life out of death. These were not virgin births, but they were miraculous. I think they are to be regarded as a foreshadowing of the virgin birth. And then we come to that famous prophesy of Isaiah 7:14: ​​“Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign. Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel” (Isaiah 7:14, ESV), which means “God with us”. 

Even with this very brief and selective sampling of Scripture references from the Old Testament, you can see how things grew more clear with the passing of time concerning the birth of the Messiah. Over time it became clear that the promised Messiah would be brought into the world through a woman, a daughter of Abraham, a daughter of David – a virgin. The Messiah would be truly human, therefore. But his birth would be miraculous. Indeed, he would not only be the son of King David, he would also be David’s Lord! He would be Immanuel, which means “God with us”. He would be the eternal Son of God incarnate. These truths were revealed dimly and in a mysterious way in Old Testament times. These truths became very clear when the Messiah was finally born into the world in fulfillment of these promises and prophesies previously made.      

Brothers and sisters, all of that Old Testament history must be in our minds as we consider this story concerning the announcement that was made to the virgin Mary by the angel Gabriel. When this angel appeared to this young woman the words that he spoke to her made it very clear that she would be the one, singular, daughter of Eve who would be blessed to bring the One, the singular, son of Adam and Son of God into the world to defeat Satan, overthrow his kingdom, and Redeem God’s people from bondage to Satan, sin, and death and to reconcile them to the Father.  

Let us now go to our passage for today to consider it in detail. 

*****

The Setting

Verses 26-27 set the stage for what follows.

The phrase, “In the sixth month”, has reference to the announcement that came to Zachariah the priest from the angel Gabriel concerning the miraculous birth of his son, John, who would prepare the way for the Messiah. 

Six months after that announcement, “the angel Gabriel was sent from God to a city of Galilee named Nazareth…” The angel Gabriel was busy in those days, wasn’t he? He had delivered messages to the prophet Daniel hundreds of years earlier which revealed the timing of the arrival of the Messiah. And now that the time had fully come, he is the one to deliver the news, first to Zechariah, and now to Mary.

The text says that he “was sent from God to a city of Galilee named Nazareth…” Nazareth was a small, poor, and insignificant village located about 66 miles to the north of Jerusalem. This was the hometown of Joseph and Mary. And although Jesus would be born in Bethlehem, Nazareth is where he would be raised. 

Notice that two locations are mentioned in Luke chapter 1. First, the Holy Place of the temple in Jerusalem, and second, the humble, off-the-beaten-path, town of Nazareth. The two locations could not be more different. The one was considered by the people to be most holy and most glorious; the other was lowly, disregarded, and even despised. In fact, there was a saying in Jesus’ day that went something like this: “Can anything good come out of Nazareth?” (John 1:46). And yet this would be the town in which Jesus the Messiah was raised.   

Not only was Jesus raised in a humble and lowly place, he was also raised by humble and lowly parents. Notice that this announcement came “to a virgin betrothed to a man whose name was Joseph”, a carpenter. Given the town in which they lived, their age, and Joseph’s profession, it is reasonable to assume that they were poor. 

Note this theme, for it will reoccur in Luke’s Gospel. When the eternal Son of God assumed a human nature to be the Messiah, he came in a humble and lowly form to Redeem those humble and lowly in spirit and to lift them up to glory. 

Later in Luke chapter one, we will encounter the song that Mary sang in response to all of this heavenly news. Listen for this as I read:  “And Mary said, ‘My soul magnifies the Lord, and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior, for he has looked on the humble estate of his servant. For behold, from now on all generations will call me blessed; for he who is mighty has done great things for me, and holy is his name. And his mercy is for those who fear him from generation to generation. He has shown strength with his arm; he has scattered the proud in the thoughts of their hearts; he has brought down the mighty from their thrones and exalted those of humble estate; he has filled the hungry with good things, and the rich he has sent away empty. He has helped his servant Israel, in remembrance of his mercy, as he spoke to our fathers, to Abraham and to his offspring forever.’” (Luke 1:46–55, ESV)

So then, the opening chapter of Luke’s Gospel begins to present Jesus the Messiah to us as a humble and lowly Savior. He was not born and raised in centers of power and prestige – Rome or Jerusalem. And neither was born to parents of wealth and renown. No, he came humbly into this world. And if we are to have him as Lord and Savior, we must identify with him in his lowliness and humility, for through him God “has scattered the proud in the thoughts of their hearts; he has brought down the mighty from their thrones and exalted those of humble estate; he has filled the hungry with good things, and the rich he has sent away empty.” 

Though it is true that Jesus would be raised in a humble town by humble parents, his parents did have the proper genealogy to give birth to and raise the Messiah, for they were of “the house of David.”  The Old Testament Scriptures make it clear that the Messiah would descend from King David. And the New Testament Scriptures are clear that Jesus of Nazareth did in fact descend from David, with Mary as his birth mother, and Joseph as his legal and earthly father. 

And so who was this young virgin who was betrothed (we might say engaged, although betrothal was legally binding), to Joseph? Verse 27 tells us, “the virgin’s name was Mary.” I think it is right for us to try to imagine what it must have been like to be Mary. Also, I think it is right for us to imagine what it would have been like to be Joseph. Both were probably young, but Mary was likely younger (perhaps as young as 14 or 15 – people grew up faster in those days, it seems). All of this news would have been very shocking to them. But they demonstrate great faith, as we will soon see. 

*****

Gabriel’s Announcement 

Now that the stage has been set, let us consider the announcement of the angel Gabriel.

Beginning in verse 28 we read, “And he came to her and said, ‘Greetings, O favored one, the Lord is with you!’” What a marvelous greeting this is. To be “favored” by the Lord is to have the Lord’s grace and kindness set upon you. Though I do not doubt that Mary was a devout, faithful, and righteous young woman (relatively speaking), it is a mistake to assume that she merited or earned the favor of the Lord by her righteousness. This idea would contradict the clear teaching of Scripture, which says, “None is righteous, no, not one” (Romans 3:10, ESV). Mary was “favored” by the Lord, and this was because the Lord, by his grace, had determined to set his favor upon her. And the greatest of all blessings was this – the Lord was with her. This was true in a spiritual sense at the time when Gabriel uttered these words to her. And it would be true even in a physical sense not many days after this, for the Lord himself would be in her and with her as the eternal Son of God incarnate. 

In verse 29 we read, “But she was greatly troubled at the saying, and tried to discern what sort of greeting this might be.” The Greek word translated as “greatly troubled” is very strong. It means to be disturbed or distressed mentally and emotionally. The young virgin was shaken by this encounter and this greeting. 

Verse 30: “And the angel said to her, ‘Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God.” To find favor with God is to have God’s grace bestowed on you. Note this: Mary is not the giver of grace, but the recipient of God’s grace. As blessed as she was, she is not to be prayed to or venerated as if she is something more than a common woman. Mary was a young woman in need of God’s grace. Yes, she is to be regarded as blessed, for she was chosen to serve as the very mother of God. But this was by God’s grace alone, for she had found favor, or grace, with God.     

After this greeting, Gabriel continues with his announcement in verse 31: “And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus. He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. And the Lord God will give to him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end.’” This announcement is jampacked with meaning. Each and every phrase was intended to remind Mary (and now us) of the Old Testament Scriptures that revealed the promised Christ. 

The phrase, “And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son”, was to remind Mary of the prophecy of Isaiah 7:14: “Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel” (Isaiah 7:14, ESV). When the angel said,  behold, “you will conceive in your womb…”, he meant, you, Mary, are the virgin of which Isaiah 7:14 speaks. 

The phrase, “and you shall call his name Jesus” is also filled with meaning. The meaning becomes clear when we recognize that the name Jesus is the Greek transliteration of the Hebrew name, Joshua. Jesus is Joshua or Jeshua. The name Joshua means “the Lord delivers” or “the Lord saves” – a fitting name for the Messiah. And the name Joshua ought to remind us of two Joshuas from the Old Testament. One, we must remember Joshua, the assistant to Moses, who would lead the people of Israel into the promised land. Joshua led Isarel into the promised land of Cannan. Jesus the Messiah came to redeem his people, not from Egypt, but from bondage to Satan, sin, and death, and to lead them, not into Cannan, but into the eternal land of promise, the new heavens and earth. Jesus is Joshua, only greater. The second Joshua we should remember served as high priest over Judah in the days of Zacharia after the Babylonian captivity and during the rebuilding of Jerusalem and the temple. You may read about Joshua the high priest in Zechariah 3 and 6. The words spoken over Joshua the high priest found in Zechariah 6 are especially interesting, for in that text Zechariah does something strange. He places a crown on the head of the priest and says, “Thus says the LORD of hosts, ‘Behold, the man whose name is the Branch: for he shall branch out from his place, and he shall build the temple of the LORD. It is he who shall build the temple of the LORD and shall bear royal honor, and shall sit and rule on his throne. And there shall be a priest on his throne, and the counsel of peace shall be between them both” (Zechariah 6:12–13, ESV). So you can see, the name Joshua carries a lot of theological baggage. It means, “the Lord delivers” or “saves”. It reminds us of Joshua the successor to Moses who conquered Israel’s enemies and lead the people safely into the promised land. And it reminds us also of the Joshua of Zechariah 3 and 6, the high priest who is called “the Branch”, the rebuilder of God’s temple, and the priest-king who expands the temple of the LORD and even involves foreigners (Gentiles) in this work (see Zechariah 6:15 and Isaiah 60:10). These Joshau’s were types of the Christ to come. Jesus of Nazareth is the true and greater Joshua.

