Old Testament Reading: Zechariah 13:7
“‘Awake, O sword, against my shepherd, against the man who stands next to me,’ declares the LORD of hosts. ‘Strike the shepherd, and the sheep will be scattered; I will turn my hand against the little ones.’” (Zechariah 13:7, ESV)
New Testament Reading: Luke 22:54-62
“Then they seized him and led him away, bringing him into the high priest’s house, and Peter was following at a distance. And when they had kindled a fire in the middle of the courtyard and sat down together, Peter sat down among them. Then a servant girl, seeing him as he sat in the light and looking closely at him, said, ‘This man also was with him.’ But he denied it, saying, ‘Woman, I do not know him.’ And a little later someone else saw him and said, ‘You also are one of them.’ But Peter said, ‘Man, I am not.’ And after an interval of about an hour still another insisted, saying, ‘Certainly this man also was with him, for he too is a Galilean.’ But Peter said, ‘Man, I do not know what you are talking about.’ And immediately, while he was still speaking, the rooster crowed. And the Lord turned and looked at Peter. And Peter remembered the saying of the Lord, how he had said to him, ‘Before the rooster crows today, you will deny me three times.’ And he went out and wept bitterly.” (Luke 22:54–62, ESV)
*****
Please excuse any typos and misspellings within this manuscript. It has been published online for the benefit of the saints of Emmaus Reformed Baptist Church, but without the benefit of proofreading.
Sermon
It is remarkable that this story about Peter’s denial of Jesus is archived for us in the pages of Holy Scripture. I say it is remarkable because societies do not typically highlight the failures and shortcomings of their beloved leaders. Peter, it must be remembered, was not just one of the twelve disciples of Jesus; he was the leader of the Apostolic band. He was the leader before he denied his beloved Savior, and he would be a leader afterwards, too. And yet the writers of Holy Scripture did not hide this blemish. Instead, they, under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, recorded it for the benefit of the people of God.
By the way, this is one piece of evidence that the Holy Scriptures are the inspired word of God. The Scriptures do not hide the warts and blemishes of the faithful, but rather expose them. Think of the stories of Noah, Abraham, Moses, and King David. God used these men in mighty ways to usher in God’s eternal kingdom. Some of them write Scripture. And yet they were sinners. Their sins are not hidden, but exposed.
No doubt, one reason the Scriptures highlight the failures and sins of men like Noah, Abraham, Moses, David, and Peter is to show that these men—as great as they were—were not the Savior.
Jesus of Nazareth is the Savior that God has provided. These men were used mightily by God to prepare the way for him and to exalt his name, but they were mere men. Like us, they were sinners in need of a Savior. Like us, they were saved by the grace of God through faith in the promised Messiah, Jesus Christ the Lord.
Luke is not the only Gospel writer to record this incident wherein Peter denied his Savior on the night he was betrayed, the night before the day of his crucifixion. The other three Gospels contain this story too (Matthew 26:57-66; Mark 14:53-64; John 18:15-27). The Holy Spirit obviously wants us to learn from Peter’s denial of Jesus. I do believe there are lessons to be learned by us individually and also as the New Covenant community, that is to say, the church.
All four Gospels present the story of Peter’s denial of Jesus immediately after the story of Judas’ betrayal of Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane. The reason for this is obvious. The one event happened right after the other. First, Judas betrayed Jesus with a kiss, and then Peter denied Jesus with his mouth. But it seems to me that Judas and Peter are meant to be compared and contrasted. Both men did something terrible. Both men turned their backs on King Jesus. But the sin of Judas was of a kind than the sin of Peter, I do believe there is much to learn from this observation.
Peter Denied His Savior In A Moment Of Weakness, Whereas Judas Betrayed The Savior In A Premeditated, Coldhearted, And Calculated Way
As we compare and contrast the sins of Peter and Judas, it is apparent, first of all, that Peter denied his Savior in a moment of weakness, whereas Judas betrayed the Savior in a premeditated, cold-hearted, and calculated way. Both acts were sinful, but the sin of Judas was a different degree. His was a high-handed sin. It was an act of premeditated rebellion against God and Christ. Peter, however, stumbled badly when severely tempted.
Let us think of Judas for a moment.
