MENU
- Times & Locations
- The Leadership
- What We Believe
- Foundation Documents
- The Gospel
- Our Association
- Our Music
- Upcoming Events
- Contact
About
- Bible Reading Plan
- Baptist Catechism
- Catechism For Girls And Boys
- Confession of Faith
- Recommended Resources
Emmaus is a Reformed Baptist church in Hemet, California. We are a community of Christ followers who love God, love one another, and serve the church, community, and nations, for the glory of God and for our joy.
Our hope is that you will make Emmaus your home and that you will begin to grow with us as we study the scriptures and, through the empowering of the Holy Spirit, live in a way that honors our great King.
LORD'S DAY WORSHIP (SUNDAYS)
10:00am Corporate Worship
In the Emmaus Chapel at Cornerstone
26089 Girard St.
Hemet, CA 92544
EMMAUS ESSENTIALS
Sunday School For Adults
9:00am to 9:45am most Sundays (Schedule)
In the Chapel
MAILING ADDRESS
43430 E. Florida Ave. #F329
Hemet, CA 92544
The Realm is our church's online network. We use this tool as our primary means of communication. Be sure to check it often and don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions.
Interested in becoming a member? Please join us for a four-week study in which we will make a case from the scriptures for local church membership and introduce the ministries, government, doctrines, and distinctive's of Emmaus Reformed Baptist Church.
Gospel Community Groups are small group Bible studies. They are designed to provide an opportunity for the members of Emmaus to build deeper relationships with one another. Groups meet throughout the week to discuss the sermons from the previous Sunday, to share life, and to pray.
An audio teaching series through the Baptist Catechism aimed to instruct in foundational Christian doctrine and to encourage obedience within God’s people.
Emmaus Essentials classes are currently offered online Sundays at 9AM. It is through our Emmaus Essentials (Sunday School) that we hope to experience an in depth study of the scriptures and Christian theology. These classes focus on the study of systematic theology, biblical theology, church history, and other topics practical to Christian living.
A podcast produced for International Reformed Baptist Seminary: a forum for discussion of important scriptural and theological subjects by faculty, administrators, and friends of IRBS.
A 24 lesson Bible study in which we consider “what man ought to believe concerning God, and what duty God requireth of man” (Baptist Catechism #6).
Search:
At Emmaus we believe that God has given parents, especially fathers the authority and responsibility to train and instruct children up in the Lord. In addition, we believe that God has ordained the gathering of all generations, young to old, to worship Him together in one place and at one time. Therefore, each and every Sunday our children worship the Lord alongside their parents and other members of God’s family.
Nov 25
9
Q. 110. What do we pray for in the third petition?
A. In the third petition, which is, “Thy will be done in earth as it is in heaven,” we pray that God by His grace, would make us able and willing to know, obey, and submit to His will in all things, as the angels do in heaven. (Matt. 6:10; Ps. 103:20,21; Ps. 25:4,5; Ps. 119:26)
“Finally, then, brothers, we ask and urge you in the Lord Jesus, that as you received from us how you ought to walk and to please God, just as you are doing, that you do so more and more. For you know what instructions we gave you through the Lord Jesus. For this is the will of God, your sanctification: that you abstain from sexual immorality; that each one of you know how to control his own body in holiness and honor, not in the passion of lust like the Gentiles who do not know God; that no one transgress and wrong his brother in this matter, because the Lord is an avenger in all these things, as we told you beforehand and solemnly warned you. For God has not called us for impurity, but in holiness. Therefore whoever disregards this, disregards not man but God, who gives his Holy Spirit to you.” (1 Thessalonians 4:1–8, ESV)
In the third petition, we are to pray that God’s will be done. If we are to pray for God’s will to be done, then we ought to ask ourselves, what is God’s will? Have you ever asked yourself what God’s will is for you? What is God’s will for our church? This is a great question and something we should be asking for ourselves and for our church. We are faced with many decisions in our own lives and in the life of the church, so we ought to be concerned with the will of God.
How are we to think of the will of God when it comes to things like the jobs and careers we are to pursue, who are we to marry, where are we to live, how are we to spend our time and money, how are we to make decisions on appointing officers of the church, decisions and determination of church discipline, church finances, and benevolence services.
Correctly understanding the will of God helps to provide a Christian with a strong foundation and framework to properly pray for and approach all we may face in our lives and the life of the church. In contrast, not understanding the will of God has devastating consequences that can lead to instability, anxiety, and forms of mysticism in the life of an individual.
So what is God’s will? We can think of God’s will in two categories. On one hand, “God’s will” is the things he has planned or decreed. This is the will of God that is hidden from all of us until it happens. That is why it is commonly referred to as his hidden will. So, if we take “God’s will” to mean that which God has planned, then we must admit that we do not know what God’s will is for us tomorrow. How could we know? Only God knows! He knows the future, for he has decreed the future. God’s will concerning the future is largely a mystery to us, with the exception of what he has revealed about the second coming of Christ, the resurrection of the dead, the judgment, and the consummation. You and I do not know what the future holds. We do not know what tomorrow holds for us, but God does, and he is our heavenly father who cares and provides for us.
We must come to terms with and be comfortable that we do not know our future, but God does. God is not going to tell us specifically who to marry, what job or career we are to pursue or take, or how to make specific decisions. What God will do is remain sovereign both in the large and small things. It is through his decrees and providence that he is leading, guiding, and taking care of his people. We must recognize and trust in his perfect sovereignty, decrees, and providence for what tomorrow and every day after holds for you and me.
So if we ask what God’s plan is for you and me tomorrow and every day thereafter, we must confess we do not know. But if we take God’s will to mean that which God has commanded, then we can answer the question, What is God’s will for you and me tomorrow? In general, his will for us is that we trust him, obey him, and live for his glory. While God’s hidden will is unknown until it has happened, God has made known through the scriptures what his commanded will is; this is sometimes called his prescriptive will, or his revealed will. While God does not specifically reveal to us what jobs and careers we are to take, who to marry, what church decisions we are to make but scripture does reveal to us God’s will on how we are to be employees and employers, the type of people we should marry, the type of husband and wife we should be, and guiding principles on how to make church decisions like the appointment of officers and church discipline so that those decisions are pleasing and aligned to his will. God has revealed much in the holy scriptures in regards to his will for how you and I are to order and live our lives.
Please allow me to read a few Scripture texts to illustrate the different uses of the term. After reading a verse, I will ask you, Is this an example of God’s revealed will, or his hidden will?
1 Thessalonians 4:3 says, “For this is the will of God, your sanctification: that you abstain from sexual immorality…” Is this God’s revealed will, or his hidden will? Revealed! For here, God tells us what he wants from us. He commands sanctification. He commands obedience.
1 Thessalonians 5:18 says, “give thanks in all circumstances; for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus for you.” Is this God’s revealed will, or his hidden will? Revealed! For here, God tells us what he wants from us. He wants us to give thanks in all circumstances in Christ Jesus.
1 Peter 3:17 says, “For it is better to suffer for doing good, if that should be God’s will, than for doing evil.” Is this a reference to God’s revealed will, or his hidden will? Here we have a reference to God’s hidden will. Is it the will of God that you or I suffer persecution in the future? I don’t know! Maybe. We will find out.
Listen now to James 4:13-15. “Come now, you who say, ‘Today or tomorrow we will go into such and such a town and spend a year there and trade and make a profit’— yet you do not know what tomorrow will bring. What is your life? For you are a mist that appears for a little time and then vanishes. Instead, you ought to say, ‘If the Lord wills, we will live and do this or that.’” Is this a reference to God’s revealed will or his hidden will? It is a reference to God’s hidden will – his plans for our future, which we do not know.
One more. 1 Peter 2:15 says, “For this is the will of God, that by doing good you should put to silence the ignorance of foolish people.” Revealed or hidden will? Revealed. God is here revealing that his will (command) for us is that we do good. This is how we are to “silence the ignorance of foolish people”, by doing good.
So what is God’s will for your life?
What job and career will you have, or will you get married, where will you live, how long will you live, what joys and sorrows will you experience? You and I do not know the answer to these questions until they happen. This is God’s hidden will for you and me.
But on the other hand, we know exactly what God’s will is for you and I. We know that God’s will for us is to grow in our sanctification. We know that God’s will is for us to avoid sexual immorality, do good to one another, and to give thanks in every circumstance. We are to love God with all our heart and mind and love our neighbors as ourselves. This we know is God’s will for us.
How are we to live and relate to God regarding both his hidden and revealed will? Are we to concern ourselves with God’s hidden or revealed will? We should focus our time and energy on obeying God’s revealed will while, at the same time, humbly submitting ourselves to his hidden will.
This is really what Jesus was teaching when he said, “Therefore I tell you, do not be anxious about your life, what you will eat or what you will drink, nor about your body, what you will put on. Is not life more than food, and the body more than clothing? Look at the birds of the air: they neither sow nor reap nor gather into barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not of more value than they? And which of you, by being anxious can add a single hour to his span of life? And why are you anxious about clothing? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow: they neither toil nor spin, yet I tell you, even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. But if God so clothes the grass of the field, which today is alive and tomorrow is thrown into the oven, will he not much more clothe you, O you of little faith? Therefore do not be anxious, saying, ‘What shall we eat?’ or ‘What shall we drink?’ or ‘What shall we wear?’ For the Gentiles seek after all these things, and your heavenly Father knows that you need them all. But seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be added to you” (Matthew 6:25–33, ESV).
Jesus speaks here on how we are to govern our lives as it pertains to God’s hidden and revealed will. Here, Christ is teaching us to concern ourselves with God’s revealed will. “[S]eek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be added to you…”, He says. And he commands us not to concern ourselves with God’s hidden will. “[W]hich of you by being anxious can add a single hour to his span of life?” he asks. Only God knows what tomorrow will bring. Obsessing with and worrying about the future is not beneficial and only hurts us and others. What then are we to do with our concerns about God’s hidden will? There is nothing for us to do except live in prayerful and trustful submission to the Lord. Knowing that he is our heavenly father who cares and causes all things to work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose.
The third petition of the Lord’s prayer is about all of this. Q. 110. What do we pray for in the third petition? A. In the third petition, which is, “Thy will be done in earth as it is in heaven,” we pray that God by His grace, would make us able and willing to know, obey, and submit to His will in all things, as the angels do in heaven. (Matt. 6:10; Ps. 103:20,21; Ps. 25:4,5; Ps. 119:26)
When we pray “thy will be done,” we are saying, Lord, may you be obeyed and your plans and purposes be accomplished.
Here we are to ask for God’s grace to obey his will and submit to it.
Here we are to ask that God would “Make us able…” to do what he has commanded.
More than this, we are asking that God would “make us… willing.” In other words, we are asking that God would change our hearts—our appetites and affections—so that we want to obey him.
To obey God, we must “know, obey, and submit to his will”, and so we are to pray that God would make us able and willing to do this.
As you can see, the catechism makes a distinction between knowing and obeying. It is one thing to know God’s word; it is another thing to obey it. It is very possible to know God’s commandments but not obey them. But you can’t obey God’s law if you do not know it. As Christians, we should want to know God’s law. We hear it read and preached every Sabbath. So we are to pray that God will graciously enable us both to know God’s law and to obey it. Or to put it in the terminology of James 1:22, we are to pray that the Lord would empower us to “be doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving [ourselves]” (James 1:22, ESV).
Lastly, we are to pray that God “would make us able and willing to… submit to His will in all things.” I think the use of the word “submission” here pertains to God’s hidden, secret, or mysterious will. What are we to do with God’s revealed will? We are to know it and obey it! What are we to do with God’s hidden will? Well, what else can we do except submit ourselves to it?
Jesus’s prayer in the garden before his crucifixion provides a good example of how we are to pray in light of God’s hidden will. Jesus said to his disciples, “‘My soul is very sorrowful, even to death; remain here, and watch with me.’ And going a little farther he fell on his face and prayed, saying, ‘My Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me; nevertheless, not as I will, but as you will.’”
We are to know and obey God’s revealed will, and at the same time, we are to pray to God with our desires and concerns, but we are to humbly and patiently submit ourselves to his hidden will. We must confess that at times it can be difficult to obey what God has commanded, and at times it can be a challenge to humbly submit to what God has decreed. Here in this third petition, we must pray for God’s grace and mercy in both areas.
The catechism answer ends with this little remark, “as the angels do in heaven.” In heaven, there are elect angels. These angels did not rebel in the beginning, nor will they ever rebel. They worship and serve God faithfully day and night. They obey him always, and they submit themselves to his decree. We aim to be like them in this regard. Lord, help us.
