Author Archive

Sermon: What Must I Do To Inherit Eternal Life?, Luke 18:18-30

Old Testament Reading: Ecclesiastes 7:20

“Surely there is not a righteous man on earth who does good and never sins.” (Ecclesiastes 7:20, ESV)

New Testament Reading: Luke 18:18–30

“And a ruler asked him, ‘Good Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?’ And Jesus said to him, ‘Why do you call me good? No one is good except God alone. You know the commandments: ‘Do not commit adultery, Do not murder, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Honor your father and mother.’’ And he said, ‘All these I have kept from my youth.’ When Jesus heard this, he said to him, ‘One thing you still lack. Sell all that you have and distribute to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me.’ But when he heard these things, he became very sad, for he was extremely rich. Jesus, seeing that he had become sad, said, ‘How difficult it is for those who have wealth to enter the kingdom of God! For it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich person to enter the kingdom of God.’ Those who heard it said, ‘Then who can be saved?’ But he said, ‘What is impossible with man is possible with God.’ And Peter said, ‘See, we have left our homes and followed you.’ And he said to them, ‘Truly, I say to you, there is no one who has left house or wife or brothers or parents or children, for the sake of the kingdom of God, who will not receive many times more in this time, and in the age to come eternal life.’” (Luke 18:18–30)

*****

Please excuse any typos and misspellings within this manuscript. It has been published online for the benefit of the saints of Emmaus Reformed Baptist Church but without the benefit of proofreading.

Introduction

As we begin to consider our text for today, we would do well to remember the theme that is present in this portion of Luke’s gospel. And what is the theme? Here, we are taught by Christ what must be done to have eternal life. 

Do you remember the parable that Christ told about the Pharisee and the tax collector in Luke 18:9-14? In that story, Christ described the Pharisee as being prideful and self-righteous. He stood by himself in the temple and prayed thus: “God, I thank you that I am not like other men, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even like this tax collector.” He boosted in his religious devotion, saying, “I fast twice a week; I give tithes of all that I get” (Luke 18:11–12). Christ contrasted this self-rightous Pharisee with a humble and contrite tax collector who stood far off, “would not even lift up his eyes to heaven, but beat his breast, saying, ‘God, be merciful to me, a sinner!’” (Luke 18:13). Christ then explained the parable with these words: “I tell you, this man [the tax collector] went down to his house justified, rather than the other. For everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, but the one who humbles himself will be exalted” (Luke 18:14). To be justified is to be cleared of transgression and made innocent before God. This parable was told to teach us what one must do to be right with God and have eternal life.

After this parable, we find a story about little children being brought to Jesus. His disciples hindered them at first. But Christ rebuked his disciples and said, “Let the children come to me, and do not hinder them, for to such belongs the kingdom of God. Truly, I say to you, whoever does not receive the kingdom of God like a child shall not enter it” (Luke 18:16–17). To enter the kingdom of God is to have eternal life. Christ here teaches us that it is those who approach him like little children—humble, aware of their need, trustful, and dependent—who will enter God’s kingdom and have life everlasting. Stated negatively, those who approach him with self-righteous pride will never enter the kingdom of heaven.

Here in Luke 18:18-30 we find a story about a wealthy ruler who approached Jesus to ask him a question. And what was his question? It agrees with the theme! “What must I do to inherit eternal life?” (Luke 18:18). 

The dialogue Jesus had with this man is fascinating and very instructive. Here, Jesus proves himself to be a very skilled physician of the soul. He could immediately discern the man’s error and need. And he skillfully spoke to the man to humble him and to make him aware of his need all the while holding forth remedy, namely, repentance from sin and faith in Jesus the Messiah.

We will consider this text in five parts. First, we will consider the question of the rich man (v. 18). Secondly, we will consider Jesus’s reply (vs. 19-22). Thirdly, we will consider the response of the rich man (v. 23). Fourthly, we will consider Jesus’ commentary (v. 24-27). Fifthly and finally, we will consider the response of the disciples of Jesus and Jesus’s reply to them. 

A Question From A Rich Man

First, let us consider the question of the rich man. It is found in verse 18. There we read, “And a ruler asked him, ‘Good Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?” (Luke 18:18). You should know that this story is also recorded in the gospels of Matthew (19:16-29) and Mark (10:17-30). This event must have deeply impacted the disciples of Christ, therefore. Matthew and Mark present the question of the man in slightly different ways. In Matthew’s account we read, “And behold, a man came up to [Jesus], saying, ‘Teacher, what good deed must I do to have eternal life?’” (Matthew 19:16). So Matthew clarifies from the start that the man thought eternal life could be obtained by doing some good deed. Mark tells us that this man “ran up and knelt before [Jesus] and asked him, ‘Good Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?’” (Mark 10:17). Mark’s account helps us to see that the man came to Jesus in a humble manner. He did not question Jesus to put him to the test like many of the Pharisees had done. It appears his question was sincere. 

Notice three things about Luke 18:18. 

One, this man is said to be a ruler. This means he was a ruler of the Jews—a civil magistrate. Later we are told that he was a very wealthy man (see v. 23). Matthew, in his gospel,  calls him a young man (see Matthew 19:20). So then, this man who approached Jesus was a very rich, young ruler.  

Two, notice how respectful he was toward Jesus. He approached Jesus and, kneeling before him, addressed him as “good teacher.” Clearly, this man held Jesus in very high regard. 

Three, notice how fine and weighty his question was. He did not approach Jesus to test him, to trap him, or to trouble him with trivial concerns. No, this rich young ruler asked Jesus a very fine and weighty question— “what must I do to inherit eternal life?” (Luke 18:18). Indeed, this is the question that all men and women should be concerned about, and Jesus is certainly the right man to bring this question to. 

As I have said, this event must have grabbed the attention of the disciples of Jesus, for it appears in the gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke. And it is not difficult to see why it grabbed their attention, for it was (and is) unusual to see a man like this concerned with things like this. This man was a ruler, and yet he came humbly to Jesus without pretence or pride. More than this, he was a young ruler, and yet, despite his youthfulness, he was thinking about the realities of death and the life to come. And he was a rich young ruler. Later, we will learn that he loved his possessions too much. But at least he could see, even at his relatively young age, that his wealth and possessions would not benefit him as it pertains to possessing eternal life.

As you know, this rich young ruler did not conclude his encounter with Jesus well, but he did begin well! He approached Jesus humbly and respectfully to ask him a question of great importance. This should serve as a warning to all of us. Dear friends, how you begin with Jesus does not matter as much as how you end. Yes, it is good to approach Jesus humbly, respectfully, and sincerely, but you must also be prepared to receive his word and to trust and obey whatever he commands. 

What did the rich young ruler say to Jesus when he approached? “Good Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?’ 

Jesus’ Reply

Jesus’ reply is fascinating to consider. His words are deliberate and precise. Like an experienced surgeon, he skillfully uses his words to cut at the man’s heart and soul to remove his false assumptions and correct his false beliefs. He then applies the soothing ointment of the gospel so that the man might be healed.

“Why do you call me good? No one is good except God alone.”

Notice that Jesus did not answer the man’s question right away. Instead, he asked the man a question and made a statement. The rich young ruler said, “‘Good Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?’ And Jesus said to him, ‘Why do you call me good? No one is good except God alone’” (Luke 18:18–19). Why did Christ respond in this way? Why did he respond to the man’s question with a question followed by a statement that, at first glance, seems to be unrelated to the man’s concern? “Good Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?” “Why do you call me good? No one is good except God alone”, was Jesus’ initial reply. Why this reply? 

It should be clear to all that Christ responded in this way to confront the man’s false assumptions. And what were those false assumptions? He assumed that Jesus was a good teacher and nothing more. And he assumed that some men were good, and therefore able to merit or earn life eternal.