The Scriptures reveal that Christ knew all along that his heart was not true. In John 6:64, we hear Christ speak to his disciples, saying, “But there are some of you who do not believe.” And then John explains, “For Jesus knew from the beginning who those were who did not believe, and who it was who would betray him” (John 6:64, ESV). Though Judas was numbered amongst the followers of Jesus Christ, his heart was never true, and Jesus knew it.
Furthermore, we know that Judas thought about what he would do to betray Jesus well in advance. It was back in Luke 22:3 that we read these words: “Then Satan entered into Judas called Iscariot, who was of the number of the twelve. He went away and conferred with the chief priests and officers how he might betray him to them. And they were glad, and agreed to give him money. So he consented and sought an opportunity to betray him to them in the absence of a crowd” (Luke 22:3–6, ESV). Notice how calculating Judas was. He thought about what he would do. He conferred with the chief priests and officers. He consented to their proposal. Finally, he looked for an opportunity to follow through on his plan. Judas’s act of betrayal was premeditated.
Finally, consider how cold-hearted Judas was toward Jesus when he betrayed him. The sign the Judas chose to identify Jesus with was a kiss. In Matthew 26:48 we read, “Now the betrayer had given them a sign, saying, ‘The one I will kiss is the man; seize him’” (Matthew 26:48, ESV). Some other sign could have been chosen. But that Judas chose the sign of a kiss shows how cold-hearted he was. He was not bashful or ashamed about what he would do, and so he was willing to approach Jesus, look him in the eyes, and even to kiss him, and in this way, betray him to his enemies. The cold-heartedness and shamelessness of Judas were not lost on Jesus. When Judas approached him to betray him in the garden, Jesus said, “Judas, would you betray the Son of Man with a kiss?” (Luke 22:48, ESV). Clearly, Judas’ heart was far from Jesus and devoid of love for him.
Contrast this now with Peter’s sin.
Peter did not plan to deny Jesus. To the contrary, after Jesus predicted that Peter would deny him, saying, “‘Simon, Simon, behold, Satan demanded to have you, that he might sift you like wheat, but I have prayed for you that your faith may not fail. And when you have turned again, strengthen your brothers.’ Peter said to him, ‘Lord, I am ready to go with you both to prison and to death.’ Jesus said, ‘I tell you, Peter, the rooster will not crow this day, until you deny three times that you know me’” (Luke 22:31–34, ESV). I do believe that Peter meant what he said in this moment—“Lord, I am ready to go with you both to prison and to death.” True, he was self-confident. True, he was likely puffed up with pride. But one thing is clear: he did not intend to deny Jesus. In fact, he was committed in his mind and heart to remain by his side, even if it would cost him his freedom or even his life.
Furthermore, Peter did follow Jesus and, in doing so, put himself at risk of imprisonment or death. In Luke 22:54 we read, “Then they seized [Jesus] and led him away, bringing him into the high priest’s house, and Peter was following at a distance. And when they had kindled a fire in the middle of the courtyard and sat down together, Peter sat down among them. Then a servant girl, seeing him as he sat in the light and looking closely at him, said, ‘This man also was with him.’ But he denied it, saying, ‘Woman, I do not know him.’ And a little later, someone else saw him and said, ‘You also are one of them.’ But Peter said, ‘Man, I am not.’ And after an interval of about an hour, still another insisted, saying, ‘Certainly this man also was with him, for he too is a Galilean.’ But Peter said, ‘Man, I do not know what you are talking about.’ And immediately, while he was still speaking, the rooster crowed” (Luke 22:54–60, ESV). Very soon, we will talk about Peter’s sin and what led to it. But for now, I am drawing your attention to the fact that Peter did begin to follow through on his earlier commitment, proving that it was the true intention of his heart. “Lord, I am ready to go with you both to prison and to death”, he said. And when they seized Jesus and led him away, Peter followed at a distance. More than this, Peter remained in enemy territory for some time before succumbing to the temptation.
And what was the temptation that Peter gave in to? When hard pressed, he gave in to the fear of man. He began to care supremely, not about what God and Christ thought of him, but of what others thought. He began to care supremely, not about his devotion to Christ and his Kingdom, but his own comfort. He began to care supremely, not about life everlasting, preserving his life in here in this world.