Q. 110. What do we pray for in the third petition?
A. In the third petition, which is, “Thy will be done in earth as it is in heaven,” we pray that God by His grace, would make us able and willing to know, obey, and submit to His will in all things, as the angels do in heaven. (Matt. 6:10; Ps. 103:20,21; Ps. 25:4,5; Ps. 119:26)
Nov 25
2
“The people of the land took Jehoahaz the son of Josiah and made him king in his father’s place in Jerusalem. Jehoahaz was twenty-three years old when he began to reign, and he reigned three months in Jerusalem. Then the king of Egypt deposed him in Jerusalem and laid on the land a tribute of a hundred talents of silver and a talent of gold. And the king of Egypt made Eliakim his brother king over Judah and Jerusalem, and changed his name to Jehoiakim. But Neco took Jehoahaz his brother and carried him to Egypt. Jehoiakim was twenty-five years old when he began to reign, and he reigned eleven years in Jerusalem. He did what was evil in the sight of the LORD his God. Against him came up Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon and bound him in chains to take him to Babylon. Nebuchadnezzar also carried part of the vessels of the house of the LORD to Babylon and put them in his palace in Babylon. Now the rest of the acts of Jehoiakim, and the abominations that he did, and what was found against him, behold, they are written in the Book of the Kings of Israel and Judah. And Jehoiachin his son reigned in his place. Jehoiachin was eighteen years old when he became king, and he reigned three months and ten days in Jerusalem. He did what was evil in the sight of the LORD. In the spring of the year King Nebuchadnezzar sent and brought him to Babylon, with the precious vessels of the house of the LORD, and made his brother Zedekiah king over Judah and Jerusalem. Zedekiah was twenty-one years old when he began to reign, and he reigned eleven years in Jerusalem. He did what was evil in the sight of the LORD his God. He did not humble himself before Jeremiah the prophet, who spoke from the mouth of the LORD. He also rebelled against King Nebuchadnezzar, who had made him swear by God. He stiffened his neck and hardened his heart against turning to the LORD, the God of Israel. All the officers of the priests and the people likewise were exceedingly unfaithful, following all the abominations of the nations. And they polluted the house of the LORD that he had made holy in Jerusalem. The LORD, the God of their fathers, sent persistently to them by his messengers, because he had compassion on his people and on his dwelling place. But they kept mocking the messengers of God, despising his words and scoffing at his prophets, until the wrath of the LORD rose against his people, until there was no remedy.” (2 Chronicles 36:1–16, ESV)
“Then the whole company of them arose and brought him before Pilate. And they began to accuse him, saying, ‘We found this man misleading our nation and forbidding us to give tribute to Caesar, and saying that he himself is Christ, a king.’ And Pilate asked him, ‘Are you the King of the Jews?’ And he answered him, ‘You have said so.’ Then Pilate said to the chief priests and the crowds, ‘I find no guilt in this man.’ But they were urgent, saying, ‘He stirs up the people, teaching throughout all Judea, from Galilee even to this place.’ When Pilate heard this, he asked whether the man was a Galilean. And when he learned that he belonged to Herod’s jurisdiction, he sent him over to Herod, who was himself in Jerusalem at that time. When Herod saw Jesus, he was very glad, for he had long desired to see him, because he had heard about him, and he was hoping to see some sign done by him. So he questioned him at some length, but he made no answer. The chief priests and the scribes stood by, vehemently accusing him. And Herod with his soldiers treated him with contempt and mocked him. Then, arraying him in splendid clothing, he sent him back to Pilate. And Herod and Pilate became friends with each other that very day, for before this they had been at enmity with each other. Pilate then called together the chief priests and the rulers and the people, and said to them, ‘You brought me this man as one who was misleading the people. And after examining him before you, behold, I did not find this man guilty of any of your charges against him. Neither did Herod, for he sent him back to us. Look, nothing deserving death has been done by him. I will therefore punish and release him.’ But they all cried out together, ‘Away with this man, and release to us Barabbas’— a man who had been thrown into prison for an insurrection started in the city and for murder. Pilate addressed them once more, desiring to release Jesus, but they kept shouting, ‘Crucify, crucify him!’ A third time he said to them, ‘Why? What evil has he done? I have found in him no guilt deserving death. I will therefore punish and release him.’ But they were urgent, demanding with loud cries that he should be crucified. And their voices prevailed. So Pilate decided that their demand should be granted. He released the man who had been thrown into prison for insurrection and murder, for whom they asked, but he delivered Jesus over to their will.” (Luke 23:1–25, ESV)
Please excuse any typos and misspellings within this manuscript. It has been published online for the benefit of the saints of Emmaus Reformed Baptist Church, but without the benefit of proofreading.
Though we acknowledge that Jesus Christ, the eternal Son of God incarnate, experienced suffering throughout his life—from his first breath to his last—it should be clear to all that he suffered greatly in the hours leading up to his death on the cross.
Here in this portion of Luke’s Gospel, we have considered Judas’ betrayal of Jesus, his arrest, the terrible mistreatment he endured at the hands of sinful men — they falsely accused him, mocked him, spat upon him, and struck him with their hands. We have also considered Peter’s threefold denial of Jesus. Oh, how that must have hurt Jesus to see such a close companion, as Peter was to him, turn his back on him. Jesus was then put on trial before the Sanhedrin and falsely accused by them. Now we find Jesus before the Roman Governor, Pilate, and Herod the Tetrarch of Galilee. Have you ever been falsely accused? It’s painful. Here we see the Son of God falsely accused, on trial, and unjustly condemned.
There is much to contemplate in the passage that is open before us today, but these two truths are predominant: One, Jesus was found innocent and was unjustly condemned. Two, Jesus, the innocent one, was condemned as a sinner in the place of a sinner. These three points will provide us with some structure as we consider the passage of Holy Scripture that is open before us today.
First of all, it is important to observe that Jesus was found innocent by the governing authorities. If you were to ask me, what do you think the main point of this passage is?, I would say it is this: Though the Jewish Sanhedrin wished to put Jesus to death, because Jesus was a threat to them religiously and politically, those with the authority to crucify Jesus so found no fault in him.
As Jesus was interrogated by Pilate, Herod, and then Pilate again, they found no fault in him. This is stated three times. We considered the first occurrence last Sunday. It is found in 23:4. After Pilate questioned Jesus, he spoke to the chief priests and the crowds, saying, “‘I find no guilt in this man.’ But they were urgent, saying, ‘He stirs up the people, teaching throughout all Judea, from Galilee even to this place’” (Luke 23:4–5, ESV).
In the text that is open before us today, we learn that Pilate, the Roman Governor, sent Jesus to Herod, the tetrarch of Galilee. No doubt, Pilate wished to free himself from the dilemma he was in and to wash his hands of this situation. In Luke 23:6 we read, “When Pilate heard this”, that is, that Jesus had been teaching throughout the region of Galilee, “he asked whether the man [Jesus] was a Galilean. And when he learned that he belonged to Herod’s jurisdiction, he sent him over to Herod, who was himself in Jerusalem at that time” (Luke 23:6–7, ESV).
Who was this man, Herod? He is Herod Antipas, one of the sons of Herod the Great, a tetrarch, or Roman governor, who ruled over the province of Galilee. He was an Edomite by birth (a descendant of Esau) and a religious Jew (his ancestors had converted to Judaism, though some would question the religious sincerity of the Herodian Dynasty, and for good reason). This Herod — Herod Antipas — is the same, vile man, who, only a few years earlier, had killed John the Baptist at the request of his illegitimate wife, Herodias — a request made through her daughter, who had pleased Herod when she danced for him (see Matthew 14:6ff). Herod knew about Jesus and the marvelous things that were being done by him. Back in Luke 9:7, we read, “Now Herod the tetrarch heard about all that was happening [with Jesus], and he was perplexed, because it was said by some that John had been raised from the dead, by some that Elijah had appeared, and by others that one of the prophets of old had risen. Herod said, ‘John I beheaded, but who is this about whom I hear such things?’ And he sought to see him” (Luke 9:7–9, ESV).

When we consider all that the Scriptures (and other historical records) have to say about this man named Herod, it is apparent that he was a sensual man—a man driven by his sinful desires and passions. This fact comes through even here in verse 8: “When Herod saw Jesus, he was very glad…” And why was he so glad to see Jesus? Luke tells us that, “he had long desired to see him, because he had heard about him, and he was hoping to see some sign done by him” (Luke 23:8, ESV). There is no indication that Herod was interested in hearing Jesus’ truthful teachings, or that he was open to the possibility of turning from his sins to follow Jesus. No, he wished to see Jesus to be entertained by him. Or perhaps he thought he could benefit somehow (in an earthly and political way) through his contact with this miracle-working man named Jesus.
Friends, many will, for a time, show interest in Jesus, but for all the wrong reasons. They think he will improve their lives here on earth, somehow. And to be clear, Jesus does greatly improve our lives here on earth! But Jesus is so much more than a miracle worker capable of bringing some improvement to our lives in the here and now. The wonders and signs he performed in the days of his earthly ministry were signs that showed him to be the eternal Son of God incarnate, the Messiah, the King of God’s eternal Kingdom. To benefit from Jesus in this life and in the life to come requires that we believe him to be the Messiah, and confess him to be our Lord and our God. To benefit from Jesus requires us to turn from our sins and to trust in him for the forgiveness of sins. We must bow the knee before Jesus and confess him as Lord and King. Herod was not interested in any of this. He was a worldly-minded man, through and through. He was dead in his sins and driven by the passions of his flesh.
Consider how Jesus responded to Herod. Verse 9: “So [Herod] questioned [Jesus] at some length, but [Jesus] made no answer” (Luke 23:9, ESV). It is interesting to consider that Jesus did respond to Pilate, but he answered Herod not a word. Here we see how God will sometimes give men over to their sins, leave them in their hardness of heart, and withhold his word from them. I do not view Pilate as a good man, but I do think he was a better man than Herod. Pilate showed some concern for justice (at least at first), but Herod was a vile man through and through — he took his brother’s wife, he beheaded that righteous man, John the Baptist, and wished to see Jesus, only to see him perform some miracle, and so Jesus made no answer when questioned by him.
In verses 9-10, we see Herod’s wickedness put on full display: “The chief priests and the scribes stood by, vehemently accusing [Jesus]. And Herod with his soldiers treated him with contempt and mocked him. Then, arraying him in splendid clothing, he sent him back to Pilate.” (Luke 23:10–11, ESV). The splendid clothing was meant as a mockery. Jesus claimed to be the King of the Jews. Herod was a kind of King of the Jews (he ruled over a portion of Judea). And so Herod dressed Jesus up like a king to mock him. The irony is thick here. Herod, in his pride, dressed Jesus up like a king to mock him, being blind to the fact that he is the King that God had promised—the King, not only of the Jews, but of every tribe, tongue, and nation. Here in this brief moment, Herod stood over Jesus in judgment, but at the end of time, King Jesus will stand over Herod to judge him for every sin he ever committed, including the murder of John the Baptist and his mistreatment of the Son of God.
In verse 12, we find a little historical note: “And Herod and Pilate became friends with each other that very day, for before this they had been at enmity with each other” (Luke 23:12, ESV). Why were they at odds with each other? The text does not say. And why does Luke share this little piece of information with us? I think it is to help us see how corrupt the rulers of this world tend to be and to increase our appetite for the full and consummate reign of King Jesus in his eternal kingdom of glory.
Last Sunday, I stressed the obligation we have to show honor to the governing authorities that God has appointed. I even read Romans 13:1-7 to you, which begins like this: “Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God” (Romans 13:1, ESV). The authorities are not to be opposed. Christians are not to take up arms against the authorities. Taxes are to be paid to them, and honor and respect are to be shown to them, for they are God’s servants appointed by God for our good. Jesus and his Apostles are our example in this. The job of the civil magistrate is to carry out “God’s wrath on the wrongdoer” (Romans 13:4, ESV) and to reward those who do good (Romans 13:3). This is what God has called them to do, at least. This is the ideal. But we know that rulers don’t always behave as they should. In fact, history is filled with examples of rulers who do not fear God or care for the people they govern. Instead of justice, they do injustice to benefit themselves and those with whom they are aligned. But this does not change what Christ and his Apostles taught concerning how the Christian is to relate to the governing authorities. While we will sometimes be required to disobey them (for we must obey God rather than man when the commands of the two condtratict one another—Acts 5:29), ordinarily, we are to remain subject to the authorities and to show resect to them as we pay taxes to them and pray for them, for in this present evil age, this is how God has determined to preserve a degree of civil order and to uphold justice, as imperfect as this justice may be. How will God, by his common grace, uphold a degree of justice and preserve a degree of peace in this world? He will do it through his civil magistrates, for they are servants of his in the civil realm.
Pilate and Herod behaved like many rulers of this world behave. They acted corruptly. They were concerned, above all, not with doing what was right and just, but with maintaining their power within and control over their realms at whatever cost. And so Jesus was shuffled around so that Pilate might earn favor with Herod. Jesus, though innocent, was brutally treated to appease the bloodthirsty Sanhedrin. Doesn’t this make you long for the full and consummate rule and reign of King Jesus? When you ponder the glories of the New Heavens and earth, do not forget this: in the New Heavens and earth, we will be happily subject to the rule and reign of King Jesus alone. No longer will we be subject to men like Herod or Pilate or Caesar, but only to King Jesus. On the last day, he will judge with perfect justice. On the last day, he will vanquish every enemy of his and of ours. On the last day, he will welcome those whom he has redeemed by his shed blood into his eternal kingdom, and there he will keep us safe and secure forever and ever. Yes, Christ Jesus is ruling and reigning now. All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to him. But he rules and reigns over the kingdoms of this world and his eternal kingdom (manifest in his churches) differently. Christ has his appointed ministers in each of these kingdoms (governors and pastors), and his ministers are imperfect. Don’t you long for the consummation of Christ’s kingdom? Then there will be no more sin or injustice, suffering or death.
Herod was no friend of Jesus, and yet even he could not find anything in him deserving of death. Look with me at verse 13: “Pilate then called together the chief priests and the rulers and the people, and said to them, ‘You brought me this man as one who was misleading the people. And after examining him before you, behold, I did not find this man guilty of any of your charges against him. Neither did Herod, for he sent him back to us. Look, nothing deserving death has been done by him. I will therefore punish and release him’” (Luke 23:16, ESV). This is now the second declaration of Jesus’ innocence. And to build upon what was said a moment ago about Pilate’s injustice, I raise this question: Pilate, if Jesus was not guilty, then why were you willing to punish him, if not to appease the bloodthirsty men who pressured you? Is this not an injustice?
Things did not get better for Pilate, but worse. The expression, if you give them an inch, they will take a mile, proved true in this instance. Verse 18: “But they all cried out together, ‘Away with this man, and release to us Barabbas’— a man who had been thrown into prison for an insurrection started in the city and for murder. Pilate addressed them once more, desiring to release Jesus, but they kept shouting, ‘Crucify, crucify him!’ A third time he said to them, ‘Why? What evil has he done? I have found in him no guilt deserving death. I will therefore punish and release him.’ But they were urgent, demanding with loud cries that he should be crucified. And their voices prevailed. So Pilate decided that their demand should be granted” (Luke 23:18–24, ESV).
Pilate declared three times that Jesus was innocent. He also testified that Herod found no guilt in him. On what basis, then, did Pilate decide that the demand of the Sanhedrin should be granted? It must have been this: it was politically prudent for him to do so. He did not want to be troubled. He did not want his power disturbed. And so he was willing to do a most unjust thing, namely, condemn an innocent man to death.
This brings us to our second main point. Jesus, the innocent one, was condemned as a sinner in the place of a sinner. Look with me at verse 25: “[Pilate] released the man who had been thrown into prison for insurrection and murder, for whom they asked, but he delivered Jesus over to their will.” (Luke 23:25, ESV).
Again, the irony is thick. In essence, Jesus was accused of stirring up an insurrection against the Romans. He was accused of stirring up trouble within the nation, of teaching others to refuse to pay taxes, and of claiming to be a king. He was found innocent. And yet he would go to the cross to die the death of an insurrectionist. Meanwhile, Barabbas, “a man who had been thrown into prison for an insurrection started in the city and for murder” (Luke 23:19, ESV), was set free. So the innocent, holy, and perfectly just man was condemned, and the guilty, vile, lawbreaker was set free.
First, notice the injustice. The job of a civil ruler is to punish the evildoer and to reward those who do good (Romans 13:1-7). Pilate perverted justice doubly when he condemned an innocent man to death and set a guilty man free.
But in this great act of injustice perpetrated by Pilate, we find a picture of our salvation in Christ Jesus. How did Christ accomplish our salvation? How did he set us free from the curse of death? How did he take away the guilt of our sin? Answer: by making atonement for our sins through his shed blood and by dying in our place and as our substitute.
