Sermon: Genesis 11:1-9: Babel: A Warning To All Who Would Build Independent Of God

Old Testament Reading: Genesis 11:1-9

“Now the whole earth had one language and the same words. And as people migrated from the east, they found a plain in the land of Shinar and settled there. And they said to one another, ‘Come, let us make bricks, and burn them thoroughly.’ And they had brick for stone, and bitumen for mortar. Then they said, ‘Come, let us build ourselves a city and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves, lest we be dispersed over the face of the whole earth.’ And the LORD came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of man had built. And the LORD said, ‘Behold, they are one people, and they have all one language, and this is only the beginning of what they will do. And nothing that they propose to do will now be impossible for them. Come, let us go down and there confuse their language, so that they may not understand one another’s speech.’ So the LORD dispersed them from there over the face of all the earth, and they left off building the city. Therefore its name was called Babel, because there the LORD confused the language of all the earth. And from there the LORD dispersed them over the face of all the earth.” (Genesis 11:1–9, ESV)

New Testament Reading: 1 Corinthians 3:10-14

“According to the grace of God given to me, like a skilled master builder I laid a foundation, and someone else is building upon it. Let each one take care how he builds upon it. For no one can lay a foundation other than that which is laid, which is Jesus Christ. Now if anyone builds on the foundation with gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, straw— each one’s work will become manifest, for the Day will disclose it, because it will be revealed by fire, and the fire will test what sort of work each one has done. If the work that anyone has built on the foundation survives, he will receive a reward.” (1 Corinthians 3:10–14, ESV)

*****

Introduction

The story of the tower of Babel is well known even in our culture, but I’m not sure that it is often understood. I wonder how many after reading this story think to themselves, “what was God so upset about that he would respond by confusing the language of the peoples of the earth to scatter them abroad?” On the surface it might seem as if God is against all cultural progress — as if he was upset that man dared to cooperate with one another to build a city. God’s response to this activity of man probably seems harsh to some, as if it were an overreaction. 

But a careful reading of this text, especially when it is considered  in the broader context of the story of Genesis and of scripture as a whole, will reveal that there is more going on here. God was displeased, not with city building or tower building per say, but with the spirit of these sinful men who sought to live their lives, to build their city and their tower, independent of God and for their own glory. 

The tower that these men built was not just a tower, but a temple — a Mesopotamian ziggurat used to promote the worship of false gods. When these men built their city and their tower their hope was that the god’s would descend to them to bless them, and they would ascend to become like the gods, and make a name for themselves. This construction project was no innocent enterprise. Instead, the building of this city in a plain in the land of Shinar, and the construction of this tower-temple, was an act of rebellion against the God of heaven. The story shows that the same desire for independence and autonomy which drove Adam and Eve to take of the forbidden tree, for Cain to build a city and to name it after his son, and for the sons of God to rule corruptly, harsly and oppressively in the days leading up to the flood, was also present in the world after the flood. Prior to the flood the earth was filled with corruption  because men sought to establish their own kingdoms, and not the kingdom of God. And the same is true in the world after the flood. Though Noah and his sons were saved from the flood waters in that Ark of God, and though they set their feet down upon a renewed earth after the floodwaters receded, they did not find themselves in the new heavens and new earth where righteousness dwells. Man was still fallen and in sin. Man still lived in a fallen and sinful world. What wee see is in this Babel story is that men were  still eager to pursue, not the glory of God, but their own glory. They were eager to decide for themselves how they ought to worship and to live. With this God was displeased.       

This brief story is a literary masterpiece . I wish that I could take the time to describe to you all of the wordplays contained in this text in the Hebrew. I wish that I could show how complex the structure of the text is, for that does help us to undestand the main point. Briefly, let me say that this little story is broken into seven sections. Those sections are formed into an extended chiasmus with verses five as the turning point. Not only is this text structured as an extended chiasmus, it is also organized into two parallel panels which are meant to be compared with one another, with emphasis given again to verse 5. I love this stuff, but it doesn’t preach very well. We will simply consider this text in it’s seven sections consisting of introductory remarks, fives scenes, and then concluding remarks. Let us consider this text scene by scene.

*****

Introductory Remarks

First, we encounter introductory remarks: “Now the whole earth had one language and the same words. And as people migrated from the east, they found a plain in the land of Shinar and settled there” (Genesis 11:1–2, ESV).

The stament, “now the whole earth had one language and the same words”, might strike you as odd given what we have already read in Genesis chapter 10. There in that table of nations, as we have called it, the spread of the descendents of Noah’s sons, Shem, Ham and Japheth are

described to us. And at the end of each section in that table of nations we read these words, “each with his own language, by their clans, in their nations” (Genesis 10:5, ESV). This is how the account of the descendents of Japheth is concluded — they spread to the coastlands,  “each with his own language, by their clans, in their nations”. The same is true for Ham — “These are the sons of Ham, by their clans, their languages, their lands, and their nations.” (Genesis 10:20, ESV). And it is also true for the section dealing with Shem — “These are the sons of Shem, by their clans, their languages, their lands, and their nations” (Genesis 10:31, ESV).

If this is what we have learned in Genesis 10, then how can Genesis 11:1 say, “Now the whole earth had one language and the same words.” The answer is that the Bible often recapitulates. It is not always organized chronologically, but sometimes goes backwards in time to emphasize some other aspect or theme in the historical development. 

The table of nations in Genesis 10 chronicles for us the dispersion of the peoples of the earth, and even takes us past the Babel incident to the time where each of these clans and nations had their own language. But as we move forward to Genesis 11 in the text, we find that the text takes us backwards in time. Genesis 10 tells us about the dispersion of the peoples of the earth. Genesis 11 tells us why they were dispersed. 

These two texts — Genesis 10 and 11 — are not difficult to harmonize. 

It should be remembered that Genesis 10 gave attention to one figure in particular in the line of Ham — his name was Nimrod. We are told in 10:8 that “he was the first on earth to be a mighty man” (he was a great and powerful king), and that “the beginning of his kingdom was Babel, Erech, Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar” (Genesis 10:10, ESV). In Genesis 10 the camera angle is very wide — there we are zoomed way out to consider the spread of the nations in general. But in Genesis 11 we are zoomed way in upon the city of Babel which Nimrod founded to see the true spirit of that civilization which lead to the curse of confusion and to the dispersion. The spirit of that civilization was to build independent from God in the line and spirit of Cain and Lamech, Ham and Nimrod. 

Also, it should be remember that in Genesis 10:25 we were introduced to one named Peleg. Peleg was born in the line of Shem, and in the righteous line of Eber. Through Peleg’s line, Abram (who we know as Abraham) would be born. From him the Hebrew people would come. And in Genesis 10:25 we learn that in Peleg’s “days the earth was divided…” (his name means “division”. In other words, it was during Peleg’s livetime that the Babel event happened. 

Genesis 10 and 11 do not contradict one another. Instead they complement one another. Genesis 10 describes the dispersion of the nations generally. Genesis 11 looks up close to show us the details. And so with these words the stage is set for our story — “Now the whole earth had one language and the same words. And as people migrated from the east [that is, from mountains of Ararat], they found a plain in the land of Shinar and settled there” (Genesis 11:1–2, ESV). 

Let us take a moment to imagine a world like that? Imagine a world where there was no such thing as a “language barrier”. People would be able to come together much more easily. People would be able to work together much more efficiently towards a common good. Or so you would think. The rest of the story describes what sinful and fallen men in the line of Ham and Nimrod did with this blessing of a unified language. Instead of using it for good, they used it for evil.  

*****

Scene 1 

Having had the scene set for us in verses 1 and  2,  let us now consider the first scene in verse 3: “And they said to one another, ‘Come, let us make bricks, and burn them thoroughly.’ And they had brick for stone, and bitumen for mortar” (Genesis 11:3, ESV).

These words need to be considered carefully if we are to understand the central meaning of this text.

The phrase, “And they said to one another, ‘Come, let us make bricks, and burn them thoroughly’”, is meant to be contrasted with another well known phrase found earlier the book of Genesis. Notice that the words of these worldly men are similar to the words of God as recorded in Genesis 1:26: “Then God said, ‘Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion…” (Genesis 1:26, ESV).

God engaged in a building project at the beginning of time. He made the heavens and earth. And he also made man. And his purpose for man — and this is very significant for our story today — was that man would exercise dominion upon the earth, but under his authority. God is not opposed to kingdom building. In fact, God created man for the express purpose of building a kingdom. Man was created to have dominion on earth and to labor for the advancement of God’s kingdom. Adam was to expand and keep the garden temple of God. 

The words of the men who built Babel, and the words of God when he made man are similar so that we might be prompted to compare and contrast them. When we do,  it becomes apparent that these city builders are up to no good. They are building a city and a tower, not under God and to advance his kingdom, but they are seeking to establish a kingdom of their own. 

*****

Scene 2

The second scene makes all of this explicitly clear. Verse 4: “Then they said, ‘Come, let us build ourselves a city and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves, lest we be dispersed over the face of the whole earth’” (Genesis 11:4, ESV).

The words “us” and “ourselves” are important.  “Come, let us build ourselves a city and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves.”

These men were very ambitious. Ambition – that is, the strong desire to achieve something — is not evil. But there is a between holy ambition and unholy ambition. Ambition that acts for the glory of something other than the glory of God and the good of others is sinful. Often, our ambitions are selfish. And this is why James says in 3:13 of his epistle, “Who is wise and understanding among you? By his good conduct let him show his works in the meekness of wisdom.” James is promoting wisdom that is meek — wisdom which first humbly submits to God and has God’s word as it’s source. And then  he says, “But if you have bitter jealousy and selfish ambition in your hearts, do not boast and be false to the truth. This is not the wisdom that comes down from above, but is earthly, unspiritual, demonic. For where jealousy and selfish ambition exist, there will be disorder and every vile practice” (James 3:13–16, ESV).

This is exactly what we see on display in this Babel narrative. Thes men had a kind of wisdom, but it was not the wisdom from above. They did not live in submission to God’s rule and to his word, but sought to establish their autonomy. And their ambition, though great in size, was selfish  ambition —  “Come, let us build ourselves a city and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves.” They wisdom and ambition were not good and godly, but “earthly, unspiritual, demonic”. It is no wonder then that the product was “disorder and every vile practice”, for this is what “jealousy and selfish ambition” produce.  

Notice the word “city”. These men desired to build a city. This city was not the city of God dedicated to the glorification of his name, but the city of man. Their ambition was to do what other city builders in the past had done in the line of Cain. 

Pay special attention to this – their city, the city of Babel, would in the course of time become the prototypical city of man, and the antitype to the city of God, called Babylon. Babel becomes Babylon in the course of time. 

Remember that to Babylon the Israelites would eventually be taken into captivity and then brought out again. In the scriptures Babylon stands for all that opposes God and his people in the earth. And yet God is sovereign even over Babylon. 