No doubt, it must have been very nerve-racking and intimidating for Peter as he lingered there as a disciple of Jesus in the courtyard of the high priest. These people were very powerful. They hated Jesus, and it was clear that they were about to do him harm. If Peter was discovered, harm could be done to him too—or so he thought. And so, fearing man, he began to waver and to pull back from his devotion to Jesus, even denying him three times with his lips.
[[It is interesting to consider that Peter would do something similar later in his life. Pauls says, “But when Cephas came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he stood condemned. For before certain men came from James, he was eating with the Gentiles; but when they came he drew back and separated himself, fearing the circumcision party. And the rest of the Jews acted hypocritically along with him, so that even Barnabas was led astray by their hypocrisy. But when I saw that their conduct was not in step with the truth of the gospel, I said to Cephas before them all, ‘If you, though a Jew, live like a Gentile and not like a Jew, how can you force the Gentiles to live like Jews?’” (Galatians 2:11–14, ESV)]]
Judas’s sin was premeditated. Peter’s was not. Therefore, although Peter’s denial of Christ was an awful sin, Judas’s sin was worse.
Question 88 of our catechism is interesting. It asks, Are all transgressions of the law equally heinous? In other words, are all sins the same in the sight of God? I’ve heard people say that they are. Though I agree that all sin is sin and that all sin renders the one who committed the sin a sinner in God’s sight, I agree with the answer or catechism gives. A: Some sins in themselves and by reason of several aggravations, are more heinous in the sight of God than others. (Ezekiel 8:13; John 19:11; 1
So then, some sins are, in themselves, more heinous in God’s sight than others. Though these two sins are related, the sin of murder is clearly more heinous in God’s sight than the sin of harboring hatred in your heart towards someone. When it comes to the sins committed by Judas and Peter, I think we can say that the sin of betraying Jesus into the hands of his enemies to be killed was more heinous than the sin of denying Jesus. Both were sins. And both were terrible sins. But the one sin was more heinous than the other.
Our catechism also teaches that some sins, by reason of several aggravations, are more heinous in the sight of God than others. What does this mean? To aggravate is to make a situation worse. What are some of the factors that aggravate the heinousness of a particular sin?
Benjamin Beddome explores this question in his book, A Scriptural Exposition Of The Baptist Catechism.
For example, he asks, “Do sins receive their aggravations from the persons offending? Yes. My people is risen up as an enemy, Micah 2:8. Are the sins of old persons more heinous than those of others? Yes. See what the ancients of the house of Israel do in the dark, Ezekiel 8:12. And of ministers? Yes. Both the prophet and the priest are profane, Jeremiah 23:11. And of magistrates? Yes. He shall give Israel up because of Jeroboam who did sin, 1 Kings 14:16. And of eminent professors? Yes. Of whom is Hymeneus and Alexander, 1 Timothy 1:20.” A little later he asks, “Doth presumption aggravate sin? Yes. The soul that doth aught presumptuously reproacheth the Lord, Numbers 15:30. And knowledge? Yes. To him that knoweth to do good, and doth it not, to him it is sin, James 4:17. And reproof? Yes. He that being often reproved hardeneth his neck shall be suddenly destroyed, Proverbs 29:1. And perseverance in sin? Yes. He went on frowardly in the way of his heart, Isalah 57:17.”
As has been said, Judas’s sin was presumptuous. He brazenly betrayed Jesus. He knew full well what he was doing. He planned it all out and he persisted in it. Peter’s sin, though it was similar to Judas’s, lacked these aggravating factors, and so the sin, though still awful, was less heinous in the sight of God.
If it sounds like I’m trying to excuse or minimize Peter’s sin, that’s not my intention. Making these distinctions is beneficial.
One, to warn sinners against committing high-handed, premeditated, cold-hearted, and calculated sins, like the one committed by Judas. To give the appearance that you are for Jesus outwardly, but to be against him or apathetic towards him inwardly in your mind and heart, is a very evil and dangerous thing.
Two, when we compare and contrast the sins of Judas and Peter, we are better able to understand Peter’s sin and the causes that led to his stumbling.
It seems there was a progression.
The Scriptures indicate that Peter had pride in his heart. No doubt, he was involved in, and perhaps even at the center of, that dispute between the disciples over who was the greatest (Luke 22:24)
Connected to this, it seems that Peter was also self-confident. After Jesus foretold that he would stumble, Peter did not cry out to Christ for mercy and assistance, but said, “Lord, I am ready to go with you both to prison and to death” (Luke 22:33, ESV).