That wicked man, Barrabus, represents you and me and all for whom Christ died. Barabbas deserved to die on that cross, for he was guilty of insurrection and murder. But he was set free and was given a new life. And it was the innocent one, Jesus Christ, who took his place.
This is the doctrine of substitutionary atonement.
The animal sacrifices of the Old Covenant anticipate it, and Paul speaks of it directly in 2 Corinthians 5:21: “For our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God” (2 Corinthians 5:21, ESV). Peter speaks of it in 1 Peter 2:24: “He himself bore our sins in his body on the tree, that we might die to sin and live to righteousness. By his wounds you have been healed” (1 Peter 2:24, ESV).
If any would complain that it is unjust for God to pardon guilty sinners and to have another pay the penalty for their sins in their place, consider these things:
One, it was God himself who stood in the place of sinners to pay the penalty for their sins. To be precise, it was not the Father of the Spirit who suffered and died for sinners, but the person of the Son only. Nevertheless, it was God who died to pay the penalty for the sins of the elect, not the divine nature, mind you, but the person of the Son of God through the human nature he assumed (see Acts 20:28).
Two, when the Son of God incarnate died in the place of sinners, he actually atoned for their sins to cleanse them from all unrighteousness. Barabbas was guilty of great iniquity. He walked away a free man, yet still in the guilt of his sin. I said, he is a picture or illustration of those for whom Christ died, but illustrations quickly break down. Christ died in the place of the elect to make them pure and clean. God spoke through the prophet Isaiah, saying, “Come now, let us reason together… though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red like crimson, they shall become like wool” (Isaiah 1:18, ESV). Christ died for us while we were still sinners; it is true. But by his death, we are cleansed. As the Apostle says, “For while we were still weak, at the right time Christ died for the ungodly. For one will scarcely die for a righteous person—though perhaps for a good person one would dare even to die— but God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. Since, therefore, we have now been justified by his blood, much more shall we be saved by him from the wrath of God” (Romans 5:6–9, ESV).
Three, not only are our sins washed away by the blood of Christ, but we are also clothed by his righteousness. Jesus was innocent, not only concerning the accusation that the Sanhedrin leveled against him, but in all things. Therefore, Jesus Christ is able to give his righteousness to those who come to him by faith.
Four, not only does Christ cleanse us and clothe us in his righteousness, but he also regenerates us by the Holy Spirit. “Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation. The old has passed away; behold, the new has come. All this is from God, who through Christ reconciled us to himself and gave us the ministry of reconciliation…” (2 Corinthians 5:17–18, ESV).
Five, those who are regenerated by the Spirit are also sanctified further in this by the same Spirit who gave them new birth. “They who are united to Christ, effectually called, and regenerated, having a new heart and a new spirit created in them through the virtue of Christ’s death and resurrection, are also farther sanctified, really and personally, through the same virtue, by His Word and Spirit dwelling in them; the dominion of the whole body of sin is destroyed, and the several lusts thereof are more and more weakened and mortified, and they more and more quickened and strengthened in all saving graces, to the practice of all true holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord” (Second London Confession, 13:1).
Barabbsas symbolizes the elect… imperfectly. Christ died in his place, and he walked away free, but the elect experience something far greater. Christ died for them and in their place to atone for their sins. And when they are brought to repentance and faith by the regenerating work of the Spirit through the word preached, they are washed, clothed in Christ’s righteousness, and sanctified further by the same word and Spirit. If you are united to Jesus by faith, this is what you have experienced.
Meditate on the innocence of Christ and all that means for you. Yes, he suffred in your place to atone for your sins, but he also lived obediently in your place to give you his righteousness. If Jesus had sinned, he could not be your Savior. He would have had to die for his own sin. Because we was sinless, he could die for the sins of his people.
When you think of Jesus, think of him as the King of kings and the Lord of lords. He is the King of kings and the Lord of lords now, but his kingdom is not yet consummated. Submit to his kingship now, as you long for the consumation.
If you are united to Christ by faith, know that Jesus took your place on the cross to die as your substitute to free you from bondage to the fear of death and to give you a new life. Live now for the glory of God and the good of others. Do not squander the gift that God has given to you in Christ Jesus.
Nov 25
2
Q. 109. What do we pray for in the second petition?
A. In the second petition, which is “Thy kingdom come,” we pray that Satan’s kingdom may be destroyed, and that the kingdom of grace may be advanced; ourselves and others brought into it, and kept in it, and that the kingdom of glory may be hastened. (Matt. 6:10; Ps. 68:1-18; Rom. 10:1; 2 Thess. 3:1; Matt. 9:37,38; Rev. 22:20)
“And Jesus went throughout all the cities and villages, teaching in their synagogues and proclaiming the gospel of the kingdom and healing every disease and every affliction. When he saw the crowds, he had compassion for them, because they were harassed and helpless, like sheep without a shepherd. Then he said to his disciples, ‘The harvest is plentiful, but the laborers are few; therefore pray earnestly to the Lord of the harvest to send out laborers into his harvest.’” (Matthew 9:35–38, ESV)
Over the years, I’ve tried to teach you to think of the story of the Bible as a story about the establishment of God’s kingdom. Yes, there are other ways to talk about the story of the Bible. We may divide the story into four parts: creation, fall, redemption, and consummation. Or we may divide up the scriptures according to the covenants that God has made with man: the Covenant of Works in the garden, the Old Covenant transacted with Abraham, and later with Israel through Moses, and with David. And then finally, the New Covenant, which is the Covenant of Grace that was promised immediately after the fall of man into sin. These are important and helpful ways to understand the story of scripture, too. And please hear me, they do not disagree with the story of God’s kingdom, but complement it perfectly. The story of scripture is indeed the story of the establishment of God’s kingdom. That story involves creation, fall, redemption, and consummation. It also involves covenants, for this is how God administers his kingdom—through covenants.
What is a kingdom? To have a kingdom, you must have three elements. One, a king. Two, a land. And three, citizens.
And if we were to speak of the story of the Bible using kingdom language, how would we put it? We say something like this:
In the beginning, God offered his eternally blessed kingdom to Adam, but Adam rejected it. Where was that kingdom? It was originally in the garden, but was to spread to the ends of the earth. Who were the citizens of that kingdom? Adam and Eve were, and all of their posterity. And who was the King? God was, and Adam was to function as God’s representative on earth. He was the original prophet, priest, and king, the head or representative of the human race. He was to worship and serve his Maker faithfully on the earth and thus bring this kingdom to its consummate state, that is to say, to glory. But as I said, Adam rejected the kingdom. This he did when he listened to the voice of another. He decided to cast the authority of his Maker aside and to live for his own glory. Adam became the first rebel and traitor, and the kingdom was lost.
But God, by his grace, determined to establish his kingdom another way, and he made a promise even in the presence of Adam and Eve, that he would provide a Savior or Redeemer through the offspring of Eve. A son of hers would one day establish the kingdom that Adam failed to obtain. This announcement is found in Genesis 3:15, and it is repeated throughout the Old Testament scriptures in different ways and with ever-increasing clarity until that Redeemer and Savior did come.
So then, we may talk about the kingdom in these terms: first, it was offered and rejected by Adam, and then it was graciously promised by the Lord.
It must also be said that in the days of Moses, on to the resurrection of Christ from the grave and his ascension to the Father’s right hand, God’s kingdom was prefigured in the nation of Israel. Laws were added to set those people apart as holy. Those people were given land. In due time, kings were appointed who were to serve, like Adam, as God’s representatives. At the very heart of that nation’s existence was the tabernacle, and later the temple. Old Covenant Israel was a holy nation, set apart by God to worship and to serve him. And I am saying that this was an earthly picture of the kingdom of God. The kingdom of God was prefigured there.
But it was not until Christ came into the world to accomplish his work that it was said, “The kingdom of heaven is at hand”. John the Baptist said it. Christ said it, too. And when Christ rose from the grave, ascended, and poured out his Spirit upon those who believe, God’s eternal kingdom was truly present on earth. Who is the king of this kingdom? God rules it through Christ. Who are the citizens of this kingdom? All who believe, who have Christ as Lord, and are sealed with the Holy Spirit. And where is this kingdom now? It is visibly manifest in the church, but it will one day fill the earth when Christ returns to judge and to make all things new. Therefore, when we speak of the kingdom of God on earth today, we must speak of it as inaugurated (or begun), but not yet consummated (or brought to completion).
And all of that serves as a vital introduction to our catechism questions for today, which asks, “What do we pray for in the second petition?”
Answer: “In the second petition, which is ‘Thy kingdom come,’ we pray that Satan’s kingdom may be destroyed and that the kingdom of grace may be advanced; ourselves and others brought into it, and kept in it, and that the kingdom of glory may be hastened.”
The kingdom of God advances in this age as Satan’s kingdom is destroyed. Everyone in the world belongs to one of two kingdoms. All men are born in Adam, into the broken covenant of works, and into Satan’s kingdom. Remember, Adam rebelled against God and submitted himself to Satan instead. God’s kingdom and Satan’s kingdom are opposed to one another now. The one is light, the other is darkness. And when God’s kingdom advances, Satan’s must be destroyed. That is what we pray for when we pray that God’s kingdom come.
More than this, we pray that the “kingdom of grace may be advanced; ourselves and others brought into it, and kept in it…” How does this happen except through the preaching of the gospel of Jesus Christ, which is the gospel of the kingdom of God? As men and women believe this gospel, they do turn from their sins, and they bow the knee to Jesus, confessing him to be Lord. When we pray, Thy kingdom come, we are praying for the success of the gospel, that men and women would hear it and believe it by the power of the Holy Spirit, and that they would be kept by God. In other words, we are praying for the building up and preservation of the church.
Lastly, we are praying that “the kingdom of glory may be hastened.” The distinction that is made between the kingdom of God inaugurated and consummated is important here. The kingdom was inaugurated at Christ’s first coming. When we pray that God’s kingdom come, we are praying that God’s kingdom would advance on earth today, as I have already said. But we are also praying that God’s kingdom come in fullness. When our catechism speaks of “the kingdom of glory,” it is a reference to the kingdom of Christ in its consummate and eternal state. Taken in this sense, the prayer, “thy kingdom come”, is like praying, Lord Jesus, come quickly.
So what sorts of things should we pray for under the petition, Thy kingdom come? We should pray for the salvation of those we know and their baptism into the church. We should pray for the growth of the church, the health of the church, the work of elders and deacons, the success of missionaries and church planters, the flourishing of those institutions that train pastors, the prosperity of our association, and the churches within. We should also pray for one another in the body of Christ, that the Lord would keep us from falling, that we would use the gifts that God has given to us for the building up of the body of Christ, that our love for one another would grow, and our unity would be preserved, along with many other things. What should we pray for under the second petition? Really, anything having to do with sinners being transferred from the kingdom of darkness and into the kingdom of God’s beloved Son.
Oct 25
26
“OF DAVID. The LORD is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear? The LORD is the stronghold of my life; of whom shall I be afraid? When evildoers assail me to eat up my flesh, my adversaries and foes, it is they who stumble and fall. Though an army encamp against me, my heart shall not fear; though war arise against me, yet I will be confident. One thing have I asked of the LORD, that will I seek after: that I may dwell in the house of the LORD all the days of my life, to gaze upon the beauty of the LORD and to inquire in his temple. For he will hide me in his shelter in the day of trouble; he will conceal me under the cover of his tent; he will lift me high upon a rock. And now my head shall be lifted up above my enemies all around me, and I will offer in his tent sacrifices with shouts of joy; I will sing and make melody to the LORD. Hear, O LORD, when I cry aloud; be gracious to me and answer me! You have said, ‘Seek my face.’ My heart says to you, ‘Your face, LORD, do I seek.’ Hide not your face from me. Turn not your servant away in anger, O you who have been my help. Cast me not off; forsake me not, O God of my salvation! For my father and my mother have forsaken me, but the LORD will take me in. Teach me your way, O LORD, and lead me on a level path because of my enemies. Give me not up to the will of my adversaries; for false witnesses have risen against me, and they breathe out violence. I believe that I shall look upon the goodness of the LORD in the land of the living! Wait for the LORD; be strong, and let your heart take courage; wait for the LORD!” (Psalm 27, ESV)
“Then the whole company of them arose and brought him before Pilate. And they began to accuse him, saying, ‘We found this man misleading our nation and forbidding us to give tribute to Caesar, and saying that he himself is Christ, a king.’ And Pilate asked him, ‘Are you the King of the Jews?’ And he answered him, ‘You have said so.’ Then Pilate said to the chief priests and the crowds, ‘I find no guilt in this man.’ But they were urgent, saying, ‘He stirs up the people, teaching throughout all Judea, from Galilee even to this place.’ When Pilate heard this, he asked whether the man was a Galilean. And when he learned that he belonged to Herod’s jurisdiction, he sent him over to Herod, who was himself in Jerusalem at that time. When Herod saw Jesus, he was very glad, for he had long desired to see him, because he had heard about him, and he was hoping to see some sign done by him. So he questioned him at some length, but he made no answer. The chief priests and the scribes stood by, vehemently accusing him. And Herod with his soldiers treated him with contempt and mocked him. Then, arraying him in splendid clothing, he sent him back to Pilate. And Herod and Pilate became friends with each other that very day, for before this they had been at enmity with each other. Pilate then called together the chief priests and the rulers and the people, and said to them, ‘You brought me this man as one who was misleading the people. And after examining him before you, behold, I did not find this man guilty of any of your charges against him. Neither did Herod, for he sent him back to us. Look, nothing deserving death has been done by him. I will therefore punish and release him.’ But they all cried out together, ‘Away with this man, and release to us Barabbas’— a man who had been thrown into prison for an insurrection started in the city and for murder. Pilate addressed them once more, desiring to release Jesus, but they kept shouting, ‘Crucify, crucify him!’ A third time he said to them, ‘Why? What evil has he done? I have found in him no guilt deserving death. I will therefore punish and release him.’ But they were urgent, demanding with loud cries that he should be crucified. And their voices prevailed. So Pilate decided that their demand should be granted. He released the man who had been thrown into prison for insurrection and murder, for whom they asked, but he delivered Jesus over to their will.” (Luke 23:1–25, ESV)
Please excuse any typos and misspellings within this manuscript. It has been published online for the benefit of the saints of Emmaus Reformed Baptist Church, but without the benefit of proofreading.
Who is Jesus? We confess that Jesus is the Christ, that is to say, the Messiah promised from ancient times. And as it pertains to his person and nature, we confess that he is,
“the only Son of God,
begotten from the Father before all ages,
God from God,
Light from Light,
true God from true God,
begotten, not made;
of the same essence as the Father.