These false assumptions are common. Even today, many will consider Jesus to be a good teacher. And many assume that men are basically good and capable of earning life eternal for themselves. Sadly, I would not be surprised if many churchgoers carry these false assumptions in their minds and hearts. Who is Jesus? Many are willing to call him a good teacher, a moral example, and the epitome of love. But is he the eternal Son of God incarnate, the Messiah God promised from long ago, and the lamb of God who has made atonement for the sins of those who trust in him. Many will stop short of confessing this. 

When Jesus replied to the rich young ruler who said, “Good Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?”, with the words, “Why do you call me good? No one is good except God alone”, it was to challenge the false beliefs that Christ new resided in that man’s heart and mind. To the rich young ruler, Christ’s words must have felt like a punch to the face. Those words must have stuck with him and nagged at his soul. “Why do you call me good? No one is good except God alone.”

Two foundational truths are contained in these words.

One, Jesus Christ is not merely a good teacher; he is the eternal Son of God incarnate. The rich young ruler was certainly right to call him good—but at this point in his life, he did not yet realize just how good Jesus was. Jesus is not merely a good teacher among other good teachers. He is not merely the best of all teachers. He is good in that supreme sense. He is good just as God is good. He is holy, pure, and undefiled, for he is God with us. He is the eternal Son of God incarnate. 

Two, when Christ replied to the rich young ruler saying, “Why do you call me good? No one is good except God alone”, he presented the foundational truth that no one, with the exception of God and Christ, is truly good, for all men are sinners in need of a Savior. 

At first glance, Jesus’s response to the man might seem completely unrelated to the question. “Good Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?” Christ replied, “Why do you call me good? No one is good except God alone.” But upon further reflection, it becomes clear that this reply was necessary. Before the man could receive a direct answer to the question, “What must I do to inherit eternal life?” his misconceptions concerning the identity of Christ and the condition of man had to be corrected. The truth is this: except for Jesus Christ, no man is good. And Jesus Christ is good because he is God incarnate. And it is because he is God incarnate that he is able to save all who trust in him. These are the ultra-foundational truths that must be known before a person can understand why eternal life can be inherited only through faith in Christ alone and not by the works of the law.

“You know the commandments…”Keep them!

As I have said, Christ’s initial reply must have seemed jarring to the man.  Christ’s words, “No one is good except God alone”, might not seem jarring to you, for many of you are accustomed to this idea and have accepted it as true. But to a man who thinks that he is basically good and that he is capable of keeping the commandments of God to earn life eternal, this statement sounds radical. What Jesus said to the rich young ruler next was meant to open his blind eyes to the truth that no one is good except God alone.”

Look at verse 20. There, Christ speaks to the man, saying, “You know the commandments: ‘Do not commit adultery, Do not murder, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Honor your father and mother.” What do you notice about these commandments? They are five of the last six of the Ten Commandments. Christ does not list them in the order they are found in Exodus and Deuteronomy. I’m not sure what to make of this fact, and I’m not sure it matters. 

Two things should be noted. One, Christ does not mention the tenth of the Ten Commandments— “You shall not covet.” The significance of this will become apparent in just a moment. Two, Christ is here calling the man to go ahead and attempt to obtain eternal life through the keeping of God’s moral law.

What the rich young ruler says next reveals just how blind he was, spiritually speaking. Look at verse 21: “And he said, ‘All these I have kept from my youth.’”

The text does not reveal the details regarding Jesus’ body language or the expression on his face. I imagine raised eyebrows. Perhaps Jesus smirked a little. I think he must have paused and looked at the man with an expression of wonderment. Christ had just applied the moral law of God to this man, a law that no mere man can keep but daily breaks in thought, word, and deed. He applied the moral law to him to convict and condemn him and to show him his need for a Savior. And the man brushed it off. He deflected, saying, “All these I have kept from my youth.”

Now, to be clear, I do not think this man was lying. He probably believed he had kept God’s law from his youth. This was the way that many of the religious people in Jesus’s day thought. They would interpret God’s law very literally and in a minimalistic way. They failed to apply God’s law to the heart and to see that to truly keep it, it must be kept from a heart of love. You probably know about Christ’s teachings regarding what the law actually requires and forbids. It requires us to love God with our whole being and our neighbor as ourselves (see Matthew 22:37). It does not only forbid murder and adultery, but hatred and lust. Again, I do not think this man was lying when he said, “All these I have kept from my youth”, but he was certainly mistaken.  He was ignorant and blind concerning his sin and his need for a Savior. 

In verse 22, we read, “When Jesus heard this, he said to him…” The way that Luke words this makes me think that Christ was, humanly speaking, astonished by this man’s answer. Mark puts it this way in his gospel: “And Jesus, looking at him, loved him, and said to him…” Jesus looked at him, amazed at his spiritual blindness, and it was because he loved him and had compassion on him that he spoke to him further. 

And what did Christ say to get through to the man? “One thing you still lack. Sell all that you have and distribute to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me” (Luke 18:22, ESV).

I have four observations to make about this saying of Jesus. 

One, Christ did not argue with the man about whether or not he had, in fact, kept the five commandments he had mentioned from the time of his youth. He could have argued this point, but he did not. He let it go. 

Two, Christ decided to focus on the sin that was most obvious in this man’s life, namely, the sin of covetousness. Covetousness is forbidden in the tenth commandment. Earlier, I noted that Christ had listed five of the last six of the Ten Commandments. He did not mention the tenth commandment, which is, “thou shall not covet”. Now, he returns to focus on it. 

The tenth commandment, it should be noted, is different from the other five that Christ mentioned in that it is, strictly speaking, a sin of the heart. We know that sins of adultery, murder, theft, bearing false witness, and the dishonoring of father and mother all come from the heart, but they are, strictly speaking, things that people say and do. Covetousness is different. It is, first and foremost, a heart-sin. And it is from this heart-sin that many other sins do flow. 

When Christ spoke to this rich young ruler, saying, “One thing you still lack. Sell all that you have and distribute to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me”, it was to reveal the covetousness and love of money and possessions that resided in his heart. There was certainly a great deal of sin in this man’s heart, but he could not see it. The sin of covetousness was prominent, and so Christ highlighted it when he said, “One thing you still lack. Sell all that you have and distribute to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me” (Luke 18:22, ESV).

Three, some mistakenly assume that Christ calls all who wish to follow him to sell all they have and distribute to the poor. That is not true. As I have said before, it is very important to interpret Scripture in light of Scripture. Many other passages of Scripture make this interpretation impossible. For example, in Luke 19:8, we find a story about a chief tax collector named Zachaeus. When he decided to follow Jesus, he said, “Behold, Lord, the half of my goods I give to the poor. And if I have defrauded anyone of anything, I restore it fourfold” (Luke 19:8), and this was regarded by Christ as sufficient. Furthermore, in 1 Timothy 6:18 the Apostle Paul gives this general command to the rich: “They are to do good, to be rich in good works, to be generous and ready to share, thus storing up treasure for themselves as a good foundation for the future, so that they may take hold of that which is truly life.” (1 Timothy 6:18–19) (see also Luke 12:33, Luke 16:9, Acts 2:45, Acts 4:34-35). When Christ called the rich young ruler to sell all that he had and to distribute it to the poor”, it was a calling somewhat unique to him. The purpose was to expose the covetousness that had a firm grip on his heart so that he might turn from this sin to Jesus as Lord and Savior. 

Four, notice that the end of the answer provided by Christ to the rich man’s question, “what must I do to inherit eternal life?” is “follow me”. The rich young ruler asked, “What must I do to inherit eternal life?” Here is the answer that Christ gave him. “Sell all that you have and distribute to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me” (Luke 18:22, ESV). The command to sell all does not apply to all, but the command to turn from sin and to follow after Jesus does apply to all. In brief, all who wish to have life everlasting must repent and believe in Jesus. Repentance without faith in Christ will not save you. And neither will faith in Christ without repentance. Eternal life will be given to all who turn from their sins to follow after Jesus. 

The Rich Man’s Response 

The response of the rich young ruler is recorded in verse 23, and it was a very sad response. “But when he heard these things, he became very sad, for he was extremely rich” (Luke 18:23, ESV). In other words, the covetousness and love of money that resided in his heart were so strong that they hindered him from following after Jesus.

