Old Testament Reading: Leviticus 19:9–18

“When you reap the harvest of your land, you shall not reap your field right up to its edge, neither shall you gather the gleanings after your harvest. And you shall not strip your vineyard bare, neither shall you gather the fallen grapes of your vineyard. You shall leave them for the poor and for the sojourner: I am the LORD your God. You shall not steal; you shall not deal falsely; you shall not lie to one another. You shall not swear by my name falsely, and so profane the name of your God: I am the LORD. You shall not oppress your neighbor or rob him. The wages of a hired worker shall not remain with you all night until the morning. You shall not curse the deaf or put a stumbling block before the blind, but you shall fear your God: I am the LORD. You shall do no injustice in court. You shall not be partial to the poor or defer to the great, but in righteousness shall you judge your neighbor. You shall not go around as a slanderer among your people, and you shall not stand up against the life of your neighbor: I am the LORD. You shall not hate your brother in your heart, but you shall reason frankly with your neighbor, lest you incur sin because of him. You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against the sons of your own people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself: I am the LORD.” (Leviticus 19:9–18, ESV)

New Testament Reading: 1 Peter 1:22–23

“Having purified your souls by your obedience to the truth for a sincere brotherly love, love one another earnestly from a pure heart, since you have been born again, not of perishable seed but of imperishable, through the living and abiding word of God…” (1 Peter 1:22–23, ESV)

*****

Please excuse any typos and misspellings within this manuscript. It has been published online for the benefit of the saints of Emmaus Reformed Baptist Church, but without the benefit of proofreading.

Sermon

About a month ago, I preached a topical sermon entitled, Church Discipline: A Variety Of Cases And Measures. In my opinion, that was an important sermon, practically speaking, because it helped the members of this church to prepare for a rather difficult members’ meeting wherein we considered and voted on several diverse church discipline cases. 

After I delivered that sermon, and especially after our members’ meeting on August 19, it has been on my mind and heart to deliver another topical sermon on church discipline, but to focus this time, not on the technical or procedural side of things—the variety of cases the church will face and the variety of measures at our disposal—but on the heart. What must be in the hearts of church members and in the hearts of elders when conducting discipline?  Also, I wish to shift our focus away from formal church discipline to what has been called formative church discipline. And so here is the title of the sermon today: Formative Church Discipline: Love One Another Earnestly From A Pure Heart.

Why do I believe there is a need for a sermon like this? First, I will say, it is not because I am aware of any serious problem within our congregation as it pertains to formative church discipline or love. I’m very pleased with the way the members of this church have carried themselves when conducting discipline. When I look out upon this church, I see members committed to the process of discipline with love in their hearts for one another. I’m delivering this sermon today, not because I think we have a problem presently, but to help protect us from a potential error.

As you know, Christ’s churches must practice church discipline in obedience to his revealed will as found in the pages of Holy Scripture. Formal church discipling can take many forms. Depending on the situation, it may involve public censure (or rebuke), suspension, withdrawal, exclusion, or excommunication. I defined these things and discussed when they are appropriate in a previous sermon. But, according to our constitution, “formative church discipline is the church engaged in edifying and disciplining itself in love.” It goes on to say, “It is the responsibility of each member to endeavor to maintain this Christian duty of mutual edification for one another(Romans 12:3-8; I Corinthians 12:12-27; Ephesians 4:7-16; I Thessalonians 5:11-14; I Peter 4:10,11). This is done by the use of and submission to the gifts of those both old and young, office bearer and member, which Christ graciously gives to his church” (Article V, Section 3).

I trust you understand what formative church discipline is. It happens continuously in the life of a church, even if you are not thinking of it in these terms. When a preacher preaches, formative church discipline is taking place. When a pastor offers counsel to a member, that’s formative church discipline. When one member encourages or rebukes another member, again, that is formative church discipline. These are all examples of the “edifying and disciplining itself…”    

But the focus of this sermon is not on what formative discipline is, but on how. How, or in what manner, is formative church discipline to be done? The answer is, in love. That is what our constitution says. Hear it again: ​​“formative church discipline is the church engaged in edifying and disciplining itself in love.” Those two words are immensely important. Formative church discipline is always to be done in love. And please do not misunderstand: formal church discipline is to be done in love, too. 

Consider this: While there are only a handful of passages in the Holy Scriptures that teach us about formal church discipline—Matthew 18; 1 Corinthians 5, 1 Timothy 5:20, Titus 3:10, etc—there are many, many passages that insist that Christains have love for one another. 

1 Peter 1:22–23, which was read just a moment ago, is one such passage. The command found in the middle of that text will shape this sermon. “Having purified your souls by your obedience to the truth for a sincere brotherly love, love one another… earnestly… from a pure heart, since you have been born again, not of perishable seed but of imperishable, through the living and abiding word of God…” So the three points of the sermon are as follows: 1) Love one another; 2) Love one another earnestly; 3) Love one another from a pure heart.

Love One Another

First, Christians must love one another. 

Love, the Scriptures tell us, is to be the defining characteristic of a disciple of Jesus. 

Christ said, “A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another: just as I have loved you, you also are to love one another. By this all people will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another” (John 13:34–35, ESV). 

In John 15:17 we hear him say,  “This is my commandment, that you love one another as I have loved you… These things I command you, so that you will love one another.” (John 15:12, 17, ESV)

Love must be felt and shown. 

“If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal. And if I have prophetic powers, and understand all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. If I give away all I have, and if I deliver up my body to be burned, but have not love, I gain nothing. Love is patient and kind; love does not envy or boast; it is not arrogant or rude. It does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful; it does not rejoice at wrongdoing, but rejoices with the truth. Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.” (1 Corinthians 13:1–7, ESV)

“Remind them to be submissive to rulers and authorities, to be obedient, to be ready for every good work, to speak evil of no one, to avoid quarreling, to be gentle, and to show perfect courtesy toward all people” (Titus 3:1–2, ESV).

“And let us consider how to stir up one another to love and good works, not neglecting to meet together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another, and all the more as you see the Day drawing near.” (Hebrews 10:24–25, ESV)

Love One Another Earnestly

True love is more than an emotion, but it is not less.  

Love one another earnestly. 

The word rendered “earnestly” pertains to an “unceasing activity, normally involving a degree of intensity and/or perseverance—‘without ceasing, continuously, constantly’” (Johannes P. Louw and Eugene Albert Nida, Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament: Based on Semantic Domains (New York: United Bible Societies, 1996), 655).

Feel love in your heart for each other.

“Let love be genuine. Abhor what is evil; hold fast to what is good. Love one another with brotherly affection” (Romans 12:9–10, ESV).

“Let brotherly love continue.” (Hebrews 13:1, ESV)

“For God is my witness, how I yearn for you all with the affection of Christ Jesus.” (Philippians 1:8, ESV)

Put on the leading heart virtue of love, as well as the other virtues of the heart that flow from it. 

“Put on then, as God’s chosen ones, holy and beloved, compassionate hearts, kindness, humility, meekness, and patience, bearing with one another and, if one has a complaint against another, forgiving each other; as the Lord has forgiven you, so you also must forgive. And above all these put on love, which binds everything together in perfect harmony.” (Colossians 3:12–14, ESV)

Love One Another From A Pure Heart

Our love for one another must issue from a pure heart. 

“Love one another earnestly from a pure heart…”, our text says (1 Peter 1:22, ESV).  

Paul, in 1 Timothy 1:5 says, “The aim of our charge is love that issues from a pure heart and a good conscience and a sincere faith” (1 Timothy 1:5, ESV).

The heart must be kept pure by our obedience to the truth.  

“Having purified your souls by your obedience to the truth for a sincere brotherly love, love one another earnestly from a pure heart…” 

We are able to keep the heart pure and to love because of the work of regeneration that God has done in us. 

“Love one another earnestly from a pure heart, since you have been born again, not of perishable seed but of imperishable, through the living and abiding word of God…” (1 Peter 1:22–23, ESV).

Those born of God will love, for God is love. 

“Beloved, let us love one another, for love is from God, and whoever loves has been born of God and knows God. Anyone who does not love does not know God, because God is love” (1 John 4:7–8, ESV).

Conclusion

Know that love is not contrary to discipline. 

Consider that God is love, and God disciplines those he loves. 