And remember also how the city of Babylon functioned symbolically in the book  of Revelation? There, Babylon symbolized the wicked and godless kingdoms of the earth. In Revelation 14:8 we read, “Another angel, a second, followed, saying, ‘Fallen, fallen is Babylon the great, she who made all nations drink the wine of the passion of her sexual immorality’” (Revelation 14:8, ESV).  Concerning the great prostitute of Revelation 17 we read,  “And on her forehead was written a name of mystery: ‘Babylon the great, mother of prostitutes and of earth’s abominations.’ And I saw the woman, drunk with the blood of the saints, the blood of the martyrs of Jesus. When I saw her, I marveled greatly” (Revelation 17:5–6, ESV). And in Revelation 18 the fall of Babylon, who stands for all of the wicked kingdoms of the the earth, was foretold. Verse 2: “And he called out with a mighty voice, ‘Fallen, fallen is Babylon the great! She has become a dwelling place for demons, a haunt for every unclean spirit, a haunt for every unclean bird, a haunt for every unclean and detestable beast” (Revelation 18:2, ESV). Verse 10: “They will stand far off, in fear of her torment, and say, ‘Alas! Alas! You great city, you mighty city, Babylon! For in a single hour your judgment has come’” (Revelation 18:10, ESV). And verse 21: “Then a mighty angel took up a stone like a great millstone and threw it into the sea, saying, ‘So will Babylon the great city be thrown down with violence, and will be found no more’” (Revelation 18:21, ESV). At the end of time the kingdoms of this world will be judged and banished from the earth so that only the kingdom of God remains. 

Notice that these men — these who were associated with Ham and Nimrod — not only desired to build a city, but also a tower with its top in the heavens. This was not just any old tower, but a temple — a Mesopotamian ziggurat. These structures were similar to the pyramids found in Egypt. But instead of being finished off and polished into that pyramid shape which is so familiar to us, these ziggurat were built up level by level, with a base that is wider than the second and third levels, and so on.

It would be nieve to think that these structures — both the pyramids of Egypt and the ziggurat tower of Babel – were mere and meaningless structures, as if the men who made them  said,  hey, lets build something big and cool. No, they were built for religious purposes. They were constructed being driven by the  religions fervor of their makers. These men built this tower to reach to heaven. Their hope was that the god’s of heaven would descend upon the mountain that they had built, and that by their mountain they themselves would manage to ascend to heaven. 

Their objective was to make a name for themselves. This means that their goal was to advance and to establish their own name. In the context their quest must have been to establish their names in the heavenly realm amongst the God. In essence, they were attempting to do what Adam and Eve thought they were doing when they ate of the forbidden fruit — they thought they would become like God. These early Babylonians built their temple with  the hopes that it would function like a stairway to heaven — the god’s would descend to them, and they would ascend to take their place amongst the god’s. Their religion was, in this sense, no different from all of the other man made religions of the world — they sought to obtain immortality by their own effort, by their own building. 

But the scriptures are clear. Now that man is fallen — now that the covenant of works has been broken — there is no way for man to ascend to heaven or to have fellowship with God by his own efforts and by his own  building. God himself must provide a way. God himself must build. And here is the distinguishing characteristic of the Covenant of Grace through which  we are saved. In the covent of Works God says, do this and you shall live. But in the Covenant of Grace God says, I will… I will do such and such. I will provide a Savior, I will establish my kingdom. I will build my church. I will finish the work that I have begun in you. Christ is the mediator of the Covenant of Grace. It is only through him that salvation is possible. And was is required for one to partake of the benefits which Christ has earned? Answer: Faith alone. Faith in Christ alone and the work he has accomplished on our behalf.   

Contrast what these early Babylonians said with what God said to Abram when he called him out of that pagan culture to make him in to a great nation and to bless the nations through the Christ who come from his loins. These early Babylonians said, “come…  let us make a name for ourselves”. But “the LORD said to Abram, ‘Go from your country and your kindred and your father’s house to the land that I will show you. And I will make of you a great nation, and I will bless you and make your name great, so that you will be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you, and him who dishonors you I will curse, and in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed” (Genesis 12:1–3, ESV).

Friends, if anything of the kingdom of God is to be built after man’s fall  into sin  and  after the breaking of the covenant of works, it must be  built by God  and according to his revealed design. 

Here in this story the building of the tower of Babel we find men building, not for God and under his rule, but fop themselves and according to their own wisdom. More than this, they are found fighting against the explicit decree of God. They built their  city and tower “lest [they] be dispersed over the face of the whole earth.”

But we should remember that after God create Adam and Eve, “God blessed them. And God said to them, ‘Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it, and have dominion…” (Genesis 1:28, ESV). And after God brought Noah and his sons through the flood and into the world that now is, he “blessed Noah and his sons and said to them, ‘Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth’ (Genesis 9:1, ESV).

Here these people of Babel aligned with Cain, Ham and Nimrod say, “Come, let us build ourselves a city and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves, lest we be dispersed over the face of the whole earth.” These people were living in all out rebellion against the God of heaven as they sought to develop their culture independent of him. 

*****

Scene 3

The third scene, which is found in the fifth verse, is the pivotal scene in this story. There we read, “And the LORD came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of man had built” (Genesis 11:5, ESV).

If you know anything about the God of the Bible, the Creator of heaven and earth, you  know that he does not need to “come down” to see anything on earth, but is omnipresent and omniscient,  that is to say, all present and all knowing. Why then  does the text say that “the LORD came down to see the city and the tower…”? 

The  statement is ironic. The Mesopotamians built their tower-temple in hopes that their god’s would come down  to them. Instead,  the one true God of heaven descended to inspect and to judge. 

The stament is also mocking. From a human perspective the ziggurat built by these people in the plane of Shinar was an impressive sight to behold. How far they got in the process we are not told, but I’m sure the project would have been considered an  engineering marvel. But from God’s persecutive, the project was small and insignificant, So small was it that God had to “come down” to see. This highlights how terribly short these people fell short in reaching their goals to build a  tower which reached to heaven. The God of heaven had to “come down” to see it.  

It really is ridiculous — and if were not so serious, I would say, comical — to consider how much we make of ourselves. We think that we are so big and powerful, so intelligent and creative, so independent and supreme. But if we were to compare ourselves to the God who made us, we would see clearly that we so small and insignificant. 

Listen to Isaiah 40:21-23. “Do you not know? Do you not hear? Has it not been told you from the beginning? Have you not understood from the foundations of the earth? It is he who sits above the circle of the earth, and its inhabitants are like grasshoppers; who stretches out the heavens like a curtain, and spreads them like a tent to dwell in; who brings princes to nothing, and makes the rulers of the earth as emptiness” (Isaiah 40:21–23, ESV).

These sons of Ham and of Nimrod were so proud of themselves. The thought they could reach up to heaven with the tower they built. But God is so  highly exulted above us, and so small are we, that he had to “come down” as it we to see their little achievement.

*****

Scene 4

Let us move on to scene 4 which is found in verse 6.  There we read, “And the LORD said, ‘Behold, they are one people, and they have all one language, and this is only the beginning of what they will do. And nothing that they propose to do will now be impossible for them” (Genesis 11:6, ESV).

This is a problem, not because God is opposed to progress, but because he, in his mercy, is opposed to progress that is Godless. He is opposed to Godless progress for it is neither to his glory, nor for our good. 

*****

Scene 5

Scene 5 is  found in verse 7, where we read, “Come, let us go down and there confuse their language, so that they may not understand one another’s speech” (Genesis 11:7, ESV).

To confuse their language means that God caused the peoples who were then unified and speaking one language, to speak many languages, and thus they would  be divided. 

Clearly, this was an act of judgement. Because the people used their unity for evil, God cursed them with disunity. No longer were they able to communicate to build their city and temple, and they were dispersed. 

We might also view this same act as an act of mercy. By confusing their languages and by dividing them God restrained the peoples of the earth from running headlong into sin. By pouring out this judgment evil was restrained.   These men and women were running full speak towards the establishment of the kingdom of Satan and of the anti-Christ, but showed mercy when he  disrupted their plans. God will do  this from time to time in the world and in our own lives. He will judge and will chasten us because he is merciful and kind. 

*****

Concluding Remarks

In verses 8 and 9 we find concluding remarks. “So the LORD dispersed them from there over the face of all the earth, and they left off building the city. Therefore its name was called Babel, because there the LORD confused the language of all the earth. And from there the LORD dispersed them over the face of all the earth” (Genesis 11:8–9, ESV).

Genesis 11 doesn’t take us any further than Genesis 10 did historically, but it does take us further as it pertains to our understanding of the spirit of this world and of God’s activities within it. 

There are two kingdoms present within this world — the kingdom of God and the kingdom of man. God is Lord and king over both kingdoms. He is Lord and  king over the kingdom of God, for that kingdom is made up of those who desire to live in obedience to him and for his glory. But he is also Lord and King over the city of man, for God is ultimately sovereign over all things. Even those who oppose and resist his rule are not outside of his sovereign  control. 

*****

Application  

Let me  make a few points of application as we close. 

First of all, the story of Babel should encourage us to be careful with how we build in this life. 

Let us take care to build our own personal lives according to God’s word. 

“Why do you call me ‘Lord, Lord,’ and not do what I tell you? Everyone who comes to me and hears my words and does them, I will show you what he is like: he is like a man building a house, who dug deep and laid the foundation on the rock. And when a flood arose, the stream broke against that house and could not shake it, because it had been well built. But the one who hears and does not do them is like a man who built a house on the ground without a foundation. When the stream broke against it, immediately it fell, and the ruin of that house was great” (Luke 6:46–49, ESV).

Let us also take care as we seek to build Christ’s church. We must build according to God word and for his glory, and not our own. 

This is  what the apostle was speaking to when he wrote those words which we read at the start of this sermon. “According to the grace of God given to me, like a skilled master builder I laid a foundation, and someone else is building upon it. Let each one take care how he builds upon it. For no one can lay a foundation other than that which is laid, which is Jesus Christ. Now if anyone builds on the foundation with gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, straw— each one’s work will become manifest, for the Day will disclose it, because it will be revealed by fire, and the fire will test what sort of work each one has done. If the work that anyone has built on the foundation survives, he will receive a reward.” (1 Corinthians 3:10–14, ESV)

Secondly, be careful how you pursue life eternal. Not by works, but by grace. Not by our efforts, but through faith in what God has built. 

“What shall we say, then? That Gentiles who did not pursue righteousness have attained it, that is, a righteousness that is by faith; but that Israel who pursued a law that would lead to righteousness did not succeed in reaching that law. Why? Because they did not pursue it by faith, but as if it were based on works. They have stumbled over the stumbling stone, as it is written, “Behold, I am laying in Zion a stone of stumbling, and a rock of offense; and whoever believes in him will not be put to shame.”” (Romans 9:30–33, ESV)

Thirdly, let us be faithful to proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ locally and to the ends of the earth. 