Through him all things were made.” (Nicene Creed)
Here in the passage that is open before us today, we see Jesus Christ, the eternally begotten Son of God incarnate, on trial. It is astonishing to consider. The holy and sinless one was treated like a sinner by sinners. The one through whom all things were created was mocked and abused by his creatures. The one who will sit in judgment over all on the last day was falsely accused, judged, and condemned to death by unjust men. Words cannot express the horrible injustice that was perpetrated by the Jewish Sanhedrin, the Roman Governor, Pilate, and Herod the Tetrarch of Galilee, when they condemned Jesus Christ, the innocent, to death.
The scene is truly horrific. But we know, to quote Isaiah the prophet, that “it was the will of the LORD to crush” Jesus. It was the LORD who “put him to grief.” This he did so that his soul would make “an offering for guilt.” God decreed in eternity that, through suffering and death, the Messiah would bear “the sins of many” and that he would “see his offspring” and “prolong his days” through his victorious resurrection from the dead on the third day. Indeed, in fulfillment to this ancient prophecy, the will of the LORD has prospered in his hand. The Messiah, the suffering servant of the LORD, has made many to be accounted righteous, for he has “poured out his soul to death and was numbered with the transgressors; yet he bore the sin of many, and makes intercession for the transgressors.” (see Isaiah 53:10–12)
Yes, we acknowledge that it was the will of the LORD that Jesus would be falsely accused, mocked, beaten, unjustly condemned, and crucified. He endured this suffering for us and for our salvation. But in no way does this fact take away from the heinousness of the sins of those who condemned and crucified him. The choices they made were their choices. God, in order to accomplish his eternal purposes in Christ, gave these sinners over to their sinful desires and the freedom of their wills. This is how the Apostle Peter interpreted these events, In Acts 2:22, we hear him preach to his fellow Jews, saying, “Men of Israel, hear these words: Jesus of Nazareth, a man attested to you by God with mighty works and wonders and signs that God did through him in your midst, as you yourselves know— this Jesus, delivered up according to the definite plan and foreknowledge of God, you crucified and killed by the hands of lawless men. God raised him up, loosing the pangs of death, because it was not possible for him to be held by it” (Acts 2:22–24, ESV). He then proceeds to call these guilty sinners to repentance and faith in Jesus.
Today, we will consider the Son of God on trial. As we do, we must remember, on the one hand, that Jesus was “delivered up according to the definite plan and foreknowledge of God”. On the other hand, we cannot ignore the wickedness and lawless actions of those who condemned and killed him.
In Luke 23:1, we learn that the Sanhedrin — that judicial council of Israel, made up of 71 leading men, the high priests, elders, and scribes — after deciding that Jesus deserved death, “arose and brought him before Pilate” (Luke 23:1, ESV). Luke tells us that the whole company of them arose and brought Jesus to Pilate. I do not think we should interpret Luke’s words two strictly, for it seems there were at least two members of the Sanhedrin who did not give their consent to the crucifixion of Christ — Joseph of Arimethia (Matthew 27:57; Mark 15:43; Luke 23:50; John 19:38), and Nicodemous (John 3:1; John 19:38). Nevertheless, the Sanhedrin brought Jesus to Pilate as a large group.
This is the Pontius Pilate who is mentioned in the Apostles Creed, in the words, “He suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died, and was buried…” Pilate was a Roman Governor who had jurisdiction over Judea. The Sanhedrin brought Jesus to him because they, the Jews, being under Roman occupation and control, did not have the authority to put Jesus to death as they wished.
Notice the accusations that the members of the Sanhedrin brought against Jesus. They were carefully crafted to give Pilate the impression that Jesus was a threat to him and to the peace of the region he governed. The accusations are found in verse 2. There are three of them. “And they began to accuse [Jesus], saying, ‘We found this man misleading our nation and forbidding us to give tribute to Caesar, and saying that he himself is Christ, a king’” (Luke 23:2, ESV). In brief, the Sanhedrin attempted to convince Pilate that Jesus was a social dissident, a revolutionary, a rebel, and, therefore, a threat to Rome.
When the Sanhedrin accused Jesus of “misleading their nation”, they meant that he was stirring up trouble amongst the Jewish population. The Greek word translated as “misleading” can mean, to “cause someone to depart from correct behavior and thus engage in serious wrongdoing—‘to lead astray, to pervert, to mislead” (Johannes P. Louw and Eugene Albert Nida, Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament: Based on Semantic Domains (New York: United Bible Societies, 1996), 769). This Jesus is a troublemaker— that was the accusation.
When the Sanhedrin accused Jesus of “forbidding to give tribute to Caesar”, this was a very serious charge. As you may know, a refusal to pay taxes is viewed by earthly rulers as an act of rebellion against the nation. It is not an armed rebellion. But rebellion of this kind does often lead to armed rebellion.
The third charge brought by the Sanhedrin against Jesus was the most serious of all. They accused Jesus of claiming to be “Christ, a king.” Of the three, this charge would have caught Pilates’ attention the most. As a Roman Governor, he could not allow anyone in his jurisdiction to walk around challenging his authority, or the authority that belonged to Caesar. Caesar alone was the king of the nation. All rival kings would have to be put down.
If these accusations were true, then Pilate would have had legitimate reasons for concern. In fact, if these charges were true, Pilate would have been justified in punishing Jesus. Biblically speaking, civil magistrates, such as Pilate, have been given authority from God to protect their people from harm and to promote peace by punishing evildoers (Luke 23:22; Romans 13:4). Their primary responsibility is to protect the nation they serve, to preserve civil order, and to punish wrongdoers by administering retributive justice. The responsibility that societioes have to administer retributive justice through those appointed to do so, is implied in the Noahic Covenant in the words, “From his fellow man I will require a reckoning for the life of man. ‘Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed, for God made man in his own image’” (Genesis 9:5–6, ESV), and the responsibility that rulers have from God to punish evildoers and to reward those who do good within society is explicitly stated by Paul in Romans 13:1-7:
“Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God. Therefore whoever resists the authorities resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment. For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Would you have no fear of the one who is in authority? Then do what is good, and you will receive his approval, for he is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God’s wrath on the wrongdoer. Therefore one must be in subjection, not only to avoid God’s wrath but also for the sake of conscience. For because of this you also pay taxes, for the authorities are ministers of God, attending to this very thing. Pay to all what is owed to them: taxes to whom taxes are owed, revenue to whom revenue is owed, respect to whom respect is owed, honor to whom honor is owed.”
If it was true that Jesus was stirring up trouble within the Roman Empire; if it was true that he refused to pay taxes to Caesar and was encouraging others to do the same; or if it was true that Jesus claimed to be a king who opposed and would rival Caesar, then Pilate would have been right to oppose Jesus and to punish him as a seditious person. But none of these charges were true.
Let’s briefly consider the first charge. Was Jesus misleading the Jewish nation? Was he stirring up trouble in a way that would be of concern to Pilate, the Roman Governor? No. Granted, Jesus was misleading the nation from the vantage point of most who served on the Sanhedrin. Jesus was a big threat to them! If he were the Christ, as he claimed, and if he came to inaugurate a New Covenant and an eternal kingdom, as he claimed, then these men would have been without a job. Their positions of power and prestige would have come to nothing. Jesus was a problem for them! But Jesus was not stirring up trouble politically or civilly for Rome. It is interesting, isn’t it, how little Jesus had to say about Rome? The Roman political system was rife with corruption. The culture was extremely sinful and vile. And yet Jesus hardly said a word about it, for he came to establish something far greater than Rome. The kingdom he came to establish was not in direct opposition to or in competition with Rome, for Christ’s kingdom is a kingdom of a different kind.
What about the second charge? Did Jesus refuse to pay taxes to Rome and teach others to do the same? No. And the chief priests and scribes knew this wasn’t true. Let me remind you of what we read back in Luke 20:19-20:
“The scribes and the chief priests sought to lay hands on [Jesus] at that very hour, for they perceived that he had told this parable against them, but they feared the people. So they watched him and sent spies, who pretended to be sincere, that they might catch him in something he said, so as to deliver him up to the authority and jurisdiction of the governor. So they asked him, ‘Teacher, we know that you speak and teach rightly, and show no partiality, but truly teach the way of God. Is it lawful for us to give tribute to Caesar, or not?’ But he perceived their craftiness, and said to them, ‘Show me a denarius. Whose likeness and inscription does it have?’ They said, ‘Caesar’s.’ He said to them, ‘Then render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s.’ And they were not able in the presence of the people to catch him in what he said, but marveling at his answer they became silent” (Luke 20:19–26, ESV).
No doubt, these spies reported back to the scribes and the chief priests who sent them with this from answer from Jesus, but that didn’t stop them from bringing this false accusation against Jesus. We found this man forbidding people to give tribute to Caesar, they claimed. This was a boldfaced lie—a false accusation. Jesus paid taxes (Matthew 17:24-27) and he taught others to do the same (Luke 20:19-26; Romans 13:1-7).
Now, what about the final accusation? Did Jesus claim to be the Christ and a king? Yes, he did. But we must pay careful attention to the kind of King that Christ claimed to be and to the nature of his kingdom.
The question that Pilate finally asked Jesus intrigues me. Notice, he dismissed the accusations regarding Jesus misleading the nation and teaching others not to pay taxes. He honed in on the accusation that Jesus claimed to be Christ and a king. “Are you the King of the Jews?”, Pilate asked. I wonder how much Pilate knew about the religion of the Jews and the Old Testament Scriptures, which spoke of a coming Christ and King. My guess is that Pilate was an educated man. He must have known something of the history, culture, religion, and expectations of the people he ruled over, especially by this point in his career (he ruled from AD 26-36). When Pilate heard that Jesus claimed to be the Christ and a king, he asked, “Are you the King of the Jews?” It’s the definite article that intrigues me. “Are you the King of the Jews?” In other words, are you the Christ (the Messiah) who was promised to the Jews long ago, who is also the King, the son promised to King David? Is this your claim? I do wonder how much Pilate knew.
Luke provides us with a very brief account of the exchange between Jesus and Pilate. “And Pilate asked him, ‘Are you the King of the Jews?’ And [Jesus] answered him, ‘You have said so’” (Luke 23:3, ESV). In other words, yes, I am, and you have said it with your own lips (see Matthew 26:25, 64; Luke 22:70). And then in verse 4, Luke informs us that Pilate declared Jesus to be innocent: “Then Pilate said to the chief priests and the crowds, ‘I find no guilt in this man’” (Luke 23:4, ESV).
The Apostle John provides us with more detail about the exchange between Jesus and Pilate. And the details found in John’s Gospel help us to understand why Pilate was not threatened by Jesus’ claim to be the Christ, the King of the Jews. In John 18:28, we read:
“Then they led Jesus from the house of Caiaphas to the governor’s headquarters [I suppose they went back to Caiaphas’ courtyard after condemning Jesus in their chamber, The Chamber Of Hewn Stones]. It was early morning. They themselves did not enter the governor’s headquarters, so that they would not be defiled, but could eat the Passover [the Feast of Unleavened Bread, see Leviticus 23:4-8; Ezra 6:22; Mark 14:1; Luke 22:1]. So Pilate went outside to them and said, ‘What accusation do you bring against this man?’ They answered him, ‘If this man were not doing evil, we would not have delivered him over to you.’ Pilate said to them, ‘Take him yourselves and judge him by your own law.’ The Jews said to him, ‘It is not lawful for us to put anyone to death.’ This was to fulfill the word that Jesus had spoken to show by what kind of death he was going to die. So Pilate entered his headquarters again and called Jesus and said to him, ‘Are you the King of the Jews?” Jesus answered, “Do you say this of your own accord, or did others say it to you about me?” Pilate answered, “Am I a Jew? Your own nation and the chief priests have delivered you over to me. What have you done?” Jesus answered, “My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world, my servants would have been fighting, that I might not be delivered over to the Jews. But my kingdom is not from the world.’ Then Pilate said to him, ‘So you are a king?’ Jesus answered, ‘You say that I am a king. For this purpose I was born and for this purpose I have come into the world—to bear witness to the truth. Everyone who is of the truth listens to my voice.’ Pilate said to him, ‘What is truth?’ After he had said this, he went back outside to the Jews and told them, ‘I find no guilt in him’” (John 18:28–38, ESV).
It is important to note that Pilate said, “I find no guilt in this man”, not once, not twice, but three times. We will eventually come to the other two occurrences in verses 14 and 22. Pilate found no guilt in Jesus. Yes, to his great guilt and shame, he would eventually hand Jesus over to be crucified, being pressured by the Jews to do so. But at first, he declared Jesus innocent, and this is important Pilate was at least somewhat concerned about justice. For a time, he fought for it! But these unbelieving Jews, these offspring of Abraham, these children of the Old Covenant, were not concerned with justice. They were power-hungry and bloodthirsty. Verse 5: “But they were urgent [fierce, and persistent], saying, ‘He stirs up the people, teaching throughout all Judea, from Galilee [in the north] even to this place [in Jerusalem]’” (Luke 23:5, ESV).
We will pick up the story of the trial, condemnation, and crucifixion of our precious Savior next Sunday. I’d like to conclude this sermon with a few contemplations and suggestions for application. I’ll begin with the most important applications and conclude with some finer points.
First of all, I wish to repeat something I said last Sunday. Do not forget who Christ is and from where he came. Never cease to marvel over the mystery of the incarnation. Never cease to be amazed at the suffering endured by the eternal Son of God through the human nature he assumed. The divine nature cannot suffer, for God is unchangeable. But the person of the eternal Son of God did suffer through the human nature he assumed. He came down from heaven to suffer (Philippians 2), and in this way, to redeem us from our sin and misery (Luke 24:25, 46; Acts 3:18, 17:3, 26:23) . Yes, the physical pain that Christ endured on the cross was great. But do not forget the suffering he endured from the time of his birth, and leading up to the cross. To not forget about the suffering he endured when he was betrayed, denied, falsely accused, mocked, and unjustly condemned by perverse and sinful men. As you contemplate the sufferings of Christ, think of how great the love of God is for sinners like you and me. Think of how merciful, gracious, and kind God is that he would even think of us (Psalm 8:4), much less, provide for our salvation in this way. As you contemplate the mystery of the incarnation and God’s superabundant love, be moved to worship and adore God and the Christ he has sent.