“And have you forgotten the exhortation that addresses you as sons? ‘My son, do not regard lightly the discipline of the Lord, nor be weary when reproved by him. For the Lord disciplines the one he loves, and chastises every son whom he receives.’ It is for discipline that you have to endure. God is treating you as sons. For what son is there whom his father does not discipline? If you are left without discipline, in which all have participated, then you are illegitimate children and not sons. Besides this, we have had earthly fathers who disciplined us and we respected them. Shall we not much more be subject to the Father of spirits and live? For they disciplined us for a short time as it seemed best to them, but he disciplines us for our good, that we may share his holiness. For the moment all discipline seems painful rather than pleasant, but later it yields the peaceful fruit of righteousness to those who have been trained by it.” (Hebrews 12:5–11, ESV)

Consider that every parent who loves their child will discipline them. 

“Whoever spares the rod hates his son, but he who loves him is diligent to discipline him.” (Proverbs 13:24, ESV)

Know that discipline cases (especially when they are difficult) can deaden our love for one another. 

“To the angel of the church in Ephesus write: ‘The words of him who holds the seven stars in his right hand, who walks among the seven golden lampstands. “ ‘I know your works, your toil and your patient endurance, and how you cannot bear with those who are evil, but have tested those who call themselves apostles and are not, and found them to be false. I know you are enduring patiently and bearing up for my name’s sake, and you have not grown weary. But I have this against you, that you have abandoned the love you had at first. Remember therefore from where you have fallen; repent, and do the works you did at first. If not, I will come to you and remove your lampstand from its place, unless you repent. Yet this you have: you hate the works of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate. He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. To the one who conquers I will grant to eat of the tree of life, which is in the paradise of God.’” (Revelation 2:1–7, ESV)

Know that love is the crucial ingredient to all our endeavors.

“So now faith, hope, and love abide, these three; but the greatest of these is love.” (1 Corinthians 13:13, ESV)

Old Testament Reading: Genesis 3:1-13

“Now the serpent was more crafty than any other beast of the field that the LORD God had made. He said to the woman, ‘Did God actually say, ‘You shall not eat of any tree in the garden’? And the woman said to the serpent, ‘We may eat of the fruit of the trees in the garden, but God said, ‘You shall not eat of the fruit of the tree that is in the midst of the garden, neither shall you touch it, lest you die.’’ But the serpent said to the woman, ‘You will not surely die. For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.’ So when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyes, and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise, she took of its fruit and ate, and she also gave some to her husband who was with her, and he ate. Then the eyes of both were opened, and they knew that they were naked. And they sewed fig leaves together and made themselves loincloths. And they heard the sound of the LORD God walking in the garden in the cool of the day, and the man and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the LORD God among the trees of the garden. But the LORD God called to the man and said to him, ‘Where are you?’ And he said, ‘I heard the sound of you in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked, and I hid myself.’ He said, ‘Who told you that you were naked? Have you eaten of the tree of which I commanded you not to eat?’ The man said, ‘The woman whom you gave to be with me, she gave me fruit of the tree, and I ate.’ Then the LORD God said to the woman, ‘What is this that you have done?’ The woman said, ‘The serpent deceived me, and I ate.’” (Genesis 3:1–13, ESV)

New Testament Reading: Luke 22:39-46

“And he came out and went, as was his custom, to the Mount of Olives, and the disciples followed him. And when he came to the place, he said to them, ‘Pray that you may not enter into temptation.’ And he withdrew from them about a stone’s throw, and knelt down and prayed, saying, ‘Father, if you are willing, remove this cup from me. Nevertheless, not my will, but yours, be done.’ And there appeared to him an angel from heaven, strengthening him. And being in agony he prayed more earnestly; and his sweat became like great drops of blood falling down to the ground. And when he rose from prayer, he came to the disciples and found them sleeping for sorrow, and he said to them, ‘Why are you sleeping? Rise and pray that you may not enter into temptation.’” (Luke 22:39–46, ESV)

*****

Please excuse any typos and misspellings within this manuscript. It has been published online for the benefit of the saints of Emmaus Reformed Baptist Church, but without the benefit of proofreading.

Sermon

The passage that is open before us today is well known and greatly loved. Though Luke does not mention the Garden of Gethsemane by name, as do Matthew and Mark in their Gospels, that is where this scene unfolded. Luke 22:39 says,  “And he [that is, Jesus] came out [of the upper room] and went, as was his custom, to the Mount of Olives [that is, across the brook Kidron (John 18:2) and into the Garden of Gethsemane (Matthew 26:36 and Mark 14:32), and the disciples [the twelve minus Judas] followed him” (Luke 22:39, ESV). 

As you likely know, the man, Jesus Christ, experienced great agony in his soul and body while in that garden. He was strongly tempted to abandon his mission to avoid the suffering that was before him. Nevertheless, he persisted. Through prayer, he overcame and submitted himself to the Father, saying, “Nevertheless, not my will, but yours, be done.”  

There is so much to learn from this passage. No doubt, we may learn a great deal from Jesus’ example. What should we do when pressed hard with temptation? We ought to follow Jesus’ example and pray. And how should we pray? We must pray like Jesus prayed! He cried out to God the Father, offered his desires up to him, and submitted to him. And we should do the same. But this passage does not only teach us about fighting against temptation through prayer, it also teaches us about Jesus, his person and his work. It would be a shame to jump straight to the practical and to ignore what this passage teaches us about Jesus, for I do believe that was Luke’s main concern. He wants us to see Jesus and to marvel over the wonderful Savior he is. He wants us to know that Jesus was obedient to the Father and faithful to his mission, although the temptation to abandon his mission was very great. 

When I first set out to write this sermon, I thought I would deal with both of these questions: What does this passage teach us about Jesus, his person and work? And what does this passage teach us about resisting temptation through prayer? But as I began to write, I quickly realized that it would be best to devote one sermon to each of these questions. Today, we will consider this passage while asking, What does this text teach us about our Savior, his person and work? Next Sunday, we will take up the question, What do we learn from Jesus’ example as it pertains to fighting against temptation?

Consider The Fiathfulness Of Jesus

To appreciate the faithfulness of Jesus in the garden of Gethsemane, I think it would be best to compare and contrast him with Adam in the garden of Eden.. 

Consider a few things: 

Like Adam, Jesus was (and is) a man. This should be clear to all given what is revealed about him in the Gospels. He was born of a woman. He grew in stature and wisdom. He was sometimes hungry and thirsty. He was sometimes filled with sorrow and grief. Here in the garden, the true humanity of Jesus is put on full display, isn’t it?

Luke tells us that Jesus had customs or habits. The Greek word is ἔθος. It refers to “a pattern of behavior more or less fixed by tradition…” (Louw and Nida, 506). All humans develop customs or habits. Jesus’ custom was to come to this garden with his disciples. Luke has already told us about this custom. In Luke 21:37, we read,  “And every day he was teaching in the temple, but at night he went out and lodged on the mount called Olivet.” (Luke 21:37, ESV). And John reports the same in his Gospel, saying, “When Jesus had spoken these words, he went out with his disciples across the brook Kidron, where there was a garden, which he and his disciples entered. Now Judas, who betrayed him, also knew the place, for Jesus often met there with his disciples” (John 18:1–2, ESV).

Luke also tells us that Jesus prayed. He was a man of prayer. After speaking to his disciples, saying, “Pray that you may not enter into temptation” (Luke 22:40, ESV), he went and prayed, so that he would not succumb to the temptation. Luke says, “And he withdrew from them about a stone’s throw, and knelt down and prayed…” (Luke 22:41, ESV). Have you ever wondered why Jesus needed to pray? If it is true that he is the eternal Son of God incarnate, why did he need to pray to God? He prayed because he was truly human. Yes, Jesus is the Son of God, the second person of the eternal, Triune God. But in Jesus the Son, we must never forget, assumed a true human nature. Jesus has a true human body. And Jesus has a true human soul (a mind, a will, and affections or emotions). It was as a true man that Jesus prayed. And when he prayed, he prayed with the entirety of his human nature.  

Notice his bodily posture. Luke tells us that he “knelt down.” Jesus honored God with his body. 

And as it pertains to his soul, notice that Jesus prayed with his human mind or intellect. He spoke to God, saying, “Father, if you are willing, remove this cup from me.” 

What cup was Jesus referring to? The cup is clearly metaphorical. It symbolized the experience he was about to endure. To drink a cup, metaphorically speaking, is to experience something. In this case, the “cup” that Jesus was about to “drink” was a cup us suffering. 