“Now there were dwelling in Jerusalem Jews, devout men from every nation under heaven. And at this sound the multitude came together, and they were bewildered, because each one was hearing them speak in his own language. And they were amazed and astonished, saying, “Are not all these who are speaking Galileans? And how is it that we hear, each of us in his own native language? Parthians and Medes and Elamites and residents of Mesopotamia, Judea and Cappadocia, Pontus and Asia, Phrygia and Pamphylia, Egypt and the parts of Libya belonging to Cyrene, and visitors from Rome, both Jews and proselytes, Cretans and Arabians—we hear them telling in our own tongues the mighty works of God.”” (Acts 2:5–11, ESV)

Posted in Sermons, Study Guides, Joe Anady, Genesis 11, Posted by Joe. Comments Off on Sermon: Genesis 11:1-9: Babel: A Warning To All Who Would Build Independent Of God

Sermon: Genesis 10: The Table Of Nations

Scripture Reading: Genesis 10

“These are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth. Sons were born to them after the flood. The sons of Japheth: Gomer, Magog, Madai, Javan, Tubal, Meshech, and Tiras. The sons of Gomer: Ashkenaz, Riphath, and Togarmah. The sons of Javan: Elishah, Tarshish, Kittim, and Dodanim. From these the coastland peoples spread in their lands, each with his own language, by their clans, in their nations. The sons of Ham: Cush, Egypt, Put, and Canaan. The sons of Cush: Seba, Havilah, Sabtah, Raamah, and Sabteca. The sons of Raamah: Sheba and Dedan. Cush fathered Nimrod; he was the first on earth to be a mighty man. He was a mighty hunter before the LORD. Therefore it is said, ‘Like Nimrod a mighty hunter before the LORD.’ The beginning of his kingdom was Babel, Erech, Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar. From that land he went into Assyria and built Nineveh, Rehoboth-Ir, Calah, and Resen between Nineveh and Calah; that is the great city. Egypt fathered Ludim, Anamim, Lehabim, Naphtuhim, Pathrusim, Casluhim (from whom the Philistines came), and Caphtorim. Canaan fathered Sidon his firstborn and Heth, and the Jebusites, the Amorites, the Girgashites, the Hivites, the Arkites, the Sinites, the Arvadites, the Zemarites, and the Hamathites. Afterward the clans of the Canaanites dispersed. And the territory of the Canaanites extended from Sidon in the direction of Gerar as far as Gaza, and in the direction of Sodom, Gomorrah, Admah, and Zeboiim, as far as Lasha. These are the sons of Ham, by their clans, their languages, their lands, and their nations. To Shem also, the father of all the children of Eber, the elder brother of Japheth, children were born. The sons of Shem: Elam, Asshur, Arpachshad, Lud, and Aram. The sons of Aram: Uz, Hul, Gether, and Mash. Arpachshad fathered Shelah; and Shelah fathered Eber. To Eber were born two sons: the name of the one was Peleg, for in his days the earth was divided, and his brother’s name was Joktan. Joktan fathered Almodad, Sheleph, Hazarmaveth, Jerah, Hadoram, Uzal, Diklah, Obal, Abimael, Sheba, Ophir, Havilah, and Jobab; all these were the sons of Joktan. The territory in which they lived extended from Mesha in the direction of Sephar to the hill country of the east. These are the sons of Shem, by their clans, their languages, their lands, and their nations. These are the clans of the sons of Noah, according to their genealogies, in their nations, and from these the nations spread abroad on the earth after the flood.” (Genesis 10, ESV)

*****

Introduction

Brothers and sisters, one of the things for which I am grateful is to have the privilege of pastoring a church that is eager to hear God’s word proclaimed in its entirety. And I would urge you to never allow that hunger for God’s word to fade.  

I think all of you would agree that there are some passages of scripture that are more exciting and obviously applicable than others. But our belief is that “all Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness” (2 Timothy 3:16, ESV). And so our practice it to teach through the scriptures in their entirety. 

I would imagine that to many the portions of scripture that seem least applicable are the ones that contain genealogies. Perhaps you have had the experience of opening your Bible a the scripture reading for the day (assuming you are using a Bible reading plan) only to see a long list of names. Many, I would imagine, feel as if there is nothing for them in a text like that. While I understand the sentiment, I do hope to change your mind today. 

While I am willing to admit that the genealogies of Genesis apply to us in a different way than, let’s say, Colossians 3:5-10 applies — they still apply! 

The application of a passage like Colossians 3:5-10 is obvious. It lays there on the surface and is easily picked up by the reader: “Put to death therefore what is earthly in you: sexual immorality, impurity, passion, evil desire, and covetousness, which is idolatry. On account of these the wrath of God is coming. In these you too once walked, when you were living in them. But now you must put them all away: anger, wrath, malice, slander, and obscene talk from your mouth. Do not lie to one another, seeing that you have put off the old self with its practices and have put on the new self, which is being renewed in knowledge after the image of its creator” (Colossians 3:5–10, ESV). This text speaks in a most direct way to how we ought to live in Christ Jesus. The meaning is clear. The application is direct. 

It is not that passages like Genesis 10 are less meaningful. Neither are they less applicable. But two things need to be said: One, it is true that more work is required to mine texts like Genesis 10 when compared to texts like Colossians 3:5-10 if we are to understand its meaning and make application. Hard mental and spiritual spade work is required here. The reader must dig a little to reap the rewards and profit from a passage of scripture like this. Two, the kind of application drawn from texts like Genesis 10 is different from the kind of application drawn from texts like Colossians 3:5-10. After considering the Colossians passage, the reader is most naturally urged to “do something” — “Put to death therefore what is earthly in you”, etc. But after considering the list of names, peoples and places in Genesis 10, the reader is most naturally urged to “see and to understand” something. The application is simply different. It has more to do with what we art to believe than with what we are to do. 

Friends, application that begins with the words, “see” or “understand” is not less important than application that begins with the word, “do”. In fact, seeing and understanding the message of the Bible is more foundational than doing what the Bible says. My objective as a minister of the gospel is not primarily to convince you to do this or that, but to convince you to believe something. My primary concerning is not to make you a better person, in other words, but to convince you that “Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and [to understand] that by believing you… have life in his name” (John 20:31, ESV). And after urging you to believe that Jesus is the Christ, then my objective is urge you to obey him.

Brothers and sisters, today I hope to convince you, if you are not convinced already, that these lists of names that appear in the scriptures from time to time are of great importance. They are of great importance for they tell the story of the accomplishment of our salvation.

Friends, I hope that you are beginning to understand that God did not accomplish our salvation through a Christ who appeared out of the blue one day. Instead, God provided salvation for us by first promising that he would.  He promised that a victorious savior would one day appear. And he would appear, not by dropping from the sky without warning, but in fulfillment to  promises previously made. The savior would, in due time, come from amongst the offspring of Eve. 

The accomplishment of our salvation, therefore, began with a promise. And it also involved the fulfillment of that promise in human history. God promised to accomplish our salvation through the offspring of the woman, and he was also faithful to bring it about. The scriptures tell this story. The scriptures tell the story of God calling and preserving a people for himself in the world. And it was through this people that the Christ eventually came to pay the price for our sins. 

Brothers and sisters, hear me now. There is no gospel of Jesus Christ apart from these genealogies.

I should  remind you that Matthew began his gospel with a genealogy. The title of his work is, “The Gospel According to Matthew”. And the first words in his gospel presentation are, “The book of the genealogy of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham”, etc. (Matthew 1:1–2, ESV). Luke’s gospel also has a genealogy at the heart of it. In Luke 3:23 we read, “Jesus, when he began his ministry, was about thirty years of age, being the son (as was supposed) of Joseph, the son of Heli”, etc. I will say it again — there is no gospel of Jesus Christ apart from these genealogies, for God determined in eternity past to accomplish our redemption progressively, in human history, through the selection and preservation of an elect line through every generation up until the birth of the Christ, who would atone for the sins of his people by his own shed blood. 

And what do we see here in Genesis 10 except the earliest stages of the development of that story. 

There is so much that could be said about this passage. Some scholars have labored to identify each of the names in this list and to identify them with known peoples and nations in the ancient world. Many of the names and peoples mentioned are known to us. Some are a bit more difficult to identify. This is a very interesting and important field of study, but it is not the focus of the sermon today. 

Let me begin by making seven general and brief observations about this list of people, places and nations before moving on to make three main points. 

One, notice that this list of names differs a bit from the lists of names that we encountered earlier in the book of Genesis. The earlier lists are appropriately called genealogies, for they clearly trace the descent from father to son. Take, for example, the genealogy beginning in Genesis 5:1. There we read, “This is the book of the generations of Adam… When Adam had lived 130 years, he fathered a son in his own likeness, after his image, and named him Seth”, etc. The language is less precise in Genesis 10. This is not so much a genealogy, but a table of nations. The point is to show where the nations of the earth descended from after the days of Noah. 

Two, notice that this passage is a continuation of what was said in Genesis 9:18. There we read, “The sons of Noah who went forth from the ark were Shem, Ham, and Japheth. (Ham was the father of Canaan.) These three were the sons of Noah, and from these the people of the whole earth were dispersed” (Genesis 9:18–19, ESV). The table of nations of Genesis 10 maps out the dispersion of the peoples of the earth descending from Noah’s three sons, Shem, Ham and Japheth. 

Three, we must remember that the book of Genesis was originally written, not to us, but by Moses to ancient Israel after they had been redeemed from Egypt. While it is difficult for you and I to recognize the names in this list and to visualize where in the world these peoples resided, it would not have been so difficult for the ancient Israelite. As they heard these names, they would have recognized them, and they would have been able to visualize where in the world these people lived. 

Four, notice the order in which the descendents of Shem, Ham and Japheth are listed. First, the descendents of Japheth are presented. Second, the descendents of Ham. And third, the descendents of Shem. Why this order? Up until this point the order has been Ham, Shem and Japheth, or Shem, Ham and Japheth. But here the order is Japheth, Ham and Shem. This ordering makes sense only if we consider it from the perspective of ancient, Old Covenant Israel and in the context of the overarching story of the history of redemption. 

The Japhethites are mentioned first, and the least detail is given concerning them, because they were the people furthest removed from the Israelites. They were the peoples with whom the Israelites had least contact. They were the “ends of the earth” peoples  from the perspective of the Hebrews. 