Many are kept from following Jesus because they love this world and the things of this world more than they love Him. And this is why Christ says, “If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. For whoever would save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for my sake and the gospel’s will save it. For what does it profit a man to gain the whole world and forfeit his soul?” (Mark 8:34–36, ESV).  Sadly, this rich young ruler would not let go of the things of this world to have Christ and the eternal life that only he can give.

Jesus’s Commentary

Christ’s commentary regarding the response of the rich young ruler is found in verse 24. “Jesus, seeing that he had become sad, said, ‘How difficult it is for those who have wealth to enter the kingdom of God! For it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich person to enter the kingdom of God’” (Luke 18:24–25, ESV). 

The image of a camel attempting to go through an eye of a needle is very fitting. For one, it communicates the impossibility of the action. Essentially, Christ teaches that it is impossible, humanly speaking. for those who have wealth to enter the kingdom of God. Two, the image says something about why this is so. It is impossible for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle because a camel is very big and the eye of a needle is very small. And so it is as it pertains to the entrance to life in God’s eternal kingdom. The doorway is small and narrow. Those who attempt to enter while holding on to their large estates and their many possessions will not succeed. 

The Response Of The Disciples Of Jesus And Jesus’s Reply To Them

The response of those who heard these things and Jesus’s reply to them is found in verses 26-30. Let’s consider this section briefly. 

Verse 26: “Those who heard it said, ‘Then who can be saved?’” In other words, if it is true that this is what is required to be saved, and if it is true that it is difficult for those who have wealth to enter the kingdom of God, and easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich person to enter the kingdom of God, then who will make it in? “But he said, ‘What is impossible with man is possible with God.’” In other words, God is able to change the hearts of men, to release them from the love of money, and to fix their affections on God and Christ.

In verse 28, Peter said, “See, we have left our homes and followed you.” It seems that Peter needed to be reassured that their sacrifice would be worth it. Whatever Peter’s reason for speaking, Christ reassured his disciples with these words. “Truly, I say to you, there is no one who has left house or wife or brothers or parents or children, for the sake of the kingdom of God, who will not receive many times more in this time, and in the age to come eternal life” (Luke 18:26–30, ESV).

In brief, Christ teaches us that any sacrifice we make to follow him in this world will be worth it. It will be worth it now, given the many blessings that come to those who forsake the world to follow after Jesus in this life. And it will certainly be worth it in the life to come, for to renounce all and to follow after Christ in this life is to “store up… treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust destroys and where thieves do not break in and steal” (Matthew 6:20, ESV).

Conclusion

Dear friends, as you seek to apply this text to your own lives, I would urge you to focus on three things. 

One, as it pertains to the question, “what must I do to inherit eternal life”, be sure that you are trusting, not in yourself and in your own ability to keep God’s law, but in Christ alone, who has keep God’s law for sinners and has died in their place. This is the only way to have eternal life. 

Two, as you come to see your sin and your need for Christ the Savior, do not allow love for this world and the things of this world to hinder you from following after him. Not every Christian is called by Christ to forsake great wealth, houses, homelands, and relationships with family and friends to follow after Jesus, but some may be called to do this. They must not hesitate as the rich young ruler did. But all Christians must forsake the world, die to self, and take up their cross daily to follow Jesus. You must know that it is worth it. Do not allow anything to hinder you from following Jesus. 

Three, those who have decided to follow Christ must forever grow in their conviction that having Christ, a right relationship with God through faith in him, and the hope of life everlasting is far better than having anything this world can offer. Along with the Apostle Paul, we must “count everything as loss because of the surpassing worth of knowing Christ Jesus [our] Lord. For his sake [we must be wiilling to suffer] the loss of all things and count them as rubbish, in order that [we] may gain Christ and be found in him, not having a righteousness of [our] own that comes from the law, but that which comes through faith in Christ, the righteousness from God that depends on faith…” (Philippians 3:8–9, ESV).

Discussion Questions: Luke 18:18-30

  1. The rich young ruler started well with Jesus but did not end well. Discuss his good beginning and his sad ending. 
  2. Why did Jesus begin to address the rich young ruler’s questions with these words, “Why do you call me good? No one is good except God alone.” (Luke 18:19)
  3. Why did Jesus tell the rich young ruler to obtain eternal life through the keeping of the commandments? Is this possible? Why then did Jesus command it?
  4. Jesus cited five commandments from the second portion of the Ten Commandments. Which commandment did he leave out? Why?
  5. The rich young ruler claimed to have kept these commandments from his youth. Was this true?
  6. Why did Jesus command the rich young ruler to sell everything and give to the poor? Is this what everyone must do to follow Jesus? Why then did Jesus require this of this man?
  7. Though all who follow Jesus are not required to sell all, what attitude must we maintain towards this world and the things of this world?

Catechetical Sermon: What Is The First Commandment And What Does It Require?, Baptist Catechism 50 & 51

Baptist Catechism 50 & 51

Q. 50. Which is the first commandment?

A. The first commandment is, Thou shalt have no other gods before me. (Exodus 20:3)

Q. 51. What is required in the first commandment?

A. The first commandment requireth us to know and acknowledge God to be the only true God, and our God; and to worship and glorify Him accordingly. (Joshua 24:15; 1 Chron. 28:9; Deut. 26:17; Ps. 29:2; Matt. 4:10)

Scripture Reading: Joshua 24.1-15

“Joshua gathered all the tribes of Israel to Shechem and summoned the elders, the heads, the judges, and the officers of Israel. And they presented themselves before God. And Joshua said to all the people, ‘Thus says the LORD, the God of Israel, ‘Long ago, your fathers lived beyond the Euphrates, Terah, the father of Abraham and of Nahor; and they served other gods. Then I took your father Abraham from beyond the River and led him through all the land of Canaan, and made his offspring many. I gave him Isaac. And to Isaac I gave Jacob and Esau. And I gave Esau the hill country of Seir to possess, but Jacob and his children went down to Egypt. And I sent Moses and Aaron, and I plagued Egypt with what I did in the midst of it, and afterward I brought you out. Then I brought your fathers out of Egypt, and you came to the sea. And the Egyptians pursued your fathers with chariots and horsemen to the Red Sea. And when they cried to the LORD, he put darkness between you and the Egyptians and made the sea come upon them and cover them; and your eyes saw what I did in Egypt. And you lived in the wilderness a long time. Then I brought you to the land of the Amorites, who lived on the other side of the Jordan. They fought with you, and I gave them into your hand, and you took possession of their land, and I destroyed them before you. Then Balak the son of Zippor, king of Moab, arose and fought against Israel. And he sent and invited Balaam the son of Beor to curse you, but I would not listen to Balaam. Indeed, he blessed you. So I delivered you out of his hand. And you went over the Jordan and came to Jericho, and the leaders of Jericho fought against you, and also the Amorites, the Perizzites, the Canaanites, the Hittites, the Girgashites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites. And I gave them into your hand. And I sent the hornet before you, which drove them out before you, the two kings of the Amorites; it was not by your sword or by your bow. I gave you a land on which you had not labored and cities that you had not built, and you dwell in them. You eat the fruit of vineyards and olive orchards that you did not plant.’ Now therefore fear the LORD and serve him in sincerity and in faithfulness. Put away the gods that your fathers served beyond the River and in Egypt, and serve the LORD. And if it is evil in your eyes to serve the LORD, choose this day whom you will serve, whether the gods your fathers served in the region beyond the River, or the gods of the Amorites in whose land you dwell. But as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.’” (Joshua 24:1–15, ESV)

*****

Please excuse any typos and misspellings within this manuscript. It has been published online for the benefit of the saints of Emmaus Reformed Baptist Church but without the benefit of proofreading.

Introduction

There is a good reason why the first of the Ten Commandments is stated first! The commandment, “You shall have no other gods before me”, is stated first because it is of supreme importance. 