Have you ever wondered how Jesus knew that he would have soon have to endure great suffering to accomplish the mission God had given to him? I suppose we may say that he knew it because he was the person of the eternal Son of God incarnate! But do not forget what Jesus said to his disciples in the previous passage. In Luke 22:37, Jesus speaks to them, saying, “For I tell you that this Scripture must be fulfilled in me: ‘And he was numbered with the transgressors.’ For what is written about me has its fulfillment’” (Luke 22:37, ESV). This, it must be remembered, is a quotation from Isaiah 53, which is a prophecy about the sufferings the Messiah would endure. It says things like this: 

“He was despised and rejected by men, a man of sorrows and acquainted with grief… Surely he has borne our griefs and carried our sorrows… But he was pierced for our transgressions; he was crushed for our iniquities; upon him was the chastisement that brought us peace, and with his wounds we are healed… like a lamb that is led to the slaughter, and like a sheep that before its shearers is silent, so he opened not his mouth. By oppression and judgment he was taken away; and as for his generation, who considered that he was cut off out of the land of the living, stricken for the transgression of my people? And they made his grave with the wicked and with a rich man in his death, although he had done no violence, and there was no deceit in his mouth. Yet it was the will of the LORD to crush him; he has put him to grief; when his soul makes an offering for guilt… Out of the anguish of his soul he shall see and be satisfied; by his knowledge shall the righteous one, my servant, make many to be accounted righteous, and he shall bear their iniquities. Therefore I will divide him a portion with the many, and he shall divide the spoil with the strong, because he poured out his soul to death and was numbered with the transgressors; yet he bore the sin of many, and makes intercession for the transgressors” (Isaiah 53, ESV).

Though it may be that Jesus knew what he was about to endure by means of his divine personhood and nature, it is also true that the Scriptures revealed what he would soon endure, for the Scriptures spoke of the sufferings of the Messiah ahead of time, and the man Jesus Christ knew the Scriptures. He knew (via his human mind) that his body would soon be pierced and crushed unto death, and his soul would endure unimaginable anguish and grief as he bore the sins of many to make atonement for them. The Scriptures revealed this about the sufferings of the Messiah, and the man Jesus knew that he was the Messiah. He used his mind as he prayed. He knew that the sufferings described in Isaiah 53 would have their fulfilment, and that they would be fulfilled by him very soon. And so he prayed, “Father, if you are willing, remove this cup from me.” 

Jesus also prayed with his human emotions. Emotions are implied in verse 42. It’s hard to imagine Jesus saying, “Father, if you are willing, remove this cup from me” in an emotionless way. But Luke speaks of Jesus’ emotions directly in verse 44, saying, “And being in agony he prayed more earnestly…” The word agonony refers to “a state of great mental and emotional grief and anxiety—‘anguish, intense sorrow’” (Louw and Nida, 318). The phrase “more earnestly” communicates that there was prologued intensity in Jesus’ prayer. Friends, God does not have changing emotions or passions, but human beings do. And Jesus was (and is) truly human. He prayed with great emotional intensity in the garden. 

Jesus also engaged his human will as he prayed. The will is that part of the soul that chooses to think, speak, or do something.  And pay attention to this: When Christ prayed to the Father in the garden, he submitted his human will to the divine will, “saying, ‘Father, if you are willing, remove this cup from me. Nevertheless, not my will, but yours, be done’” (Luke 22:42, ESV). 

As I have said, the full humanity of Jesus Christ was put on full display there in the garden of Gethsemane. Just as Adam was (and is) a man, so too Jesus was (and is) a man. Just as Adam was present in the garden of Eden, body and soul, so too Jesus was present in Gethsemane, body and soul.  And just as Adam was tempted in the Garden of Eden, so too was Jesus tempted in Gethsemane. 

That Jesus was tempted in Gethsemane should be clear to all. He was hard pressed and very distressed. Clearly, Jesus was dreading the suffering that was before him and longed for a way out, humanly speaking.  

Here is a question. Was it possible for Jesus to abandon his mission? In other words, theoretically speaking, was it possible for Jesus to run away from the cross and not submit his human will to the divine will? We must say, no. I’ll give you three reasons why Jesus couldn’t fail his mission, beginning with the least and moving to the greatest.

First of all, notice the support that the man Jesus received from heaven. Luke tells us that “there appeared to him an angel from heaven, strengthening him” (Luke 22:43, ESV). Yet again, Luke reminds us of the spiritual world and the battle that rages there over the souls of men. Satan was intensely active in those days. He led Judas astray. He wished to have all of the disciples of Jesus so that he might sift them as wheat, but Jesus interceded for them (Luke 22:31). No doubt, Satan wished to destroy Jesus. Do not forget what Luke said in 4:13. After Satan tempted Jesus in the wilderness at the start of his public ministry, Luke tells us, “And when the devil had ended every temptation, he departed from him until an opportune time” (Luke 4:13, ESV). The battle between Satan and Jesus was clearly coming to a head. And so the evil one pressed the man Jesus hard in the garden. But all of heaven was behind Jesus and for his success.  Again, Luke reports, “there appeared to [Jesus] an angel from heaven, strengthening him” (Luke 22:43, ESV).

Secondly, we must not forget that the man Jesus was anointed by the Holy Spirit and with power. Luke told us about this anointing in 3:22. At the time of Jesus’ baptism, “the Holy Spirit descended on him in bodily form, like a dove; and a voice came from heaven, ‘You are my beloved Son; with you I am well pleased’” (Luke 3:22, ESV). Peter stressed this anointing of the Holy Spirit in his preaching. In Acts 10:38, we hear Peter say that “God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Spirit and with power.” And that “He went about doing good and healing all who were oppressed by the devil, for God was with him” (Acts 10:38, ESV). The Holy Spirit anointed Jesus and filled him with the power necessary for his work.

Thirdly, and most significantly,  it was the person of the eternal Son of God, the second person of the Holy Trinity, that was acting through the human nature of Jesus Christ. A person is a subject who acts through a nature. You are I share this in common: We have human natures—that is, we have human bodies and human souls consisting of a mind, affections, and will. What distinguishes us from one another? We are different persons acting through the particular human bodies and souls that God has given to us. We share the “what” in common, but we differ as it pertains to the “who”. What is Jesus? He is a human. But who is Jesus? Who is the person of Jesus of Nazareth? Who is the subject acting through that particular human being? He is the person of the eternal Son of God, the second person of the Holy Trinity. That is who Jesus is. He is the Son of God. And because the divine nature cannot be divide from the divine person of the Son, we confess that in Jesus, “ two whole, perfect, and distinct natures were inseparably joined together in one person, without conversion, composition, or confusion; which person is very God and very man, yet one Christ, the only mediator between God and man.”  In the man Jesus, it is the person of the Son of God who acts. Therefore, it was impossible for Jesus to abandon his mission and to fail. For Jesus to succumb to temptation and to rebel against the will of the Father would require that the person of the eternal Son of God rebel against the will of the Father, and that cannot be, for the will of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit is one. 

Now, some may wonder, if Jesus couldn’t sin because he was supported by heaven, anointed with the Holy Spirit beyond measure, and is the person of the eternal Son of God incarnate, then was the temptation he endured genuine? Yes, it was genuine. Jesus was genuinely tempted as a human being. His human mind was troubled by the sufferings he would soon endure, his human emotions were truly overwhelmed by his circumstances, and the resolve of his human will was tested. So intense was the temptation in his soul, even his body was affected. Luke reports that so great was the agony of Jesus’ soul, that “his sweat became like great drops of blood falling down to the ground” (Luke 22:44, ESV). This condition actually has a name. It is called hematidrosis. One source says it is a very rare “medical condition that can be caused by extreme stress, anxiety, or physical exertion. When capillaries (tiny blood vessels) in the sweat glands rupture, red blood cells can leak into the sweat, causing it to appear bloody.” This, it seems, is what happened to Jesus’ body. So great was his stress, so intense was his angst, “his sweat became like great drops of blood falling down to the ground” (Luke 22:44, ESV). Was the temptation Jesus endured genuine? Yes, indeed.  And so the writer to the Hebrews says, “For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who in every respect has been tempted as we are, yet without sin” (Hebrews 4:15, ESV).

Not only was the temptation Jesus endured genuine, but it was also much greater than the temptation endured by Adam in the garden. 