The Hamites are mentioned second, and with much more detail, because they were the peoples that Israel had most contact with, and many of them were their enemies. Consider verse 6, where we read,  “The sons of Ham: Cush, Egypt, Put, and Canaan” (Genesis 10:6, ESV). Of those four names, two are familiar to us — Egypt and Canaan. And coinsider this — the Israelites had just been freed from Egypt and they were sojourning towards a land that God had promised to them, the land of Canaan. Israel would have to drive the Canaanites out of the land and subdue them before occupying it. 

The Shemites are mentioned last because this is line through through with the Hebrew people — God’s chosen people under the Old Covenant — would descend.  

Five, remember that when Noah cursed Ham for his sin, he did not curse Ham directly, but his son Canaan. Now it should be clear why Noah cursed Canaan and not Ham, for not all who descended from  Ham were cursed, but only the Canaanites. Noah said, “Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be to his brothers” (Genesis 9:25, ESV). Again, this must be considered from the perspective of the Israelite who had been redeemed from slavery in Egypt and was sojourning towards the promised land of the Canaanites.  

Six, it is significant that if all of the descendents of Shem, Ham and Japheth are counted, the number comes to 70. Seventy is a number of completion in  the scriptures. Clearly, this is not a complete and detailed genealogy of the sons of Noah. This is a selective list. The number 70  is meant to communicate the idea of completeness. From the sons of Noah, “the people of the whole earth were dispersed” (Genesis 9:18–19, ESV).   

Seven, special attention should be payed to the remarks that are made about certain individuals in this list. 

Take, for example, the remarks that are made about Nimrod in the line of Ham. Verse 8: “Cush fathered Nimrod; he was the first on earth to be a mighty man. He was a mighty hunter before the LORD. Therefore it is said, ‘Like Nimrod a mighty hunter before the LORD.’ The beginning of his kingdom was Babel, Erech, Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar. From that land he went into Assyria and built Nineveh, Rehoboth-Ir, Calah, and Resen between Nineveh and Calah; that is the great city” (Genesis 10:8–12, ESV). This is quite a statement. It is meant to catch our attention. In brief, it communicates that in the line of Ham was characterized by  mighty men — oppressive rulers, who engaged in city building, not to the glory of God, but to the glory of man. 

Notice also that when we come to the line of Shem in verse 21 we read, “To Shem also, the father of all the children of Eber, the elder brother of Japheth, children were born” (Genesis 10:21, ESV). It is highlighted and emphasized from  the outset that Shem was the “the father of all the children of Eber”. From Eber, the Hebrew people would descend, and this is emphasized  from the outset. 

With those general remarks out of the way, let me now make three points:

*****

The Sons Of Japheth

Screen Shot 2019-04-05 at 2.12.39 PM.png

Firstly, as we consider the Japhethites, let it be recognized that God’s plan from the beginning was to bring salvation to all the peoples of the earth.

This table of the nations in Genesis 10 makes it clear that those who descended from Japheth were the ones who were far removed from Israel. They were the gentile people — the people with whom Israel had least contact. But we must also remember the blessing that God pronounced upon his son Japheth: “May God enlarge Japheth, and let him dwell in the tents of Shem, and let Canaan be his servant” (Genesis 9:27, ESV). God’s purpose from the beginning was to bless all the nations of the earth — even those who were far off — through his chosen people, the Israelites. 

This will become even more clear in Genesis 12 when God calls Abram, one of Shem’s descendents. There we will read, “Now the LORD said to Abram, ‘Go from your country and your kindred and your father’s house to the land that I will show you. And I will make of you a great nation, and I will bless you and make your name great, so that you will be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you, and him who dishonors you I will curse, and in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed” (Genesis 12:1–3, ESV). Two things are communicated here: one, God would make Abram into a great nation. And two, in Abram “all the families of the earth shall be blessed”. This is a reiteration of the blessing pronounced upon Japheth when Noah said, “May God enlarge Japheth, and let him dwell in the tents of Shem”, which would become the tents of Abram in the course of time. 

Friends, God’s purpose from the beginning was to save a people for himself from every tongue, tribe and nation. The savior, when he did come, would be the savior of the world, and not of the Hebrews only. The savior would defeat the evil one who plunged the world into sin and darkness. And the savior would redeem the children of Adam, who was the father, not of the Jews only, but of all people. But this savior would come into the world through one particular people, namely, the Hebrew people. It would be through the Jewish people that all the nations o f the earth would be blessed. This was God’s design from the beginning. 

So much of the Old Testament scriptures focuses in upon this one people — the Hebrew people —  that it would be east to assume that God had as his supreme goal the salvation  of this people. Really, Genesis 12 through to the end of  the Old Testament is about things that happened amongst the Hebrews. But do not forget God’s original design — to bless the Japhethites in and through the Shemites.  

You and I live in an amazing time, for the gospel of Jesus Christ has gone to the farthest corners of the earth. The Christ has come. He atoned for sin by his death and resurrection. And the good news off salvation in his name has been preached in Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria, and to the ends of the earth. But there are still some places where the gospel has never been preached. There are some peoples who have never heard. 

*****

The Sons of Ham

Screen Shot 2019-04-06 at 9.19.06 AM.png

Secondly, as we consider the Hamites, let it be recognized that impulse of fallen and sinful man has always been to build cities and kingdoms for themselves, and for their own glory.  

I have already mentioned the emphasis  that is placed upon that man named Nimrod in the line of Ham. It must be recognized that a theme continues to develop in the story of scripture. God called Adam to build a city for the glory of God. He was to expand the garden, tend and keep it, so that worship of God might be promoted in that place. The garden was a temple — a city and  kingdom devoted entirely to the worship and service of God. Adam sinned when he rebelled against his maker and sought establish his own kingdom — to decide for himself right and wrong, good and evil. 

All of human history can be viewed from this angle. There are those who belong to God who are concerned  to live for his glory and for the advancement of his kingdom on earth, and there are those who belong to the evil one who are concerned to promote their own glory (to make a name for themselves), and to advance the kingdoms of this world. 

Cain and his son Enoch were of the world. Cain built a city and named it after his son, Enoch. 

Lamech was a mighty king who perverted justice. 

In the days leading  up to the flood powerful and tyrannical kings ruled on earth. They “saw that the daughters of man were attractive. And they took as their wives any they chose” (Genesis 6:2, ESV).

The Nimrod in the line of Ham was another one who lived  for his own glory and sought to advance the kingdoms of this world independent of God. “The beginning of his kingdom was Babel, Erech, Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar. From that land he went into Assyria and built Nineveh, Rehoboth-Ir, Calah, and Resen between Nineveh and Calah; that is the great city” (Genesis 10:10–12, ESV).

This conflict between the kingdom of God and the kingdoms of the world will by displayed most famously in Genesis 11  in the story of the tower of  Bable, when the people of the earth said, “‘Come, let us build ourselves a city and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves, lest we be dispersed over the face of the whole earth.’ And the LORD came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of man had built” (Genesis 11:4–5, ESV).

Friends, there is nothing new under the sun. Even today there are those who live for their own glory and pleasure, and for the kingdoms of this world, and there are those who live for the glory and pleasure of God, and the advancement of his righteous kingdom. 

The line of Ham is characterized by the insatiable desire to establish kingdoms where man rules as supreme, independent of, and in constant rebellion against the God of heaven. 

*****

The Sons of Shem

Screen Shot 2019-04-06 at 9.20.33 AM.png

Thirdly, as we consider the Sethites, let it be recognized that God, by his grace, determined to set a people apart for himself as holy and, through them, to provide a savior. 

Remember the blessing pronounced upon Seth by Noah. Genesis 9:26: “He also said, ‘Blessed be the LORD, the God of Shem; and let Canaan be his servant.” (Genesis 9:26, ESV)

From Seth, Eber would be born. And from Eber, the Hebrews would descend. 

But notice that in this passage the line of Seth is traced through Eber and then through Yoktan (10:25), which does not lead Abram and the Hebrews.

In chapter 11 we will find that the line of Seth is again traced through Eber, but this time through Ebers son Peleg (11:16), and eventually to Terah, who was the father of Abram and the Hebrews.   

Seths line is put before us twice, therefore — first in chapter 10 and again in chapter 11. The first does not lead to God’s chosen people. The second genealogy does. This was also true of Adam’s genealogy. The line of Cain was traced from Adam in Genesis 4. And the genealogy of Adam was presented again in Genesis 5 — this time with attention given to righteous and chosen line of Seth. 

What is the meaning of all of this?  It shows that God, by his grace, was faithful to preserve a people for himself in the world as holy and, through them, to provide a savior. This is the story of scripture. This is a crucial aspect of the gospel of Jesus Christ. 

*****

Application  

From the line of Japheth 

God’s purpose has always been to save people from every tongue, tribe and nation. 

Let us pray for the salvation of the nations. 

Racism has no place in Christ’s church. 

From the line of Ham

Let us recognize and beware of the spirit of the world which is to build cities and kingdoms  for the glory and honor of man and not for the glory of God. 

Let us be sure that that spirit is not in us. 

Let us live for God’s glory — may he be our only Lord and king. 

And let us labor to promote his kingdom in the world around us. 

I wonder, what opportunities do you have to promote God’s kingdom?

From the line of Shem 

Let us marvel at the mercy and grace of God that he would call and  keep a people for himself so that he might provide salvation for the world through them? 

This  is your spiritual heritage if you are in Christ.  

Thanks be to God for his faithfulness to call and to preserve his people in every generation. 

Posted in Sermons, Study Guides, Joe Anady, Genesis 10, Posted by Joe. Comments Off on Sermon: Genesis 10: The Table Of Nations

Sermon: Genesis 9:18-29: Canaan Cursed, Shem Blessed, Japheth Blessed In Shem

Old Testament Reading: Genesis 9:18-29

“The sons of Noah who went forth from the ark were Shem, Ham, and Japheth. (Ham was the father of Canaan.) These three were the sons of Noah, and from these the people of the whole earth were dispersed. Noah began to be a man of the soil, and he planted a vineyard. He drank of the wine and became drunk and lay uncovered in his tent. And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father and told his two brothers outside. Then Shem and Japheth took a garment, laid it on both their shoulders, and walked backward and covered the nakedness of their father. Their faces were turned backward, and they did not see their father’s nakedness. When Noah awoke from his wine and knew what his youngest son had done to him, he said, ‘Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be to his brothers.’ He also said, ‘Blessed be the LORD, the God of Shem; and let Canaan be his servant. May God enlarge Japheth, and let him dwell in the tents of Shem, and let Canaan be his servant.’ After the flood Noah lived 350 years. All the days of Noah were 950 years, and he died.” (Genesis 9:18–29, ESV)

New Testament Reading: Acts 14:19-28

“But Jews came from Antioch and Iconium, and having persuaded the crowds, they stoned Paul and dragged him out of the city, supposing that he was dead. But when the disciples gathered about him, he rose up and entered the city, and on the next day he went on with Barnabas to Derbe. When they had preached the gospel to that city and had made many disciples, they returned to Lystra and to Iconium and to Antioch, strengthening the souls of the disciples, encouraging them to continue in the faith, and saying that through many tribulations we must enter the kingdom of God. And when they had appointed elders for them in every church, with prayer and fasting they committed them to the Lord in whom they had believed. Then they passed through Pisidia and came to Pamphylia. And when they had spoken the word in Perga, they went down to Attalia, and from there they sailed to Antioch, where they had been commended to the grace of God for the work that they had fulfilled. And when they arrived and gathered the church together, they declared all that God had done with them, and how he had opened a door of faith to the Gentiles. And they remained no little time with the disciples.” (Acts 14:19–28, ESV)

*****

Introduction

The story of Genesis 9:18-29 is very important for it reveals in greater detail than before something of God’s plan to bring salvation to his people. This text is crucial, for it builds upon promises that were previously made and also sets the stage for important events that would transpire in the future. In order to properly interpret this story we must both look backwards into  the earlier chapters of Genesis and also forwards. In doing so it will become abundantly clear that the events recorded in this passage build upon promises previously given by God and also set the stage for more development in God’s redemptive program.   