What good will it do if we succeed at keeping the other nine commandments (to some degree) but fail to keep the first, which, as we will soon learn,  requires us “to know and acknowledge God to be the only true God, and our God; and to worship and glorify Him accordingly.” Will it do us any good (ultimately) to not bow to idols, to treat the name of God with respect, and to observe the Sabbath day? Will it do us any good (in the end) to honor father and mother, not murder, not commit adultery, not steal, not bear false witness, and not covet, if we do not first have God as our God and honor him as such? I suppose some may say, well yes, it would be better for someone to obey God’s moral law (somewhat) even if they do not honor God as God. And I suppose there is some truth to that. A moral atheist is certainly better than an immoral one, worldly speaking. But I am asking the question in an ultimate sense. Will it do us any good ultimately, or perhaps we could say, really, truly, and eternally, to keep the other nine commandments if we do not, first and foremost, love God and live for his glory? The answer is, no. 

Do not forget, brothers and sisters, that the sum of the first four of the Ten Commandments, is to love the LORD our God with all our heart, soul, mind, and strength. If we wish to keep these commandments really and truly, we must begin and end with love for God. And this is true, not only of the first four but of the last six as well. All of our efforts to keep God’s law must be motivated by our love for him. As Christ said, “If you love me, you will keep my commandments” (John 14:15, ESV). And the aim of our obedience ought to be the glory of God. As Paul said, “So, whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God” (1 Corinthians 10:31, ESV). If our obedience to God’s law is not motivated by our love for him, then our obedience is not from the heart – it is merely superficial. And if our obedience is not aimed at bringing honor to God, then it must be aimed at some other end or purpose, most likely our own honor or praise.

And so we must begin here. If we wish to live a life that is right before God, we must start by honoring God as God and having no other gods before him. You will notice that the first commandment is stated negatively – “you shall not…”, it says. And so it is good for us to ask what it requires, positively. The negative command implies a positive requirement.  What does this commandment require? Our catechism is right to say, The first commandment requires us to know and acknowledge God to be the only true God, and our God; and to worship and glorify Him accordingly.

 *****

Catechism Explained

Three requirements are mentioned here. One, the first commandment requires us to know God as the only true God and our God. Two, the first commandment requires us to acknowledge God to be the only true God and our God. Three, the first commandment requires us to worship and glorify God accordingly.

Let us consider each of these requirements one at a time. 

One, the first commandment requires us to know God as the only true God and our God. When the first commandment forbids us (in a negative way) from having any other gods besides the one true God, it does also require us (in a positive way) to have God as our God. And to have God as our God, we must know him. 

What does it mean to know God? Two things: 

First, to know God is to know the truth about him. Do you know about God? Do you know that he exists? Do you know what he is like? Do you know about his nature,  his attributes, and his ways with men? If we are to have God as our God we must know about him. And where must we go to find out the truth about God? Well, we know that he has revealed the truth about himself in two places. He has revealed some things about himself in nature, and he has revealed the truth about himself much more thoroughly and clearly in Scripture. And so we must study these two books – the “book” of nature, and the book of Scripture – if we wish to know the truth about God. These two “books” will always agree, for they are both from God – he reveals himself through both. If they ever seem to contradict, the problem is not with the one book or the other, but with the interpreter. And of these two books, the book of Scripture is supreme, for through the Scriptures God has revealed himself with great clarity. And so I ask you, do you know God? Do you know the truth about him – who he is, what he is like, and how he relates to man? You should! The first of the Ten Commandments requires us to have God as our God. And this means we must know about him. 

Second, to know God is to be in a right relationship with him. All men and women are in a relationship with God. He is their Creator and they are his creatures. This is true even if they deny him. And they are not only related to him as his creatures. They are related to him covenantally too, for all men and women are born under that broken covenant of works that was made with Adam, and all do also live under the covenant of creation that was made in the days of Noah after the flood. All who live are in a relationship with God. The question is, what kind of relationship is it? Answer: not a good one. By nature and because of sin, we are called children of wrath. By nature – that is to say, by virtue of our natural birth – we are enemies of God because of our sin, and we are under his condemnation. So then, all people do know God and are in a relationship with him in this sense – God is their creator, and they are his creatures. And given the fact of sin, God is the judge and they stand before him guilty and condemned (see John 3:16-18). To know God in the way that the first commandment requires is to be in a right relationship with him. The first commandment requires that we know God to be the only true God and to have him as our God

Already, you can see that a Savior is needed. If rebel sinners are to know God as their God – if they are to be in a right relationship with him – they need someone to deal with the problem of sin. Jesus Christ is that Savior. He lived, died, and rose again to redeem us from bondage to sin and to reconcile us to God the Father. The redemption and reconciliation that Israel experienced in the days of Moses was an earthly picture (foreshadowing) of the greater act of redemption and reconciliation that Jesus Christ, the Promised One, would accomplish. Through faith in Jesus the Messiah, we are really and truly reconciled to God so that we might know him, that is to say, be in a right relationship with him. Those who have faith in Christ do not know God as Judge but as Father.     

So then, the first commandment requires us to know God. Two, the first commandment also requires us to acknowledge God to be the only true God. What is the difference between knowing God and acknowledging him? Well, I suppose it would be possible to know God privately in the mind and heart, but not publicly. But this is not the way we are to walk before our God. If God is truly our God, we will openly acknowledge him as such.  We will honor him as God by acknowledging him in all our ways (Proverbs 3:6). We will honor him by fearing him in our walk (Genesis 42:18). We will honor him by trusting in him (Psalm 25:2). We will honor him by submitting to him (James 4:7). 

Those who have the LORD as their God will not be private it about. Instead, they will acknowledge the LORD as God in their thoughts, words, and deeds. With their whole life, they will say, “I am the LORD’s” (Isaiah 44:5). They will declare, “But as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD” (Joshua 24:15). Those who truly have the LORD as their God will “made the good confession in the presence of many witnesses” (1 Timothy 6:12). They will confess with the mouth “Jesus is Lord” while believing in the heart that God raised him from the dead (Romans 10:9). And do not forget the warning of Jesus: “So everyone who acknowledges me before men, I also will acknowledge before my Father who is in heaven, but whoever denies me before men, I also will deny before my Father who is in heaven” (Matthew 10:32–33). 

The commandment, you shall have no other gods before me, is negative. It forbids us from having any other god besides the one true God. But considered positively (and considered in the light of what the rest of the Scriptures say about this subject)  it requires us to have God as our God.  And to have God as our God, we must know him and acknowledge him to be our LORD and God. 

Three, the first commandment requires us to worship and glorify God accordingly. Those who know God and acknowledge him to be their God will worship him and live for his glory. 

To worship is to bow down. One may worship by bowing down physically. Certainly, we must bow down before the Lord in the mind and heart. To worship is to acknowledge that God is worthy of our obedience and praise. To worship is to give oneself up to the will of God, to surrender to him, and to serve him (2 Chronicles 30:8). We worship God individually as we bow before him in private prayer, as we contemplate his Word, and as we surrender our lives to him as his humble servants. We worship in private families as we pray, read Scripture, and sing. And we worship in public as we assemble with God’s people on the Lord’s Day to hear the word of God read and preached, as we pray in Jesus’ name, as we sing Psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs, and as we break the bread in obedience to Christ’s command. The Old Covenant people of God had ordinances for worship; and the New Covenant people of God have ordinances too. Those who have the one true God as their God, will know him, acknowledge him, and worship him.

To glorify God is to honor and exalt him. We exalt God when we worship him in the way he has prescribed. We exalt God as we obey him. And we exalt him as we trust him, live lives of thankfulness and contentment before him, and as we testify concerning his goodness to us in Christ Jesus. We glorify God as we worship and serve him with all that we are and urge others to do the same (1 Corinthians 6:20).    

*****

Conclusion

Brothers and sisters, the first of the Ten Commandments does not merely forbid having other gods besides the LORD. No, when all is considered, it requires us “to know and acknowledge God to be the only true God, and our God; and to worship and glorify Him accordingly.” 