Consider this: both Adam and Jesus were tempted to rebel against God’s revealed will for them, but God’s will for Adam was different from God’s will for Jesus. Jesus’ mission was much more difficult. Adam was called to actively obey God’s law in paradise. This he was to do perfectly and perpetually for a period of time (theologians refer to this as a probationary period). And after actively obeying God’s law, he would have been permitted to eat of the tree of life, that is to say, he would have entered into life in glory. Compare and contrast this God’s will for Jesus. Jesus also had to actively obey God’s law. He had to keep all of God’s commandments, not only the moral law, but the many positive laws of the Old Covenant. And this he had to do, not in paradise, but in a world fallen in sin and filled with temptation. More than this, Jesus was also called to passively obey God by submitting himself to suffering—suffering throughout his life, and especially suffering on the cross. Do not forget what Jesus had just said to his disciples. Isaiah 53 has its fulfilment! And Jesus knew that he would be the one to endure the suffering that is described there. His body would be crushed, and his soul would experience the agony of death as he would bear the sins of many to make atonement for their sins before God. Never was Adam asked to do anything like this. The weight that Jesus was called to bear was much greater than the weight Adam was called to bear, and so the temptation to turn away was greater, too. 

Secondly, we should compare and contrast the fight that Adam put up in the garden when temptation came and the fight that Jesus put up. Adam hardly resisted at all. Adam’s fall into sin is described in one brief line: “and she also gave some [of the forbidden fruit] to her husband who was with her, and he ate” (Genesis 3:6, ESV). There is no indication that Adam agonized over this decision. There was no resistance; there was no fight. But Jesus resisted temptation all the days of his life. He resisted while in the wilderness at the start of his public ministry, throughout the days of his public ministry, and especially here in Gethsemane, on the night before he would go to the cross. 

Jesus endured genuine temptation in Gethsemane. And the temptation he endured was greater than the temptation endured by any man who has ever lived, for Jesus endured through to the end. He endured, resisted, and emerged victorious, saying, “Father, if you are willing, remove this cup from me. Nevertheless, not my will, but yours, be done” (Luke 22:42, ESV).

 There is one last comparison to be made between Adam and Jesus. These two men are unique in that they lived as federal heads or representatives of others. Adam represented the human race in the Covenant of Works, and Jesus represented those given to him by the Father in eternity in the Covenant of Grace. With both of these men, success would mean success for all and failure would mean failure for all of whom they represented. We know that Adam failed, and Jesus succeeded, and this is why the Apostle says, “For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ shall all be made alive” (1 Corinthians 15:22, ESV).

As we consider Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane, it is important that we view him, not as an individual man, but as one who represented others. He endured the temptation for those given to him by the Father. This is why the Apostle speaks of Jesus as” the founder and perfecter of our faith, who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is seated at the right hand of the throne of God” (Hebrews 12:2, ESV). What was the joy set before Jesus? It was the reward of his obedience, namely, the redemption of the elect—even the redemption of all creation. You may go back to Isaiah 53 and see that the Messiah was destined to suffer and die for others. He was to suffer and die for his spiritual offspring. He was to suffer and die to atone for sin, to bear the sins of many, and to make many righteous. How important it is that we view Jesus as a covenantal head or representative of others in Gethsemane and on the cross. 

Conclusion

I’ll conclude now with a few brief suggestions for application. 

Firstly, it is not uncommon to hear preachers emphasize the deity of Christ, and that is a very good and important thing to do! I wish to emphasize his humanity today! Christ Jesus, our Savior and King, was and is a true man. We must think of him as such. The Messiah indeed had to be God with us, for no mere man could do the work required for our salvation. But it is equally true that the Messiah had to be truly human, for, as the ancients have said, what is not assumed is not healed or redeemed. To heal and to redeem human beings, the Messiah had to be one. That Jesus was and is truly human is seen clearly in the Garden of Gethsemane. I would urge you to reflect upon his humanity today. 

Secondly, as you think upon the man Jesus Christ, ponder how he suffered in body and soul to redeem us body and soul. He suffered, died, and rose again bodily so that he might raise us bodily. And he endured great temptation and agony in his soul and was found faithful. Consider what Jesus endured in his human mind, his affections, and in his human will. He was tempted and found faithful in every part of his human nature so that he redeem and heal us bodily. As I said in the introduction to this sermon, there are many practical things to learn from Jesus’ example in the garden. This we will do next Sunday, Lord willing. But before I say, do this in imitation of Jesus, I think it importinat to say, look at what Jesus has done for you in obedience to the Father. 

Thirdly, as you think upon the man Jesus and consider his temptation and all that he suffered, remember that he is a faithful high priest who is able to sympathize with you in your temptations and sufferings. As the Apostle has fampously said, “For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who in every respect has been tempted as we are, yet without sin. Let us then with confidence draw near to the throne of grace, that we may receive mercy and find grace to help in time of need” (Hebrews 4:15–16, ESV). That is my final point of application, knowing that Jesus was tempted as we are tempted, and that he suffered more than any of have ever suffered, “Let us then with confidence draw near to the throne of grace, that we may receive mercy and find grace to help in time of need” (Hebrews 4:15–16, ESV). 

Baptist Catechism 101

Q. 101. What is the duty of such who are rightly baptized?

A. It is the duty of those who are rightly baptized to give up themselves to some particular and orderly church of Jesus Christ, that they may walk in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless. (Acts 2:46,47; Acts 9:26; 1 Peter 2:5; Heb. 10:25; Rom. 16:5)

Scripture Reading: Romans 16:1–15

“I commend to you our sister Phoebe, a servant of the church at Cenchreae, that you may welcome her in the Lord in a way worthy of the saints, and help her in whatever she may need from you, for she has been a patron of many and of myself as well. Greet Prisca and Aquila, my fellow workers in Christ Jesus, who risked their necks for my life, to whom not only I give thanks but all the churches of the Gentiles give thanks as well. Greet also the church in their house. Greet my beloved Epaenetus, who was the first convert to Christ in Asia. Greet Mary, who has worked hard for you. Greet Andronicus and Junia, my kinsmen and my fellow prisoners. They are well known to the apostles, and they were in Christ before me. Greet Ampliatus, my beloved in the Lord. Greet Urbanus, our fellow worker in Christ, and my beloved Stachys. Greet Apelles, who is approved in Christ. Greet those who belong to the family of Aristobulus. Greet my kinsman Herodion. Greet those in the Lord who belong to the family of Narcissus. Greet those workers in the Lord, Tryphaena and Tryphosa. Greet the beloved Persis, who has worked hard in the Lord. Greet Rufus, chosen in the Lord; also his mother, who has been a mother to me as well. Greet Asyncritus, Phlegon, Hermes, Patrobas, Hermas, and the brothers who are with them. Greet Philologus, Julia, Nereus and his sister, and Olympas, and all the saints who are with them.” (Romans 16:1–15, ESV)

*****

Please excuse any typos and misspellings within this manuscript. It has been published online for the benefit of the saints of Emmaus Reformed Baptist Church but without the benefit of proofreading.

*****

So why have I tortured myself with the task of reading all of these unfamiliar and hard-to-pronounce names that are found at the end of Paul’s letter to the church in Rome? The reason I’ve done this is to remind you that those who have faith in Christ are to be baptized and join themselves to churches. These names are names of real people who believed in Christ, were baptized upon their profession of faith, and were members of the church in Rome. Isn’t that awesome to think about? These hard-to-pronounce names represent people — real people, who lived real lives, a long, long time ago. They lived in a very different time and place from the time and place we live in today, but we share this in common—our faith in Christ, our baptism, and our membership in Christ’s church. They were members of the church in Rome. They heard the Word read and preached there, and they celebrated the Lord’s Supper there, much in the same way that you and I do in this place today. 

The question that we are considering from our catechism today reminds us of the same thing. Those who have faith in Christ are to be baptized, and those who are baptized are to join themselves to a local church where they will be taught to obey all that Christ has commanded us. 

Let’s consider question 101 of the baptism catechism piece by piece. First, the question: “What is the duty of such who are rightly baptized?” In other words, what are those who are baptized to do?

That is a really important question. Baptism is to be applied near the beginning of the Christian life. It marks one’s entrance into the kingdom of God and shows that we are partakers of the Covenant of Grace. It should be applied not long after someone makes a credible profession of faith. So baptism is applied at the beginning of the Christian life… but what then?

Our catechism is right to say that “[i]t is the duty of those who are rightly baptized to give up themselves to some particular and orderly church of Jesus Christ…

What does “particular” mean in this context? Here, “particular” refers to a local, or visible, church. 

Is there such a thing as the universal, or catholic, church? Yes, of course, there is. When we speak of the universal church, we are speaking of all who have (and have had) true faith in Christ throughout the world. The universal church is sometimes called the invisible church because we cannot see it with our eyes. God sees it, but we cannot. The universal church cannot assemble on earth. It assembles in heaven now, spiritually speaking. And it will assemble for all eternity in the new heavens and earth after Christ returns. But it cannot assemble on earth today, for the universal church is too large, and it is separated by geographical distance, not to mention language and culture. When a person places their faith in Christ, they are automatically joined to this universal and invisible church by virtue of their Spirit-wrought union with Christ.