Consider now the phrase, “He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High.” We should remember that Gabriel told Zechariah that his son, John, would be great. He would “great before the Lord”, he said. In fact, he is to be regarded as the greatest of the Old Covenant prophets, for he was the last, and the one who prepared the way for the arrival of the promised Messiah. But Jesus’ greatness is on another level, for he is the Son of the Most High, that is to say, he is the eternal Son of God, the second person of the Triune God, come in the flesh. And so this explains what was meant by the prophecy of Isaiah, “Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel” (Isaiah 7:14, ESV). Immanuel means God with us. This son born to the virgin is the Son of the Most High. He is the eternally begotten Son of the Father who took to himself a true human nature, body and soul.  

The phrase, “And the Lord God will give to him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end”, is to remind us of the promises that God made to King David when he entered into a covenant with him as recorded in 2 Samuel 7. The Lord promised to give David a son who would build God’s temple whose throne and kingdom would last forever and ever. These promises were fulfilled in part by Solomon and the Kings of Israel who descended from him. These promises are fulfilled in full in Jesus Christ. He sits on the throne of his father David. He reigns over the house of Jacob forever. And of his kingdom there will be no end.

*****

Gabriel’s Answer To Mary’s Question 

Let us now consider Mary’s question and the answer provided by Gabriel in verses 34 through 37.  

First, Mary’s question: “And Mary said to the angel, ‘How will this be, since I am a virgin?’” Some have wondered why Zechariah was rebuked by the angel and struck with muteness when he asked the question, “How shall I know this? For I am an old man, and my wife is advanced in years” (Luke 1:18, ESV), in response to the announcement that was made to him, whereas no such rebuke or punishment was delivered to Mary. What was the difference between their questions? First, notice that the questions differed in substance. Zechariah asked, “how shall I know this?” In other words, I do not know this or believe this. How will you convince me? Mary’s question was different. She asked, “How will this be, since I am a virgin?” She was not asking for proof that it would be, but was perplexed concerning how it would be, and was requesting clarification. Two, it should be clear that there was a difference in the heart of Zechariah and Mary when they asked these questions. Zechariah disbelieved the word of the angel and asked for evidence or proof. He was struck with muteness as a punishment and as a sign that the word of the angel was true. But Mary did not doubt. She wondered. And there is a great difference between doubting the clearly revealed word of the Lord and wondering about things that are mysterious. Brothers and sisters, we must be careful to not transgress this boundary. The Lord has spoken. He has revealed himself to us and his will for us in Christ and in the Scriptures. We must never question or doubt the word of the Lord. But there are things that are mysterious to us. We may bring those questions to the Lord in prayer, but when we do we are to come with the humble and faithful disposition of Mary. Her question was not one of disbelief. It was an honest, humble, and faithful inquiry. And so the angel did not rebuke her but answered her so as to further strengthen her precious faith. 

Look at verse 35: “And the angel answered her, ‘The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born will be called holy—the Son of God.” Here we have an answer to the question, how did the eternal son of God become incarnate? Mary asked, how will this be? And the angel provided an answer. Yes, she was a virgin. And she would remain a virgin up until the birth of the Messiah. The child would be conceived, not in an ordinary way – not of Adam’s (or Joseph’s) physical seed – but of the woman’s seed only, and by the power of God Almighty. Christ is fully man, therefore. He obtained his true human nature – a true body and reasonable soul – from Mary. And Christ is fully God. He has God alone as his Father. He is the eternally begotten Son of God, the second person of the Triune God, come in the flesh.  

Notice that Gabrial explains the result of this miraculous virgin birth – “therefore the child to be born will be called holy—the Son of God.” You and I were born into this world in sin. We had not sinned personally. But we were born in sin and with a corrupted nature because we were born in Adam as our federal head and representative. He broke the Covenant of Works that was made with him in the garden, and he did so on behalf of all humanity. To be born in Adam through the process of ordinary generation is to be born in sin, that is to say, in a fallen and corrupted state. Through the miraculous virgin birth of Christ, that chain was broken. Jesus Christ was truly human given his birth to Mary. Through her, he was the true son of David, Abraham, and Adam. But he was shielded from the transmission of original sin through the miraculous virgin conception by the power of the Most High God. Jesus Christ is human as we are, yet without sin (Hebrews 4:15), for he is the person of the eternal Son of God come in the flesh, miraculously conceived in the womb of the virgin Mary. He is the holy Son of God.

In verses 36 and 37 the angel adds, “And behold, your relative Elizabeth in her old age has also conceived a son, and this is the sixth month with her who was called barren. For nothing will be impossible with God.” This announcement must have brought great comfort to the young woman Mary, for it revealed that she was not alone. God was with her, and he was working in and through others too. In fact, in the very next passage of Luke’s Gospel, we will find Mary visiting her relative Elizabeth to be comforted and encouraged by her and to rejoice with her concerning the marvelous things that God was doing through them.

*****

Mary’s Response

The last thing that we need to consider is Mary’s humble and submissive response to these things. Her response is found in verse 38: “And Mary said, ‘Behold, I am the servant of the Lord; let it be to me according to your word.’ And the angel departed from her.” I have three brief observations to make concerning Mary’s response. 

One, we should not overlook the dramatic impact these things would have on this young girl’s life. This miraculous conception would impact her relationship with Joseph, the man to whom she was betrothed. People in her community would question her integrity. Her whole life would be wrapped up in this drama. There would be great joy, of course. But there would be great sorrow too. In fact, later in Luke, we will encounter the words that a man named Simeon spoke to Mary. Among other things, he said, ​​“and a sword will pierce through your own soul also” (Luke 2:35, ESV), referring to the sorrow that Mary would experience as the mother of Jesus, our crucified and risen Lord. My point is this: though Mary was greatly blessed to be the mother of the Messiah, there is a sense in which it cost her her life.

Two, Mary’s response is an example to all of us. Being called by God to undergo these wonderful but very difficult things, she humbly submitted herself to the will of God. Hear again her words: “Behold, I am the servant of the Lord; let it be to me according to your word.” Sometimes the Lord calls his people to endure great difficulty. We ought to submit to his will for us. Indeed, the Christain life begins with submission. We “confess with [our] mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in [our] heart[s] that God raised him from the dead…” (Romans 10:9, ESV). And the Christian life is to be marked by submission to Christ as Lord to the very end. The young virgin Mary is an example to all of us. 

Three, Mary’s faithful submission to the Lord must be contrasted with the rebellion of Eve. Through the rebellion of the woman, Eve, temptation and sin entered the world. Through the faithful submission of the woman, Mary, the Redeemer was brought into the world, and he who would overcome Satan, sin, and death for all of those given to him by the Father in eternity.    

*****

Contemplations

Let us now conclude with a few brief contemplations. 

One, I think it is important that we not lose sight of Luke’s stated purpose for writing. He wrote to Theophilus, and to us, so that we might have certainty about the things we have been told concerning Jesus. You can see that Luke, like an attorney standing before and judge and jury, is beginning to present us with witnesses and evidence so as to convince us that Jesus of Nazareth is the promised Messiah. The witnesses are people: Zachariah and Mary. But notice the way in which Luke also sets the Old Testament Scriptures before us to function as witnesses. Jesus the Christ was born into this world in fulfillment of the Old Testament Scriptures. He was born right on time. He was born in the line of David. He was born to a virgin. His name was Jesus, or Joshua. 

Two, as we consider this narrative we should feel motivated grow in our familiarity with the Scriptures, both the New Testament and the Old. Notice that Gabriel (and Luke) did not feel the need to make these references to the Old Testament explicit. It was assumed that this young girl, Mary, was so familiar with the Old Testament Scriptures that she would make the connections quickly in her mind as these words and phrases drawn from the Old Testament were used. I wonder, would we make these connections? Are we so familiar with the Old Testament Scriptures that the true meaning and significance of Gabriel’s announcement would be clear to us? Or would his announcement go over our heads? Yes, Mary was perplexed concerning how she would conceive and bear a son as a virgin. But she was not perplexed about the meaning and significance of the announcement of the angel. She understood his message. She understood that she would be the virgin of whom Isaiah spoke. She understood that she would be the mother of the promised Messiah. Mary knew the Scriptures well, and so should we. Our faith will be strengthened as we grow in our understanding of the Scriptures.