But let me ask you, have you kept this law perfectly? All must confess, no we have violated this law in thought, word, and deed. All must confess this, except one, Christ Jesus our Lord, who kept God’s law perfectly on our behalf, and died in our place so that we might be reconciled to God, and serve him faithfully all the days of our life. May all who hear this be found trusting in him for the forgiveness of sins and life everlasting. Amen.  

Discussion Questions: Baptist Catechism 50 & 51

  1. Why is the first commandment first?
  2. What is the difference between knowing that God is the only true God and acknowledging God to be the only true God?
  3. Why does our catechism add that to keep the first commandment, we must also “worship and glorify Him accordingly”? What does this mean?

Discussion Questions: Baptist Catechism 44-47

  • Why is it most appropriate to ask the question, “What is the duty which God requireth of man?” at this point in the catechism? 
  • What is meant by “revealed will”? What is God’s “hidden” or “secret will”? Which one are we called to obey? Why are we to obey the one and not the other?
  • Where did God first “write” his moral law?
  • Where in the Scriptures should we go to find a summary of God’s moral law?
  • Why is it important that the Ten Commandments be said to contain a summary of God’s moral law? In other words, why should the Ten Commandments not be strictly equated with the moral law? 
  • What is the sum of the Ten Commandments? How do these two laws get to the heart of the first four and last six of the Ten Commandments, respectively?

Catechetical Sermon: The Moral Law, Baptist Catechism 44-47

Baptist Catechism 44-47

Q. 44. What is the duty which God requireth of man?

A. The duty which God requireth of man, is obedience to His revealed will. (Micah 6:8; Eccles. 12:13; Ps. 119:4; Luke 10:26-28)

Q. 45. What did God at first reveal to man for the rule of his obedience?

A. The rule which God at first revealed to man for his obedience, was the moral law. (Rom. 2:14,15; 5:13,14)

Q. 46. Where is the moral law summarily comprehended?

A. The moral law is summarily comprehended in the Ten Commandments. (Deut. 10:4; Matt. 19:17)

Q. 47. What is the sum of the Ten Commandments?

A. The sum of the Ten Commandments is, to love the Lord our God, with all our heart, with all our soul, with all our strength, and with all our mind; and our neighbor as ourselves. (Matt. 22:36-40; Mark 12:28-33)

Scripture Reading: Matthew 22:34–40

“But when the Pharisees heard that he had silenced the Sadducees, they gathered together. And one of them, a lawyer, asked him a question to test him. ‘Teacher, which is the great commandment in the Law?’ And he said to him, ‘You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind. This is the great and first commandment. And a second is like it: You shall love your neighbor as yourself. On these two commandments depend all the Law and the Prophets.’” (Matthew 22:34–40, ESV)

*****

Please excuse any typos and misspellings within this manuscript. It has been published online for the benefit of the saints of Emmaus Reformed Baptist Church but without the benefit of proofreading.

*****

Baptist Catechism 44

Last week we entered into the third and final large section of the catechism when we considered question 44, which asks, “What is the duty which God requireth of man?” Answer: “The duty which God requireth of man, is obedience to His revealed will.” “Duty” means responsibility or obligation. So the question is this, what does God expect man to do? What is man’s obligation before God? What is his responsibility or duty?

In that sermon, I pointed out that this is a very important question, and it is also very timely. And by timely I mean, it is the right question to ask at this point in our catechism given all that we have learned. And what have we learned? Well, in brief, we have learned about God! We have learned that God – the Triune God (BC 8, 9), who is “infinite, eternal, and unchangeable in His being, wisdom, power, holiness, justice, goodness and truth” (BC 7) – is our Creator. He is the creator of all things seen and unseen. He has given us life, and he sustains us continuously. More than this, we have also learned that, though we have sinned against God, he has redeemed us. God the Father has accomplished our redemption through the Son and he effectively applies its benefits to his elect by the working of the Holy Spirit. So then, in questions 7 through 43 we have learned all about God our Creator, Sustainer, and Redeemer.

If you have been paying attention to this teaching; if you have believed it in the mind and received it in the heart; if you have grasped, at least to some degree, the glory of God and his goodness to us in Christ Jesus, then you will agree that this is the right question to ask: “What is the duty which God requireth of man?” In other words, how should I respond to this Holy and Awesome God and to the marvelous grace that he has shown to me in redeeming me from bondage to sin? This is the question that a creature should ask his Creator. And I suppose it could be said that this is, even more so, the question that one who has been redeemed should ask his Redeemer. We ought to respond to God, our Creator, and Redeemer, saying, I’m grateful. I owe you everything.  What do you, O God, require of me?

The question is fitting. It is timely. Again the answer: “The duty which God requireth of man, is obedience to His revealed will.” 

When we speak of God’s will, we are speaking of his command or decree. And his will may be considered in two ways. 

First, we may speak of God’s hidden or secret will. This is God’s will or decree concerning all that will come to pass in history. Why is it called “secret” or “hidden”? Because God has not revealed it to us! What will happen tomorrow? We don’t know! The future is a mystery to us. But does God know what will happen tomorrow? Yes! And he knows, not only because he can see the future, but because he has decreed what will happen. We call this decree his “hidden will”. The biblical teaching concerning God’s decree was summarized for us way back in Baptist Catechism 10: “What are the decrees of God?” A: “The decrees of God are His eternal purpose, according to the counsel of His will, whereby for His own glory, He has foreordained whatsoever comes to pass.”

Notice, we are not called to obey God’s hidden will. How could we? For it has not been revealed or told to us! But we are called to obey God’s revealed will, that is to say, his laws or commandments which he has given to us. And that is the second way we speak of God’s will. His revealed will is his law. 

You know, one thing I have noticed over the years is that people sometimes get this backward. They focus on trying to figure out God’s hidden will while ignoring God’s revealed will. Even Christians can fall into the trap of obsessing over questions like, what is God’s plan for my life, or what does the future hold for me, while failing to do that which God has clearly commanded.  Jesus had something to say about that in Matthew 6:25: “Therefore I tell you, do not be anxious about your life, what you will eat or what you will drink, nor about your body, what you will put on… do not be anxious, saying, ‘What shall we eat?’ or ‘What shall we drink?’ or ‘What shall we wear?’ For the Gentiles seek after all these things, and your heavenly Father knows that you need them all. But seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be added to you” (Matthew 6:25–33, ESV). That’s really marvelous, isn’t it? Jesus is saying, don’t obsess over the future. Don’t be anxious about things outside of your control. Instead, trust God as it pertains to these things, and focus instead on living in obedience to God while seeking to further his Kingdom.  

*****

Baptist Catechism 45-47

Questions 45 through 47 of our catechism clarify which law we must obey and where it is found. 

First, in question 45 we are rightly taught that God revealed his will, or law, by first writing it on the heart of man at creation. Q 45: “What did God at first reveal to man for the rule of his obedience?”

A: “The rule which God at first revealed to man for his obedience, was the moral law.” You would do well to notice that Romans 2:14-15 and 5:13-14 are listed as proof texts for this Q&A. Romans 2:14-15 teaches that God wrote his law on man’s heart at creation, and Romans 5:13-14 teaches that the God’s law was in fact in the world prior to the giving of the Ten Commandments at Sinai. The point is this: God’s law was not given for the first time when it was written on those stone tablets and given to Israel through Moses. No, God’s law was first written on the heart of man when God created him. Adam knew right from wrong, and good from evil because God made him in his image. Man has God’s moral law written on his heart. He knows right from wrong. Now, granted, man is now fallen. This law is now badly bent out of shape, marred, distorted, and suppressed so that men by nature love what is evil and flee from what is good. But it is important for us to confess that God made man with this capacity to know right from wrong, and that man was upright in the beginning. 

Secondly, question 46 connects the moral law of God (which was written on man’s heart at the beginning and is universal and unchanging) with the Ten Commandments that were written on stone and given to Israel at Sinai. Q 46: “Where is the moral law summarily comprehended?” A: “The moral law is summarily comprehended in the Ten Commandments.” That question and answer are worded very carefully to guard against error. 