But that is not the church that our catechism is talking about. No, our catechism teaches that the one who has faith in Christ ought to join themselves to a particular church—a local church, a visible church—consisting of officers and members. It is here, in local churches, that the Word of God is read and preached and Sacraments are administered as the church assembles each Lord’s Day. That is what the word “particular” means in this context. 

You know, as you read the New Testament, you’ll find that references to particular, local churches are everywhere. You just need to look for them. The gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John were to be circulated amongst the churches, and they contain instructions for life in the church. The book of Acts is all about the local church. We hear of churches being planted, of elders and deacons, and of members. Most of Paul’s letters were written either to local churches —churches in Rome, Ephesus, Colossi, etc.—or to men who were serving as ministers within these churches. Even the book of Revelation was addressed to seven particular churches in Asia Minor. 

The topic of the local church is so pervasive in the NT that it is really hard to imagine the Christian faith being practiced apart from it… and yet so many in our day and age neglect membership in a local church. Many claim to love Jesus, but they want nothing to do with the church. These seem to have forgotten that Jesus did not merely die for them individually—no, he laid down his life for the church. It is the church, and not you and me as individuals, that he calls his bride (see Eph 5:25ff.).

So, we must acknowledge that this is what the Scriptures call us to do. After believing in Christ, we are to be baptized. And having been baptized, we are to join ourselves to a particular church.

Notice also the word “orderly”. “It is the duty of those who are rightly baptized to give up themselves to some particular and orderly church of Jesus Christ…” An orderly church is ordered (organized) according to the Scriptures. No church is perfect. But a church that is well-ordered will have officers and members. The Scriptures will be faithfully taught there, and the Sacraments of baptism and the Lord’s Supper will be faithfully administered. And lastly, an orderly church will be disciplined. And by this I mean that the church—its elders and members together—will be faithful to do what is commanded in Matthew 18 and described is 1 Corinthians 5. Those who are struggling with sin will be lovingly and patiently called to repentance, and those who persist in sin will, in an orderly manner, be removed from the church.  

Again, “orderly” means properly ordered. And properly ordered implies that there is a standard to which we are to conform.  I’m afraid that many churches have forgotten this. So many take it upon themselves to decide how they should “do church”, but that is not our place. Some decisions are naturally left to us, but our main concern should be to conform ourselves to the order prescribed by Christ which is found in the Scriptures.

The words “give up themselves” are also important. “Church” is not a service to attend, but a body to join. Are you following me? When someone joins a church they make a commitment to that congregation, and the congregation makes a commitment to them. And what is that commitment? Well, in brief, we commit to be the church together, to assemble for worship, to receive the word together, to partake of the ordinances, and to do, and even be subject to, discipline. When someone joins a church they make a commitment to love the members of that congregation, and they receive a commitment to be loved. The Scriptures teach that new members are to be received (Romans 14:1), and that does imply some formality. Please remember this: Christains are not merely to attend church, as if attending a conference, or worse yet, a concert or comedy club. Christians are to give themselves up to a local church. They are to entrust themselves to the elders, deacons, and members of that church, and they themselves are to endeavor to use whatever gifts God has given to them for the building up of the body of Christ in that place, for we are all members one of another (Romans 12:5).

Lastly, our catechism says, “that they may walk in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless.”

The Christian life is a walk. It is a journey. Where we end up matters more than where we begin. And Christians are to walk with others. They are to walk by faith in the church. And in this walk, we are to be concerned with keeping the commandments of God. Remember what Jesus said when he commissioned his disciples?  “And Jesus came and said to them, ‘All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age” (Matthew 28:18–20, ESV). One of the primary responsibilities of the church, with elders at the lead, is to teach Christians to observe all that Christ has commanded them. This is a process. Sometimes it is a difficult process. We must be patient and kind towards one another. 

God’s commands are to be obeyed, and Christ’s ordinances are to be kept. Here we are to think primarily of baptism and the Lord’s Supper. 

*****

Conclusion

Q. 101. What is the duty of such who are rightly baptized?

A. It is the duty of those who are rightly baptized to give up themselves to some particular and orderly church of Jesus Christ, that they may walk in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless. (Acts 2:46,47; Acts 9:26; 1 Peter 2:5; Heb. 10:25; Rom. 16:5)

Old Testament Reading: Proverbs 16:16-20

“How much better to get wisdom than gold! To get understanding is to be chosen rather than silver. The highway of the upright turns aside from evil; whoever guards his way preserves his life. Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall. It is better to be of a lowly spirit with the poor than to divide the spoil with the proud. Whoever gives thought to the word will discover good, and blessed is he who trusts in the LORD.” (Proverbs 16:16–20, ESV)

New Testament Reading: Luke 22:24-34

“A dispute also arose among them, as to which of them was to be regarded as the greatest. And he said to them, ‘The kings of the Gentiles exercise lordship over them, and those in authority over them are called benefactors. But not so with you. Rather, let the greatest among you become as the youngest, and the leader as one who serves. For who is the greater, one who reclines at table or one who serves? Is it not the one who reclines at table? But I am among you as the one who serves. You are those who have stayed with me in my trials, and I assign to you, as my Father assigned to me, a kingdom, that you may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom and sit on thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel. [Verse 31] ‘Simon, Simon, behold, Satan demanded to have you, that he might sift you like wheat, but I have prayed for you that your faith may not fail. And when you have turned again, strengthen your brothers.’ Peter said to him, ‘Lord, I am ready to go with you both to prison and to death.’ Jesus said, ‘I tell you, Peter, the rooster will not crow this day, until you deny three times that you know me.’” (Luke 22:24–34, ESV)

*****

Please excuse any typos and misspellings within this manuscript. It has been published online for the benefit of the saints of Emmaus Reformed Baptist Church, but without the benefit of proofreading.

Sermon

The Christian life begins when God, by his grace, and by his Word and Spirit, humbles a sinner, convinces them of their sin and misery, opens their eyes to their great need for a Savior, and enables them to see that Jesus Christ is the Savior God has provided. In other words, true conversion always involves being humbled. It involves being brought low, such that we abandon any sense of self-sufficiency as it pertains to our right standing before God. In other words, when Christ converts a sinner, there is a kind of death and resurrection that takes place. The sinner dies to self and is raised unto life in Christ. We who have been converted do not hope in ourselves, or think of ourselves as worthy or sufficient. We hope in Christ alone and think of him as worthy and sufficient, and so we confess that he is Savior and Lord.

It should be clear to all that the heart sins of pride, self-conceit, and selfish ambition are opposed to everything that happens in conversion. When a sinner is converted, it is particularly the heart’s sins of pride, self-conceit, and selfish ambition that are defeated in the mind and heart of the sinner. If these heart sins were not defeated by God’s word and Spirit, then no one could ever truly repent, believe in Jesus, and confess him as Lord!  Pride, self-conceit, and selfish ambition are contrary to the Christian life, therefore. The two things are like oil and water – they do not mix. And whenever there is pride and selfish ambition in the heart of a Christian, it will produce “disorder and every vile practice.” (James 3:16, ESV).

We see this in the text that is open before us today. Were these men who followed after Jesus converted persons? Had they been humbled and subdued by God’s word and Spirit, such they had turned from their sins to confess Jesus as Lord? Yes, eleven of the twelve were true converts. And yet we see that they were still plagued by pride and selfish ambition. In the time of Jesus’ greatest need, when he was about to accomplish their redemption and inaugurate the kingdom they were longing to see, they were arguing with one another about which of them was the greatest. 

I do believe there is a powerful warning found in this text, brothers and sisters. Beware of the heart sins of pride and selfish ambition. It may be that the Lord has genuinely converted you. It may be that he truly humbled you, by his word and Spirit, and enabled you, by his grace, to abandon all hope in yourself and to place your trust in Christ. But this does not mean that heart sins of pride, self-conceit, and selfish ambition will never rise up within you again. They certainly will, for throughout the Christian life the corruptions that remain in our flesh will war against the Spirit (Galatians 5:17) and temptations are sure to come (Luke 17:1). And when these temptation do come, either from the world, the flesh, or Devil, they must be mortified, that is to say, put to death (Romans 8:13; Colossians 3:5).  

We considered Luke 22:24-30 in a previous sermon. Today, we turn our attention to verses 31-34. As we consider this text, we will learn, 1) to beware of the sin of pride and selfish ambition, 2) to be sober concerning the schemes of the Evil One, 3) to find our comfort and confidence in Christ alone, 4) to draw strength from his body, the church, and 5) to not despise the discipline of the Lord. 