Three, I urge you to contemplate further this theme that is already beginning to emerge in Luke’s Gospel, and that is the way in which God works through the humble and lowly of this world to confound the wise and the proud. Jesus was born to poor and humble parents living in a poor and humble town. They were nobodies according to the wisdom of the world. But God determined to work in and through them. Christ himself lived a humble and lowly life. Indeed, his followers are called to imitate him in this. And yet we are constantly tempted to think as the world thinks – to value worldly power, wealth, and fame. We must remember, brothers and sisters, that he wisdom of God turns all of that on its head. So let me ask you, Christian, are you enamored with the things of this world? Do worldly power, wealth, and fame impress you and tempt you? I exhort you to put off worldly-mindedness and to have the mind of Christ instead, for he was humble and lowly. “He has shown strength with his arm; he has scattered the proud in the thoughts of their hearts; he has brought down the mighty from their thrones and exalted those of humble estate…” (Luke 1:51–52, ESV). Let us be sure to have humble hearts like that of our Savior. 

Four, let us marvel more and more over the wisdom of God in the accomplishment of our salvation through Jesus Christ. God’s plan of salvation is truly marvelous to consider. To think that he would redeem us from bondage to Satan, sin and death by sending the eternal Son to assume a human nature through the virgin birth, to live, suffer, die, descend, and ascend to glory for us, is truly incredible. As we consider the salvation that God has worked for us through Jesus Christ in the Gospel of Luke, we ought to be moved to praise. We should agree with Paul, who, after contemplating these things, said, “Oh, the depth of the riches and wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments and how inscrutable his ways! ‘For who has known the mind of the Lord, or who has been his counselor?’ ‘Or who has given a gift to him that he might be repaid?’ For from him and through him and to him are all things. To him be glory forever. Amen.” (Romans 11:33–36, ESV)

Posted in Sermons, Joe Anady, Luke 1:26-38, Posted by Joe. Comments Off on Morning Sermon: He Will Be Called Holy—The Son Of God, Luke 1:26-38

Afternoon Sermon: What Is Forbidden In The Fourth Commandment, And What Reasons Are Added? (Or, Beware Of The Errors Of Legalism And Antinomianism) Baptist Catechism 66 & 67, Acts 20:7-12

Baptist Catechism 66 & 67

Q. 66. What is forbidden in the fourth commandment?

A. The fourth commandment forbids the omission or careless performance of the duties required, and the profaning the day by idleness, or doing that which is in itself sinful, or by unnecessary thoughts, words, or works, about worldly employments or recreations. (Ezekiel 22:26; 23:38; Jer. 17:21; Neh. 13:15,17; Acts 20:7)

Q. 67. What are the reasons annexed to the fourth commandment?

A. The reasons annexed to the fourth commandment are, God’s allowing us six days of the week for our own lawful employments, His challenging a special propriety in a seventh, His own example and His blessing the Sabbath day. (Exodus 34:21; 31:16,17; Gen. 2:2,3)

Scripture Reading: Acts 20:7-12

“On the first day of the week, when we were gathered together to break bread, Paul talked with them, intending to depart on the next day, and he prolonged his speech until midnight. There were many lamps in the upper room where we were gathered. And a young man named Eutychus, sitting at the window, sank into a deep sleep as Paul talked still longer. And being overcome by sleep, he fell down from the third story and was taken up dead. But Paul went down and bent over him, and taking him in his arms, said, ‘Do not be alarmed, for his life is in him.’ And when Paul had gone up and had broken bread and eaten, he conversed with them a long while, until daybreak, and so departed. And they took the youth away alive, and were not a little comforted.” (Acts 20:7–12, ESV)

*****

Please excuse any typos and misspellings within this manuscript. It has been published online for the benefit of the saints of Emmaus Reformed Baptist Church but without the benefit of proofreading.

*****

Introduction

As we consider the moral law of God as summarized in the Ten Commandments there are two errors that we have to be very careful to avoid. The first is the error of legalism. The second is the error of antinomianism. Both of these errors are very serious and they must be avoided. 

What is legalism? Well, it takes different forms. 

One, it is the false belief that sinful men and women can be made right with God through obedience to the law of God. The Scriptures are very clear that this is impossible for the simple reason that we are all lawbreakers. Apart from Christ, we stand guilty before God. No amount of law keeping will fix that problem. We need a Redeemer. His name is Jesus Christ. He kept God’s law in our place. He died in our place too, so that we might be forgiven and reconciled to the Father  

There is a second form of legalism that we must also be careful to avoid, and it is the elevation of human traditions and opinions to place of law along with the imposition of those traditions and opinions on others. If I choose to fast every Thursday and to make that a law for myself – if I do it, not to earn God’s favor, but from the heart and out of gratitude for all that God has done for me in Christ Jesus – that is not legalism. But if I begin to preach and to bind the consciences of others, saying, you must fast every Thursday, or you must not eat meat during this time of the year, or you must observe these holidays, etc, that is legalism, for the word of God has not commanded such things.  

A third form of legalism is really a subcategory of the second, and that is the false teaching that believers under the New Covenant are obliged to obey the civil and ceremonial laws that were given to Old Covenant Israel. Granted, these laws are biblical in the sense that they are found in the Bible, but they are not binding on us because we do not live under the Old Covenant of which they were a part. We live under the New Covenant, which is a different covenant. Yes, the Hebrews living under the Old Covenant were obligated to circumcise their male children, to offer sacrifices at the temple, honor many holy days and Sabbaths, etc. They were not legalists in striving to keep these laws, (provided that they weren’t trying to earn an eternal right standing with God through them instead of through faith in the promised Redeemer). No, they were right to obey these laws, for they were the product of man, but were given by God to them. But is anyone comes to you today and says, you are obligated to keep these civil and ceremonial laws given to Israel – to be circumcised, to abstain from certain foods, or to observe Old Covenant festivals, new moons, and Sabbaths (see Colossians 2:16), that person is a legalist. Though it is true that all of these laws were from God, it is also true that they are not for us, for we live under the New Covenant and not the Old. We have Christ as our High Priest, and not Aaron. And the scriptures are clear, “when there is a change in the priesthood, there is necessarily a change in the law as well” (Hebrews 7:12, ESV).

Beware of legalism in all of its forms, brothers, and sisters.

What then is antinomianism? Well, it is the false teaching that says there is no law for the Christian. The prefix “anti” means “against”, and “nomos” means “law”. So then, antinomians teach. in one way or another, that there is no law for the Christian. As with legalism, antinomianism comes in different flavors. Some may teach that there is no objective law for the Christian, period. I suspect that most would say that there is a law, but it is the law of the Spirit, or the law of Christ, and that this law is different in substance from the law written on stones at Sinai. Both views are erroneous, and they leave the Christian without an objective moral standard. If I were to guess, I would say antinomianism is a bigger problem the church today (at least in our region) than legalism. It must be avoided. 

What then is our view concerning the law of God and its usefulness to the believer under the New Covenant? Chapter 19 of our confession actually states our position beautifully. I’d like to read this chapter to you. It will only take a moment and I think it will be helpful.  

Chapter 19: Of The Law Of God

Paragraph 1. God gave to Adam a law of universal obedience written in his heart, and a particular precept of not eating the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil; by which he bound him and all his posterity to personal, entire, exact, and perpetual obedience; promised life upon the fulfilling, and threatened death upon the breach of it, and endued him with power and ability to keep it.

(Genesis 1:27; Ecclesiastes 7:29; Romans 10:5; Galatians 3:10, 12)

Paragraph 2. The same law that was first written in the heart of man continued to be a perfect rule of righteousness after the fall, and was delivered by God upon Mount Sinai, in ten commandments, and written in two tables, the four first containing our duty towards God, and the other six, our duty to man.

(Romans 2:14, 15; Deuteronomy 10:4)

Paragraph 3. Besides this law, commonly called moral, God was pleased to give to the people of Israel ceremonial laws, containing several typical ordinances, partly of worship, prefiguring Christ, his graces, actions, sufferings, and benefits; and partly holding forth divers instructions of moral duties, all which ceremonial laws being appointed only to the time of reformation, are, by Jesus Christ the true Messiah and only law-giver, who was furnished with power from the Father for that end abrogated and taken away.

(Hebrews 10:1; Colossians 2:17; 1 Corinthians 5:7; Colossians 2:14, 16, 17; Ephesians 2:14, 16)

Paragraph 4. To them also he gave sundry judicial laws, which expired together with the state of that people, not obliging any now by virtue of that institution; their general equity only being of moral use.

(1 Corinthians 9:8-10)

Paragraph 5. The moral law doth for ever bind all, as well justified persons as others, to the obedience thereof, and that not only in regard of the matter contained in it, but also in respect of the authority of God the Creator, who gave it; neither doth Christ in the Gospel any way dissolve, but much strengthen this obligation.

(Romans 13:8-10; James 2:8, 10-12; James 2:10, 11; Matthew 5:17-19; Romans 3:31)

Paragraph 6. Although true believers be not under the law as a covenant of works, to be thereby justified or condemned, yet it is of great use to them as well as to others, in that as a rule of life, informing them of the will of God and their duty, it directs and binds them to walk accordingly; discovering also the sinful pollutions of their natures, hearts, and lives, so as examining themselves thereby, they may come to further conviction of, humiliation for, and hatred against, sin; together with a clearer sight of the need they have of Christ and the perfection of his obedience; it is likewise of use to the regenerate to restrain their corruptions, in that it forbids sin; and the threatenings of it serve to show what even their sins deserve, and what afflictions in this life they may expect for them, although freed from the curse and unalloyed rigour thereof. The promises of it likewise show them God’s approbation of obedience, and what blessings they may expect upon the performance thereof, though not as due to them by the law as a covenant of works; so as man’s doing good and refraining from evil, for the law encourageth to the one and deterreth from the other, is no evidence of his being under the law and not under grace.