Two, as you consider the Son of God on trial, the false accusations that were leveled against him, and the mistreatment he endured, take comfort in the fact that you have a Savior and High Priest who is able to sympathize with you whenever you endure similar things. This is what the writer of Hebrews reminds us of in these famous words: “For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who in every respect has been tempted as we are, yet without sin. Let us then with confidence draw near to the throne of grace, that we may receive mercy and find grace to help in time of need” (Hebrews 4:15–16, ESV). If our Lord and Savior was betrayed, denied, falsely accused, mocked, and unjustly treated, then why are we surprised when we experience similar mistreatment as we sojourn in this sin-sick world? Christ has warned his disciples that if the world hated and . Paul speaks of “sharing in the sufferings of Christ” (Philippians 3:10). In fact, he commands his young protege, Timothy, to be prepared to do so. “Share in suffering as a good soldier of Christ Jesus” (2 Timothy 2:3, ESV), he says. And little later in the same letter he says, “As for you, always be sober-minded, endure suffering, do the work of an evangelist, fulfill your ministry” (2 Timothy 4:5, ESV). Dear Christian, as disciples of Jesus Christ, we must be prepared to suffer as Christ suffered. Dear fellow minister, we must be prepared to endure mistreatment in our Christian ministry. And the way in which we suffer and endure mistreatment matters greatly. When a worldly-minded, sensual, fleshly person is mistreated, they will often lash out in anger and rage. But when a Christian is unjustly treated, they are to respond like Jesus.
Peter reminds us of this in his epistle, saying, “For this is a gracious thing, when, mindful of God, one endures sorrows while suffering unjustly. For what credit is it if, when you sin and are beaten for it, you endure? But if when you do good and suffer for it you endure, this is a gracious thing in the sight of God. For to this you have been called, because Christ also suffered for you, leaving you an example, so that you might follow in his steps. He committed no sin, neither was deceit found in his mouth. When he was reviled, he did not revile in return; when he suffered, he did not threaten, but continued entrusting himself to him who judges justly. He himself bore our sins in his body on the tree, that we might die to sin and live to righteousness. By his wounds you have been healed” (1 Peter 2:19–24, ESV). Dear brothers and sisters, do not only prepare yourselves to apply this principle in the future, should times of persecution come upon the church. Apply it now. When your wife speaks rudely to you, behave like Jesus. When your child talks back, behave like Jesus. When your boss is harsh and unjustly critical, behave like Jesus. Enduring mistreatment in a Christlike way does not mean that we always remain silent, or that we must never defend ourselves, or remove ourselves from a situation. We are to act with wisdom, dear brothers and sisters. Sometimes wisdom dictates that we speak up (Proverbs 26:5), and sometimes it is wise to remain silent(Proverbs 26:4 ). Whatever the proper course of action is, we must act with Christlike character. Hear the Apostle again. When Christ suffered unjust treatment, “He committed no sin, neither was deceit found in his mouth. When he was reviled, he did not revile in return; when he suffered, he did not threaten, but continued entrusting himself to him who judges justly”, that is to say, to God.
Three, as you reflect upon the trial, condemnation, and crucifixion of Jesus, take special notice of his innocence of Jesus. Three times Pilate said, I find no guilt in this man (Luke 23:4, 14, 22). Jesus was innocent. He stood innocent before the Romans. He stood innocent before the law of Moses. And he stood innocent before God. And yet he died the death of a vile sinner. He, an innocent, pure, and perfectly holy man, died in the place of sinners to redeem us from our sin and misery. The Apostle reflects on this in Hebrews 7:26-27, saying, “For it was indeed fitting that we should have such a high priest, holy, innocent, unstained, separated from sinners, and exalted above the heavens. He has no need, like those high priests, to offer sacrifices daily, first for his own sins and then for those of the people, since he did this once for all when he offered up himself.” (Hebrews 7:26–27, ESV). When Jesus died, he actually made atonement for sin, and the atonement he made was substitutionary. He died in the place of sinners, the innocent one for the guilty. We will talk more about substitutionary atonement in the weeks to come. For now, pay special attention to Jesus’ innocence. The very gospel of Jesus Christ and your salvation in him depend on it. If Jesus was not innocent, he could not save us from the guilt of sin.
Four, let us learn from the sins of the Sanhedrin and tremble at the thought of living for our own glory, pride, and pleasure, being willing to pervert justice and to bear false witness against our neighbor, to advance our own cause in the world, as these men did. What these men did was demonic. If you think these words are too strong, you’ll have to take it up with Jesus, for Christ spoke of them in this way, saying, “You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies” (John 8:44, ESV). The Sanhedrin— pay careful attention to this—murdered Jesus, not with their hands, but with their lips. I doubt the members of the Sanhedrin ever touched Jesus. Others touched Jesus to detain him. Others beat him. Others would drive the nails through his hands and feet. But the sin of the Sanhedrin was greater (John 19:11). Though their hands were clean, their tongues were vile, being used to utter false accusations and slanderous lies that led to the murder of the Christ. The members of the Sanhedrin violated the sixth commandment, “You shall not murder” (Exodus 20:13), by violating the ninth commandment, “You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor” (Exodus 20:16, ESV). Brothers and sisters, do not excuse the sins you commit with the mouth—such as harshness of speach (Proverbs 12:18, 15:4), lying, slander, and gossip—as insignificant. They are not insignificant sins! They are dishonoring to God and they do great damage to others! Just look at heinous things done to Jesus, all stirred up by the slanderous lies of the Sanhedrin. Brothers and sisters, honor God and love your neighbor with the words of your mouth. “Put to death therefore what is earthly in you: sexual immorality, impurity, passion, evil desire, and covetousness, which is idolatry. On account of these the wrath of God is coming. In these you too once walked, when you were living in them. But now you must put them all away: anger, wrath, malice, slander, and obscene talk from your mouth. Do not lie to one another, seeing that you have put off the old self with its practices and have put on the new self, which is being renewed in knowledge after the image of its creator” (Colossians 3:5–10, ESV).
My fifth and final point of application has to do with the Lordship of Christ. The Sanhedrin knew that they Jesus claimed to be Christ and king, and they wanted to kill him for it. Pilate understood that Christ claimed to be the king of the Jews—the king of a kingdom not of this world—and he dismissed his claims. What will you do with King Jesus? Salvation will come only to those who bow the knee to him to honor him as Lord and King. As Paul says, “[I]f you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. For with the heart one believes and is justified, and with the mouth one confesses and is saved. For the Scripture says, “Everyone who believes in him will not be put to shame.” For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek; for the same Lord is Lord of all, bestowing his riches on all who call on him.” (Romans 10:9–12, ESV)
Oct 25
26
Q. 108. What do we pray for in the first petition?
A. In the first petition, which is “Hallowed be thy name,” we pray that God would enable us and others to glorify Him in all that whereby He makes Himself known, and that He would dispose all things to His own glory. (Matt. 6:9; Ps. 67:1-3; Rom. 11:36; Rev. 4:11)
“TO THE CHOIRMASTER: WITH STRINGED INSTRUMENTS. A PSALM. A SONG. May God be gracious to us and bless us and make his face to shine upon us, Selah that your way may be known on earth, your saving power among all nations. Let the peoples praise you, O God; let all the peoples praise you! Let the nations be glad and sing for joy, for you judge the peoples with equity and guide the nations upon earth. Selah Let the peoples praise you, O God; let all the peoples praise you! The earth has yielded its increase; God, our God, shall bless us. God shall bless us; let all the ends of the earth fear him!” (Psalm 67, ESV)
Last Sunday, we considered the preface or the introduction to the Lord’s Prayer, which is “our Father in heaven.” The words, “our Father in heaven” are introductory. With these words, we address God in prayer. But the first petition, or request, is this: “Hallowed be thy name…” So then, we are to address God Almighty as Father, for he has set his love upon us in Christ Jesus and has graciously adopted us as his own. And the very first thing we should pray for is that God’s name be “hallowed”.
Brothers and sisters, the petitions of the Lord’s Prayer are carefully ordered. And the first petition is first for a reason.
The way we begin our prayers reveals something about the condition of our hearts. Now, don’t get me wrong. There are times when we may get straight to business with God in prayer, just as there are times when we get straight to business in our conversations with others. It is not wrong to cry out to God in a moment of fear, frustration, or desperation and to immediately bring your concerns or needs to him. But typically, when bowing before the Lord in prayer, we ought to begin, not with requests concerning our own needs, but with a request that God’s name be hallowed. This should be our first request, not only because Christ said that it should be, but because it ought to be the highest concern of our hearts.
When we pray that God’s name be hallowed, we are praying that God would be honored, revered, exalted, and glorified. This is what our catechism teaches, saying, “In the first petition, which is ‘Hallowed be thy name,’ we pray that God would enable us and others to glorify Him in all that whereby He makes Himself known, and that He would dispose all things to His own glory.” That God be glorified should be the leading concern of our hearts, and it should be the first thing we pray for.
Notice that our catechism helps us to think about the various ways that God may be glorified.
In the first petition, which is “Hallowed be thy name,” we pray that God would enable us… to glorify Him…” So then, when we pray to God our leading prayer should go something like this: Father in heaven, use me to bring glory to your name today. Be exalted in my thoughts. Be exulted through my words. Be exulted through my deeds. When pray that God’s name be hallowed, we are praying that God would enable (empower) us to contemplate his glory, to worship and adore him in our minds and hearts, and live for his glory in word and in deed. And because we are to pray, not only for ourselves but also for others, we should pray that “God would enable [empower]… others to glorify Him” too. Lord, be exulted through my spouse and my children. Be exulted through my brothers and sisters in Christ as they live for you in this world. Be exalted through your church as she gathers to worship and serve you, Lord’s Day by Lord’s Day.
The phrase “in all that whereby He makes Himself known”, reminds us that God is to be glorified in all things. As Paul says, “So, whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God” (1 Corinthians 10:31, ESV). I’m afraid that Christians sometimes assume that God is to be glorified in the chapel and through praise while forgetting that God is to be glorified in every place and in all things. He is to be honored in our eating and drinking, in our thinking and speaking, in our working, and in our recreation. The Christian should do all things to the glory of God, and that is what we are to pray for in this first petition. Lord, empower us to do all things to the glory of your name.
The phrase, “and that He would dispose all things to His own glory,” reminds us to pray that God be glorified in all circumstances. God must be praised when he poors out blessings upon us in Christ Jesus, but he is also to be praised in times of difficulty, knowing that he works all things together for good in the lives of his people (Romans 8:28). “[P]ray without ceasing, give thanks in all circumstances; for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus for you” (1 Thessalonians 5:17–18, ESV).
Q. 108. What do we pray for in the first petition?
A. In the first petition, which is “Hallowed be thy name,” we pray that God would enable us and others to glorify Him in all that whereby He makes Himself known, and that He would dispose all things to His own glory. (Matt. 6:9; Ps. 67:1-3; Rom. 11:36; Rev. 4:11)
Oct 25
19
“Why do the nations rage and the peoples plot in vain? The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD and against his Anointed, saying, ‘Let us burst their bonds apart and cast away their cords from us.’ He who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord holds them in derision. Then he will speak to them in his wrath, and terrify them in his fury, saying, ‘As for me, I have set my King on Zion, my holy hill.’ I will tell of the decree: The LORD said to me, ‘You are my Son; today I have begotten you. Ask of me, and I will make the nations your heritage, and the ends of the earth your possession. You shall break them with a rod of iron and dash them in pieces like a potter’s vessel.’ Now therefore, O kings, be wise; be warned, O rulers of the earth. Serve the LORD with fear, and rejoice with trembling. Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and you perish in the way, for his wrath is quickly kindled. Blessed are all who take refuge in him.’” (Psalm 2, ESV)
“Now the men who were holding Jesus in custody were mocking him as they beat him. They also blindfolded him and kept asking him, ‘Prophesy! Who is it that struck you?’ And they said many other things against him, blaspheming him. When day came, the assembly of the elders of the people gathered together, both chief priests and scribes. And they led him away to their council, and they said, ‘If you are the Christ, tell us.’ But he said to them, ‘If I tell you, you will not believe, and if I ask you, you will not answer. But from now on the Son of Man shall be seated at the right hand of the power of God.’ So they all said, ‘Are you the Son of God, then?’ And he said to them, ‘You say that I am.’ Then they said, ‘What further testimony do we need? We have heard it ourselves from his own lips.’” (Luke 22:63–71, ESV)
Please excuse any typos and misspellings within this manuscript. It has been published online for the benefit of the saints of Emmaus Reformed Baptist Church, but without the benefit of proofreading.
Here in this portion of Luke’s Gospel, we see Jesus descend into the darkness of suffering and death alone. Of course, God was with him, but he alone suffered and died for us and for our salvation.
To be clear, the descent of Jesus into suffering did not begin here. We confess that it began when the eternal Son of God became incarnate, being conceived by the Holy Spirit and born of the virgin Mary (see The Apostles Creed).
The Apostle Paul helps us to see this when he says that although Jesus “was in the form of God, [he] did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross” (Philippians 2:6–8, ESV). The humiliation of Jesus began at the incarnation.
The Nicene Creed also traces the beginning of Jesus’ descent back to his miraculous conception in the womb of the Virgin Mary. In this creed we confess to believe,
“…in one Lord Jesus Christ,
the only Son of God,
begotten from the Father before all ages,
God from God,
Light from Light,
true God from true God,
begotten, not made;
of the same essence as the Father.
Through him all things were made.
For us and for our salvation
he came down from heaven;
he became incarnate by the Holy Spirit and the virgin Mary,
and was made human.
He was crucified for us under Pontius Pilate;
he suffered and was buried.”
When did the humiliation of Jesus begin? Not when he was betrayed, denied, arrested, falsely charged, mocked, beaten, crucified, and buried, but when he was miraculously conceived by the power of the Holy Spirit in the womb of a virgin, for he is the eternal Son of God incarnate.
To fully appreciate the text that is open before us today, we must remember who Jesus is and where he came from. If Jesus were nothing more than a holy and honorable man, we would be repulsed by the terrible treatment he endured at the hands of these corrupt sinners. But when we consider that he is no mere man, but God with us (Matthew 1:23), we will see that the unjust treatment he endured was blasphemous and unspeakably horrendous.
Jesus was betrayed by Judas and taken into custody late at night after the Passover had been celebrated. No doubt, he was immediately interrogated by the High Priests and other leading men within Israel. The other Gospel writers tell us of this initial interrogation (Mark 14:53, Matthew 26:57, John 18:19). Luke implies that an initial interrogation took place in 22:54, in the words, “Then they seized him and led him away, bringing him into the high priest’s house, and Peter was following at a distance” (Luke 22:54, ESV). Interestingly, the other Gospels place Peter’s denial of Christ after his interrogation by the chief priests, scribes, and elders. Luke tells us that Peter denied Jesus before an interrogation. The solution is simple: Jesus was interrogated by this group of men twice, once late at night in the courtyard og the High Priest (Luke mentions this in passing in 22:54) and then again at daybreak (Luke tells us of this interrogation 22:66-51).