 Beware Of The Sins Of Pride And Selfish Ambition

First, this passage teaches us that we should always beware of the sins of pride and selfish ambition in the heart. I see this principle in words, “Simon, Simon.”

In the previous passage, Luke tells us that a dispute arose among the disciples as to which of them was to be regarded as the greatest. No doubt, all of the disciples were embroiled in this dispute. But, as was said in a previous sermon, the voices of Peter, James, and John were likely the loudest. These three were clearly leaders amongst the twelve, and Peter was the leader of these three.  

Notice that Jesus addresses Peter directly in our text. Did Jesus single Peter out because his voice was the loudest in the dispute about greatness?  Or did he single him out because he was the leader of the band of disciples? I’d say it was for both of these reasons that Jesus singled him out. Peter, having been puffed up with pride and selfish ambition, needed to be humbled. And Peter would need to lead his fellow disciples in the way of humility in the future.

As you may know, Peter goes by different names. He is sometimes called Cephas, which is the Aramaic equivalent of the  Greek name, Peter. Peter means “rock” (John 1:42). This is the special name that Jesus gave to him. After he confessed that Jesus was the Messiah, the Son of the living God, Christ said, “Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah! For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my Father who is in heaven. And I tell you, you are Peter [Cephas], and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven” (Matthew 16:17–19, ESV). Again, the name Peter, or Cephas, means rock, and it was given to Simon after he confessed that Jesus was the Messiah, the Son of God. 

It is interesting that Jesus here refers to Peter using his old name, Simon. The last time Peter was called Simon in Luke’s gospel was in Luke 7:44. He has been Peter, the rock, ever since. But here Christ calls him Simon, and it is not difficult to see why. Peter was wavering. He was, in this moment, consumed with pride and selfish ambition. He was making things about himself and forgetting that he was but a servant of Jesus, the Messiah. I cannot help but think that when Peter, and the rest of the disciples with him, heard Jesus speak to him, saying, “Simon, Simon”, they would have understood the meaning. He had been called Peter for some time now. But he was not behaving like a man worthy of the name Peter in this moment, for he had begun to slip off his rock-solid foundation, namely, his devotion to Jesus as the Christ, the Son of the living God. Being puffed up with pride and selfish ambition, Peter began to waver. 

It is also interesting that the name Simon is related to the Hebrew word that means to hear. Perhaps Jesus called Peter “Simon” to indicate that he had heard Peter disputing about his greatness, and was now urging him to hear his words of warning. Or perhaps Jesus wanted Simon to remember the Shamah and to apply it to his sinful heart: “Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God, the LORD is one” (Deuteronomy 6:4, ESV).

No doubt, this passage is a warning to all of us concerning the dangers of pride and selfish ambition in the heart. No one is immune to this heart sin. In fact, it is a very common disease of the heart, and something that the Lord hates. As Proverbs 6:16-19 says, “There are six things that the LORD hates, seven that are an abomination to him: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked plans, feet that make haste to run to evil, a false witness who breathes out lies, and one who sows discord among brothers.” (Proverbs 6:16–19, ESV). There is a connection to made between the first and the last sins on this list. Haughty eyes, that is to say, pride in the heart, will always lead to discord amongst the brethren. 

And what is the remedy to the heart-sin of pride? It is the Shamah: “Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God, the LORD is one” (Deuteronomy 6:4, ESV). We must be ever mindful of God and his Christ and their authority over us. “Oh come, let us worship and bow down; let us kneel before the LORD, our Maker! For he is our God, and we are the people of his pasture, and the sheep of his hand” (Psalm 95:6–7, ESV).

Be Sober Concerning The Schemes Of The Evil One

Not only does this text teach us to beware of the sins of pride and selfish ambition, it also teaches us to be sober concerning the schemes of the Evil One. This warning is found in verse 31, wherein we hear Christ say, “Simon, Simon, behold, Satan demanded to have you, that he might sift you like wheat…”

When Christ mentioned Satan, it was to remind his disciples of the invisible, spiritual world and the battle that has raged in that realm for the souls of men ever since Satan entered the garden to bring temptation to Adam through Eve. Jesus’ disciples were fighting with one another over who was the greatest, and Jesus immediately reminded them that Satan was trying to destroy them. 

You should know that in verse 31 and in its first two occurrences in verse 32, the word translated as “you” and “your” is plural in the Greek.  “Simon, Simon, behold, Satan demanded to have you [all], that he might sift you [all] like wheat, but I have prayed for you [all] that [the] faith of [you all] may not fail. And when you [Peter] have turned again, strengthen your brothers” (Luke 22:31–32, ESV). 

It was not only Peter who was being tempted by the Evil One, but all of the disciples of Jesus. Satan knew that this was a crucial moment. He had entered Judas’ heart to lead him to betray Jesus. The time for Jesus to be crucified was drawing near. And so Satan brought a strong assault against the disciples of Jesus. He demanded to have them. This must mean that he, as the accuser of the brethren, came before God to do the very thing he had done in the days of Job. He brought his accusations against them and requested to have them so that he might destroy them. He wished to sift them like wheat. This means, he wished to shake them up, disturb them, divide them, and even to distroy them. 

Yes, when the disciples of Jesus were assembled in that upper room, after they had observed the last Passover, and after the Lord’s Supper was instituted, Satan attacked them. And pay careful attention to his tactic. He tempted their hearts with pride and selfish ambition and sought to divide them one from another.

Dear brothers and sisters, do not be ignorant of the schemes of the Evil One. Study the Holy Scriptures to know how he operates. His tactics are the same as they were in the Garden of Eden. Satan will tempt you to think little of God and much of yourself. He will tempt you to forget, twist, or doubt God’s word. He will tempt you to think much of yourself and little of others. He would love it if you would forget Christ and despise him. He will attempt to divide and conquer Christ’s people. This he will do by attempting to stir up the fleshly and sinful desires within us, especially pride and selfish ambition.

The Apostle Paul warns us not to be outwitted by Satan. He insists that we forgive those who are repentant after they are disciplined, “so that we would not be outwitted by Satan; for we are not ignorant of his designs” (2 Corinthians 2:11, ESV). The Apostle Peter wrote his letters under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, but he also wrote from experience: “Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour” (1 Peter 5:8, ESV). No doubt, the experiences Peter had on the night before Christ’s crucifixion had a profound impact upon him. He learned to be humble. He learned to be sober-minded and watchful. And so he exhorts us to do the same.  

Find Your Comfort And Confidence In The Mediation Christ

Thirdly, this passage teaches us to take comfort and confidence in Jesus Christ, our mediator and great High Priest. This encouragement is found in verse 32: “Simon, Simon, behold, Satan demanded to have you [all], that he might sift you [all] like wheat, but I have prayed for you [all] that your faith may not fail” (Luke 22:31–32, ESV).

Christ has promised to uphold his people. “And this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up on the last day” (John 6:39, ESV).

“My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me. I give them eternal life, and they will never perish, and no one will snatch them out of my hand. My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all, and no one is able to snatch them out of the Father’s hand. I and the Father are one.” (John 10:27–30, ESV)

And how does Christ preserve his people? One of the things he does is intercede for them.

“Who is to condemn? Christ Jesus is the one who died—more than that, who was raised—who is at the right hand of God, who indeed is interceding for us.” (Romans 8:34, ESV)

“My little children, I am writing these things to you so that you may not sin. But if anyone does sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous.” (1 John 2:1, ESV)

Though Christ had not yet died, risen, and ascended to the Father’s right hand, he was already interceding for his disciples in prayer. “Simon, Simon, behold, Satan demanded to have you [all], that he might sift you [all] like wheat, but I have prayed for you [all] that your faith may not fail” (Luke 22:31–32, ESV). Think of how much greater his intercession is now that he is risen and ascended. The writer of the book of Hebrews reflects on this, saying, “Consequently, [Jesus] is able to save to the uttermost those who draw near to God through him, since he always lives to make intercession for them” (Hebrews 7:25, ESV).

Dear friends, when I say, find your comfort and confidence in the mediation of Christ, I mean, do not find your comfort or confidence in yourself or in any other created thing. Take comfort in God and in his Christ. Make him your only confidence, for he alone can save you and sustain you. 

Draw Strength From Christ’s Body, The Church 

Fourthly, this passage teaches us to draw strength from Christ’s body, the church. How so, you ask? I see this principle in the words that Christ spoke to Peter: “And when you have turned again, strengthen your brothers” (Luke 22:32, ESV).