One, it is clear that there is a connection between the moral law and the Ten Commandments written on stone. Do you wish to know God’s moral law which is for all people living in all times and places? Then you should go to the Ten Commandments, for there the moral law is comprehended or known. 

Two, it is also important to notice that the moral law and the Ten Commandments are not equated. If the moral law and the Ten Commandments were the exact same thing the question would have been more direct, perhaps something like this: Where do we find the moral law? And the answer would have simply been, in the Ten Commandments. Instead, the question and answer are more nuanced. “Where is the moral law summarily comprehended?” A: “The moral law is summarily comprehended in the Ten Commandments.” 

“Summarily comprehended” means summarized in a way that is clear and knowable. It is important that the question and answer be phrased in this way for two reasons. 

One, there are some things stated in the Ten Commandments that were unique to Old Covenant Israel and are not, therefore, for all people living in all times and places. In other words, not everything stated in the Ten Commandments is to be regarded as “moral law”. Take for example the preface, which mentions Israel’s redemption from Egypt. Consider also the commandment to observe the Sabbath on the seventh day. Also, remember the blessings attached to the keeping of the fifth commandment, namely, blessings in the land that would be given to Israel. And do not forget the curses attached to the breaking of the second commandment, namely, God’s “visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and the fourth generation of those who hate me, but showing steadfast love to thousands of those who love me and keep [his] commandments” (Exodus 20:5–6, ESV). The point is this, the moral law and the Ten Commandments are not to be equated because there are some things stated with them that were unique to Israel, and are not for all people living in all times and places. Nevertheless, the moral law is comprehended within the Ten Commandments. 

Two, the phrasing of this question and answer is important because the Ten Commandments are to be regarded as a summary of the moral law. In other words, the Ten Commandments do not say all that can possibly be said about living in a way that is right before God but function as a summary. In other words, the implications must be fleshed out. This will be demonstrated beautifully in questions 45 through 89 as our catechism will follow this pattern with each one of the Ten Commandments. What is the _____ commandment? What does this commandment require? What does this commandment forbid? You will notice that we are not only going to memorize the Ten Commandments. We will also, with the help of Scripture, tease out the implications or necessary consequences, of each commandment. For example, the fifth commandment, honor your father and mother, “requireth the preserving the honor, and performing the duties, belonging to everyone in their several places and relations, as superiors, inferiors, or equals.” The Scriptures clearly teach that this is the implication of the fifth commandment, which is to be regarded as a summary of God’s moral law. 

Finally, we come to question 47 which asks, “What is the sum of the Ten Commandments?” Or to put it another way, what is the sum total of the summary of God’s moral law? Answer: “The sum of the Ten Commandments is, to love the Lord our God, with all our heart, with all our soul, with all our strength, and with all our mind; and our neighbor as ourselves.” 

The proof texts cited here are Mattew 22:36-40 and Mark 12:28-33. These passages record for us Jesus’ answer to the question, “which is the great commandment in the Law?” And said, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind. This is the great and first commandment. And a second is like it: You shall love your neighbor as yourself. On these two commandments depend all the Law and the Prophets” (Matthew 22:36–40, ESV). 

Clearly, Jesus was summing up the first four of the Ten Commandments when he spoke of the love we are to offer up to God, and he was summing up the last six of the Ten Commandments when he spoke of the love we are to show to our neighbor. It should be remembered that this idea was not unique to Jesus. No, he was simply quoting the law of Moses, Deuteronomy 6:5, and Leviticus 19:18.

*****

Conclusion

So then, what duty does God require of man? A: Obedience to His revealed will. This reminds me of what Jesus said to his disciples: “If you love me, you will keep my commandments” (John 14:15, ESV).

And what did God at first reveal to man for the rule of his obedience? He gave man his moral law. He wrote it on Adam’s heart at the time of creation. This is a part of what it meant for Adam and Eve to have been made in God’s image. 

And where is this moral law summarized for us so that it might be known? A: “The moral law is summarily comprehended in the Ten Commandments.” 

And what is the sum of the Ten Commandments? A: The sum of the Ten Commandments is, to love the Lord our God, with all our heart, with all our soul, with all our strength, and with all our mind; and our neighbor as ourselves.“

May the Lord do two things for us. One, may he show us that we cannot keep this law but daily break it in thought, word, and deed, and therefore, are in need of a Savior, Christ the Lord. Two, may he give us faith in Christ with a renewed mind, heart, and will so that we might do what God has commanded, out of gratitude for what he has graciously done for us as our Creator and Redeemer.

Sermon: Let The Children Come To Jesus, Luke 18:15-17

Old Testament Reading: Zephaniah 3:9–13

“For at that time I will change the speech of the peoples to a pure speech, that all of them may call upon the name of the LORD and serve him with one accord. From beyond the rivers of Cush my worshipers, the daughter of my dispersed ones, shall bring my offering. On that day you shall not be put to shame because of the deeds by which you have rebelled against me; for then I will remove from your midst your proudly exultant ones, and you shall no longer be haughty in my holy mountain. But I will leave in your midst a people humble and lowly. They shall seek refuge in the name of the LORD, those who are left in Israel; they shall do no injustice and speak no lies, nor shall there be found in their mouth a deceitful tongue. For they shall graze and lie down, and none shall make them afraid.” (Zephaniah 3:9–13)

New Testament Reading: Luke 18:15-17

“Now they were bringing even infants to him that he might touch them. And when the disciples saw it, they rebuked them. But Jesus called them to him, saying, ‘Let the children come to me, and do not hinder them, for to such belongs the kingdom of God. Truly, I say to you, whoever does not receive the kingdom of God like a child shall not enter it.” (Luke 18:15–17)

*****

Please excuse any typos and misspellings within this manuscript. It has been published online for the benefit of the saints of Emmaus Reformed Baptist Church but without the benefit of proofreading.

Introduction

One thing I have found helpful when interpreting the Gospel of Luke is to look for themes. It seems to me that when Luke wrote his Gospel he grouped stories and teachings of Jesus together according to themes. Perhaps you recall that not long ago we encountered a string of passages linked together by the theme of money and the right use of money. Here in this section of Luke’s Gospel, we find three passages that teach us what is necessary to be in a right relationship with God so that we might enter his Kingdom and have eternal life.

In the previous passage, we learned that it was not the religiously devout Pharisee who was right with God. That man was filled with self-righteous pride! Instead, it was the repentant tax-collector who was right with God, for he was humble and contrite. He knew he was a sinner and that he needed a Savior. As he prayed to God at the temple, he stood “far off, would not even lift up his eyes to heaven, but beat his breast, saying, ‘God, be merciful to me, a sinner!’” Jesus tells us that it was this man who “went down to his house justified, rather than the other. For everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, but the one who humbles himself will be exalted” (Luke 18:13–14).

In the next passage, Luke 18:18-30,  we will learn of an encounter that Jesus had with a rich young ruler. The ruler approached Jesus and said, “Good Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?” (Luke 18:18). As we consider that story we will learn that this man thought he could inert eternal life through his keeping of the law, that is to say, by his own goodness. Jesus showed him that this was not possible. This man needed to be humbled by the law to recognize his need for a Savior. 

And sandwiched between these two stories, which are intended to put self-righteous pride to death, we find this little story about Jesus receiving little children to bless them. As Jesus received the children to bless them, he delivered a message. “Let the children come to me, and do not hinder them, for to such belongs the kingdom of God. Truly, I say to you, whoever does not receive the kingdom of God like a child shall not enter it” (Luke 18:16–17). The meaning is very similar to the passages before and after this one. To stand right before God, to enter the Kingdom of God, and to gain life eternal, one must do away with all self-righteous pride and humbly come to Jesus to be embraced by him and to receive the salvation that only he can give. The Pharisees, and others who were filled with self-righteous pride, stood far off from Jesus and ridiculed him as one who received tax collectors and sinners. But these children came humbly, without pretense or pride,  to receive Jesus’ warm embrace. Only those who come to Jesus humbly, out of a sense of their need for him (his person and work), will enter the Kingdom of God, of which he is King.  