After the initial, late-night interrogation and after Peter denied Christ three times, Jesus was kept in custody. Think of this for a moment—the eternal Son of God, the one through whom the heavens and earth were made, was kept in custody by sinful men. Worse yet, Luke tells us that “the men who were holding Jesus in custody were mocking him as they beat him. They also blindfolded him and kept asking him, ‘Prophesy! Who is it that struck you?’ And they said many other things against him, blaspheming him” (Luke 22:63–65, ESV). To blaspheme is to revile or defame one’s name. In this moment, these men thought they were reviling a mere man—a false prophet, perhaps, or one who was guilty of blasphemy himself—but cloaked within the humble, human form of Jesus was the person of the eternal Son of God. No doubt, these men did not know what they were doing.
Consider, dear brothers and sisters, the love of God for sinners. Consider how merciful he is. Consider his restraint. Consider the humility of Jesus. That he, the eternally generated Son of God, would humble himself by taking to himself a true human nature is astonishing. But that he, for us and for our salvation, would subject himself to such mistreatment at the hands of sinful men, is mind-boggling. Such humility, restraint, self-sacrifice, and love are difficult to comprehend.
The men who held Jesus captive were military men (see John 18:3). But when the sun rose,
Luke tells us that “the assembly of the elders of the people gathered together, both chief priests and scribes. And they led him away to their council…” (Luke 22:66, ESV). This is a reference to the Sanhedrin, the supreme judicial council within Judaism at the time. This council was made up of 71 members— scribes, elders, and the high priest. Except for the Sabbath and festival days, the Sanhedrin would meet daily to hear cases. Though they would occasionally meet in the courtyard of the high priest’s home (Luke 22:54), their official meeting place, which was called The Chamber of Hewn Stones, was located in the temple complex in Jerusalem. One Encyclodidia of the Bible says, “The Sanhedrin sat in semicircular rows so that members could view one another. Two clerks sat at either end taking notes and recording votes. Facing the assembly sat three rows of students who were usually disciples of leading scribes. The accused stood in the middle facing the elders. He was required to show abject humility… (Antiq. 14.9.4)” (Walter A. Elwell and Barry J. Beitzel, “Sanhedrin,” in Baker Encyclopedia of the Bible (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1988), 1904.) This was the council that Jesus, the eternal Son of God incarnate, stood before.
As I said before, when we compare the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, it appears to me that Jesus stood before this council twice. Once at night, when they were gathered in the courtyard of the high priest, and then again in the morning. Matthew tells us that when Jesus appeared before the council at night, witnesses were called, but none of the accusations stuck. Perhaps this second trial was called because cases carrying the death penalty were supposed to be conducted during the daytime for the sake of transparency. To be clear, the Jews, being under Roman occupation, did not have the authority to put Jesus to death on their own. They would need the Romans to do it. This is why they would soon send Jesus to Pilate, the Roman governor (Luke 23:1-5; 18-25). But the Sanhedrin clearly wanted to put Jesus to death (see Matthew 26:66, Mark 14:64), and it was because they were aiming for the death penalty that they brought Jesus before their council in daytime. This trial, which was held in the morning, was an abbreviated version of the one that was held the night before. No witnesses were called. Instead, the council picked up where it left off the night before, and spoke to Jesus very directly, saying, “If you are the Christ, tell us” (Luke 22:67, ESV).
As you may know, “Christ” is the Greek equivalent of the Hebrew word “Messiah”. Both of these words mean “anointed one”. For many centuries, the Jewish people were looking forward to the arrival of the promised Messiah (or Christ), that is, the Holy Spirit-anointed Prophet, Priest, and King of God’s eternal kingdom.
When Jesus was born into the world, he was said to be the Christ (Luke 2:11, 26). When John the Baptist was ministering, the people wondered if he was the Christ. He said he was not and pointed to Jesus instead (Luke 3:15). Even the demons knew and confessed that Jesus was the Christ (Luke 4:41). When Jesus asked Peter, the leader of the twelve Apostles, who do you all say that I am, Peter made a good confession, sayin, “The Christ of God” (Luke 9:20). And finally, Jesus was clear that he knew himself to be the Christ, the son of King David, who is also King David’s Lord (Luke 20:41-44). All of this talk that we find in Luke’s Gospel about Jesus being the promised Messiah, or Christ, really comes to a head text as Jesus stands before the Sanhedrin.
Think of it. Though a promise concerning the arrival of a Savior was made even to Adam and Eve (Genesis 3:15), and though that promise was entrusted to and elaborated upon amongst the elect of God who lived from Adam to Abraham (Genesis 6:8; 14:18), beginning with Abraham, it was to the Hebrew people (the Jews) that the promises concerning a coming Savior were given. The promises, prophecies, types, and shadows that pointed forward to the Messiah and his eternal kingdom grew in number and in clarity with the passing of time. Things accelerated greatly in the days of Moses when the Hebrews began to be formed into a nation. Things accelerated greatly again in the days of King David when the nation of Israel became an established kingdom. Of all the nations of the earth, Israel was God’s chosen people, and to them the promises of God concerning the Messiah were entrusted. Paul the Apostle (a Hebrew himself) reflects on the privileged position of the Israelites in Romans 9:4, saying, “They are Israelites, and to them belong the adoption, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship, and the promises. To them belong the patriarchs, and from their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ, who is God over all, blessed forever. Amen” (Romans 9:4–5, ESV).
I remind you of this history so that you might fully appreciate the significance of this moment that we are now considering. Jesus stood before the Sanhedrin, the supreme judicial council of the nation of Israel. The two high priests were there. There were two—Caiaphas and his father-in-law Annas— because of political turmoil. In those days, high priests were installed and removed by Roman rulers. Though this is not recorded in the Bible, the tradition is that the Romans had deposed Annas and made Caiaphas the high priest. Officially, Caiaphas, the son-in-law of Annas, was the high priest during Jesus’ ministry, but Annas, the former high priest, still held significant power and was still called a high priest (John 18:13). Both were involved in the trial of Jesus. And the elders (the leading men of the nation) and the scribes (the leading scholars) were also there. So then, there is a sense in which Jesus was standing trial before Israel through their leaders and representatives. And notice what they said to him. “If you are the Christ, tell us” (Luke 22:67, ESV).
This really is the central question, isn’t it? If Jesus is the Christ, the long-awaited, Holy Spirit-anointed, Prophet, Priest, and King of God’s eternal kingdom, then these men (and all men) must bow the knee to him, to confess him as Lord and King, to trust him, and pledge their allegiance to him. But if he is not, these men (and all men) would be right to dismiss and condemn him as a false prophet, an impotent priest, and an imposter king. Indeed, if Jesus were not the Christ, then he would be guilty of blasphemy, just as they claimed.
“If you are the Christ, tell us” (Luke 22:67, ESV), said the Sanhedrin. Jesus replied, “If I tell you, you will not believe, and if I ask you, you will not answer” (Luke 22:67–68, ESV). Jesus knew that the hearts of these men were cold and hard. He knew that what they loved above all was their worldly power and prestige. He knew that they would never risk losing the earthly power they had and the temporal pleasures they enjoyed by bowing the knee to him. And so he spoke the truth to them, saying, “If I tell you [that I am the [Christ], you will not believe, and if I ask you [questions to prove that I am he], you will not answer.” And he was right about that, as we will soon see.
Jesus then proceeded to answer their question, saying, “But from now on the Son of Man shall be seated at the right hand of the power of God” (Luke 22:69, ESV).
I love the way that Jesus answers questions as recorded for us in the Gospels. He is not always direct, is he? What would be the direct answer to the question, Are you the Christ? The direct answer from Jesus would be, Yes, I am. But Jesus did not give a direct answer to his accusers.
And to be clear, Jesus refused to answer directly, not to be evasive, but to give his audience more than they were asking for, and to force them to say things with their own lips that they would not otherwise say.
“If you are the Christ, tell us” (Luke 22:67, ESV). Jesus replied, “But from now on the Son of Man shall be seated at the right hand of the power of God” (Luke 22:69, ESV). There is a lot of information packed into this single sentence.
When Jesus said, “From now on…” he directed the attention of his accusers to the future. At present, Jesus was near the lowest point in his descent into suffering and death. No doubt, from a worldly perspective, Jesus seemed to be a nobody to these powerful and wealthy aristocratic rulers. But in the not-too-distant future, things would change, and so Christ said, “From now on…”
The phrase, “the Son of Man,” is loaded with meaning. It was Jesus’ favorite title for himself in the days of his earthly ministry. On the one hand, the title “Son of Man” emphasizes Jesus’ true humanity and his humility. But on the other hand, it is a Messianic title and one that is used to communicate that the Messiah would one day be exalted to the right hand of God Almighty to be given everlasting dominion, power, and authority,
The key Old Testament text is Daniel 7:13-14. There, the prophet Daniel says, “I saw in the night visions, and behold, with the clouds of heaven there came one like a son of man, and he came to the Ancient of Days and was presented before him. And to him was given dominion and glory and a kingdom, that all peoples, nations, and languages should serve him; his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom one that shall not be destroyed” (Daniel 7:13–14, ESV).
The members of the Sanhedin knew this passage well. They knew it was about the Messiah (or Christ) and the dominion that he would be given. Therefore, when they spoke to Jesus, saying, “If you are the Christ, tell us” (Luke 22:67, ESV), and he replied, saying, “But from now on the Son of Man…”, the meaning was clear. Jesus was claiming to be the Son of Man of Daniel 7.
The words “shall be seated” are also filled with meaning. This is enthronement language. Kings, when coronated, are seated on their throne. This is also judgmental language. Kings and those in authority judge while seated. Indeed, the members of the Sanhedrin were at this moment seated in their chamber. They sat as rulers and judges while Jesus stood before them, accused and soon to be condemned. But in the not-too-distant future, the Son of Man would be seated on his throne as ruler and judge over all.
And where would Jesus, the Son of Man, be seated? Not on an earthly throne or amongst the members of the Sanhedrin, but in heaven “at the right hand of the power of God” (Luke 22:69, ESV). This phrase, “at the right hand of the power of God”, reminds us of Daniel 7, which has already been read. It also reminds us of Psalm 110. Like Daniel 7, this Psalm speaks of the enthronement of the Messiah on his heavenly throne. Certainly, when Jesus spoke of being seated “at the right hand of the power of God”, this Psalm would have immediately come into the minds of his hearers:
“A PSALM OF DAVID. The LORD says to my Lord: ‘Sit at my right hand, until I make your enemies your footstool.’ The LORD sends forth from Zion your mighty scepter. Rule in the midst of your enemies! Your people will offer themselves freely on the day of your power, in holy garments; from the womb of the morning, the dew of your youth will be yours. The LORD has sworn and will not change his mind, ‘You are a priest forever after the order of Melchizedek.’ The Lord is at your right hand; he will shatter kings on the day of his wrath. He will execute judgment among the nations, filling them with corpses; he will shatter chiefs over the wide earth. He will drink from the brook by the way; therefore he will lift up his head.” (Psalm 110, ESV)
Can you see how Jesus’ indirect answer gave his audience more than they were asking for? By answering, not with a simple yes, but with the phrase, “But from now on the Son of Man shall be seated at the right hand of the power of God”, he reminded his audience of those Old Testament passages that speak of the exaltation of the Messiah to the Father’s right hand, and to his entronement, everlasting dominion, and authority to judge.
As I have said, Jesus’ indirect answer also prompted his accusers to say things with their own lips that they would not otherwise say. In verse 70, we find the response of the Sanhedrin: “So they all said, ‘Are you the Son of God, then?’” (Luke 22:70, ESV).
This response shows that the members of the Sanhedrin were not ignorant of what the Scriptures say concerning the coming Messiah. They knew that the Messiah would not only be the Son of Man (in fulfilment of Daniel 7) but that he would also be the Son of God, for this is what is revealed in another Messianic enthronement Psalm, namely Psalm 2. It was read earlier. I’d like you to listen to it again and imagine it being in the minds of the members of the Sanhedrin with Jesus standing before them, claiming to be the one to whom it points.
“Why do the nations rage and the peoples plot in vain? The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD and against his Anointed, saying, ‘Let us burst their bonds apart and cast away their cords from us.’ He who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord holds them in derision. Then he will speak to them in his wrath, and terrify them in his fury, saying, ‘As for me, I have set my King on Zion, my holy hill.’ I will tell of the decree: The LORD said to me, ‘You are my Son; today I have begotten you. Ask of me, and I will make the nations your heritage, and the ends of the earth your possession. You shall break them with a rod of iron and dash them in pieces like a potter’s vessel.’ Now therefore, O kings, be wise; be warned, O rulers of the earth. Serve the LORD with fear, and rejoice with trembling. Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and you perish in the way, for his wrath is quickly kindled. Blessed are all who take refuge in him” (Psalm 2, ESV).
The men who sat on the Sanhedrin were wicked and foolish men, but they were not stupid. They knew the Old Testament Scriptures very well, and so they understood what Jesus was claiming when he said, “But from now on the Son of Man shall be seated at the right hand of the power of God” (Luke 22:69, ESV). They knew he was claiming to be the anointed King who would be enthroned in heaven, and so this prompted them to ask if he thought himself to be the Son of God mentioned in the most famous enthronement passage of all (Psalm 2). “Are you the Son of God, then?” they asked. Jesus’ reply: “You say that I am” (Luke 22:70, ESV).
It’s difficult to know what these Jews believed concerning the nature of the Son of God mentioned in Psalm 2. Did they believe that the Son of God of Psalm 2 was the second person (or subsistence) of the Triune God, “begotten from the Father before all ages, God from God, Light from Light, true God from true God, begotten, not made; of the same essence as the Father”, through whom all things were made (Nicene Creed)? I’m not sure how orthodox they were when it came to their doctrine of the Triune God. My guess is that they were deficient in their understanding. Nevertheless, they believed that when Christ claimed to be the Son of God, it was blasphemous and deserving of death (for more on Jesus as the eternally begotten Son of God, see John 1:1-14, 1:34, 1:49, 3:18, 5:25, 10:36, 11:4, 11:27, 19:7, 20:31).
In verse 71 we hear the Sanhedrin say, “What further testimony do we need? We have heard it ourselves from his own lips” (Luke 22:71, ESV). From there, they proceed to seek Jesus’ execution by way of crucifixion at the hands of the Romans.
I’ll conclude with a few suggestions for further contemplation and application.
First, I would encourage you, dear brothers and sisters, to never grow tired of contemplating the mystery of the incarnation. As we consider the pronounced sufferings of Jesus, the Son of Man, in the weeks to come, do not forget who Jesus is and from where he came. He is the Son of God, “begotten from the Father before all ages, God from God, Light from Light, true God from true God, begotten, not made; of the same essence as the Father.”