I do not forget that Peter was negligent in prayer. When Jesus entered the garden of Gethsemane, he commanded his disciples, saying, “Pray that you may not enter into temptation” (Luke 22:40, ESV). Jesus went away to pray, and when he returned, he found his disciples “sleeping for sorrow, and he said to them, ‘Why are you sleeping? Rise and pray that you may not enter into temptation’” (Luke 22:45–46, ESV).
Furthermore, Peter demonstrated that his mind was set on the things of this world and that he trusted in the strength of his flesh. When the enemies of Christ approached, he struck with the sword (Luke 22:50).
Peter did show courage when he followed Jesus after he was taken captive, but the text also says that he followed at a distance (Luke 22:54). Dear brothers and sisters, our walk with Jesus must always be close. To follow him at a distance is a dangerous thing.
Finally, when Peter was in the courtyard of the high priest, he began to show that the fear of man was in his heart. Three times, he was identified as a potential disciple of Jesus, and three times he denied it, out of fear that he would suffer for his association with his Savior.
We distinguish between the sins of Judas and Peter, not to excuse Peter’s sin, but to better understand it so that we might learn from it. Was Peter’s faith true? Yes. Did Peter have a genuine love for Jesus in his heart? Yes. But weakness and corruptions remained within him. Peter needed to be humbled. He needed to learn not to rely upon himself or the strength of his flesh, but on Christ. He needed to learn that the kingdom of Christ is not of this world, but is heavenly and eternal. No doubt, this was a very low moment in Peter’s life—perhaps the lowest—but the Lord willed to refine Peter through this experience.
Dear brothers and sisters, examine yourselves in the light of Peter’s sin and the progression that led to it. Ask yourself, are these weaknesses and corruptions that were in Peter in me? If you look inward and find pride, self-confidence, slackness, or sleepiness in prayer, worldly mindedness, a distant walk with Jesus, or the fear of man, turn from these sins. It seems to me that it is better to humble yourself before God than to have to be humbled by him.
When Jesus Looked At Peter, He Was Filled With Sorrow;
When Jesus Looked At Judas, He Felt No Shame
That Peter’s heart was vastly different from Judas’s heart is seen most clearly in the way the two men responded when Jesus set his gaze upon them. When Jesus looked at Peter, he was filled with sorrow; when Jesus looked at Judas, he felt no shame.
We have already considered Judas in Gathsemany. When Jesus looked at Judas in the garden and spoke to him, saying, “Judas, would you betray the Son of Man with a kiss?” (Luke 22:48, ESV), Judas was not phased. He proceeded to deliver the kiss of betrayal just as he had planned.
But Luke tells us that when Peter was “still speaking [his words of denial], the rooster crowed. And the Lord turned and looked at Peter. And Peter remembered the saying of the Lord, how he had said to him, ‘Before the rooster crows today, you will deny me three times.’ And he went out and wept bitterly” (Luke 22:60–62, ESV).
Jesus did not say anything to Peter. He did not need to. There was a sermon contained within his gaze, and Peter heard it. That look from Jesus—I imagine it was an intense, sorrowful, and compassionate look—brought to mind what Jesus had said previously: “Before the rooster crows today, you will deny me three times.” It was then that Peter came to his senses as the Holy Spirit of God brought conviction to his soul.
And that it was true convention that Peter felt is proven by two things.
One, Peter wept over his sin. By this I do not mean to suggest that conviction must always cause us to weep if it is to be deemed true. No, we will not always weep when the Holy Spirit convicts us concerning our sin, but we will grieve over our sin ( 2 Corinthians 7:9–11). Friend, if you are able to sin against God and you are not grieved by it, this indicates that something is very wrong with your soul. How can someone who has been born again of the Holy Spirit of God sin and not care? If this is the condition of your soul, you must cry out to God for mercy. Ask him for the new birth. Or ask him to make your hard, calloused heart soft again.
Two, that this was true conviction that came upon Peter is proven by his actions. Peter went out and wept bitterly, and then he turned from his sin to Christ again.
Peter Repented And Was Restored, Whereas Judas Persisted In Sin And Was Destroyed
Peter repented and was restored, whereas Judas persisted in his sin and was destroyed.