This Passage Is Not About Infant Baptism

If you read commentaries on this passage you will see that it is often used by those who believe in baptizing the infant children of believers to support their position and practice. This only shows how desperate they are to find support for their practice from the New Testament. This passage has nothing to do with the sacrament of baptism, but it is often appealed to by paedobaptists because no better or stronger New Testament texts can be found. 

The best paedobaptists will simply admit that the New Testament does not teach infant baptism. B.B. Warfield was a paedobaptist theologian who was not afraid to admit this. In a work entitled, The Polemics Of Infant Baptism, Warfield writes, “It is true that there is no express command to baptize infants in the New Testament, no express record of the baptism of infants, and no passages so stringently implying it that we must infer from them that infants were baptized. If such warrant as this were necessary to justify the usage we should have to leave it incompletely justified. But the lack of this express warrant is something far short of forbidding the rite; and if the continuity of the Church through all ages can be made good, the warrant for infant baptism is not to be sought in the New Testament but in the Old Testament, when the Church was instituted, and nothing short of an actual forbidding of it in the New Testament would warrant our omitting it now. As Lightfoot expressed it long ago, ‘It is not forbidden’ in the New Testament to ‘baptize infants, — therefore, they are to be baptized’” (The Works Of B.B. Warfield, vol. IX, p. 399).

I trust you can see the argument that Warfield and Lightfoot put forth. Given that the New Testament does not teach infant baptism, their position and practice must be argued from the Old Testament and their doctrine of the covenants. While I have immense respect for men like Warfield and Lightfoot, I find this argument to be very weak. Why would we look to the Old Covenant Scriptures to learn how to properly apply the sign of the New Covenant? This seems like a very strange move. If baptism was instituted by Christ as the sign marking entrance into the New Covenant community, then shouldn’t we expect the instructions for the proper administration of this ordinance to be found on the lips of Christ and in the New Testament Scriptures? I think most would agree that the New Testament Scriptures would be the most natural place to find instructions concerning the administration of this New Covenant ordnance. And indeed, when we search the New Testament Scriptures for an answer to the question, to whom should baptism be given, the answer is found. “And Jesus came and said to them, ‘All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age” (Matthew 28:18–20). 

Those familiar with this debate will know that the paedobaptists assume that because male infants were circumcised on the eighth day under the Old Abrahamic and Mosaic Covenants then babies should be baptized under the New Covenant. The trouble is, this assumption is false. 

This assumption is false because the New Covenant is not the same as the Abrahamic and Mosaic Covenant. No, the New Covenant is substantially different from the Old (see Jerimiah 31:31ff.).

For one thing, the Old Abrahamic and Mosaic Covenants were made with a particular ethnic people, namely, the Hebrews. It is no wonder, then, that the sign of the Old Covenant was applied to the male reproductive organ of the Hebrews at birth. All who were born from Abraham were members of the Old Abrahamic and Mosaic Covenants, so naturally, all of the males were to be given the sign of the covenant at birth as a visible reminder to all of the Hebrews—and yes, the males and females were both suitably reminded by this sign—that they, as Heberws, were in a special covenantal relationship with God. 

But the New Covenant is not like the Old Covenant in some very important ways. The most important point of discontinuity to note (as it pertains to the topic we are now considering) is that the New Covenant is not made with an ethnic people. Physical birth matters nothing as it pertains to entrance into the New Covenant that Christ mediates. It is only those who turn from their sins to place their faith in Jesus the Messiah who are members of the New Covenant, and this they are enabled to do only by the regenerating work of the Holy Spirit as the Gospel of Jesus Christ is proclaimed. 

It is no wonder, then, that the sign of the New Covenant is different than the sign of the Old Abrahamic and Mosaic Covenants. If the Old and New Covenants were the same in substance, one would expect the sign of these covenants to remain the same. But because there is more discontinuity than continuity, the sign marking one’s entrance into the covenant community has changed from circumcision to Baptism. Not surprisingly, the sign that marks one’s entrance into the New Covenant community does not have anything to do with procreation or physical birth. Baptism symbolizes new birth and cleansing through union with Christ, which is received by faith alone. This is what the Apostle Paul teaches when he says, “For neither circumcision counts for anything, nor uncircumcision, but a new creation” (Galatians 6:15). And the Apostle John gets at the same truth with these words, “But to all who did receive [Jesus], who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God, who were born, not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God” (John 1:12–13). As I have said, Baptism is the sign of the New Covenant. It symbolizes this new birth, cleansing, and union with Christ. Therefore, it is not surprising that the New Testament consistently teaches that the sign of the New Covenant is to be given to those of whom these things are true —  it is to be given to those who make a credible profession of faith in Jesus Christ who show signs of regeneration or conversion. .   

The reason paedobaptists must try to make a case for their practice of baptizing their babies from the Old Testament Scriptures and the Abrahamic and Mosaic Covenants of circumcision is that, as B.B. Warfield admits, there is not a single text that commands or describes this practice in the New Testament. Worse yet, as it pertains to the question, to whom should Baptism be given, everything explicitly taught or described in the New Testament demands that we say, it is those who turn from their sins and profess faith in Jesus who are to be baptized. 

Matthew 28:18–20 has already been cited. Listen to Acts 2:38: “And Peter said to them, ‘Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit’.” Acts 2:41 says, “So those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls.” Finally, Acts 18:8 tells us that “Crispus, the ruler of the synagogue, believed in the Lord, together with his entire household. And many of the Corinthians hearing Paul believed and were baptized.”

When the Paedobaptists attempt to use the text that is open before us today to support their practice of giving baptism to infants it only shows how desperate they are to find New Testament support for their practice. This text is not about baptism. It does not say that Jesus (or his disciples) baptized the babies that were brought to him. It says that he touched them (to bless them). It says that he instructed his disciples to let the children come to him and not to hinder them (see Luke 18:16). And neither does it say that the kingdom of God belongs to the children of believers. No, Christ said, “to such belongs the kingdom of God”, and “whoever does not receive the kingdom of God like a child shall not enter it” (Luke 18:16–17).

These are precious and important sayings of Jesus. We must allow this text to say what it says, and not attempt to force it to say things that it does not. I’ve taken the time to show what this text does not say so that we might better appreciate what it says.

Let The Children Come To Jesus

What then does this passage say?

In verse 15 Luke reports that the people “were bringing even infants to [Jesus] that he might touch them.” This should not surprise us. At this point in Jesus’ earthly ministry, great crowds were following him (see Luke 14:25. Jesus was especially popular with the common people, for he had touched many who were sick and lame to heal them. When Luke tells us that the people “were bringing “even infants to [Jesus] that he might touch them”, it is most natural to think that these parents were bringing their children to Jesus so that he touch them to heal them. If your were to look up the appearances of this word “touch” in Luke’s Gospel, you would find it used in the contect of healing. These parents wanted Jesus to touch their children to heal them or perhaps to bless them. It should be clear to all that touch means touch. It does not mean or imply baptism. 

Luke goes on to report that when “the disciples saw” these people (parents, I presume) bringing their infants and children to Jesus “they rebuked them“ (Luke 18:15, ESV). The Greek word translated as “rebuked” is actually quite strong. The disciples expressed strong disapproval — they rebuked these parents for attempting to bring their children to Jesus.

The same Greek word appears again in Luke 18:39. In that passage, a blind beggar heard that Jesus was passing by, “And he cried out, ‘Jesus, Son of David, have mercy on me!’ And those who were in front rebuked him, telling him to be silent. But he cried out all the more, ‘Son of David, have mercy on me!’ And Jesus stopped and commanded him to be brought to him”, and he healed him” (Luke 18:37–41). 

I’m noticing a theme. The disciples of Jesus must have been concerned to protect Jesus from being overburdened. They were beginning to distinguish between those they thought were more or less important and most or less worthy.  Jesus would have none of this. He healed the blind beggar and he commanded that the children not be hindered from coming.