(Romans 6:14; Galatians 2:16; Romans 8:1; Romans 10:4; Romans 3:20; Romans 7:7, etc; Romans 6:12-14; 1 Peter 3:8-13)

Paragraph 7. Neither are the aforementioned uses of the law contrary to the grace of the Gospel, but do sweetly comply with it, the Spirit of Christ subduing and enabling the will of man to do that freely and cheerfully which the will of God, revealed in the law, requireth to be done.

(Galatians 3:21; Ezekiel 36:27)

There is a lot that could be said about chapter 19 of our confession. It is a very beautiful and helpful statement. And it is beautiful and helpful because it is true to the teaching of Holy Scripture. I hope you can see how it protects us from the errors of legalism and antinomianism. 

It protects us from legalism, one, by stating in para 6  that “true believers be not under the law as a covenant of works, to be thereby justified or condemned…”, two, by stating in para 3 that we are not bound to keep the ceremonial laws of the Old Testament, and three, by stating in para 4 that we are not bound to keep the civil or judicial laws either, for these have been fulfilled and taken away by the coming of Christ and the arrival of the New Covenant. For protection against the legalistic error of elevating the traditions and opinions of men to the place of law, we would have to go to chapter 21 of our Confession, entitled Of Christian Liberty And Liberty Of Conscience. That too is a very important and beautiful chapter in our confession of faith, which we do not have the time to read. 

Chapter 19 of our confession helps to guard us against the error of antinomianism in its teaching that the moral law of God was written on man’s heart in the beginning, on stone at Mount Sianai in Ten Commandments. And it is this law – the moral that is written on our hearts by the regenerating power of the Holy Spirit (see Jeremiah 31:31ff). The law of the Spirit of life (Romans 8:2), and the law of Christ (Galatians 6:2), are not different from the moral law in substance. But they are different from the Ten Commandments as it pertains to power. For in Christ and by the Spirit we are graciously enabled to keep God’s moral law from the heart. That is what 2LCF 19.7 teaches when it says,
Neither are the aforementioned uses of the law contrary to the grace of the Gospel, but do sweetly comply with it, the Spirit of Christ subduing and enabling the will of man to do that freely and cheerfully which the will of God, revealed in the law, requireth to be done.”

*****

Baptist Catechism 66 & 67

You may be wondering what all of this has to do with Baptist Catechism questions 66 and 67. Well, I believe I have said enough about what the fourth commandment requires and forbids in the previous two sermons. Here I wanted to take a moment to counter the criticism that we will certainly face from other Christians living in our place and time as we strive, by the grace of God and in the power of the Spirit, to honor the Lord’s Day Sabbath and to keep it holy. What will some charge us with? Answer: legalism.

But is it legalistic to say that the Christain ought to obey God’s moral law? Is it legalistic to say that the Christian ought to worship God in the way he has prescribed, honoring one day in seven as holy unto him until the end of the world? Certainly not. 

Some who are anti-Sabbatiarians will say, well, the practice of Sabbath keeping belonged to the ceremonial laws of Old Covenant Israel and has been done away with. You are guilty of legalism for teaching that the Sabbath Day is to be kept under the New Covenant. 

This is not true. That Sabbath command was not given first to Israel through Moses, but to Adam. And when the Sabbath command was given to Isarel through Moses, it was given a special place in the Ten Commandments, wherein we find universal and unchanging laws. Are we charged with legalism when we say that God alone is to be worshiped, not with images, and with reverence for his name?  Are we charged with legalism when say, you shall honor your father and mother, do not murder, commit adultery, steal, bear false witness, or covet? Are we guilty of legalism when we teach that Christians are to keep these laws by God’s and from a heart renewed and empowered by the Holy Spirit? Of course not!  Then why do so many professing Christians in our day charge us with legalism when we teach that the fourth of these ten Commandments is to be kept too? I’m afraid that the antinomian error has had a devastating effect on the modern church.    

Some who are anti-Sabbatiarians will respond, saying, but the command to keep the Sabbath holy is not restated in the New Testament, therefore we are not bound to keep it. 

First of all, this is simply not true. But let us assume for a moment that it was true. What if the fourth commandment were not restated in the New Testament? Would this mean that we are not bound to keep it? I think not. The question I would ask in reply is this: who invented this rule that in order for something to be believed or obeyed by the New Covenant people of God, it must be restated in the New Testament? This is a false assumption. In fact, the New Testament is not written as a fresh start. It is written as a continuation and fulfillment of the Old. If something is to be done away with, you will need to demonstrate that it has been fulfilled or advanced somehow. And as I said in the previous sermon, the think of which the Sabbath is a sign, namely eternal rest in the presence of God, is not here yet in full. Christ has entered his rest. We rest in him in part. We will rest eternally when he returns to make all things new. Until then, the practice of Sabbath keeping remains for the people of God.  This idea that something must be said in the New Testament for it to be believed or obeyed is a byproduct of the dispensational error, I think. 

As I said, this claim that the Sabbath is not taught in the New Testament is not true. Christ kept the Old Covenant Sabbath. He also stripped away all of the legalistic gunk that the religious leaders has piled on it so as to demonstrate what true Sabbath-keeping looked like. And after his resurrection, he met with his disciples on the first day of the week to break bread. The early church did the same as recorded in Acts. Assembling for Christian worship on the first day of the week is not merely the tradition of man. It is the law of God properly understood. It is the Christian, New Covenant, Lord’s Day Sabbath. If it is only the tradition of man, then there is nothing at all binding us to worship on Sunday. In fact, there is nothing binding us to weekly worship either.

Some who are anti-Sabbatiarians will respond by saying, then why has the day changed? Answer: because while the pattern of one day in seven is moral ever since the creation of the world, the day itself is symbolic or ceremonial. In the previous sermon, I described how the seventh day Sabbath fit the Covenant of Works that God made with Adam in the garden (work will lead to rest). It was a reminder of the original creation which has been ruined by sin. The first day Sabbath fits the Covenant of Grace instituted by Christ  (rest in Christ leads to work). I a reminder of the original creation and of the new creation which Christ earned, inaugurated, and will consummate at his return. 

*****

Conclusion

The fourth commandment remains, brothers and sisters. The day has changed. But the moral obligation to devote a proportion of time to the public and private worship God remains. The pattern established at creation was one and seven. While this world remains, that pattern will remain. From Adam through Christ the day was Saturday. From the resurrection of Christ to the end of the world, the day is Sunday. And this is why it is important for you to know that “the fourth commandment forbids the omission or careless performance of the duties required, and the profaning the day by idleness, or doing that which is in itself sinful, or by unnecessary thoughts, words, or works, about worldly employments or recreations.” 

Have you kept this law perfectly? No, we have violated this law in thought, word, and deed. Thanks be to God for the forgiveness that is in Christ Jesus, and for the gift of the Spirit, who enables us to freely do all that pleases the Lord through regeneration and sanctification.  

Posted in Sermons, Joe Anady, Posted by Joe. Comments Off on Afternoon Sermon: What Is Forbidden In The Fourth Commandment, And What Reasons Are Added? (Or, Beware Of The Errors Of Legalism And Antinomianism) Baptist Catechism 66 & 67, Acts 20:7-12

Discussion Questions: Luke 1:26-38

Questions For Discussion At Home Or In Gospel Community Groups

  • Compare and contrast the setting of the announcement made to Zechariah and the setting of the announcement made to Mary. What should be noted about Nazareth? What theme does this introduce that will be developed by Luke?
  • Discuss how every phrase in Gabriel’s announcement (vs. 28-33) is rooted in Old Testament promises and prophesies regarding the coming Messiah. Why is this important?  
  •  What was the difference between Zechariah’s question and Mary’s? Why was Zechariah rebuked and punished while Mary was not?
  • According to Gabriel, how would the Son of God become incarnate? See also Baptist Catechism 25. 
  • What can we learn from Mary’s response? How should we emulate her?
Posted in Study Guides, Joe Anady, Posted by Joe. Comments Off on Discussion Questions: Luke 1:26-38

Morning Sermon: The Time Had Come, Luke 1:5-25

Old Testament Reading: Malachi 4

“For behold, the day is coming, burning like an oven, when all the arrogant and all evildoers will be stubble. The day that is coming shall set them ablaze, says the LORD of hosts, so that it will leave them neither root nor branch. But for you who fear my name, the sun of righteousness shall rise with healing in its wings. You shall go out leaping like calves from the stall. And you shall tread down the wicked, for they will be ashes under the soles of your feet, on the day when I act, says the LORD of hosts. Remember the law of my servant Moses, the statutes and rules that I commanded him at Horeb for all Israel. ‘Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the great and awesome day of the LORD comes. And he will turn the hearts of fathers to their children and the hearts of children to their fathers, lest I come and strike the land with a decree of utter destruction.’” (Malachi 4, ESV)