Here in verse 32, the Greek word translated as “you” is singular. Jesus is speaking directly to Peter here. “And when you [Peter] have turned again, strengthen your brothers” (Luke 22:32, ESV).

Of course, when Christ spoke of Peter turning again, he implied that Peter had begun to wander off in the wrong direction, would need to repent, and eventually would. 

Peter understood what Jesus was implying. That is why he replied, “Lord, I am ready to go with you both to prison and to death” (Luke 22:33, ESV). In fact, Peter was not ready to do this. Men who are puffed up with pride and selfish ambition are not prepared to lay down their lives in the service of others. Jesus knew this about Peter. Peter probably knew this about himself. And so he doubled down and boldly expressed his devotion to Christ. “Lord, I am ready to go with you both to prison and to death” (Luke 22:33, ESV). “Jesus said, ‘I tell you, Peter, the rooster will not crow this day, until you deny three times that you know me’” (Luke 22:34, ESV). This, as you may know, would happen. 

But our attention here is on the words, “And when you [Peter] have turned again, strengthen your brothers” (Luke 22:32, ESV). Peter, as the leader of the band, was to use this experience to strengthen his fellow disciples once he was restored. 

The Christian life, dear friends, is not to be lived in isolation. We are to encourage and strengthen one another in the Lord.

Do Not Despise The Discipline Of The Lord  

Fifthly, this passage teaches us not to despise the discipline of the Lord. 

No doubt, it was Peter who willfully decided to deny Jesus three times on the night before his crucifixion, but we must also confess that it was the will of the Lord to permit it. And why did the Lord permit it? It is safe to say that the Lord allowed this to discipline Peter so that he might walk humbly before him in the future and teach us others to do the same.    

Consider the good effect this experience had on Peter. He must have reflected upon this humbling experience in his life when he wrote these words: “Likewise, you who are younger, be subject to the elders. Clothe yourselves, all of you, with humility toward one another, for ‘God opposes the proud but gives grace to the humble.’ Humble yourselves, therefore, under the mighty hand of God so that at the proper time he may exalt you, casting all your anxieties on him, because he cares for you. Be sober-minded; be watchful. Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour” (1 Peter 5:5–8, ESV).

Do not despise the discipline of the Lord, brothers and sisters.

“And have you forgotten the exhortation that addresses you as sons? “My son, do not regard lightly the discipline of the Lord, nor be weary when reproved by him. For the Lord disciplines the one he loves, and chastises every son whom he receives.” It is for discipline that you have to endure. God is treating you as sons. For what son is there whom his father does not discipline? If you are left without discipline, in which all have participated, then you are illegitimate children and not sons. Besides this, we have had earthly fathers who disciplined us and we respected them. Shall we not much more be subject to the Father of spirits and live? For they disciplined us for a short time as it seemed best to them, but he disciplines us for our good, that we may share his holiness. For the moment all discipline seems painful rather than pleasant, but later it yields the peaceful fruit of righteousness to those who have been trained by it. Therefore lift your drooping hands and strengthen your weak knees, and make straight paths for your feet, so that what is lame may not be put out of joint but rather be healed. Strive for peace with everyone, and for the holiness without which no one will see the Lord” (Hebrews 12:4–14, ESV).

Conclusion

Baptist Catechism 98-99

Q. 98. To whom is baptism to be administered?

A. Baptism is to be administered to all those who actually profess repentance towards God, faith in, and obedience to our Lord Jesus Christ; and to none other. (Acts 2:38; Matt. 3:6; Mark 16:16; Acts 8:12,36; Acts 10:47,48)

Q. 99. Are the infants of such as are professing believers to be baptized?

A. The infants of such as are professing believers are not to be baptized; because there is neither command nor example in the Holy Scriptures, or certain consequence from them, to baptize such. (Proverbs 30:6; Luke 3:7,8)

Scripture Reading: Acts 2:36–41

“‘Let all the house of Israel therefore know for certain that God has made him both Lord and Christ, this Jesus whom you crucified.’ Now when they heard this they were cut to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, ‘Brothers, what shall we do?’ And Peter said to them, ‘Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. For the promise is for you and for your children and for all who are far off, everyone whom the Lord our God calls to himself.’ And with many other words he bore witness and continued to exhort them, saying, ‘Save yourselves from this crooked generation.’ So those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls” (Acts 2:36–41, ESV).

*****

Please excuse any typos and misspellings within this manuscript. It has been published online for the benefit of the saints of Emmaus Reformed Baptist Church but without the benefit of proofreading.

*****

As I’m sure you know, the Baptist Catechism and the Westminster Shorter Catechism (the Catechism used by many who are Reformed Presbyterians) are very, very similar. The same thing can be said of our confessions of faith. The Second London Confession and the Westminster Confession are very similar documents. The similarities are important and encouraging. They remind us that we have a lot in common with our Reformed, Presbyterian brothers and sisters. This should encourage Christian unity and love.  

Now obviously, there are differences between these standards. The primary difference is our answer to the question, to whom is baptism to be administered? 

On the one hand, I do not want to over-emphasize the importance of this question. Indeed, there are other doctrines more foundational to the faith than the doctrine of baptism. To be a Christian, one must hold to orthodox views regarding God, Scripture, the fall of man into sin, and salvation through faith in Christ, for these doctrines are foundational to the faith. They carry much greater weight, therefore, than questions about baptism. Stated differently, I do believe that it is possible for Christians to differ over the question of who should be baptized and to regard one another as true and dear brothers and sisters in Christ, their unity being rooted in Christ, and in their agreement on the foundational doctrines just mentioned. There is something to be said for the approach of majoring in the majors and minoring in the minors. 

But on the other hand, I do not think it is wise to dismiss this question as unimportant. Baptism is very important, brothers and sisters, for Christ has ordained it. He has commanded that disciples be baptized in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Furthermore, baptism is connected to other things. Maybe you have heard me say that all theology hangs together. The meaning is that errors in one area will lead to errors in other areas. Errors in foundational doctrines (like the doctrines of God, Scripture, Man, Sin, and Salvation in Christ) are potentially catastrophic. And errors made in less foundational points of doctrine, though they might not disturb the foundation of the faith, will have a ripple effect on other doctrines, too. Our understanding of baptism will impact, in some way, our understanding of the church. It will impact our understanding of the nature of the New Covenant. Who are members of the New Covenant? Is the New Covenant breakable? These are a few related questions that come quickly to mind. 

Question 95 of the Westminster Shorter Catechism asks, “To whom is Baptism to be administered?” Their answer is, “Baptism is not to be administered to any that are out of the visible church, till they profess their faith in Christ, and obedience to him; but the infants of such as are members of the

visible church are to be baptized.”

Contrast this with question 98 of the Baptist Catechism: To whom is baptism to be administered? Answer: Baptism is to be administered to all those who actually profess repentance towards God, faith in, and obedience to our Lord Jesus Christ; and to none other. (Acts 2:38; Matt. 3:6; Mark 16:16; Acts 8:12,36; Acts 10:47,48)

This is the clear teaching of the New Testament. 

Firstly, we should remember what the NT says that Baptism signifies. We considered the symbolism of baptism last week with the help of Baptist Catechism 97: What is Baptism? Answer. Baptism is an ordinance of the New Testament instituted by Jesus Christ, to be unto the party baptized a sign of his fellowship with Him, in His death, burial, and resurrection; of his being engrafted into Him; of remissions of sins; and of his giving up himself unto God through Jesus Christ, to live and walk in newness of life.” If it is true that baptism signifies union with Christ in his death and resurrection, new birth, cleansing from sin, and a resolve to walk in a new way, then it is most reasonable to think that this sign is for those of whom these things are true! Baptism is for those who have been united to Christ by faith, cleansed by his blood, who have died to their old self, and raised to new life.  

Secondly, we should remember what we say through the waters of baptism. It is through baptism that we profess our faith. It is through baptism that we say, Jesus is Lord! Yes, we say that Jesus is Lord with our lips. But that profession is to be made through baptism. To be baptized is to say, I believe. To be baptized is to say, I have been forgiven. To be baptized is to say, I have died to my old self and raised to a newness of life. Through baptism, we make a profession and a commitment. Baptism is for those of whom this is true. 

Thirdly, we should remember what God says to us in baptism. In baptism, God’s name is placed on his people (we are to baptize in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit). In baptism, God says, through Christ you are forgiven and adopted as my own. Again I say, baptism is for those of whom this is true. 

In fact, a careful study of the New Testament Scriptures reveals that it is only those who make a credible profession of repentance and faith who are to be baptized. 