The text that is before us today is broken neatly into two parts. First, we have the story of Noah’s drunkenness, the shameful response of Ham to his fathers nakedness, and the honorable behavior of Shem and Japheth — their impulse was to cover the shame of their father, rather than expose it. That story is told in verses 18-23 of Genesis 9. Secondly, we find the speech of Noah wherein he pronounces a curse upon Canaan (the son of wicked Ham), and blesses both Seth and Japheth This story is told in verses 24-28 of Genesis 9. And it is the more significant of the two parts — the first section sets the stage for the second. 

I suppose it is possible to draw application from this text which condemns the sin of drunkenness and encourages children to show respect to their parents. Indeed, the scriptures forbid drunkenness. Noah sinned when he got drunk. Indeed, the scriptures forbid the disrespect of parents. And this was the sin of Ham — he did not honor his father, but acted shamefully when he drew ate nation to the shame of his father rather than covering it. But to think that this text is primarily concerned with the promotion of moral living would be a terrible mistake. If what I said was, “this story teaches us to not get drunk and to honor your parents — the end”, I would be guilty of mishandling this portion of scripture. This text is not primarily about morals. Instead, it is about God’s program of redemption. It reveals more clearly than before God’s plan for the salvation of his people.

*****

Noah’s Sin: A Repeat Of Adam’s Sin 

It is crucial to see that in this story — the story of Noah’s drunkenness, the shameful response of Ham to his fathers nakedness, and the honorable behavior of Shem and Japheth — we find a repeat of the story of Adam’s fall into sin. Many of the themes present in the story of Adam’s fall are repeated here in this narrative. This is very significant, for it helps us to see what this story is — a reiteration of God’s purpose to save a people for himself despite man’s sin. 

In verses 18 and 19 we read, “The sons of Noah who went forth from the ark were Shem, Ham, and Japheth. (Ham was the father of Canaan.) These three were the sons of Noah, and from these the people of the whole earth were dispersed” (Genesis 9:18–19, ESV). 

These verses pick up where Genesis 6:9 left off before telling us of the story of the great and worldwide flood. In Genesis 6:9 we read, “These are the generations of Noah. Noah was a righteous man, blameless in his generation. Noah walked with God. And Noah had three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth” (Genesis 6:9–10, ESV). Now we return to focus on these figures — Noah and his three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth. Notice that it was from these three that the whole earth would be repopulated after the flood. Notice also the parenthetical note that “Ham was the father of Canaan”. This is emphasized again in verse 20 where Ham is again called “the father of Canaan”. This will become an important piece of information later in the story, so don’t forget it — Ham was the father of Canaan.

In verses 20 and 21 we read, “Noah began to be a man of the soil, and he planted a vineyard. He drank of the wine and became drunk and lay uncovered in his tent” (Genesis 9:20–21, ESV). 

The story is simple enough. Noah was a farmer. He planted a vineyard (vineyards and wine are associated with God’s blessing in the scriptures). But Noah misused God’s blessing when he became drunk with the wine and, therefore, laid shamefully naked and exposed in his tent. 

I think it is important that we compare Noah with Adam, and Noah’s transgression with Adam’s. 

One, notice that Noah and Adam were both farmers. Adam was put by God “in the garden of Eden to work it and keep it” (Genesis 2:15, ESV). True, Adam was more than a farmer, for he was to keep the garden — he was to protect it from intruders — but Adam was not less than a farmer. He was to tend the garden and expand its boarders to the ends of the earth. Noah was also a farmer. “Noah began to be a man of the soil, and he planted a vineyard.” 

Two, notice that Adam’s sin and Noah’s sin both involved a misuse of God’s blessing of the fruit of the ground. Adam was given every tree in the garden to eat with the exception of one. He sinned when he ate of the forbidden fruit. Noah was blessed with a vineyard. He sinned when he misused the fruit of the vine and became drunk.  

Three, notice the result of Adam’s sin and of Noah’s. Both men were ashamed of their nakedness after they sinned. When Adam and Eve sinned by eating of the forbidden fruit, “the eyes of both were opened, and they knew that they were naked. And they sewed fig leaves together and made themselves loincloths” (Genesis 3:7, ESV). When Noah sinned by drinking wine to the point of drunkenness, he fell asleep and laid naked in his tent. 

These episodes are not identical, but they are similar. They are meant to be compared. After God created the heavens and earth, he created man, placed him in his garden and entered into a covenantal relationship with Adam as the representative for all of humanity. Adam was to obey God. Instead he rebelled. And having sinned, he experienced the shame of his nakedness. Similarly, after God brought a new earth and a new humanity through the waters of the flood, he entered into a covenantal relationship with Noah as a representative for all humanity. Noah was to obey God, but he  sinned. And having sinned, he experienced the shame of his nakedness.  

In verses 22 and 23 the response of Noah’s sons to his sin and shame are described: “And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father and told his two brothers outside. Then Shem and Japheth took a garment, laid it on both their shoulders, and walked backward and covered the nakedness of their father. Their faces were turned backward, and they did not see their father’s nakedness” (Genesis 9:22–23, ESV).

Even if we were to read this text superficially it is not difficult to see that Ham did something shameful and Shem and Japheth did something honorable for their father.

Ham showed disrespect  to his father when he exposed and magnified his sin instead of seeking to cover it. He found his father drunk and shamefully exposed. And instead of covering his fathers nakedness, he went out to tell his brothers, presumably to mock his father in his moment of shame. 

Shem and Japheth did the honorable thing. They showed respect to their father and covered the shame of his nakedness. They draped a cloak over their shoulders, walked backwards into the tent together, and having arrived the foot of their fathers bed, dropped the cloak over their father to cover his shame.

It is important to God that children honor their parents. The fifth of the ten commandments speak to this. Paul the apostle refered to that commandment when he wrote, “Children, obey your parents in the Lord, for this is right. ‘Honor your father and mother’ (this is the first commandment with a promise), ‘that it may go well with you and that you may live long in the land’” (Ephesians 6:1–3, ESV). Children to are to show honor two their parents. This they are to do when they are young and when they are old. And this they are to do even if their parent is acting in less than an honorable way. 

Ham disrespected his father by failing to cover him, and by mocking his nakedness. Shem and Japheth honored their father by refusing to look upon his shame, and by going to the trouble to cover him in his moment of disgrace. This is evident from a superficial reading of the text. 

But I think we should continue to do what we have already done and compare this passage with the passage that describes Adam’s temptation, his sin and God response to it. When we do we will find that the actions Ham showed that he was of the evil one — he was of the seed of the serpent — whereas Shem and Japheth were of God — they were of the promised seed of the woman. 

When Ham rejoiced in his fathers shame and sought to magnify and expose it by telling his brothers, he showed that he was in league with the evil one who rejoiced in Adam’s fall and shame. Ham had the heart of the serpent. Ham was of the seed of the serpent. He was the one, as we will see, through whom the line of wicked Cain would be preserved in the new world. God will always have a people in this world, and so will the evil one. Ham was of the evil one. His response to his fathers sin and shame revealed it. 

When Shem and Japheth covered their fathers nakedness, they demonstrated that they were of God. They had the heart of God who grieved over the sin of Adam and graciously covered the shame of his nakedness. After Adam and Eve sinned “they heard the sound of the LORD God walking in the garden in the cool of the day, and the man and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the LORD God among the trees of the garden. But the LORD God called to the man and said to him, ‘Where are you?’ And he said, ‘I heard the sound of you in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked, and I hid myself’” (Genesis 3:8–10, ESV). How did God respond to this? After pronouncing his  judgements, “the LORD God made for Adam and for his wife garments of skins and clothed them” (Genesis 3:20–21, ESV). By their actions Shem and Japheth demonstrated that they were of God. They were in league with him and possessed his heart.

*****

Noah’s Curse and Blessings: A Repeat Of God’s Curse And Blessing

This story — as important as it is — merely sets the stage for the curse that Noah pronounced upon Canaan (Ham’s son), and the blessing that he pronounced upon Shem and Japheth. This curse and these blessings would set the trajectory for the rest of history as it pertains to God’s redemptive purposes. From these three men the earth would be repopulated. And these three men would represent three distinct groups of people in relation to God’s program of redemption. Canaan, the son of Ham, was cursed. Shem was blessed. And Japheth was blessed by his association with Shem. 

This episode, wherein Noah pronounces a curse upon Canaan and blesses Shem and Japheth, is to be compared with that episode wherein God pronounced his judgments upon the serpent, Eve and Adam. Remember that imbedded within those judgements was the gospel. Good news was announced — a promise was given — that one would arise from the seed of the woman who would bruise the head of the serpent (Genesis 3:15). In other words, through the women and from her offspring a savior would come — a champion would arise. This gospel was proclaimed in the context of the judgments that God pronounced upon three figures — the serpent, Eve and Adam. 

The words of Noah in Genesis 9:24 and following are to be viewed as a continuation of the word of the Lord in Genesis 3:14 and 15. These words of Noah pick up theme of Genesis 3:14 and 15, which has to do with the curse of God upon Satan and his followers, and the eventual victory that would be won by the Messiah, and bring them into the new world. In other words, in the world that once was prior to the flood a promise was made that the seed of the serpent would be cursed, and from the seed of the woman a champion savior king would arise who would defeat the evil one fully and finally. That same message was also communicated in new world — in the world after the flood — through the curse and blessings pronounced by Noah upon his sons, but with greater clarity and precision than before. 

What do the curse and blessings of Noah communicate concerning God’s plan of redemption from the days of Noah onward? We learn that though many will belong to the evil one in the line of Ham, God will set apart a people for himself in the of Seth, and that some from Japheth will in due time associate with Seth, and will they themselves be blessed in him.  