New Testament Reading: Luke 1:5-25

“In the days of Herod, king of Judea, there was a priest named Zechariah, of the division of Abijah. And he had a wife from the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elizabeth. And they were both righteous before God, walking blamelessly in all the commandments and statutes of the Lord. But they had no child, because Elizabeth was barren, and both were advanced in years. Now while he was serving as priest before God when his division was on duty, according to the custom of the priesthood, he was chosen by lot to enter the temple of the Lord and burn incense. And the whole multitude of the people were praying outside at the hour of incense. And there appeared to him an angel of the Lord standing on the right side of the altar of incense. And Zechariah was troubled when he saw him, and fear fell upon him. But the angel said to him, ‘Do not be afraid, Zechariah, for your prayer has been heard, and your wife Elizabeth will bear you a son, and you shall call his name John. And you will have joy and gladness, and many will rejoice at his birth, for he will be great before the Lord. And he must not drink wine or strong drink, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit, even from his mother’s womb. And he will turn many of the children of Israel to the Lord their God, and he will go before him in the spirit and power of Elijah, to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the disobedient to the wisdom of the just, to make ready for the Lord a people prepared.’ And Zechariah said to the angel, ‘How shall I know this? For I am an old man, and my wife is advanced in years.’ And the angel answered him, ‘I am Gabriel. I stand in the presence of God, and I was sent to speak to you and to bring you this good news. And behold, you will be silent and unable to speak until the day that these things take place, because you did not believe my words, which will be fulfilled in their time.’ And the people were waiting for Zechariah, and they were wondering at his delay in the temple. And when he came out, he was unable to speak to them, and they realized that he had seen a vision in the temple. And he kept making signs to them and remained mute. And when his time of service was ended, he went to his home. After these days his wife Elizabeth conceived, and for five months she kept herself hidden, saying, ‘Thus the Lord has done for me in the days when he looked on me, to take away my reproach among people.’” (Luke 1:5–25, ESV)

*****

Please excuse any typos and misspellings within this manuscript. It has been published online for the benefit of the saints of Emmaus Reformed Baptist Church but without the benefit of proofreading.

Introduction

In Galatians 4:4 Paul the Apostle says, “But when the fullness of time had come, God sent forth his Son, born of woman, born under the law, to redeem those who were under the law, so that we might receive adoption as sons” (Galatians 4:4–5, ESV). I would like you to see that the same truth Paul states in his epistle, Luke narrates in his Gospel. Paul delivers the truth regarding the birth of the Messiah and the purpose of his coming in the form of doctrine, or teaching. Luke delivers the truth to us by telling the story. 

The phrase from Galatians that I would like to draw your attention to  is, “But when the fullness of time had come…”  It indicates that the birth of Jesus the Messiah was right on time. More than this, it indicates that the birth of Jesus the Messiah was in fulfillment of promises previously made. Jesus the Messiah was born into the world – “born of woman, born under the law, to redeem those who were under the law, so that we might receive adoption as sons” – at just the right time (according to the plan of God), and in fulfillment to the promises of God previously made (as recorded in the Old Testament Scriptures). What Paul says in a direct way, Luke teaches in narrative form. 

In Luke 1:5-25 Luke tells us the story of the angelic announcement that came to a man named Zachariah concerning the imminent miraculous conception and birth of his son, John. John would not be the Christ who was promised beforehand, but he would be the forerunner to Christ. This son of Zachariah would be the one who would prepare the way for the Messiah. And you should know that the Old Testament Scriptures do not only contain promises and prophesies concerning the coming Messiah. They also speak of the one who would prepare the way for him. 

So then, this announcement that came to Zachariah by way of the Angel Gabriel was no small thing. It was a clear indication that “the fullness of time had come”. The very thing that those who were devout and faithful in Israel were looking forward to, was about to happen. The Lord’s Messiah – the Messiah who was promised to Adam and Eve after their fall into sin, to Abraham in the covenant that God made with him and his descendants, to Israel in the covenant that God made with them through Moses, and to David in the covenant that God made with him – was about to arrive. Those who were devout and faithful in Old Covenant Israel believed these promises and they were very much looking forward to their fulfillment. It would be hard to overstate just how amazing and significant this heavenly announcement would have been to those who had faith in these promises. To hear that the forerunner of the Messiah was about to be born would have been the greatest of all announcements to hear, for this meant that the Messiah himself was at hand. In other words, the “fullness of time (as it pertained to the arrival of the promised Redeemer) had come.”

I think that is the main point of the passage that is before us today. As we consider Luke 1:5-25 and the announcement that came to Zechariah by way of the angel Gabriel, we ought to be struck with a sense of the weightiness of the moment. Something was about to happen that would shake heaven and earth. Let us now consider this narrative in detail to see that it is so. I have five observations to make. 

*****

The Announcement Concerning The Soon Arrival Of The Messiah 

Happened First At The Temple

One, notice that the announcement concerning the soon arrival of the Messiah happened first at the temple in Jerusalem. The angel Gabriel appeared to Zachariah to deliver this message while he ministered as a priest in the temple, in the holy place, and before the altar of incense

I’m glad that we have just finished a study of the book of Exodus. Having that story fresh in our minds will help us greatly in our study of Luke’s Gospel, for Luke presents Christ to us as a second and greater Moses, and the work of Christ as a second and greater Exodus. And it is also good because in that study we learned all about the tabernacle (or temple), its design, and its significance.

I cannot take the time in this sermon to remind you of all that the tabernacle, and later temple, signified. But I will remind you of three basic things. One, the tabernacle, and later temple, was the place where the God of heaven invited his people on earth to come and meet with him and to worship him under the Old Mosaic Covenant. The tabernacle and temple functioned, therefore, as a kind of special contact point between heaven and earth in those days. Two, the tabernacle and temple, along with all of the sacrifices that were offered there, provided cleansing for the priests and the people in an earthly and temporary way while also pointing forward to the Christ who would one day atone for sin really, truly, and eternally in fulfillment to the promises of God previously made. So then, the tabernacle and temple were places for ceremonial cleansing and true worship, but they also pointed forward to someone and something greater, namely Christ, his atoning sacrifice, and the new creation temple which he would earn through his obedience unto death. Three, the tabernacle and temple were constructed in such a way as to symbolize one’s approach to God who is enthroned in heaven. To journey to the temple was to ascend the mountain of the Lord. Entering the courtyard the people were reminded of their sojourning on earth by the mountain-like altar upon which animal sacrifices were offered up, and the ocean-like sea in which the priests would be consecrated and daily cleansed. The Holy place symbolized (in part) the heavens above, and the Most Holy Place symbolized the heaven of heavens, that is to say, the very throneroom of God in heaven where he manifests his glory even now before the elect angels. But as you know, a curtain divided the Holy Place from the Most Holy Place. The High Priest would pass through the curtain and enter the Most Holy Place once a year, and not without animal blood to atone for his own sin and the sins of the people. The curtain communicated, on the one hand, that the way into the presence of God had not yet been opened up wide. On the other hand, when the High Priest entered once a year, it communicated that the way into God’s presence was not closed off entirely. No, it would be opened up wide, for God had promised. And we know that it was opened up by Jesus Christ, our great High Priest, and mediator of the New Covenant, through the offering up of himself before God for the sins of many. The priests of Israel (the common ones) were not able to enter the Most Holy Place. They ministered daily in the Holy Place. And one of the things they did was burn incense on the altar of incense at the hour of prayer, morning and evening. The incense would raise from the altar, pass through the curtain, and enter the Most Holy Place, signifying that our prayers do in fact reach God’s ears. And all things considered, what do you think the priests were to pray for as they offered up incense and prayers on behalf of the people at that altar morning and evening? One of the things they must have prayed for was the consolation of Israel through the arrival of the Messiah who was promised to them long before.  

It is perfectly fitting, therefore – in fact, it is marvelously beautiful and glorious  –  that the first announcement concerning the soon arrival of the Messiah happened at the temple in Jerusalem. More specifically, the announcement came to Zachariah the priest as he ministered at the altar of incense which was placed just in front of that ominous curtain that separated the Holy Place from the Most Holy place. It is not hard to imagine generations of faithful priests ministering there at that altar praying for the consolation of Israel through the arrival of the Messiah as if knocking on the door and saying, open wide the way, O Lord. Open wide the way into your presence for Israel and for the nations in fulfillment of your promises. 

Brothers and sisters, we must read the New Testament Scripture being mindful of the Old Testament Scriptures. And the more we know and understand the Old Testament Scriptures, the more we will be able to appreciate the meaning of the New. When Luke tells us that the announcement concerning the soon arrival of the Messiah was delivered first to a priest ministering in the temple at the altar of incense, it is far more than fact – it is a fact that is filled with significance and meaning. The One that the temple signified was about to arrive. The One whom those who were faithful in Israel longed for and prayed for was about to arrive. The One who would open wide the way into the presence of God through his broken body and shed blood was at hand. The location at which this announcement was first made was perfectly fitting and filled with symbolism. May the Lord give us understanding.

*****

The Announcement Concerning The Soon Arrival Of The Messiah 

Came First To A Righteous Priest

Two, notice that the announcement concerning the soon arrival of the Messiah came first to a righteous priest. This too was most fitting.