Jesus prophesied that Peter would return after his failure. “Simon, Simon, behold, Satan demanded to have you, that he might sift you like wheat, but I have prayed for you that your faith may not fail. And when you have turned again, strengthen your brothers” (Luke 22:31–32, ESV).
It is only in John’s gospel that we find the story of Peter’s repentance and restoration by the risen Christ. In John 21, we learn that Jesus appeared to his disciples after his resurrection by the Sea of Tiberias. He spoke to them, saying, “‘Come and have breakfast.’ Now none of the disciples dared ask him, ‘Who are you?’ They knew it was the Lord. Jesus came and took the bread and gave it to them, and so with the fish. This was now the third time that Jesus was revealed to the disciples after he was raised from the dead. When they had finished breakfast, Jesus said to Simon Peter, ‘Simon, son of John, do you love me more than these?’ He said to him, ‘Yes, Lord; you know that I love you.’ He said to him, ‘Feed my lambs.’ He said to him a second time, ‘Simon, son of John, do you love me?’ He said to him, ‘Yes, Lord; you know that I love you.’ He said to him, ‘Tend my sheep.’ He said to him the third time, ‘Simon, son of John, do you love me?’ Peter was grieved because he said to him the third time, ‘Do you love me?’ and he said to him, ‘Lord, you know everything; you know that I love you.’ Jesus said to him, ‘Feed my sheep. Truly, truly, I say to you, when you were young, you used to dress yourself and walk wherever you wanted, but when you are old, you will stretch out your hands, and another will dress you and carry you where you do not want to go.” (This he said to show by what kind of death he was to glorify God.) And after saying this he said to him, ‘Follow me’” (John 21:1–19, ESV).
Luke has his own way of telling us about Peter’s repentance and restoration. Peter is mentioned one more time in Luke’s Gospel. In Luke 24:12 Luke reports that Peter, after hearing the report of the empty tomb of Jesus, “rose and ran to the tomb; stooping and looking in, he saw the linen cloths by themselves; and he went home marveling at what had happened” (Luke 24:12, ESV). More than this, Luke, in his second volume—the Book of Acts—tells us all about the faithful and fruitful ministry of Peter. Interestingly, Peter’s first words recorded in the book of Acts have to do with Judas. Acts 1:15 says, “In those days Peter stood up among the brothers (the company of persons was in all about 120) and said, ‘Brothers, the Scripture had to be fulfilled, which the Holy Spirit spoke beforehand by the mouth of David concerning Judas, who became a guide to those who arrested Jesus. For he was numbered among us and was allotted his share in this ministry.’ (Now this man acquired a field with the reward of his wickedness, and falling headlong he burst open in the middle and all his bowels gushed out. And it became known to all the inhabitants of Jerusalem, so that the field was called in their own language Akeldama, that is, Field of Blood.) ‘For it is written in the Book of Psalms, ‘May his camp become desolate, and let there be no one to dwell in it’; and ‘Let another take his office.’” (Acts 1:15–20, ESV)
Conclusion
Dear brothers and sisters, I pray that this sermon would have a sobering effect on you.
We have considered the sins of Judas and Peter today, not only to learn about these men and what they have done, but to learn from them so that we might examine our own souls to see if there is anything Judas-like, or Peter-like, in us. Are you in any way like Judas? Are you in any way like Peter? If so, cry out to God for mercy and grace. Turn from your sin and turn to Christ Jesus.
And do not forget how merciful, gracious, and kind he is. When Jesus fixed his gaze upon Peter in the courtyard, it was not an angry look that he gave. No, it was intensely sorrowful, compassionate, and kind. Peter has sinned grievously, and yet he loved his Savior, and he knew that his Savior loved him.
It may be that the Lord Jesus is fixing his gaze upon you today to call you to repentance and faith. After you grieve over your sin, run quickly to Jesus just as Peter did. When Peter heard that the tobt was empty, he rose and ran to it, hoping to find his Savior. And when He saw the risen Christ on the shore of the Sea of Tiberias, Peter threw himself into the sea, swam to him, and ran to him (John 21:4-8).
Turn from your sins, and run to Jesus, “For with the LORD there is steadfast love, and with him is plentiful redemption” (Psalm 130:7, ESV).
Posted in Sermons, Joe Anady, Posted by
Joe.