Perhaps the most important text is the one we call the Great Commission: “And Jesus came and said [to his disciples], ‘All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age” (Matthew 28:18–20, ESV, emphasis added). 

When baptisms are described in the New Testament, we see that it is those who believe who are baptized. Sometimes those who believe in infant baptism will point to the household baptisms found in the Book of Acts and say, there must have been infants in these households! Two things can be said in response. One, it is not wise to build doctrines on the foundation of assumptions and speculations. Two, most of these passages where “households” are mentioned teach that those in these households heard the word and believed, something infants and small children cannot do (i.e.  Acts 11:13-18,  16:29-32).

I think it is very safe to say that not one text in the New Testament clearly teaches us to baptize infants. But we are not biblicists. We reject the idea that for something to be believed as true there must be a verse that says it. No, we are not biblicists. We agree that some doctrines are to be believed because they are taught by way of necessary consequence. This means that the whole of what the Bible says on a subject is to be taken into consideration when forming our doctrines. The most famous example of this is the doctrine of the Trinity. The Bible in some places teaches that God is one. In other places, the Bible teaches that God is three. No one verse can be found that teaches that God is three in one, but when all is carefully considered, we are moved by the testimony of the totality of Scripture to confess that God is Triune. 

Never does the New Testament command infant baptism – only the baptism of those who profess faith and repentance.

Never does the New Testament describe infant baptism – only the baptism of those who profess faith and repentance.

But do the Scriptures require us to believe in infant baptism by way of necessary or certain consequence? In other words, does a theological reading of Scripture require us to baptize the children of believers? Stated one more way, is infant baptism taught in a similar way to how the Trinity is taught in the Scriptures – no one verse of Scripture teaches it, but when the whole Bible is considered on the subject, we are bound to believe that babies are to be baptized? 

If we are to be consistent in our interpretation of the Scriptures, we must be open to the possibility (for we are not biblicists!), but the answer is no.

Listen to Baptist Catechism 99 after that, I will explain why.  Question 99: Are the infants of such as are professing believers to be baptized? Answer: The infants of such as are professing believers are not to be baptized; because there is neither command nor example in the Holy Scriptures, or certain consequence from them, to baptize such.

So why are we to baptize those who make a credible profession of repentance and faith in Christ only, and not the infants of those who make such a profession?  

1. The Scriptures nowhere command infant baptism. 
2. The Scriptures nowhere describe infant baptism. 
3. A careful, theological, covenantal, redemptive-historical study of the totality of the Scriptures – Old Testament and New – does not necessitate the practice of infant baptism. To the contrary, a careful examination of the Old Testament Scriptures agrees with the teaching of the New Testament that baptism is for those who profess faith in Christ alone. 

Those familiar with the debate between Reformed paedobaptists (paedo means child) and Reformed credobaptists (credo refers to a profession of faith) will know that the Reformed paedobaptists do not argue for their practice of infant baptism from the New Testament but from the Old. 

They argue like this:

1. The sign of circumcision was applied to infants under the Old Abrahamic and Mosaic Covenants. 
2. The Old Covenant was a particular external administration of the Covenant of Grace, and the New Covenant is a particular external administration of the Covenant of Grace.
3. Given that the sign of admission into the Old Covenant (circumcision) was applied to the infants of covenant members, it must necessarily be that the sign of admission into the New Covenant (baptism) be applied to the infants of covenant members, namely, of those who believe. 

So you can see that the Reformed paedobaptists do not typically argue for their position by pointing to this verse or that in the New Testament. They argue from the Old Testament by reasoning that if circumcision was applied to infants under the Old Covenant, then it must necessarily be that baptism is to be given to infants under the New Covenant, even though the New Testament never says so.  

With all due respect to our Reformed paedobaptist brethren (many of whom we esteem very highly), we reject this reasoning. 

One, we do not agree that the Old Covenant was a particular external administration of the Covenant of Grace. The Abrahamic and Mosaic covenants were mixed. They were covenants of works that could be broken (and they were). But they carried within them promises, prophesies,  types, and shadows that pointed forward to Christ, his kingdom, and the covenant that he mediates – the New Covenant. The New Covenant alone is the Covenant of Grace. The Abrahamic and Mosaic anticipated and pointed forward to the Covenant of Grace, but they were not the Covenant of Grace, properly speaking, for they did not have Christ as head and mediator. We could talk about this for hours. And we have before in other studies. For now, let me say that our particular articulation of covenant theology, which differs from the typical paedobaptists’ articulation of that doctrine in important respects, leaves no room for the argument from infant circumcision to infant baptism that the paedobaptists are so fond of making. Do circumcision and baptism share something in common? Yes! They are both signs of their respective covenants, Old and New. But it does not necessarily follow that because one was applied to infants, then the other must be applied to infants also. The two covenants, though certainly interrelated, differ substantially from each other. It should be no surprise, therefore, that the signs of the covenants also differ substantially.   

Two, (and this point deserves much more time and attention than what we can give to it today) while we agree that it is appropriate to argue from necessary consequence in many matters of theology, it is not an appropriate thing to do with the positive laws which God added to the various covenants that he has entered into with man. The signs that God attached to the various covenants he made with man – trees, the rainbow, circumcision, and baptism – are arbitrary. By that I mean, they are simply based on God’s choice. We cannot necessarily reason from one to the other to figure out what they are and how they are to be applied. With positive laws, we are completely dependent on God’s express command. And this is why we look to Christ, his words, and to the New Testament to know what baptism is, what it signifies, how and to whom it is to be given. We are not biblicists. We acknowledge the validity of the interpretive principle of necessary consequence (Trinity). But we deny that it is appropriate to use this principle when it comes to positive laws and sacramental things, for it is impossible to reason from one sign to the other.

Now,  I suppose we are right to expect that signs will be attached to the Covenants God makes, for this is God’s established way. And of course, we should expect that the sign of a covenant will agree in its symbolism with the substance of the given covenant. It makes perfect sense that the sign of the Covenant of Works made with Adam in the garden would be two trees representing two choices, and two paths,  but God could have chosen a different sign. And it makes sense that the sign given to Abraham in the covenant that he made with him and all his physical descendants would be applied to the male reproductive organ, that it would involve the removal of something, thus symbolizing the threat of being cut off from the covenant (a covenant of works!) through disobedience, and that it would be bloody, signifying the crosswork of Christ who would be cut off for his people. This Christ was promised to Abraham and his children. He is the promised seed of the woman, the offspring of Abraham and David. Circumcision fit the Old Abrahamic Covenant, and it made perfect sense that it was to be applied to all of the male children of Abraham at eight days old irrespective of faith, for the Old Abrahamic covenant was made with them by virtue of the birth. For what it’s worth, it seems to me that circumcision was an excellent choice for the sign of the Old Abrahamic covenant, for it agreed with the substance of that covenant.

But the sign of circumcision does not fit the substance of the New Covenant, which is the Covenant of Grace. Think of it. The New Covenant is not made with an ethnic group. It is made with God’s elect. It is made with all who are born again and believe. It is those who have the faith of Abraham, not the DNA of Abraham, who are members of the New Covenant. And there is no threat of being cut off from the New Covenant. All who are true members of it will be preserved. And Christ, the seed of Abraham and David has come. He was cut off for us on the cross. He shed his blood to atone for sin. For all of these reasons, circumcision has been fulfilled and taken away, and baptism has been given as the sign of the New Covenant instead.

And baptism agrees with the substance of the New Covenant and thus serves as a fitting sign. Baptism signifies many things – union with Christ in his death and resurrection, the washing away of our sin, death to our old self, and new birth. This sign is to be given to those of whom these things are true.

The point is this: our Reformed and paedobaptist brethren error when they look to the sign of the Old Covenant to figure out to whom the sign of the New Covenant is to be applied. These are two different covenants made with two different groups of people (though there is some overlap, thanks be to God). We cannot reason from the one to the other, therefore. To know the answer to the question, to whom is baptism to be administered? To Christ and the New Testament we must go, for there this positive law is revealed. 

*****

Conclusion

Q. 98. To whom is baptism to be administered?

A. Baptism is to be administered to all those who actually profess repentance towards God, faith in, and obedience to our Lord Jesus Christ; and to none other. (Acts 2:38; Matt. 3:6; Mark 16:16; Acts 8:12,36; Acts 10:47,48)

Q. 99. Are the infants of such as are professing believers to be baptized?

A. The infants of such as are professing believers are not to be baptized; because there is neither command nor example in the Holy Scriptures, or certain consequence from them, to baptize such. (Proverbs 30:6; Luke 3:7,8)