Now, it is true that many of the priests and the religious elite in Israel did not recognize Jesus as the Messiah. Many had a dead and lifeless form of religion. Many did not understand the Old Testament Scriptures truly, though they claimed to be experts. Many did not believe the promises of God concerning Jesus the Messiah. The Gospels make much of the hardness of heart and unbelief of many within Israel in the days of Christ. But notice this: some did believe. There were some who were righteous, faithful, and eagerly awaiting the consolation of Israel and the arrival of the Lord’s Messiah. Zachariah the priest, along with his wife Elizabeth, were among these.

Our text says that Zechariah and his wife Elizabeth “were both righteous before God, walking blamelessly in all the commandments and statutes of the Lord.” When the text says they were righteous, this does not mean that they were sinless, but that they were made righteous through faith in the promised Messiah, just as Abraham was. And because they were made righteous through faith, they also walked “blamelessly in all the commandments and statutes of the Lord.” They kept God’s law, in other words. They kept the civil and ceremonial laws of Moses. They strove to keep the moral law. When they sinned (which they certainly did), they repented and turned to God by offering up the sacrifices required under the Old Covenant, trusting always, not in their own righteousness, nor in the blood of bulls and goats, but in the promised Messiah, of which these things were a sign. 

The text also tells us that the righteous couple “had no child, because Elizabeth was barren, and both were advanced in years.” This would have undoubtedly been a great sorrow to Zachariah and Elizabeth. Children are blessing from God to all people living in all times and places. But they were especially precious to Israelites living in those days. Children would take care of their parents in old age. Being childless left people particularly vulnerable. I emphasize the obvious sorrow associated with childlessness to draw your attention to this reality: those who are righteous and faithful – those who walk blamelessly before God – do also suffer. But those who have faith know that God works in and through our sufferings, and so we entrust ourselves to God even in the midst of difficulties and sorrows, knowing that he cares for us.

There is one more observation that I would like to make concerning Zechariah and Elizabeth before moving on. They were nobodies when considered in a worldly way. They were likely poor, weak, and vulnerable.  And yet the Lord determined to use them mightily. Notice how Luke introduces Zechariah to us alongside another individual, namely, Herod, king of Judea – “In the days of Herod, king of Judea, there was a priest named Zechariah, of the division of Abijah”, the text says. Herod was a man of great power and wealth. He was so powerful that “days” or times were identified by his reign. And yet the Lord’s will was not to establish his kingdom through the rich and powerful, but the weak, vulnerable, and marginalized of society. This theme will run strong throughout Luke’s Gospel, and it is introduced here at the very beginning. Brothers and sisters, know this: God, through Jesus the Messiah, takes the wisdom and ways of this fallen and sin-sick world and turns them on their heads. In Christ, the mighty and the proud will be brought low, but the humble and poor in spirit will be lifted up. Look for the theme. It is everywhere in Luke’s Gospel. More importantly, believe in the teaching and live by it. Do you wish to be exulted? Then be brought low. Bow the knee before God and Christ. Live for his glory, not your own. Do you wish to gain your life? Then lose it by dying to self and living for the good of others and the glory of God. Walk humbly before God and man. In due time, he will exult you.   

*****

The Announcement Concerning The Soon Arrival Of The Messiah Was 

Delivered By The Angel Gabriel

Thirdly, notice that the announcement concerning the soon arrival of the Messiah was delivered by the angel Gabriel. 

Angels are ministering spirits. At some point before man’s fall into sin on earth, there was a fall or rebellion in the heavenly realm. There was no one angel who was set as covenant head over all the rest, as Adam was over humanity, and so the decision to remain faithful to God or to rebel was individual. The elect angels (as they are called in 1 Timothy 5:21) remained faithful. The fallen angels rebelled. We do not have all the details about this, and we ought not to speculate about things not revealed. But it seems clear that some of the angels (with Lucifer or Satan in the lead) were filled with discontent regarding their place and wanted to have the power of God as their own, so they rebelled, and Satan then brought temptation to the man Adam through the woman Eve. Notice two things: One, no redeemer is provided for the angels. Two, not all angels fell, but some remained as servants of God and of God’s people.

There are many angels and demons, but we only know the names of a few of them through the Scriptures. Two of the elect angels that are mentioned by name in the Bible are Michael and Gabriel. They are often mentioned together and they seem to have been given the special task of ministering to God’s covenant people (see Daniel 8-10, 12, Jude 9, Revelation 12).

So what is the significance of this announcement being delivered by the angel Gabriel? Consider three things: 

One, the announcement by an angel communicates that what was about to happen on earth (namely, the birth of the forerunner to the Messiah, and thus the birth of the Messiah) was of heavenly origin and concern. It was the will of God, and it was of interest to the elect angelic. 

Two, the announcement by the angel Gabriel suggests that what was about to happen on earth was connected to the war that was (and is) raging in the spiritual realm, of which he was a part. I would like you to think about that passage in Daniel 10 where the prophet Daniel receives a vision concerning the future of Israel and it is none other than the angel Gabriel who speaks to him. But notice that Gabriel says something interesting in that encounter. In Daniel 10:13 he says, “The prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me twenty-one days, but Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me, for I was left there with the kings of Persia” (Daniel 10:13, ESV), and a little later he says, “Do you know why I have come to you? But now I will return to fight against the prince of Persia; and when I go out, behold, the prince of Greece will come. But I will tell you what is inscribed in the book of truth: there is none who contends by my side against these except Michael, your prince” (Daniel 10:20–21, ESV). It is beyond the scope of this sermon to offer a detailed explanation of Daniel 10. The thing that I want for you to notice is that it was Gabriel who appeared to Daniel, it was Gabriel who delivered a message to him concerning the future of Israel, and it was Gabriel who waged war in the spiritual realm with the prince of Persia (Israel’s enemy) and would wage war in the future with the prince of Greece (Isreal’s future enemy). These princes are spiritual beings – fallen angels who bound the nations in darkness and idolatry. Gabriel (and Michael) fought against them on behalf of Isarel. And so when Gabriel appears to Zechariah, it is right for us to assume that his announcement has something to do with this war that had been raging in the spiritual and heavenly realm. Indeed, Luke’s Gospel will make it quite clear that Jesus the Messiah came, not only to atone for sins, but defeat Satan himself, to overthrow his kingdom of darkness, and plunder his house.  In Luke’s Gospel, we will hear about the casing out of demons, the expulsion of Satan from heaven, and the binding of Satan, so that the gospel might spread to all nations – nations once bound in darkness and deceit.  When Gabriel appears, it is right to assume that it has something to do with this spiritual war. Indeed, more angels will appear to others announcing the birth of the Messiah. In Luke 2:13 they are described as a “multitude of heavenly host”. This is a description, not of an angelic choir, but of an angelic army prepared for battle. 

Three, when we hear that the angel Gabriel made the announcement to Zechariah concerning the soon arrival of the Messiah, we ought to remember the announcements that he made previously as God’s messenger to Daniel the prophet. As I have said, Gabriel appeared to Daniel as recorded in the book of Daniel chapters 8 and 9. In Daniel 8 things are revealed to Daniel regarding the future of Isarel. The details are limited, but it is clear that it has to do with the oppression that Isarel would endure, first under the Medo-Perian empire, and then under the Greeks. In Daniel 9 we find Daniel praying for his people Israel and pleading with the Lord to act and to deliver them. It is Gabriel who appeared to him again to bring an answer (Daniel 9:20).  And it is here that we find that famous prophecy concerning the 70 weeks, which revealed the length of time that would pass before the Lord’s anointed one (Messiah) would appear to be cut off to atone for sins (see Daniel 9:26; Isaiah 53:8). Again, it is beyond the scope of this sermon to offer a detailed interpretation of Daniel 9. But it should be clear that when Gabriel appears to deliver this announcement to Zechariah concerning the soon arrival of the Messiah, it has to do with the prophecy he previously delivered to Daniel. The time of which he spoke previously had come.   

*****

The Announcement Concerning The Soon Arrival Of The Messiah Was 

Presented As A Fulfilment Of Old Testament Prophesy

This leads us now to the fourth point of the sermon. Notice that the announcement concerning the soon arrival of the Messiah was presented as a fulfillment of Old Testament prophesy. 

I have just said that the very appearance of Gabriel ought to remind us of the prophecies of Daniel 8-10 and signal that the time for their fulfillment had come. But notice that Gabriel explicitly quotes Old Testament prophecy too. 