Secondly, as we contemplate the divine person and nature of Jesus, it should lead us to marvel all the more concerning the sufferings he willingly endured for us in the human nature he assumed for us and for our salvation. Oh, how deep and rich is the love of God shown to sinners. How merciful, gracious, and kind he is to redeem us from our sin and misery through the shed blood of the eternal Son of God incarnate.
Thirdly, and you contemplate the humiliation of Jesus, the Son, do not forget about his exaltation and session at the Father’s right hand. As Paul says, “He who descended is the one who also ascended far above all the heavens, that he might fill all things” (Ephesians 4:10, ESV). You do not trust in a dead Savior, but the one who was raised from the dead. You do not serve a weak and lowly Savior, but one who has ascended and is now seated at the right hand of God “in the heavenly places, far above all rule and authority and power and dominion, and above every name that is named, not only in this age but also in the one to come” (Ephesians 1:20–21, ESV). Christ Jesus is worthy to receive your trust, your worship, and obedience.
Fourthly, as you consider the risen, ascended, and enthroned Christ, do not forget that from there he will return to judge all people and nations and to make all things new. Obey Psalm 2, therefore. “Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and you perish in the way, for his wrath is quickly kindled. Blessed are all who take refuge in him” (Psalm 2:12, ESV). The kiss that you are to place on the cheek of the Son is not like the kiss of betrayal that Judas delivered, but a kiss of love, of friendship, of trust, and of allegiance. Kiss the Son to take refuge in him under his sovereign rule and supreme authority. Blessed are all who take refuge in him.
Fifthly, as you look forward to the return of Christ, know for certain that he has the power to save you to the uttermost. The Apostle John speaks of Christ and the salvation that comes to all who trust in him, saying, “The true light, which gives light to everyone, was coming into the world. He was in the world, and the world was made through him, yet the world did not know him. He came to his own, and his own people did not receive him. But to all who did receive him, who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God, who were born, not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God” (John 1:9–13, ESV).
Oct 25
19
Q. 107. What doth the preface of the Lord’s Prayer teach us?
A. The preface of the Lord’s Prayer, which is, ‘Our Father, which art in heaven,’ teacheth us to draw near to God, with all holy reverence and confidence, as children to a father, able and ready to help us, and that we should pray with and for others. (Matt. 6:9; Luke 11:13; Rom. 8:15; Acts 12:5; 1 Tim. 2:1-3)
“So then, brothers, we are debtors, not to the flesh, to live according to the flesh. For if you live according to the flesh you will die, but if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body, you will live. For all who are led by the Spirit of God are sons of God. For you did not receive the spirit of slavery to fall back into fear, but you have received the Spirit of adoption as sons, by whom we cry, ‘Abba! Father!’ The Spirit himself bears witness with our spirit that we are children of God, and if children, then heirs—heirs of God and fellow heirs with Christ, provided we suffer with him in order that we may also be glorified with him.” (Romans 8:12–17, ESV)
Please excuse any typos and misspellings within this manuscript. It has been published online for the benefit of the saints of Emmaus Reformed Baptist Church but without the benefit of proofreading.
I was looking over our Confession of Faith the other day when chapter 12 caught my eye. If you are reading the confession in a full-page format, it really stands out because it is so brief. It is by far the shortest chapter in our confession, being only one paragraph long. And what is chapter 12 about? The title is “Of Adoption”. It is situated right in the middle of those chapters that speak of those things which God alone does for his elect in salvation. In chapter 10, we learn that God effectually calls his elect to himself, in chapter 11, we learn that God justifies his elect the moment they believe, and in chapter 13, we learn that God sanctifies his elect, making them more and more into the likeness of Christ. Chapter 12 is situated right in the middle of all of that. There, we learn that God adopts the elect as his own. There is something so tender and warm about this teaching. The doctrines of effectual calling, justification, and sanctification are vitally important, of course. But so too is the doctrine of adoption, and I have found that it is often neglected. It is a shame because the doctrine of adoption really gets to the heart of the benefit of our redemption in Christ Jesus, namely, reconciliation with God the Father through faith in the Son by the working of the Holy Spirit. Because of sin, we are by nature alienated from God (Colossians 1:21), at enmity with him (James 4:4), and rightly called, children of wrath (Ephesians 2:3). But through faith in Christ, we are adopted as beloved children of God. Think of that. Is this not the highest blessing of our salvation? Not only have we been cleansed. Not only have we been pardoned and declared not guilty. We have also been reconciled to God and adopted as his sons and daughters, through Christ the Son, so that we might call him Abba, Father.
I’d like to read chapter 12 of our confession to you.
“All those that are justified, God vouchsafed, in and for the sake of his only Son Jesus Christ, to make partakers of the grace of adoption, by which they are taken into the number, and enjoy the liberties and privileges of the children of God, have his name put on them, receive the spirit of adoption, have access to the throne of grace with boldness, are enabled to cry Abba, Father, are pitied, protected, provided for, and chastened by him as by a Father, yet never cast off, but sealed to the day of redemption, and inherit the promises as heirs of everlasting salvation.”
Oh, what a blessing! How comforting and warm!
So what does this have to do with the preface to the Lord’s Prayer and Baptist Catechism 107? Well, I think you can see. “The preface of the Lord’s Prayer, which is, ‘Our Father, which art in heaven,’ teacheth us…” to pray to God according to the reality of our adoption in Christ Jesus. Those who have faith in Christ do not pray to God merely as Creator, nor as Lord, or Savior, or Provider—he is all of those things to us, and these truths should be considered in prayer too. No, Christians are invited to pray to God Almighty as Father, and this is possible only because they have been effectually called, justified, and adopted as his beloved children.
This brings up an important observation. Not everyone can rightly regard God as Father. Liberal theologians like to talk about the universal Fatherhood of God and the universal brotherhood of man. By this, they mean to say, all have God as Father, and all are therefore brothers. There is a bit of truth to this. If by “Father” we mean “Creator” or “source”, then it is true. God is the Father of all, and we human beings, made in the image of God, are all indeed brothers and sisters. But that is not how the term is used in the Scriptures.
When Christ taught his disciples to pray, “our Father in heaven”, he invited them to pray to God as the one who had redeemed them from sin, Satan, and death unto adoption. The Scriptures are so very clear that we do not have God as beloved Father by birth, but we are “by nature children of wrath” (see Ephesians 2:3). Jesus himself spoke to those who persisted in unbelief, saying, “If God were your Father, you would love me, for I came from God and I am here… You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father’s desires…” (John 8:42–44, ESV). This is our natural condition ever since Adam, our federal head, fell into sin and broke the Covenant of Works that God made with him. So no, we are not natural children of God. By nature, and in sin, we are his enemies! But by his grace, he has washed us in Christ’s blood and adopted us as his own through Spirit-wrought union with his beloved Son, received by faith.
The words, “Our Father in heaven.”, are to remind us of all of that. And being reminded of all of that, we are then enabled to “draw near to God”—that is what our catechism says next. In prayer, we are to draw near to God. We are invited to pray to God, not as if he is distand from us. No, we are invited to come near to him and to know for certain that he loves us and cares for us as his beloved children.
This catechism question is so very helpful in teaching us how we are to draw near to the Father. We are to draw near:
“[W]ith all holy reverence…” To revere God is to fear and respect him. Yes, God is our Father, but he is no ordinary Father. He is our Heavenly Father. He is God Almighty, creator of heaven and earth, YHWH, the self-existent, eternal, and unchanging one. He is our Father, but this does not mean that we should approach him carelessly, and certainly not irreverently. We are to draw near with holy reverence.
Next, notice the words “with… confidence.” We may come boldly before the throne of grace because we approach the Father not by our own merits, but by the merits of Christ. By the way, this is what it means to pray in Jesus’ name. It is not that we must add Jesus’ name to the end of our prayers, but rather, we must approach the Father through the Son, being found in him by faith.
We are to come to God “as children to a father…” Those who had evil fathers, or absent fathers in this world, may find it a little more difficult to know what this means, but it is possible to learn, isn’t it? I think that we all know what a father should be like. And we understand that even the best of earthly fathers fall far short of the perfection that is our heavenly Father. This is analogical language being used here. When we think of God as Father, we must strip away everything creaturely and every imperfection found in earthly fathers and know that through faith in Christ, God is our heavenly Father, and he is a perfect Father.
In Christ, we are to come to God “as children to a father”, knowing that he is “able and ready to help us…” He is able to help us, for he is God Almighty. Nothing is too hard for him. And he is ready because he is willing. He has set his love upon us, has promised to finish the work that he has begun in us, and to keep us faithful to the end. To come to the Father knowing that he is “able and ready to help us”, requires faith. We must pray believing that what the Word of God says is true.
Lastly, our catechism adds these words: “and that we should pray with and for others.” Where does this insight come from? It comes from the plural pronoun “our” found at the beginning of the Lord’s prayer. Christ taught us to pray to our Father in heaven. This will not only help us in corporate prayer, but in private prayer too. For even when we pray in private, we are to pray being mindful of others.
Q. 107. What doth the preface of the Lord’s Prayer teach us?
A. The preface of the Lord’s Prayer, which is, ‘Our Father, which art in heaven,’ teacheth us to draw near to God, with all holy reverence and confidence, as children to a father, able and ready to help us, and that we should pray with and for others.
Oct 25
12
“‘Awake, O sword, against my shepherd, against the man who stands next to me,’ declares the LORD of hosts. ‘Strike the shepherd, and the sheep will be scattered; I will turn my hand against the little ones.’” (Zechariah 13:7, ESV)
“Then they seized him and led him away, bringing him into the high priest’s house, and Peter was following at a distance. And when they had kindled a fire in the middle of the courtyard and sat down together, Peter sat down among them. Then a servant girl, seeing him as he sat in the light and looking closely at him, said, ‘This man also was with him.’ But he denied it, saying, ‘Woman, I do not know him.’ And a little later someone else saw him and said, ‘You also are one of them.’ But Peter said, ‘Man, I am not.’ And after an interval of about an hour still another insisted, saying, ‘Certainly this man also was with him, for he too is a Galilean.’ But Peter said, ‘Man, I do not know what you are talking about.’ And immediately, while he was still speaking, the rooster crowed. And the Lord turned and looked at Peter. And Peter remembered the saying of the Lord, how he had said to him, ‘Before the rooster crows today, you will deny me three times.’ And he went out and wept bitterly.” (Luke 22:54–62, ESV)
Please excuse any typos and misspellings within this manuscript. It has been published online for the benefit of the saints of Emmaus Reformed Baptist Church, but without the benefit of proofreading.
It is remarkable that this story about Peter’s denial of Jesus is archived for us in the pages of Holy Scripture. I say it is remarkable because societies do not typically highlight the failures and shortcomings of their beloved leaders. Peter, it must be remembered, was not just one of the twelve disciples of Jesus; he was the leader of the Apostolic band. He was the leader before he denied his beloved Savior, and he would be a leader afterwards, too. And yet the writers of Holy Scripture did not hide this blemish. Instead, they, under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, recorded it for the benefit of the people of God.
By the way, this is one piece of evidence that the Holy Scriptures are the inspired word of God. The Scriptures do not hide the warts and blemishes of the faithful, but rather expose them. Think of the stories of Noah, Abraham, Moses, and King David. God used these men in mighty ways to usher in God’s eternal kingdom. Some of them write Scripture. And yet they were sinners. Their sins are not hidden, but exposed.
No doubt, one reason the Scriptures highlight the failures and sins of men like Noah, Abraham, Moses, David, and Peter is to show that these men—as great as they were—were not the Savior.
Jesus of Nazareth is the Savior that God has provided. These men were used mightily by God to prepare the way for him and to exalt his name, but they were mere men. Like us, they were sinners in need of a Savior. Like us, they were saved by the grace of God through faith in the promised Messiah, Jesus Christ the Lord.
Luke is not the only Gospel writer to record this incident wherein Peter denied his Savior on the night he was betrayed, the night before the day of his crucifixion. The other three Gospels contain this story too (Matthew 26:57-66; Mark 14:53-64; John 18:15-27). The Holy Spirit obviously wants us to learn from Peter’s denial of Jesus. I do believe there are lessons to be learned by us individually and also as the New Covenant community, that is to say, the church.
All four Gospels present the story of Peter’s denial of Jesus immediately after the story of Judas’ betrayal of Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane. The reason for this is obvious. The one event happened right after the other. First, Judas betrayed Jesus with a kiss, and then Peter denied Jesus with his mouth. But it seems to me that Judas and Peter are meant to be compared and contrasted. Both men did something terrible. Both men turned their backs on King Jesus. But the sin of Judas was of a kind than the sin of Peter, I do believe there is much to learn from this observation.
As we compare and contrast the sins of Peter and Judas, it is apparent, first of all, that Peter denied his Savior in a moment of weakness, whereas Judas betrayed the Savior in a premeditated, cold-hearted, and calculated way. Both acts were sinful, but the sin of Judas was a different degree. His was a high-handed sin. It was an act of premeditated rebellion against God and Christ. Peter, however, stumbled badly when severely tempted.
Let us think of Judas for a moment.
The Scriptures reveal that Christ knew all along that his heart was not true. In John 6:64, we hear Christ speak to his disciples, saying, “But there are some of you who do not believe.” And then John explains, “For Jesus knew from the beginning who those were who did not believe, and who it was who would betray him” (John 6:64, ESV). Though Judas was numbered amongst the followers of Jesus Christ, his heart was never true, and Jesus knew it.
Furthermore, we know that Judas thought about what he would do to betray Jesus well in advance. It was back in Luke 22:3 that we read these words: “Then Satan entered into Judas called Iscariot, who was of the number of the twelve. He went away and conferred with the chief priests and officers how he might betray him to them. And they were glad, and agreed to give him money. So he consented and sought an opportunity to betray him to them in the absence of a crowd” (Luke 22:3–6, ESV). Notice how calculating Judas was. He thought about what he would do. He conferred with the chief priests and officers. He consented to their proposal. Finally, he looked for an opportunity to follow through on his plan. Judas’s act of betrayal was premeditated.
Finally, consider how cold-hearted Judas was toward Jesus when he betrayed him. The sign the Judas chose to identify Jesus with was a kiss. In Matthew 26:48 we read, “Now the betrayer had given them a sign, saying, ‘The one I will kiss is the man; seize him’” (Matthew 26:48, ESV). Some other sign could have been chosen. But that Judas chose the sign of a kiss shows how cold-hearted he was. He was not bashful or ashamed about what he would do, and so he was willing to approach Jesus, look him in the eyes, and even to kiss him, and in this way, betray him to his enemies. The cold-heartedness and shamelessness of Judas were not lost on Jesus. When Judas approached him to betray him in the garden, Jesus said, “Judas, would you betray the Son of Man with a kiss?” (Luke 22:48, ESV). Clearly, Judas’ heart was far from Jesus and devoid of love for him.