It is in verse 16 of our text that Christ intervenes. Having become aware of what was happening, “ Jesus called them [the parents and the children] to him, saying, [to the disciples] ‘Let the children come to me, and do not hinder them…” (Luke 18:16). 

There are several lessons to be learned from these words. 

Disciples

All who are disciples of Jesus must learn that Jesus does not need to be shielded from those who wish to come to him. He was able to receive all who came to him in the days of his earthly ministry, How much more is he able now that he has ascended to the Father and sent forth his Holy Spirit? Furthermore, the disciples of Jesus learn from this story not to discriminate between those they perceive to be more or less important or more or less worthy. This is not for is to judge. Finally, by considering this scene, disciples of Jesus must come to see that their Lord and Savior is not cold or aloof, but is tender, merciful, gracious, and kind. 

Parents

Christian parents must also learn from this story, for there is encouragement found here to bring your children to Jesus! Christian parents, you must bring your children to Jesus. Bring them to him in your private prayers. Bring them to him in family devotions. Bring them to him in corporate worship. Bring them especially to hear the preaching of the word of Christ! Teach your children to worship. Teach them to pray. Let them observe the administration of the sacraments so that those visible words may speak to their minds and hearts. And when the time is right — when your children profess faith in Christ and show evidence of true conversion and repentance, then lead them to the waters of Baptism.

Parents, we should not act like baptism is the only or even the primary way to bring our children to Jesus. Before baptism can be applied, we must pray for them, teach the faith to them, and preach the gospel to them. The sign of the Covenant is only to be given once they make a credible profession of faith. And we must remember that our children might be regenerated and believe the Gospel before they are capable of expressing faith and demonstrating repentance. 

Dear parents, you must bring your children to Jesus! But this does not require you to seek to  apply the sacrament of baptism prematurely. Those who apply the sacrament of baptism to infants apply it, not to those in Christ, but to those in Adam. Those who apply the sacrament of baptism to infants apply it, not to those who have been washed clean by the blood of the lamb, but to those who remain in the guilt of Adam’s imputed sin. Those who apply the sacrament of Baptism to infants apply it, not to those who have been united with Christ in his death, burial, and resurrection, but to those who remain dead in their sins with corrupted natures. Of course, the great hope of these parents is that their children will someday turn from their sins and place their faith in Jesus the Messiah so that the symbolism of baptism, namely, union with Christ, cleansing, and new birth (most of which is lost in the practice of pouring or sprinkling, by the way) becomes true of their child after the fact. Whether or not these children grow to profess faith in Christ, it is not uncommon to hear these parents encourage their children to walk with Christ with these words, remember your baptism! The trouble is, they cannot remember their baptism. 

Parents, bring your children to Jesus in prayer and through the proclamation of the gospel, and when it becomes apparent that they have embraced Jesus and that Jesus has embraced them, then baptism is to be applied. And then these may be exhorted to continue on walking with Jesus with these words: remember your baptism. Remember when you said, “Jesus is Lord” in those waters (see Romans 10:9; . Remember when the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit was placed on you (Matthew 28:18-20). Remember when you made that “appeal to God for a good conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ…” (1 Peter 3:21). Remember when God reassured you that you have been cleansed and raised to newness of life. One very good and practical reason for delaying baptism until our children make a credible profession of faith is so our children can actually remember their baptism as they look back upon it with understanding.  

Children

There is also something for children to learn from this passage. Children, listen to me. You must come to Jesus. You must confess that you have sinned against God by disobeying his commandments. You must turn from your sins and trust in Jesus to forgive you of your sins. 

Children, please hear what I say. Baptism does not save you. Jesus saves you. The water of baptism does not wash your sins away. The blood of Jesus washes your sins away. Baptism does not give you eternal life. Jesus gives eternal life to all who believe in him. “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life” (John 3:16). 

All who have turned from their sins to place their faith in Jesus must then be baptized in water in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit to show that Jesus is their Lord, that they have been united to him by faith, washed by him, buried with him, and raised to life eternal with him. And this we will do in due time. 

Little children, you will need to wait to come to the waters of baptism and to the Lord’s Supper (a credible profession of faith is what we are waiting for), but this does not mean that you must wait to come to Jesus. If you can understand my words, if you know that you are a sinner who needs a Savior, and if you know that Jesus is the Savior God has provided, then you must run to him today knowing that he will receive all who who turn from their sins to trust in him. As Christ has said, “All that the Father gives me will come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never cast out” (John 6:37).

For To Such Belongs The Kingdom Of God

We have a little more of our passage to consider. Look again at verse 16. “But Jesus called them to him, saying, ‘Let the children come to me, and do not hinder them…:” And then he added these words of explanation, “for to such belongs the kingdom of God. Truly, I say to you, whoever does not receive the kingdom of God like a child shall not enter it” (Luke 18:16–17).

Pay careful attention to Jesus’ words. “To such belongs the kingdom of God…”, he said. He did not say, To these belongs the kingdom of God. Or to infants and children belongs the kingdom of God. Or to the infants and children of believers belongs the kingdom of God. This is how the paedobaptists read the text, but the text says no such thing. What did Christ say?  “To such belongs the kingdom of God…” The Greek word translated as “such” means “like such”, or “such as these”. The meaning is not that all children or the children of believers are a part of God’s kingdom. Rather, the meaning is that it is those who are child-like (“like such”, or “such as these”) who will enter God’s kingdom. 

That this is the meaning is made very clear in verse 17. There Christ says, “Truly, I say to you, whoever does not receive the kingdom of God like a child shall not enter it” (Luke 18:17). Far from teaching that all children, or the children of believers enter the kingdom at birth (and therefore ought to be baptized), Christ teaches us that it is only those who “receive the kingdom of God like a child” who will enter it.

Quoting now John Gill, “it is as if our Lord should say, do not drive away these children from my person and presence; they are lively emblems (symbols or representations)… of such that shall enter into the kingdom of heaven: by these [children] I may instruct and point out to you, what converted persons should be, who have a place in my church below, and expect to enter into my kingdom and glory above; that they are, or ought to be, like such children, harmless and inoffensive; free from rancor and malice, meek, modest, and humble; without pride, self-conceit, and ambitious views, and desires of grandeur and superiority.” 

Conclusion

This is the lesson being conveyed by Jesus. Far from teaching that infants and children should be baptized because they are somehow partakers of Christ’s covenant and kingdom by virtue of natural birth, he teaches that those who wish to enter the kingdom God must receive the kingdom (Christ’s kingship and rule) in a child-like way. And what are the qualities of children worthy of imitation? Is it their ignorance? Is it their immaturity? No. Given the context of the passages that precede and follow, Gill is right. Christ here draws attention to the fact that these infants and children were harmless and inoffensive; free from [hatred] and malice, meek, modest, and humble; without pride, self-conceit, and ambitious views, and desires of grandeur and superiority.” 

Dear friends, those who are proud and self-righteous will never enter God’s Kingdom, for their self-righteous pride will forever keep them from bowing the knee to King Jesus. “Let the children come to me, and do not hinder them”, Jesus said, “for to such belongs the kingdom of God. Truly, I say to you, whoever does not receive the kingdom of God like a child shall not enter it” (Luke 18:16–17).

Discussion Questions: Luke 18:15-17

  1. Some who believe that the infants of those who have faith in Christ should be baptized attempt to use this passage to justify their practice. How so?
  2. Should Christian parents bring their children to Jesus? If so, how? Does this mean that infants and children must be baptized before they make a credible profession of faith and show evidence of their conversion?
  3. What do we learn about our Savior given that he received little children? 
  4. What does this passage teach us about what is required to enter the kingdom of God?
  5. What about children is worthy of emulation? In other words, what are the childlike qualities that Christ puts forth as requirements for entering the kingdom of God? 

"Him we proclaim,
warning everyone and teaching everyone with all wisdom,
that we may present everyone mature in Christ."
(Colossians 1:28, ESV)

©2025 Emmaus Reformed Baptist Church