Let us consider the curse that Noah pronounced upon Canaan (Ham’s son) in verses 24-25: “When Noah awoke from his wine and knew what his youngest son had done to him, he said, ‘Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be to his brothers” (Genesis 9:24–25, ESV). 

Why did Noah curse Canaan instead of cursing Ham directly? One, it is probably to communicate that these curses and blessings have to do, not just with these three men individually, but with their offspring. These men represent their offspring. If you know the story of the Old Testament and the enmity that will exist between the Israelites and the Canaanites, them it is easy to understand why Canaan would be named specifically instead of Ham. Secondly, there is probably a play on words in the Hebrew. The name for Canaan in the Hebrew sounds very much like the verb which means “subdue”. Canaan would subdued by his brothers —  “Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be to his brothers”.

This curse would play out in the history of redemption in the days of the conquest as Israel would move into the land that God had promised to them to take possession of it. Under Joshuas leadership, the Canaanites would be driven out or enslaved by the Hebrew people who were descendants of Abraham, who was a descendent of Shem, as we shall see. 

In verse 26 we find Noah’s blessing upon Shem: “He… said, ‘Blessed be the LORD, the God of Shem; and let Canaan be his servant” (Genesis 9:26, ESV). 

Notice that Shem is not actually blessed. The LORD is blessed by Noah — “Blessed be the LORD, the God of Shem”. But it is in this that the blessing of Shem is found — the LORD is their God. There is no greater blessing in all the earth than to have the LORD as God. Shem is set apart from his brothers in this regard — the LORD, the covenant making and covenant keeping God, the maker of heaven and earth, is their God. 

There is also a play on words here with the name Shem. Shem means “name”, and here is the distinguishing characteristic of the line of Shem — they have taken the name of the LORD to themselves. They are God’s people. The LORD is their God. They call upon his name. 

This will play out clearly in the narrative of Genesis. In Genesis 11:10-26 we find the genealogy of Shem. I will refrain from reading the whole genealogy to you at this time, but for now it is important to note that Abram, who will later become Abraham, is in the line of Shem (Genesis 11:26). And it is from Abraham that the Hebrew people will descend, as you know. 

What is the meaning? 

The descendents of Ham (the Canaanites) are of the evil one. They are the continuation of the line of Cain in the new world. They are the continuation of the seed of the serpent.

But the descendents of Shem are blessed in the LORD. They belong uniquely to him. They bear his name. They are the continuation of the line of Able and of Seth in the new world. They are the continuation of the seed of the women. From them the messiah would come who would conquer the evil one himself. 

Before moving on to Japheth I would like to make a point of clarification. When we talk about these genealogies — the like of Cain and Seth, or the line of Ham and Shem — and identify them with the seed of the serpent and the seed of the woman respectively, we should not think that all of the individuals within those lines were either saved or unsaved, justified or condemned. The thing that distinguished between those who are saved and unsaved, justified or condemned, is faith. The questions is, did that person have faith in the promised Christ? I am sure that not all in the line of Seth or in the line of Shem had faith. And I would also imagine that some in the line of Cain and Ham had faith in the God of Seth and Shem — by the grace of God, they, though they were Cainites and Canaanites, identified with the Sethites and Shemites, and worshiped the LORD, who was their God. 

When we say that these genealogies — the genealogies of Seth and Shem — belonged to God and to the seed of the woman, what we mean is that the worship of God was promoted and maintained amongst them, and the promises of God were preserved and propagated. In general and in an external way, they belonged to God. Many of them had faith, no doubt, but not all. 

To illustrate this principle we only need to point to Old Covenant Israel and to say, though they all were the descents of Abraham, not all had the faith of Abraham. This is what Paul is referring to when he says, “For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel, and not all are children of Abraham because they are his offspring, but ‘Through Isaac shall your offspring be named.’ This means that it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring” (Romans 9:6–8, ESV).

In general, therefore, the Canaanites were cursed of God and belonged to the evil one, whereas the Shemites were God’s people. They bore his name. The LORD was their God, and they were his people. 

But what about Japheth? In verses 27 we read, “May God enlarge Japheth, and let him dwell in the tents of Shem, and let Canaan be his servant” (Genesis 9:27, ESV).

Notice that Japheth is blessed, but he is blessed in Shem. “Let him dwell in the tents of Shem”, the text says. The blessing communicates that in due time the tents of Shem will be opened to Japheth so that he mighty come in and enjoy the blessing that belonged uniquely to Shem.

There is also a play on words here. The Hebrew word translated as “enlarge” in the ESV in verses 27 might also be translated “open wide”. It is a rare Hebrew word that sounds very much like name Japheth. In the Hebrew it would should like this: may God yapht (that is “open”, i.e. the tent) for yephet. Again, the meaning is this: God will eventually “open wide” the tent of Shem so that Japheth might enter in to enjoy the blessings of Shem. And what were the blessing of Shem? The LORD was their God. They bore his name. He was their God and they were his people. In due time the doors of the tents of Shem would be thrown open to that the descendents of Japheth might enter in.

Who are the descendents of Japheth? If we pay careful attention to the development of these things in the scriptures it becomes clear that they are the gentiles. For a time the promises of God and the worship of God would be confined to the descendents Shem, that is to the Hebrews. From Shem would come Eber, and this is where the name Hebrew comes from. And from Eber would come Abraham. From Abraham would come Isaac, and from Isaac Jacob. The children of Jacob would go into Egypt. And then God would appoint Moses to call them out. Under Moses the Hebrews would made into a unique nation for a time. And from them the Christ would eventually come. But when the Christ came the kingdom of God would no longer be restricted to the Hebrew people. Indeed the gospel of the kingdom would preached to all nations. And it would be in the gospel of the kingdom going to all nations that the blessing pronounced by Noah upon his son Japheth would be fulfilled. In the days of Christ  and under the New Covenant the doors of the tent of Shem would be thrown open so that the descendents Japheth might come in and have the God of Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and Moses as their own.

Brothers and sisters, this is such an major theme in the pages of the New Testament. Look for it as you read. Look for the emphasis upon the fulfillment of these promises, that in the days of Christ and under the New Covenant, the kingdom of God would burst forth from Israel and expand to the furthest corners of the earth. 

“For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life” (John 3:16, ESV).

“And Jesus came and said to them, ‘All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age’” (Matthew 28:18–20, ESV).

“But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the end of the earth” (Acts 1:8, ESV).

“And Paul and Barnabas spoke out boldly, saying, ‘It was necessary that the word of God be spoken first to you. Since you thrust it aside and judge yourselves unworthy of eternal life, behold, we are turning to the Gentiles. For so the Lord has commanded us, saying, ‘I have made you a light for the Gentiles, that you may bring salvation to the ends of the earth’’” (Acts 13:46–47, ESV).

“Therefore remember that at one time you Gentiles in the flesh, called ‘the uncircumcision’ by what is called the circumcision, which is made in the flesh by hands— remember that you were at that time separated from Christ, alienated from the commonwealth of Israel and strangers to the covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in the world. But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far off have been brought near by the blood of Christ. For he himself is our peace, who has made us both one and has broken down in his flesh the dividing wall of hostility by abolishing the law of commandments expressed in ordinances, that he might create in himself one new man in place of the two, so making peace…” (Ephesians 2:11–15, ESV).

Friends, most of you are not the descendents of Shem, but of Japheth. You are those gentiles who are blessed in the tents of the Hebrews. The door of the tent has been thrown open to you by Christ who came, not to save the Jews only, but also the gentiles. Though you do not descend from Abraham according to the flesh, you are are his children according to promise and by faith. 

*****

Conclusion 

Isn’t this incredible? Isn’t it incredible how God has revealed the gospel successively and by steps throughout the history of redemption? 

Even Adam and Eve had access to the gospel. They new that a savior would eventually come through the seed of the woman. 

But in the days of Noah things were reiterated and made even more clear. A unique people would be set aside in the line of Shem, and through them the descendents of Japheth would be blessed.

This reached its climax with the coming of the Christ. 

Are you are in Christ?

Are we together laboring to proclaim Christ?

Are we consented to see Christ preached to the ends of the earth?

Are we committed to do this until he returns?

Posted in Sermons, Study Guides, Posted by Joe. Comments Off on Sermon: Genesis 9:18-29: Canaan Cursed, Shem Blessed, Japheth Blessed In Shem

Discussion Questions for Sermon Preached on 3/24/19: Genesis 9:1-17

  • Explore the connection between the blessing and commissioning  of Noah and his sons and the blessing and commissioning of Adam and Eve in Genesis 1.
  • Why was Noah forbidden to eat blood? What did this have to do with Christ?
  • What kind of covenant is the Noahic Covenant?  With whom is it made? What are the terms and conditions?
  • Why did  God establish the  Noahic Covenant?
Posted in Study Guides, Gospel Community Groups, Posted by Joe. Comments Off on Discussion Questions for Sermon Preached on 3/24/19: Genesis 9:1-17

Discussion Questions for Sermon Preached on 3/17/19: Genesis 8

  • The gospel has been revealed by God in words. But he  has also put the gospel on display through historical events which painted a picture ahead of time of the salvation that Christ would accomplish for his people. The flood was one of those events. Discuss how this is so.
  • What do we learn about the final judgement by considering the waters of the flood?
  • What do we learn about our salvation in Christ by considering God’s provision of the ark?
  • What do we learn about the new heavens and earth by considering the world after the flood waters receded?
Posted in Study Guides, Gospel Community Groups, Posted by Joe. Comments Off on Discussion Questions for Sermon Preached on 3/17/19: Genesis 8

Discussion Questions for Sermon Preached on 3/3/19: Genesis 6:9-22

  • Why should we believe that the flood was a true historical event?
  • What did the flood event reveal concerning the final judgement?
  • Clearly the story of Noah, his ark, and the covenant established with him was about the preservation of the human race and the animal kingdom. How is it also about Christ and our redemption in him?
  • The ark was a replica of the cosmos, a miniature version of the sanctuary of Eden and of the temple of Israel. Discuss.
  • The ark was a picture of the Christ who was to come. Discuss.
  • Noah was delivered from the flood  waters of judgement via the ark. How was he delivered from the judgment of God due to him for his sins? (See Heb. 11:6-7)
Posted in Study Guides, Gospel Community Groups, Posted by Joe. Comments Off on Discussion Questions for Sermon Preached on 3/3/19: Genesis 6:9-22

Sermon: Genesis 3:22-24: Adam Driven Out

Old Testament Reading: Genesis 3:22-24

“Then the LORD God said, ‘Behold, the man has become like one of us in knowing good and evil. Now, lest he reach out his hand and take also of the tree of life and eat, and live forever—’ therefore the LORD God sent him out from the garden of Eden to work the ground from which he was taken. He drove out the man, and at the east of the garden of Eden he placed the cherubim and a flaming sword that turned every way to guard the way to the tree of life.” (Genesis 3:22–24, ESV)

New Testament Reading: Philippians 3:7–11

“But whatever gain I had, I counted as loss for the sake of Christ. Indeed, I count everything as loss because of the surpassing worth of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord. For his sake I have suffered the loss of all things and count them as rubbish, in order that I may gain Christ and be found in him, not having a righteousness of my own that comes from the law, but that which comes through faith in Christ, the righteousness from God that depends on faith— that I may know him and the power of his resurrection, and may share his sufferings, becoming like him in his death, that by any means possible I may attain the resurrection from the dead.” (Philippians 3:7–11, ESV)

*****

Introduction

We have come now to the seventh and final scene in this large section in the book of Genesis which runs from chapter 2 verse 5 through to the end of chapter 3. In this final scene the LORD God is the sole actor; the man named Adam is present but he is completely passive. This seventh scene corresponds to the first scene which ran from Genesis 2:5-17. There the same was true — the LORD God was the sole actor; the man was present but completely passive. In this final scene God’s judgement of the man is brought to conclusion.   