Contrast this now with Peter’s sin.
Peter did not plan to deny Jesus. To the contrary, after Jesus predicted that Peter would deny him, saying, “‘Simon, Simon, behold, Satan demanded to have you, that he might sift you like wheat, but I have prayed for you that your faith may not fail. And when you have turned again, strengthen your brothers.’ Peter said to him, ‘Lord, I am ready to go with you both to prison and to death.’ Jesus said, ‘I tell you, Peter, the rooster will not crow this day, until you deny three times that you know me’” (Luke 22:31–34, ESV). I do believe that Peter meant what he said in this moment—“Lord, I am ready to go with you both to prison and to death.” True, he was self-confident. True, he was likely puffed up with pride. But one thing is clear: he did not intend to deny Jesus. In fact, he was committed in his mind and heart to remain by his side, even if it would cost him his freedom or even his life.
Furthermore, Peter did follow Jesus and, in doing so, put himself at risk of imprisonment or death. In Luke 22:54 we read, “Then they seized [Jesus] and led him away, bringing him into the high priest’s house, and Peter was following at a distance. And when they had kindled a fire in the middle of the courtyard and sat down together, Peter sat down among them. Then a servant girl, seeing him as he sat in the light and looking closely at him, said, ‘This man also was with him.’ But he denied it, saying, ‘Woman, I do not know him.’ And a little later, someone else saw him and said, ‘You also are one of them.’ But Peter said, ‘Man, I am not.’ And after an interval of about an hour, still another insisted, saying, ‘Certainly this man also was with him, for he too is a Galilean.’ But Peter said, ‘Man, I do not know what you are talking about.’ And immediately, while he was still speaking, the rooster crowed” (Luke 22:54–60, ESV). Very soon, we will talk about Peter’s sin and what led to it. But for now, I am drawing your attention to the fact that Peter did begin to follow through on his earlier commitment, proving that it was the true intention of his heart. “Lord, I am ready to go with you both to prison and to death”, he said. And when they seized Jesus and led him away, Peter followed at a distance. More than this, Peter remained in enemy territory for some time before succumbing to the temptation.
And what was the temptation that Peter gave in to? When hard pressed, he gave in to the fear of man. He began to care supremely, not about what God and Christ thought of him, but of what others thought. He began to care supremely, not about his devotion to Christ and his Kingdom, but his own comfort. He began to care supremely, not about life everlasting, preserving his life in here in this world.
No doubt, it must have been very nerve-racking and intimidating for Peter as he lingered there as a disciple of Jesus in the courtyard of the high priest. These people were very powerful. They hated Jesus, and it was clear that they were about to do him harm. If Peter was discovered, harm could be done to him too—or so he thought. And so, fearing man, he began to waver and to pull back from his devotion to Jesus, even denying him three times with his lips.
[[It is interesting to consider that Peter would do something similar later in his life. Pauls says, “But when Cephas came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he stood condemned. For before certain men came from James, he was eating with the Gentiles; but when they came he drew back and separated himself, fearing the circumcision party. And the rest of the Jews acted hypocritically along with him, so that even Barnabas was led astray by their hypocrisy. But when I saw that their conduct was not in step with the truth of the gospel, I said to Cephas before them all, ‘If you, though a Jew, live like a Gentile and not like a Jew, how can you force the Gentiles to live like Jews?’” (Galatians 2:11–14, ESV)]]
Judas’s sin was premeditated. Peter’s was not. Therefore, although Peter’s denial of Christ was an awful sin, Judas’s sin was worse.
Question 88 of our catechism is interesting. It asks, Are all transgressions of the law equally heinous? In other words, are all sins the same in the sight of God? I’ve heard people say that they are. Though I agree that all sin is sin and that all sin renders the one who committed the sin a sinner in God’s sight, I agree with the answer or catechism gives. A: Some sins in themselves and by reason of several aggravations, are more heinous in the sight of God than others. (Ezekiel 8:13; John 19:11; 1
So then, some sins are, in themselves, more heinous in God’s sight than others. Though these two sins are related, the sin of murder is clearly more heinous in God’s sight than the sin of harboring hatred in your heart towards someone. When it comes to the sins committed by Judas and Peter, I think we can say that the sin of betraying Jesus into the hands of his enemies to be killed was more heinous than the sin of denying Jesus. Both were sins. And both were terrible sins. But the one sin was more heinous than the other.
Our catechism also teaches that some sins, by reason of several aggravations, are more heinous in the sight of God than others. What does this mean? To aggravate is to make a situation worse. What are some of the factors that aggravate the heinousness of a particular sin?
Benjamin Beddome explores this question in his book, A Scriptural Exposition Of The Baptist Catechism.
For example, he asks, “Do sins receive their aggravations from the persons offending? Yes. My people is risen up as an enemy, Micah 2:8. Are the sins of old persons more heinous than those of others? Yes. See what the ancients of the house of Israel do in the dark, Ezekiel 8:12. And of ministers? Yes. Both the prophet and the priest are profane, Jeremiah 23:11. And of magistrates? Yes. He shall give Israel up because of Jeroboam who did sin, 1 Kings 14:16. And of eminent professors? Yes. Of whom is Hymeneus and Alexander, 1 Timothy 1:20.” A little later he asks, “Doth presumption aggravate sin? Yes. The soul that doth aught presumptuously reproacheth the Lord, Numbers 15:30. And knowledge? Yes. To him that knoweth to do good, and doth it not, to him it is sin, James 4:17. And reproof? Yes. He that being often reproved hardeneth his neck shall be suddenly destroyed, Proverbs 29:1. And perseverance in sin? Yes. He went on frowardly in the way of his heart, Isalah 57:17.”
As has been said, Judas’s sin was presumptuous. He brazenly betrayed Jesus. He knew full well what he was doing. He planned it all out and he persisted in it. Peter’s sin, though it was similar to Judas’s, lacked these aggravating factors, and so the sin, though still awful, was less heinous in the sight of God.
If it sounds like I’m trying to excuse or minimize Peter’s sin, that’s not my intention. Making these distinctions is beneficial.
One, to warn sinners against committing high-handed, premeditated, cold-hearted, and calculated sins, like the one committed by Judas. To give the appearance that you are for Jesus outwardly, but to be against him or apathetic towards him inwardly in your mind and heart, is a very evil and dangerous thing.
Two, when we compare and contrast the sins of Judas and Peter, we are better able to understand Peter’s sin and the causes that led to his stumbling.
It seems there was a progression.
The Scriptures indicate that Peter had pride in his heart. No doubt, he was involved in, and perhaps even at the center of, that dispute between the disciples over who was the greatest (Luke 22:24)
Connected to this, it seems that Peter was also self-confident. After Jesus foretold that he would stumble, Peter did not cry out to Christ for mercy and assistance, but said, “Lord, I am ready to go with you both to prison and to death” (Luke 22:33, ESV).
I do not forget that Peter was negligent in prayer. When Jesus entered the garden of Gethsemane, he commanded his disciples, saying, “Pray that you may not enter into temptation” (Luke 22:40, ESV). Jesus went away to pray, and when he returned, he found his disciples “sleeping for sorrow, and he said to them, ‘Why are you sleeping? Rise and pray that you may not enter into temptation’” (Luke 22:45–46, ESV).
Furthermore, Peter demonstrated that his mind was set on the things of this world and that he trusted in the strength of his flesh. When the enemies of Christ approached, he struck with the sword (Luke 22:50).
Peter did show courage when he followed Jesus after he was taken captive, but the text also says that he followed at a distance (Luke 22:54). Dear brothers and sisters, our walk with Jesus must always be close. To follow him at a distance is a dangerous thing.
Finally, when Peter was in the courtyard of the high priest, he began to show that the fear of man was in his heart. Three times, he was identified as a potential disciple of Jesus, and three times he denied it, out of fear that he would suffer for his association with his Savior.
We distinguish between the sins of Judas and Peter, not to excuse Peter’s sin, but to better understand it so that we might learn from it. Was Peter’s faith true? Yes. Did Peter have a genuine love for Jesus in his heart? Yes. But weakness and corruptions remained within him. Peter needed to be humbled. He needed to learn not to rely upon himself or the strength of his flesh, but on Christ. He needed to learn that the kingdom of Christ is not of this world, but is heavenly and eternal. No doubt, this was a very low moment in Peter’s life—perhaps the lowest—but the Lord willed to refine Peter through this experience.
Dear brothers and sisters, examine yourselves in the light of Peter’s sin and the progression that led to it. Ask yourself, are these weaknesses and corruptions that were in Peter in me? If you look inward and find pride, self-confidence, slackness, or sleepiness in prayer, worldly mindedness, a distant walk with Jesus, or the fear of man, turn from these sins. It seems to me that it is better to humble yourself before God than to have to be humbled by him.
That Peter’s heart was vastly different from Judas’s heart is seen most clearly in the way the two men responded when Jesus set his gaze upon them. When Jesus looked at Peter, he was filled with sorrow; when Jesus looked at Judas, he felt no shame.
We have already considered Judas in Gathsemany. When Jesus looked at Judas in the garden and spoke to him, saying, “Judas, would you betray the Son of Man with a kiss?” (Luke 22:48, ESV), Judas was not phased. He proceeded to deliver the kiss of betrayal just as he had planned.
But Luke tells us that when Peter was “still speaking [his words of denial], the rooster crowed. And the Lord turned and looked at Peter. And Peter remembered the saying of the Lord, how he had said to him, ‘Before the rooster crows today, you will deny me three times.’ And he went out and wept bitterly” (Luke 22:60–62, ESV).
Jesus did not say anything to Peter. He did not need to. There was a sermon contained within his gaze, and Peter heard it. That look from Jesus—I imagine it was an intense, sorrowful, and compassionate look—brought to mind what Jesus had said previously: “Before the rooster crows today, you will deny me three times.” It was then that Peter came to his senses as the Holy Spirit of God brought conviction to his soul.
And that it was true convention that Peter felt is proven by two things.
One, Peter wept over his sin. By this I do not mean to suggest that conviction must always cause us to weep if it is to be deemed true. No, we will not always weep when the Holy Spirit convicts us concerning our sin, but we will grieve over our sin ( 2 Corinthians 7:9–11). Friend, if you are able to sin against God and you are not grieved by it, this indicates that something is very wrong with your soul. How can someone who has been born again of the Holy Spirit of God sin and not care? If this is the condition of your soul, you must cry out to God for mercy. Ask him for the new birth. Or ask him to make your hard, calloused heart soft again.
Two, that this was true conviction that came upon Peter is proven by his actions. Peter went out and wept bitterly, and then he turned from his sin to Christ again.
Peter repented and was restored, whereas Judas persisted in his sin and was destroyed.
Jesus prophesied that Peter would return after his failure. “Simon, Simon, behold, Satan demanded to have you, that he might sift you like wheat, but I have prayed for you that your faith may not fail. And when you have turned again, strengthen your brothers” (Luke 22:31–32, ESV).
It is only in John’s gospel that we find the story of Peter’s repentance and restoration by the risen Christ. In John 21, we learn that Jesus appeared to his disciples after his resurrection by the Sea of Tiberias. He spoke to them, saying, “‘Come and have breakfast.’ Now none of the disciples dared ask him, ‘Who are you?’ They knew it was the Lord. Jesus came and took the bread and gave it to them, and so with the fish. This was now the third time that Jesus was revealed to the disciples after he was raised from the dead. When they had finished breakfast, Jesus said to Simon Peter, ‘Simon, son of John, do you love me more than these?’ He said to him, ‘Yes, Lord; you know that I love you.’ He said to him, ‘Feed my lambs.’ He said to him a second time, ‘Simon, son of John, do you love me?’ He said to him, ‘Yes, Lord; you know that I love you.’ He said to him, ‘Tend my sheep.’ He said to him the third time, ‘Simon, son of John, do you love me?’ Peter was grieved because he said to him the third time, ‘Do you love me?’ and he said to him, ‘Lord, you know everything; you know that I love you.’ Jesus said to him, ‘Feed my sheep. Truly, truly, I say to you, when you were young, you used to dress yourself and walk wherever you wanted, but when you are old, you will stretch out your hands, and another will dress you and carry you where you do not want to go.” (This he said to show by what kind of death he was to glorify God.) And after saying this he said to him, ‘Follow me’” (John 21:1–19, ESV).
Luke has his own way of telling us about Peter’s repentance and restoration. Peter is mentioned one more time in Luke’s Gospel. In Luke 24:12 Luke reports that Peter, after hearing the report of the empty tomb of Jesus, “rose and ran to the tomb; stooping and looking in, he saw the linen cloths by themselves; and he went home marveling at what had happened” (Luke 24:12, ESV). More than this, Luke, in his second volume—the Book of Acts—tells us all about the faithful and fruitful ministry of Peter. Interestingly, Peter’s first words recorded in the book of Acts have to do with Judas. Acts 1:15 says, “In those days Peter stood up among the brothers (the company of persons was in all about 120) and said, ‘Brothers, the Scripture had to be fulfilled, which the Holy Spirit spoke beforehand by the mouth of David concerning Judas, who became a guide to those who arrested Jesus. For he was numbered among us and was allotted his share in this ministry.’ (Now this man acquired a field with the reward of his wickedness, and falling headlong he burst open in the middle and all his bowels gushed out. And it became known to all the inhabitants of Jerusalem, so that the field was called in their own language Akeldama, that is, Field of Blood.) ‘For it is written in the Book of Psalms, ‘May his camp become desolate, and let there be no one to dwell in it’; and ‘Let another take his office.’” (Acts 1:15–20, ESV)
Dear brothers and sisters, I pray that this sermon would have a sobering effect on you.
We have considered the sins of Judas and Peter today, not only to learn about these men and what they have done, but to learn from them so that we might examine our own souls to see if there is anything Judas-like, or Peter-like, in us. Are you in any way like Judas? Are you in any way like Peter? If so, cry out to God for mercy and grace. Turn from your sin and turn to Christ Jesus.
And do not forget how merciful, gracious, and kind he is. When Jesus fixed his gaze upon Peter in the courtyard, it was not an angry look that he gave. No, it was intensely sorrowful, compassionate, and kind. Peter has sinned grievously, and yet he loved his Savior, and he knew that his Savior loved him.
It may be that the Lord Jesus is fixing his gaze upon you today to call you to repentance and faith. After you grieve over your sin, run quickly to Jesus just as Peter did. When Peter heard that the tobt was empty, he rose and ran to it, hoping to find his Savior. And when He saw the risen Christ on the shore of the Sea of Tiberias, Peter threw himself into the sea, swam to him, and ran to him (John 21:4-8).
Turn from your sins, and run to Jesus, “For with the LORD there is steadfast love, and with him is plentiful redemption” (Psalm 130:7, ESV).