Beginning in Luke 1:11 we read, “And there appeared to him an angel of the Lord standing on the right side of the altar of incense. And Zechariah was troubled when he saw him, and fear fell upon him.” This is the common reaction of men when they see an angel. So glorious are they that men fall to their knees and fear. Verse 13: “But the angel said to him, ‘Do not be afraid, Zechariah, for your prayer has been heard, and your wife Elizabeth will bear you a son, and you shall call his name John.’” Many assume that Zachariah’s prayer was for a child, and perhaps it was. But I cannot help but think that he was praying also (or even exclusively) for the consolation of Isarel through the arrival of the Messiah. Yes, it was announced to him that he would have a son in answer to his prayer. But more specifically, he would have a son who would serve as the forerunner to the Lord’s Messiah. Verse 14: “And you will have joy and gladness, and many will rejoice at his birth, for he will be great before the Lord. And he must not drink wine or strong drink, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit, even from his mother’s womb. And he will turn many of the children of Israel to the Lord their God, and he will go before him in the spirit and power of Elijah, to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the disobedient to the wisdom of the just, to make ready for the Lord a people prepared.” (Luke 1:11–17, ESV)

There is a lot that could be said about verses 14 through 17. He is the thing that must be seen: the birth of John the Baptist, the forerunner of the Messiah, was announced by Gabriel as the fulfillment to the prophecy of Malachi 4:6, which is the very last verse of the Old Testament (according to the ordering of the books in our English Bibles), and the very last word of prophecy to be delivered before 400 years of silence. Stated differently, all of the prophetic activity of the Old Testament culminated in these words from Malachi: “Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the great and awesome day of the LORD comes. And he will turn the hearts of fathers to their children and the hearts of children to their fathers, lest I come and strike the land with a decree of utter destruction” (Malachi 4:5–6, ESV). The announcement of the angel Gabriel was clear. Zecharia and Elizabeth would be the ones to bring “Elijah” into the world. This was not the Old Covenant prophet “Elijah” reincarnated, of course, but the Elijah-like figure of whom Malachi spoke. John the Baptist would “go before [the LORD] in the spirit and power of Elijah.” His mission was to “turn many of the children of Israel to the Lord their God… [and] to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the disobedient to the wisdom of the just, to make ready for the Lord a people prepared” (Luke 1:16–17, ESV). Indeed, this is the very thing that John the Baptist did. And it was all in fulfillment to Old Testament prophecy. 

*****

The Announcement Concerning The Soon Arrival Of The Messiah Was 

Accompanied By Miraculous Events

I have one more observation to make before moving to a conclusion, and it will be brief. 

Fifthly, notice that the announcement concerning the soon arrival of the Messiah was accompanied by miraculous events. 

One, an angel appeared to Zacheriah. As we move on in Luke’s narrative we will learn that angels appeared to others too. The heavenly realm is typically hidden from our site. But at this period in the history of redemption, the heavenly realm was opened up a bit to demonstrate that the Lord was at work.

Two, Zachariah was made to be mute for a time because of his disbelief. Yes, this was a form of punishment, but we must also see it as a gift. It was a powerful sign to Zachariah and to all who knew him that the Lord had indeed spoken to him in the temple. The punishment fit the crime, didn’t it? Zachariah opened his mouth in disbelief; the Lord closed his mouth so that he would believe. It is also interesting to note that after Daniel received a message from the angel Gabriel the scriptures say that he “turned [his] face toward the ground and was mute” (Daniel 10:15, ESV). So then, Zechariah, like Daniel before him, was mute, but for different reasons. What Zechariah experienced was miraculous.

Three, it was a miracle that Zachariah and Elizabeth would have a child being advanced in years as they were. We should remember that God gave Abraham and Sarah a son in their old age after years of barrenness. So then, Isaac was born in a miraculous way. Isaac’s wife, Rebecca, was barren too. Issac prayed for her, and she gave birth to twins: Jacob and Esau (Genesis 25: 21). And now we hear that John the Baptist was born to a father and mother advanced in years who were barren. These are to be regarded as miraculous births which demonstrated God’s power and ability to bring life from death. They were a demonstration that God was at work. The miraculous births in the line of Abraham did also anticipate and prefigure the most miraculous birth of all: the virgin birth of Christ. 

*****

Conclusion

As we move to a conclusion, let us not forget Luke’s stated purpose for writing. “[I]t seemed good to [him]… having followed all things closely for some time past, to write an orderly account [to]… most excellent Theophilus, that [he] may have certainty concerning the things [he had] been taught” (Luke 1:3–4, ESV).

Let us pay special attention to the way in which Luke went about this task. Yes, he stated the facts concerning the things that happened. But notice that he presented the facts to us in such a way as to demonstrate beyond a shadow of a doubt that John the Baptist was the promised forerunner to the promised Christ. In other words, the story of John the Baptist, and therefore, the story of Jesus Christ, is set squarely in the context of the story contained in the Old Testament Scriptures.  

The Messiah (and before that, his forerunner) came into the world in fulfillment of promises previously made. Christ was the fulfillment of the temple and the priesthood. He was the fulfillment of prophecies revealed to Daniel by the angel Gabriel hundreds of years earlier. He was the fulfillment to prophecies uttered by Malachi. And when the birth of the forerunner to the Messiah was announced, the message with confirmed by miracles. In this way, Luke labors to give Theophilus (and all who love God through faith in Christ as he did) certainty concerning the things he had been taught. 

Brothers and sisters, if you wish to grow in certainty – if you wish to increase in faith, hope, and love – then one thing you must do is study the Scriptures, for in the Scriptures we find the revelation of God’s marvelous plan of redemption. In the Old Testament, we find promises, prophesies, types, and shadows concerning the Savior who was to come. In the New Testament, we learn that Jesus of Nazareth fulfilled these things, “For all the promises of God find their Yes in him. That is why it is through him that we utter our Amen to God for his glory” (2 Corinthians 1:20, ESV).

Posted in Sermons, Joe Anady, Luke 1:5-25, Posted by Joe. Comments Off on Morning Sermon: The Time Had Come, Luke 1:5-25

Afternoon Sermon: How Is The Sabbath To Be Sanctified?, Baptist Catechism 65, Isaiah 58:13-14

Baptist Catechism 65

Q. 65. How is the Sabbath to be sanctified?

A. The Sabbath is to be sanctified by a holy resting all that day, even from such worldly employments and recreations as are lawful on other days, and spending the time in the public and private exercises of God’s worship,  (Lev. 23:3; Isa. 58:13,14; Isa. 66:23; Matt. 12:11,12)

Scripture Reading: Isaiah 58:13-14

“If you turn back your foot from the Sabbath, from doing your pleasure on my holy day, and call the Sabbath a delight and the holy day of the LORD honorable; if you honor it, not going your own ways, or seeking your own pleasure, or talking idly; then you shall take delight in the LORD, and I will make you ride on the heights of the earth; I will feed you with the heritage of Jacob your father, for the mouth of the LORD has spoken.” (Isaiah 58:13-14, ESV)

*****

Please excuse any typos and misspellings within this manuscript. It has been published online for the benefit of the saints of Emmaus Reformed Baptist Church but without the benefit of proofreading.

*****

Introduction

Questions 62 through 67 of the Baptist Catechism are about the fourth commandment, which is “Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy.” With the help of catechism questions 63-65, we learned that the practice of Sabbath keeping was not unique to Old Covenant Israel, but is for all people living in all places and times. The command was first given to Adam, remember? It was not first given to Abraham, or to Israel through Moses. All people ought to worship God alone, not with images, with reverence for his name, setting one day in seven apart as holy unto the Lord as a day for rest and for worship.

On which day was the Sabbath to be kept from the creation of the world until the resurrection of Christ from the dead? Answer: The seventh day, which we call Saturday. The seventh day Sabbath fit the Covenant of Works that was made with Adam in the garden. It communicated that faithful work would lead to eternal rest. Adam failed to enter that rest. But the seventh day Sabbath remained, one, as a reminder of what Adam failed to obtain, and two, as a reminder of the promise of God to provide a Redeemer from the seed of the woman (a second Adam) who would, in the fulness of time, earn eternal rest through his faithful obedience.     

On which day is the Sabbath to be kept holy now that the Messiah has come, has finished his work, and has entered into his rest? The Sabbath day is now the first day of the week, which we call Sunday. Christ met with his disciples after his resurrection on the first day of the week to establish this pattern (see especially John’s Gospel). The early church assembled on the first day, and they called it the Lord’s Day (see Acts 20:7, Rev 1:10). And this practice has remained throughout the history of the church. The first day of the week (Sunday) is to be regarded as the Christian, or Lord’s Day, Sabbath. 

So then, the pattern of one day out of every seven being set apart as holy remains, but the day has changed. Why has the day changed? Because the particular day is filled with symbolism. I’ve already explained the symbolism of the seventh day (it fit the Covenant of Works and communicated that eternal rest was still yet to be earned). And now I want you to see that the first day Sabbath fits the Covenant of Grace, of which we are partakers if we have faith in Christ Jesus. The first day Sabbath reminds us, not only of the original creation but of the new creation which Christ ushered in through his life, death, and resurrection. It reminds us that Christ, the second Adam, was faithful to finish his work (the work given to him by the Father in eternity), and has entered into his rest. It reminds us of the rest that is ours through faith in him – a rest that we enjoy now in part – a rest that we enjoy in full when Christ returns. The first day Christian Sabbath communicates a different pattern than the seventh day Jewish Sabbath. We do not work to enter rest, we rest in Christ, and then work to obey him with his help out of gratitude for all he has done.

And why does the practice of Sabbath keeping remain for the people of God under the New Covenant (Hebrews 4:9)? Because the thing that Sabbath signifies is not yet here in full, namely, eternal rest in the new heavens and earth.  

All of that is review. Now we ask, how is the Sabbath to be sanctified? In other words, how are we to go about keeping the Sabbath day holy? What should we do, and what should we not do on the Lord’s Day Sabbath? 