It would be good to remember what transpired in the previous scene as we move into this last one. The LORD God first pronounced a curse upon the serpent. After this, he pronounced judgements upon the women . And then God addressed the man — “And to Adam he said, ‘Because you have listened to the voice of your wife and have eaten of the tree of which I commanded you, ‘You shall not eat of it,’ cursed is the ground because of you; in pain you shall eat of it all the days of your life; thorns and thistles it shall bring forth for you; and you shall eat the plants of the field. By the sweat of your face you shall eat bread, till you return to the ground, for out of it you were taken; for you are dust, and to dust you shall return’” (Genesis 3:17–19, ESV).

Remember, although that previous scene was primarily about the judgement of God pronounced upon the snake, the man and the woman, the grace of God was also on display there. By God’s grace the man and the woman would go on living — room was left for repentance.  By God’s grace, the promise of a victorious Savior was announced. And by God’s grace, the man and the woman were clothed — “the LORD God made for Adam and for his wife garments of skins and clothed them” (Genesis 3:21, ESV), we are told. God was gracious to Adam and Eve, and he is gracious to us. But the consequence of sin — both Adam’s sin and ours — is that life is now marked by difficulty. Lie is marked by perpetual conflict, pain in the process of bringing forth children, strife in our relationships, toil and frustration in our work, and ultimate vanity given the certainty of death. 

In this final scene that is before us today God’s judgements upon the man are brought to a conclusion. And you would do well to note that the most tragic of all the consequences of sin are reserved for this final scene. More tragic than the conflicts which mar the course of human history; more tragic than the increased pain that women experience in the process of childbearing; more tragic than strife between husband and wife, and the toil and frustration that men encounter in their work; indeed, even more tragic than the inevitability of physical death and the vanity of life that accompanies it, is this — man, because of his sin, was driven from the presence of God to live out the years of his life alienated from his Maker. This consequence — our alienation  from God; our loss of a right relationship with him — was the most tragic of all the consequences of man’s fall into sin. 

Does that strike you as an odd perspective? Is your impulse to reply back saying, “No! The conflicts and strive, the pain and suffering, and the certainty of physical death must be considered worse punishments that our communion with God having been broken!” If that is your perspective it is because you have not experienced the joy of knowing God. You have not learned nor come to believe the truth so wonderfully stated by St. Augustin when he said, “Thou hast made us for thyself, O Lord, and our heart is restless until it finds its rest in thee.” Friends, we were created to know God, and to be know by him.  We were designed  live in communion with God, to obey him, and to glorify his name. When Adam fell into sin, all of this broken and lost. All of the conflict, pain and strife that we experience  in this world — even the event of physical death itself — cannot be compared to the tragedy of having lost that sweet communion with our Maker. 

Adam in innocency knew God. He enjoyed sweet and intimate communion with God in that garden temple which the LORD had made for him. While Adam was upright he walked with God, and God walked with him. But when Adam fell into sin he that sweet and intimate communion with God was lost. Adam was not just sent out of the garden. The texts says that he was driven from that place and from God’s presence.  

This loss of a right relationship with God was by far the most tragic of all the consequences of man’s sin. Man was made to know God and to glorify and enjoy him forever. Indeed, Christ himself said, “And this is eternal life, that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent” (John 17:3, ESV). What does it mean to have life eternal? According to Christ, to have eternal life is to know God. To be severed from God — to be alienated from him and under his wrath because of our sin — is death. This is why scriptures call men and women who are alive “dead” if they have not been reconciled to God through faith in Christ. Though they are living they are really “dead”. The Apostle Paul wrote to Christians saying, “And you were dead in the trespasses and sins in which you once walked, following the course of this world, following the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that is now at work in the sons of disobedience—” (Ephesians 2:1–2, ESV). This was their state of being prior to their having been reconciled to God through faith in Christ – though alive, they were dead in their trespasses and sins. To know God is to to have eternal life. To be alienated from him is eternal death. Christ came to make dead men and women and alive by reconciling them to the Father, thanks be to God.

 In the day that Adam ate of the forbidden tree he died, for in that day he was driven from the presence of God and lost the sweet communion that he once enjoyed with his Maker. Therefore, I suppose that we might say that what is described to us here in this passage that is before us today is Adam being “put to death” by God. Yes, later we will learn that Adam lived for 930 years in total, and then he died (Genesis 5:5). But what I am saying is that in another sense, Adam truly died in the day that he ate the forbidden fruit, for its was then that he was driven from the presence of his Maker. 

Let us consider this passage now in detail.

*****

“Then the LORD God said, ‘Behold, the man has become like one of us in knowing good and evil.’” 

In verse 22 of Genesis 3 we read,  “Then the LORD God said, ‘Behold, the man has become like one of us in knowing good and evil.’”

This is a very interesting and important verse. We should pay careful attention to it. 

First of all, notice that Adam is in focus here. Eve is not mentioned at all. It will become clear that everything that is pronounced upon Adam in this passage will also apply to Eve. But notice that Adam in particular is the one who is judged by God in this text. This is because the covenant of life, or of works, or of creation — whichever term you prefer — was made with Adam (see Genesis 2:15-17). The covenant was made with him, and he was the one who broke the covenant. And though it is true that Adam’s sin would effects others — indeed all others — the judgements were pronounced upon Adam, for he was appointed by God to function as the representative of others in the keeping of this covenant.

Secondly, we must answer the question, who was the LORD God speaking to when he said, “Behold, the man has become like one of us in knowing good and evil”?

Commentators differ on the answer to this question. Some say that he was speaking to the angels. But in my opinion, it is best to think that God was addressing himself when he said, “Behold, the man has become like one of us in knowing good and evil.” 

How can it be that God would speak to himself? Well, the rest of scripture will make it clear that though there is only one God, there is also a plurality of  persons, or subsistences, within the Godhead. We are right to ask our children the question, “Are there more gods than one?” and to teach them to answer, “There is but one only, the living and true God.” And we are also right to ask them, “How many persons are there in the Godhead?”, and to expect the reply, “There are three persons in the Godhead, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one God, the same in essence, equal in power and glory.”

The doctrine of the Trinity is not explicitly taught here in Genesis 3:22, but it is implied. And you would do well to remember that this is not the first time in Genesis where plurality within the Godhead is suggested. From the very beginning of Holy Scripture we are introduced to one God, the creator of heaven and earth, and we find that there is plurality within him. The rest of scripture will make it clear that there are three persons within the Godhead — Father, Word and Spirit. 

Thirdly, what does God mean when he says, “Behold, the man has become like one of us in knowing good and evil.” Stated more precisely, how did man become like God when he rebelled? And what does it mean that man and God now share knowing good and evil in common? 

Let me state the answer to this question briefly and directly before demonstrating my interpretation from the text. Man became like God when he rebelled in that he took to himself a right that was only appropriate for God to have – namely, the right to know or to determine that which is good and that which is evil. To “know good and evil” is to decide good and evil. God, the supreme lawgiver, commanded Adam, saying, “do not eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil”. And Adam rejected God as the supreme lawgiver and took to himself the role of lawgiver when he ate of it that tree. It was an act of rebellion. In essence Adam said, I will not submit to God, but instead I will be God myself. 

The meaning of the Hebrew word translated as “knowing” certainly allows for this interpretation. To know is to understand or to perceive. It is right for God to know, to understand, or to perceive that which is good and evil. It is right for him to give laws to man which correspond to his perception of good and evil, which is always perfect and true. And is good and right for man to agree with God’s perspective concerning good and evil and to live in obedience to his laws. On the other hand it is terribly wrong for the creature to disagree with his Maker, to seek to establish his own law so that he might live independent from his God. This is what Adam did when he ate of that tree. He pursued wisdom apart from God who is the source of all true wisdom. He sought to define good and evil on his own and in rebellion against his Maker. When he ate he sought to establish his autonomy so that he might go on living independent from God. 

This interpretation of the statement, “Behold, the man has become like one of us in knowing good and evil”, also fits perfectly with the story of Genesis. 

When we encounter this communication within God himself in  Genesis 3:22 with the words, “Then the LORD God said, ‘Behold, the man has become like one of us in knowing good and evil’”, it is meant to remind us of a previous conversatin within the Godhead that was revealed to us. Remember the words of Genesis 1:26-17. There we heard God speaking within himself saying, “‘Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.’ So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them” (Genesis 1:26–27, ESV). There in Genesis 1:26-27 we encounter a conversation within the Godhead. The one true God said, let us make man in our image. And then what did the one true God do? He created man (singular) in his image and in such a way that his plurality would be reflected — “in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.”

I believe that it is very important for us to recognize the connection between Genesis 3:22 and Genesis 1:26-27. 

In both passages we encounter something peculiar – a conversation that God had within himself is revealed to us. This is meant to grab our attention! This is meant to provoke the reader to pause and to ask, who is God speaking to? 

And when we compare these two passages (they are meant to be compared) we find that they both have something important to say regarding the nature of man and man’s relationship to God. Stated differently, these two texts when set side by side reveal that man is like God in some respects, but he also not like God in other respects. 

What did Genesis 1:26-27 reveal to us? It revealed that man was made in the image of God. God created man, male and female, to be like him, to image him, to correspond to him. I will not go into all that that entails, for that has already been done. Here we must simply remember that man was created to be like God in some respects.

But to say that man was made in the image of God, or that man was made to be like God, does not mean that man is God. Though it is true that some similarities exist between God and man, and this by God’s design, it must also be confessed that the differences between the Creator and creature are vast. God is omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent and eternal. Man is none of those things. In  short, God is the Creator, man the creation. God is supreme, man subordinate. God is God, man is man. Though it be true that man was made in the image of God and is in some respects like him, man must never forget that he is not God. 

That man is not God, and that man was to go on living in perpetual submission to God was made clear by the fact that God created man, placed him in the garden, provided for him, commanded the man to keep the garden, and to eat of the one tree and not the other. The tree of the knowledge of good and evil functioned as a symbol of the created order of things. God, being supreme, knows and determines that which is good and that which is evil, and he gave man his law. The question was, would man live as if God were supreme over him? Would man live in submission to his Makler? The tree of the knowledge of good and evil symbolized this order and also put man to the test.

And what did the tempter say when he approached Eve? “Did God actually say, ‘You shall not eat of any tree in the garden’?” And then afterwards “the serpent said… ‘You will not surely die. For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil’”(Genesis 3:1, 4–5, ESV). In other words, God has lied to you. This tree that God has forbidden actually has the power to give you life and wisdom. Yes, you have been made in God’s image, but if you would only eat of this tree, then truly you would be like God, no longer having to live in subordination to him. There is freedom in this tree. When you eat of it you will cast off the bonds of God. When you eat of it you will become truly autonomous and independent, as God himself now is. Adam and Eve believed this lie, and they ate.  

When the LORD God said, “Behold, the man has become like one of us in knowing good and evil”, he spoke truth concerning the man. In a sense the man had become like God knowing good and evil. But it is also obvious that God spoke these words in a sarcastic and condescending sort of way — there is irony in his words. 

Did Adam become like God when he ate of the forbidden tree? The answer is “yes” as I have already said, but it is also “no”.

It is “no” in that Adam was still a man and not God. Adam the creature was still the creature. He was not elevated at all when ate of the forbidden fruit. In fact, he fell. The image of God that he did possess by virtue of his creation was now marred and twisted. So it might actually be said that Adam was less like God after his fall into sin and certainly not more.

And so God mocked Adam with these words — “Behold, the man has become like one of us in knowing good and evil.” Certainly this was to impress all the more strongly upon Adam the foolishness of his sin.

When I hear God speak condescendingly to Adam in this text it reminds of a that passage in Psalm 2, where the Psalmist asks, “Why do the nations rage and the peoples plot in vain? The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD and against his Anointed, saying, ‘Let us burst their bonds apart and cast away their cords from us [they are like their father Adam, aren’t they?].’ He who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord holds them in derision. Then he will speak to them in his wrath, and terrify them in his fury, saying…” (Psalm 2:1–5, ESV)

*****

“Now, lest he reach out his hand and take also of the tree of life and eat, and live forever—”

In the second half of verse 22 God beings to speak a word of judgement concerning Adam, saying, “Now, lest he reach out his hand and take also of the tree of life and eat, and live forever—” (Genesis 3:22, ESV)

Notice how the voice of God drops off at the end of this verse and the voice of the narrator (Moses) picks up, saying, “therefore the LORD God sent him out from the garden”, etc., etc. This is very unusual. But it is deliberate no doubt. 

Perhaps the words of judgement would be too much for us to bear if they came from God’s lips, and so Moses interviews to describe the result. Or perhaps the falling off of God’s voice is meant to communicate that final judgement has been delayed? This seems to me to be the effect. God begins to pronounce judgement, but then his words are suspended creating a sense of delay, and Moses resumes with a description of what transpired.  

*****

“Therefore the LORD God sent him out from the garden of Eden to work the ground from which he was taken.”

And what does Moses say? In verse 23 we read, “therefore the LORD God sent him out from the garden of Eden to work the ground from which he was taken” (Genesis 3:23, ESV)

Notice that though Adam was judged, and though the loss of communion with God was terribly tragic, this was not the final judgement. Adam was sent out of the garden to toil in his labor. There Adam would work the ground. And as he worked the ground he would be reminded of things: from this ground he was taken — he would have been remanded that he is a creature and not God, and to the ground he would one day return — the wages of sin is death, spiritual and physical.

*****

“He drove out the man, and at the east of the garden of Eden he placed the cherubim and a flaming sword that turned every way to guard the way to the tree of life.”

In verse 24 we read, “He drove out the man, and at the east of the garden of Eden he placed the cherubim and a flaming sword that turned every way to guard the way to the tree of life.” (Genesis 3:24, ESV)

When God sent Adam out of the garden it was to prohibit him from having access to the tree of life. Remember, God said, “Now, lest he reach out his hand and take also of the tree of life and eat, and live forever” — for this reason he was sent out of the garden. 

The tree of life was not a magical tree as if eating from it would automatically confer eternal life. The tree of life, like the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, was a sacramental tree. It symbolized obedience to God and the life that would be found in God by going the way of obedience. 

When Adam was driven out of the garden, cherubim (plural) being set to guard the entrance with a flaming sword, it communicated in no uncertain terms that the way to eternal life that was once open to the man through obedience to the law of Go  was no longer open to him. If Adam were to have eternal life it would need to be obtained through something other than the covenant of works, for that covenant had been broken. If Adam were to enter into eternal life it would need to be by some other way than through the keeping of God’s law, for he had sinned against it, and the wages of sin is death. To use the words of Paul, “For by works of the law no human being will be justified in [God’s] sight, since through the law comes knowledge of sin” (Romans 3:20, ESV). This was the message that was sent to Adam, and powerfully so, when God drove him from the garden and placed his cherubim and a flaming sword at its entrence. This way to glory is now shut. This way to life eternal is no more. Look elsewhere, namely to the savior that God has promised to provide. 

As it was the previous passage, so it is with this one. Though these texts are primarily about the judgements of God, the gospel of the Christ is also present. How is it present here?, you ask. Let me tell you! 

We must remember who this is book was written by, and for whom it was written. It was written by Moses and for the people of Israel redeemed from Egypt originally. And we should also remember that Moses did not only right Genesis but also the rest of the pentateuch — Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy. And in some of those books the design and eventual construction of the tabernacle will be described to us. And what will we find except that when the tabernacle is build it is meant to remind the worshipper who is approaching God through the shedding of blood of Eden. The entrance to the tabernacle and temple was to face east. Cherubim were embroidered upon the curtain which separated the holy place from the most holy place, where the presence of God was found. And on each side of the  ark of the covenant which contained God’s law stood cherubim, guarding as were mans approach to God.

The Israelites who read Gensus, and all who would read it afterwards, would make these connections. And they would also understand the meaning — though Adam was driven from the temple of Eden, and though the way life through the keeping of God’s law was now shut up and guarded, God by his grace has provided another way to come into his presence. Not law keeping, but through the sacrifice. And not by works, but by grace. 

After the Christ died for our sins the veil on the temple which had the cherubim embroidered upon it was torn in two. “Therefore, brothers, since we have confidence to enter the holy places by the blood of Jesus, by the new and living way that he opened for us through the curtain, that is, through his flesh… let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, with our hearts sprinkled clean from an evil conscience and our bodies washed with pure water. Let us hold fast the confession of our hope without wavering, for he who promised is faithful” (Hebrews 10:19–24, ESV).

*****

Conclusion 

I would like to conclude by making three points of application. 

First of all, do you consider the loss of communion with God to be the most tragic of all the consequences of our sin? Or do you have such a low view of God and such a high view of this world and of the pleasures found within that you weep more at the though of the loss of worldly comforts and pleasures than at the though of the loss of communion with God himself. 

The Christian will agree with Augustine and says, “Thou hast made us for thyself, O Lord, and our heart is restless until it finds its rest in thee.” And the Christian will agree with Paul and say, “But whatever gain I had, I counted as loss for the sake of Christ. Indeed, I count everything as loss because of the surpassing worth of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord.” Truly, there is no greater pleasure in all the world than to God through the Christ whom he has sent.

Secondly, have you submitted to God and to his law as revealed to us in his holy word? Adam’s sin was that he rebelled against God’s word. He sought pursue wisdom apart from God. He sought to know good and evil, right and wrong, truth from error on his own. This sin of rebellion abounds within our world today. How common it is for the sons and daughters of Adam to seek to establish their own standards, their own truth and to go their own way. Our days are very much like the days of the Judges of Israel, when “everyone did what was right in his own eyes” (Judges 17:6, ESV). It is not surprising to find that this is the way of the world, but sadly it is also the way of the church, so called. Most, it would seem to me, give little attention to God’s law. Few care to ask, how has God commanded that he be worshipped? When it comes to establishing doctrine, God’s word is pushed to the side and is replaced with rationalism, emotionalism, and pragmatism. And if you do not know what those words mean I’ll state it differently. Many Christians today refuse come under the authority of God’s word so as to submit to it. Instead they stand over God’s word and they judge it according to their standards. They will believe and teach that which makes sense to them, that which feels right to them, or that which works in their opinion, but they refuse to surrender themselves to God’s word, to believe what its says in humility. Instead  of “[receiving] with meekness the implanted word, which is able to save [our] souls” (James 1:21, ESV), they pridefully stand over the word of God to judge it according to their standards. And when they do they prove that they are in Adam, and not in Christ. And so I ask, have you submitted to God and to his law as revealed to us in his holy word?

Thirdly, are you trusting in your own  righteousness or in Christ. Friends, don’t you see that the way to life through the covenant or works is closed off. The way to eternal through obedience to God’s law is no longer open to any of the natural sons and daughters off Adam. Adam was able to earn eternal life through obedience to God’s law while in the garden. But when he sinned, he was driven out and the way to the tree of life was shut up and guarded. “By works of the law no human being will be justified in [God’s] sight…” (Romans 3:20, ESV). But God has graciously promised and provided another way. He sent a Savior, Christ Jesus our Lord. He was a true son of Adam. He had to be if he was to represent the sons and daughters of Adam and pay for their sins. But more than that he was a the Son of God. He had to be if he was to keep God’s law, bear the sins of all God’s elect, and conquer sin and death by raising on the third day. Indeed, salvation is found only in him. “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me” (John 14:6, ESV). “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life” (John 3:16, ESV).

Tags:
Posted in Sermons, Study Guides, Genesis 3:22-24, Posted by Joe. Comments Off on Sermon: Genesis 3:22-24: Adam Driven Out

Gospel Community Group Discussion Questions, Week of January 20, 2019

Sermon Text: Genesis 3:14-21

  • What new beginning is described to us in Genesis 3:14-21?
  • In what way is the world we live in today the same as the world that God created in the beginning? How is it different?
  • Discuss the effects of our fall into sin upon the world in general. Discuss the effects of our fall into sin upon humanity in particular.
  • In what ways does the text of Genesis 3:14-21 announce good news?
  • How does this passage point forward to Christ?
Posted in Study Guides, Gospel Community Groups, Posted by Joe. Comments Off on Gospel Community Group Discussion Questions, Week of January 20, 2019


"Him we proclaim,
warning everyone and teaching everyone with all wisdom,
that we may present everyone mature in Christ."
(Colossians 1:28, ESV)

©2025 Emmaus Reformed Baptist Church