You will notice that our catechism does not provide a detailed list of things appropriate (or not appropriate) for Sabbath day. Instead, it presents broad principles. Of course, we must apply these principles in a specific way, and that will require wisdom.  

*****

Baptist Catechism 65

How is the Sabbath to be sanctified? Answer: “The Sabbath is to be sanctified by a holy resting all that day…”

The word sanctified means to “set apart as holy”. The Sabbath day is a holy day, not a common day. In our culture, we have many holidays. But which holy day is the Christian bound to observe? It is not Christmas, Good Friday, or Easter. And neither is the New Covenant Christian bound to observe the many holy days that were given to Israel under the Old Mosaic Covenant (see Colossians 2:16 – Sabbath is plural in the Greek, by the way  – it ought to be translated as “Sabbaths”). The Christian is bound to observe the Lord’s Day Sabbath only. One day in seven was set apart as holy for Adam in the garden. One day in seven was set apart as holy for Abraham, Issac, and Jacob. And one day in seven is set apart for all who are united by faith to the second Adam, the son of Abraham, Christ the Lord. 

Our catechism is clear that the Sabbath day is a day for rest. But the question must be asked, rest from what? Is the Sabbath day a day for sleeping? Well, naps are certainly permitted, if needed. But truly, the day is to be a day full of a particular kind of activity, as we will soon see. The word “holy” helps us to see this. Not only is it a day set apart for rest. It is also a day set apart for holy purposes, namely, worship. Leviticus 23:3 clarifies this, saying, “Six days shall work be done, but on the seventh day is a Sabbath of solemn rest, a holy convocation. You shall do no work. It is a Sabbath to the LORD in all your dwelling places.” (Leviticus 23:3, ESV). Convocation means “a formal assembly”. A holy convocation is an assembling together for worship. So no, the Sabbath day is not a day for sleeping in or napping. It is a day for worship. 

So again I ask, what are we to rest from? Our catechism is right to say that we are to rest “from such worldly employments and recreations as are lawful on other days…” In other words, the Sabbath day is a stop day. It is a day to cease (or rest) from a certain kind of activity (namely, common work and recreation) so that we can be devoted to another kind of activity (namely, public and private worship). Common activities are to be set to the side. Holy activities are to be taken up. 

The Lord’s Day Sabbath is not a day for common work, brothers and sisters. The Lord’s Day Sabbath is not a day for recreation. What then is it a day for? Our catechism is right to say that we are to “[spend] the time in the public and private exercises of God’s worship, except so much as is to be taken up in the works of necessity and mercy.”  

I like the word “spend”. It reminds us that time is spent kind of like money is spent. We only have so much of it, and we have to decide how to spend it. On the Lord’s Day, we are to spend the day (the whole day) “in the public and private exercises of God’s worship.” As has already been mentioned, the Sabbath day is a day for holy convocation, or assembling. That is what “public… exercises of God’s worship” refers to. The church of Christ is to assemble on the Lord’s Day for corporate worship. And this is why the writer of Hebrews exhorts us to, “not [neglect] to meet together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another, and all the more as you see the Day drawing near” (Hebrews 10:25, ESV).

The day is to be spent in “public… exercises of God’s worship.” And after public worship is over  (however much time the church decides to devote to that), Christians are then to spend their time in  “private exercises of God’s worship.” I take this to mean that we are to continue in a spirit of worship as we go our separate ways. We are to think upon the word that was preached. We are to pray. We are to read Scripture and talk about Scripture. We might even continue to sing! 

Are we to worship God privately on the other days of the week too? Yes, of course! But the Lord’s Day Sabbath is a day set aside for this. By resting from common work and common recreation, we are freed to worship the Lord corporately and privately in a pronounced and focused way. To state the matter differently, on the other days of the week we are often consumed with work and distracted by recreation. Work and recreations are not bad things. In fact, approached rightly and within proper boundaries, they are very good things. And yes, we are to honor the Lord in our work and in our recreations Monday through Saturday. But on Sunday, we are invited to set these common things to the side to enable us to fix our attention squarely upon the Lord, to worship him, and to delight in him.

Now to be clear, I do not know of any individuals or families that spend the entire Lord’s Day in strict private or family worship after assembling with the congregation. If that is what is intended by our catechism (and confession) then I would have to confess that we fall short of it. But I would like to think (and perhaps I am wrong) that our catechism is simply teaching us to go on from public worship in a spirit of private worship. Stated negatively, our catechism is teaching us to not run off from corporate worship to common work and to recreation but to continue to keep the day – the whole day – as holy unto the Lord by thinking and conversing about the things of God in private (wedding illustration).  

Lastly, our catechism mentions two exceptions: “except so much as is to be taken up in the works of necessity and mercy.” A work of necessity is a work that absolutely cannot wait until the following day. If your ox falls into a ditch (does anyone have an ox?), you should pull it out to preserve the life of the ox and your property. If a water pipe bursts under your house you should fix it. If your neighbor is experiencing a difficulty like this, you should help them on the Sabbath day. An act of mercy is similar. It is an act of kindness done for someone in need. The Lord’s Day Sabbath is a good day for this, as Jesus demonstrated by healing the lame and the sick on the Sabbath. And it should also be recognized that some people are engaged in professions that involve doing acts of necessity or mercy. Emergency room doctors, police officers, and perhaps even water district employees will need to work on Sundays. Christians who are engaged in professions like these should do their very best to have Sundays off, however.  

*****

Conclusion

Brothers and sisters, it is no secret that Christian individuals, families, and churches sometimes struggle to know and come to an agreement on what exactly should be done, and what should not be done, on the Lord’s Day Sabbath. I would like to conclude by offering a few pieces of advice that I hope will help.  

One, think about the purpose of the day and ask, does this activity (whatever it is) fit with the purpose of the day? This general question will serve you better than a strict and detailed list of do’s and dont’s. Most of the time, the answer will be obvious. Does playing in a baseball league fit with the purpose of the day? Does zoning out on a movie or the Supper Bowl fit? What about working on the house remodel, or doing some other chore or task that can easily wait until Monday? It’s hard to see how these sorts of activities could possibly fit the day. These are clear examples of common work and recreation that ought to be reserved for the common days of the week. 

Two, when trying to encourage others to keep the Sabbath day holy, appeal to the goodness of the thing. By that I mean, emphasize what it is that we get to do on the Lord’s Day Sabbath, namely, delight in the Lord, rather than what we don’t get to do on the day. The day was designed to be a blessing to us, and so this is what we should emphasize.   

Three, be careful with the little ones. Do not expect more out of them than they are able to give. Little ones do need to play. They have a limited ability to focus when compared to adults. I hope our children delight in the Lord’s Day as they grow up in the church. I hope they consider it to be the best of all the days. Brothers and sisters, we must be careful to not frustrate them with unreasonable expectations. With that said, we should encourage our children to keep the Lord’s Day with more and more care and seriousness as they grow older. Paul’s words in 1 Corinthians 13:11 seem to apply. “When I was a child, I spoke like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I gave up childish ways” (1 Corinthians 13:11, ESV). Our expectations of children ought to be reasonable. At the same time, we need to encourage our children to go on toward maturity in all things, including honoring the Lord’s Day Sabbath. 

Four, be patient with others even as you remain resolute in your convictions. Very few Christians today honor the Lord’s Day Sabbath. We need to leave room for others to grow in their understanding of this doctrine and in their application of it. Is there a place for exhortation? Yes, of course. When you see a brother or sister violating the Sabbath Day in an obvious way, it is right that you encourage them to turn from sin and to obedience in Christ. But we must be loving and patient with each other in all that we do. 

Five, leave room for differences of opinion regarding the particulars of Sabbath keeping. I think you would agree with me that there are activities that clearly do not agree with the purpose of the day. The Lord’s Day is not a day for common work, and nor is it a day for recreation. We ought not to be distracted by work and recreation on the Lord’s Day, therefore. But in my mind, there may be some activities that some would classify as recreation that may in fact serve the purpose of the day. I’m thinking of things like a walk, hike, drive, game of catch, or bike ride. All of these activities can be done in such a way as to encourage conversation and contemplation concerning the things of God and to serve the purpose of the day.  Now, it may be that you are convinced that these things ought not to be done on the Lord’s Day, and that is fine. But I would encourage you to not attempt to bind the consciences of others on these things but to consider them as matters of opinion. 

Six, we must call the Sabbath a delight. I think it is right for us to view the Lord’s Day Sabbath as a celebration, or festival. It is to be a joyous day! But note this: The Sabbath day is to be a delight to us, not because we spend the day pleasing the flesh, but because we feed the soul by delighting ourselves in God and in Jesus Christ, the Lord of the Sabbath.  

Posted in Sermons, Joe Anady, Posted by Joe. Comments Off on Afternoon Sermon: How Is The Sabbath To Be Sanctified?, Baptist Catechism 65, Isaiah 58:13-14


"Him we proclaim,
warning everyone and teaching everyone with all wisdom,
that we may present everyone mature in Christ."
(Colossians 1:28, ESV)

© 2011-2022 Emmaus Reformed Baptist Church